The role of traditional institutions in defining internal migration policies in southern african countries
Evolution and survival of traditional and constitutional governing institutions in South African states. Reasons for "south to south" migration. Political, social and statistical background of Migration Source countries: Somalia, Eritrea, Ethiopia.
|Рубрика||Социология и обществознание|
|Размер файла||2,4 M|
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
FEDERAL STATE AUTONOMOUS EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY
HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS
Faculty of Social Sciences
THE ROLE OF TRADITIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN DEFINING INTERNAL MIGRATION POLICIES IN SOUTHERN AFRICAN COUNTRIES
Field of study 41.04.04 Political Science
Master's program `Political Analysis and Public Policy'
Department of Public Policy
Candidate of Sciences (Phd)
Professor Irina Filatova Scientific Supervisor Assistant professor
Professor Nina Belyaeva
First, I would like to thank my thesis supervisor, Professor Nina Belyaeva, head of the Public Policy Department at Higher School of Economics, Moscow Russia (further HSE). Professor Belyaeva despite her busy schedule was able to take time to guide and steer me in the right direction while allowing me to own the paper.
I would also like sincerely thank Professor Parkhomenko Sergey who has been instrumental from the early stages of my paper, checking on my progress and deadlines.
Special thanks also goes to other professors at HSE who helped in one way or the other, Academics at Institute for African studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences which was instrumental in finding sources and information for my thesis paper.
Finally, I wish to express my profound gratitude to Dmitry Sibrin and Ivan Novikov who have been instrumental in providing support in many ways and in my research, my parents for their full commitment to ensure a smooth uninterrupted time during my studies, Chileshe, Charity and Flo for their prayers, encouragement and patience when I was quiet. This accomplishment would not have been possible without any of them.
Thank you Mathenge Charles
- Table Of Content
- List of abbreviations
- CHAPTER 1
- 1.1 Evolution and survival of traditional and constitutional governing institutions in South African states
- 1.1.1 Traditional Governance
- 1.1.2 Representative governance
- 1.2 Functions of traditional institutions and how traditional institutions implement policies
- 1.2.1 Surveys and Data on Influence of Traditional institutions in Zambia and South Africa
- 1.2.2 Collision and Cooperation of Zambia's and South Africa's governance systems
- CHAPTER 2
- 2.1. Reasons for “south to south” migration
- 2.2 Political background of Migration Source countries: Somalia, Eritrea, Ethiopia
- 2.3 Social background of migration source countries: Somalia, Eritrea, Ethiopia
- 2.4 Statistical data on Africa's migration and remittances
- 2.5 Job sector for African Immigrants in Africa
- 2.6 African migration to other continents
- CHAPTER 3
- 3.1 Role of the African Union Conventions on Migrants and Refugees
- 3.2 The role of SADC in regulating migration in Southern Africa
- 3.3 Internal migration policies and models of governing migration in Southern Africa
- 3.3.1 Models for governing immigration in South Africa and Zambia
- 3.4 Role of traditional institutions in shaping migration governance in their countries
traditional migration political social
List of abbreviations
ADD - Alliance For Democracy And Development
ANC - African National Congress
AU - African Union
CONTRALESA - Congress Of Traditional Leaders Of South Africa
EC - The Eastern Cape
EFF - Economic Freedom Fighters
FDD - Forum For Democracy And Development
FS - The Free State
GT - Gauteng
HSE - Higher School of Economics, Moscow Russia
ILO - International Labor Organization
IOM - International Organization for Migration
KZW - KwaZulu-Natal
LP - Limpopo
MMD - Movement For Multi-Party Democracy
MP - Mpumalanga
NC - The Northern Cape
NEPAD - New Partnership For African Development
NW - North West
OECD - The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PF - Patriotic Front
SADC - Southern African Development Community
SASAS - South African Social Attitudes Survey
UNICEF - United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund
UPND - United Party for National Development
WC - The Western Cape
Despite collisions by representative systems and traditional systems of governance, there has been at the same time collaboration between these two systems in the policy making field.
1. To explore forms and practices of collaboration between traditional and representative systems of governance.
2. To determine in what ways collaboration can effectively promote immigration policies and integration between the citizens and newcomers (aliens).
3. Research question
In what ways can representative systems and traditional systems of policymaking cooperate in the field of migration policies.
Traditional institutions in Africa countries are a legitimate form of power, their partaking in migration policy formulation can affect citizens attitudes towards immigrants and refugees.
The paper will be based on the theory of Neo-Institutionalism and argue from both the actors and institutions approach as both these policy making institutions act as formulators and influencers as well as recognized institutions under the constitutions in their various countries. The representative systems gains its legitimacy from electoral process and allows it to function through various arms constituted to diversify power and formulate policies. On the other hand the traditional systems of governance relies on `house of traditional chiefs' which are recognized in the constitution and thus serve as basis for legitimacy and the ability to act as an institution which can formulate and enforce policies.
Sources of data
The paper will source data from various sources such as Afro barometer, government archives, data archives from migration organizations such as IOM, online journals and HSE online library.
Limitations of current studies
Unfortunately due to barriers that limit the ability of this research conducting physical interviews in these target countries, the paper will have to rely on expert interviews, already carried out surveys which will are a valuable asset in this research.
Traditional institutions in Africa are forms of governance institutions that ruled most if not all of the African communities before the colonial period and had structures similar to modern governments that ensured effective rule over the citizenry or subjects. In many of the African communities, the citizens referred to their leaders as chiefs, kings, councils of elder men or queens and there were different titles to these positions depending on the African tribe or name. For example in Kenya, the Agikuyu tribe called their ruler as `shifuu' while the in Angola their king was `Damba', the wolof in Gambia named their king `fari'. In both Kenya and Tanzania, they named a princess `kibibi' and in Egypt, we had the pharaoh. With the onset of colonization by the west and `emergence' from the `dark' the African way of life has changed to a very western centric kind of lifestyle socially and politically where we have central forms of elected governments called `democracies' or representative governments that are constitutionally mandated to rule. Unfortunately, it is the author's belief the world has not taken a closer and serious look on African traditional kingdoms as legitimate and enduring monarchies such as monarchies in Western Europe or Asia. Perhaps it is the lack of documented evidence, but yet again oral stories, some physical proofs and researches by anthropologists should be enough to bring forth interest in African traditional kingdoms which had their own democratic systems with hierarchy much like the western monarchies. The Kikuyu tribe was ruled by a chief and at one time a woman, (wangu wa makeri) who ruled the kikuyu with an iron fist and had a council of elders who advised her on many issues regarding governance. Such information could be used to encourage women leadership in the world especially modern Africa.
African communities in the past were not united but lived in different language groups each ruled by a traditional leaders(s) however there were many wars between tribes with the quest to be more powerful, conquer trade routes, receive taxes and find women and animals as these were priced possessions at the time. The works of the traditional leaders were to arbitrate, judge and lead the soldiers into wars. There are broad definitions on what African political traditional institutions are and their history, according to (university of Pretoria and B, NA), they define Traditional leadership as an institution that has developed over hundreds, if not thousands, of years in Africa. Much of Africa's history on the traditional kingdoms were based orally (passed from parents to children and from generations to generations and not written like in the west until pre-colonial and colonial period anthropologists who documented Africa's past through research. The position of traditional authorities in many post-colonial African states remains unclear and their future under the new dispensation in highly contested (mayekiso, mawere, 2014), it also begs the question of how these traditional institutions will be embraced in current competing democratic institutions and structures. (logan 2008) tries to share the thoughts of concerned traditionalists by saying:
“Perhaps one thing that traditionalists and modernists often agree on, however, is that both portray traditional authority and elected political leaders as competitors. The struggle between the two for political power and legitimacy is seen as a zero-sum game. Whatever authority a traditional leader wrenches from the state is treated as a loss for “official” state leadership, and vice versa.”
Most of the African countries had traditional governing institutions that were well known as chiefdoms or in other terms monarchies. According to (Skalnik, 2001-2002) he tries to describe chiefdoms as a cluster of small but originally independent polities, but these are interpretations from western authors, while some African authors such as (Monteil, 1929 cited in Kkalnik) a Malian author described chiefdoms as empires. However more authors such as (Skalnik, Feinman, Chabal, 2004) go ahead to define chiefdoms as:
“Those traditional social forms that measure in the tens of thousands of people (or fewer), have inherited (as opposed to achieved) forms of leadership, are integrated through kinship or fictive kin ties, and have non-bureaucratic structures.”
The African chiefs by far had similar roles; were widely revered (O'Neil, 2006), this means they held a great position within the African societies and as 'god' sent and the position was hereditary, from father to son and in some cases to the daughters. There was a centralized form of government with the chief as the head and decision maker and as in Uganda, the chief or king 'kabaka' had a legislative council called the 'lukiko' who also served as advisers to the king.
Traditional institutions have been accused of `selling' Africa to the west but we have to understand the might of the western power militarily and the African forces who used stones and spears to fight could not defeat this. The colonialists mostly the British imposed their rule on the chieftaincy stripping them of their power and thus making traditional authority mere government officials and puppets. However despite this knowledge of coercion on traditional institutions, many independent African countries did not want to maintain these traditional authorities because of their tainted past which involved `selling' Africa to the west, in exchange of western gifts (glass wears, mirrors) and religion which resulted in colonization. To make it worse during colonization their support of the colonial masters, their laws especially regarding payment of high taxes was frowned upon by the people as there were tough consequences if the people failed to pay taxes and change their way of lives to embrace the western culture such as western education and Christianity. Many of the chiefs were torn apart between bowing down to the western masters and maintaining legitimacy from their people, however many lost it as the benefits ripped from supporting the west was much more than from their subjects. This created a deep rooted hatred by post independent governments who tried to get rid of these authorities however many of these governments were forced to maintain these traditional chiefs as they proved important in gaining support from the people at the grassroots levels and this is a form of path dependency theory.
I concur with (fadiran and Sar, 2016) where they describe path dependency as the path of institutions promulgated within a system historically which determines the nature of institutions that will ensue within the same system in the present and in the future. This has been the case in my country of focus. Mozambique which tried to get rid of the colonial administration system through traditional institutions had to re-introduce the traditional systems again as a way of 'devolving power to the citizens' however with less power than before. This is a great example of path dependency at work. The government knew that this was one way or endearing itself to the citizens at a time when Mozambique underwent civil strife.
These traditional institutions were given enormous power and wealth during the colonial period such that they influenced people's lives and this is in addition to absoluteness of the traditional institutions power pre-colonial time. Africans have a sense of tribal belonging or in other terms cocoons which gives them a sense of belonging and respecting of the leaders who were believed to be wiser and had the best interests of the community at heart and so it was no surprise when in south Africa for example the people helped advocate for the inclusion of the traditional institutions despite their undemocratic practices during the colonial period. Africans feel that the presence of these traditional institutions allow them to keep in touch with their roots in this evolving western oriented world. This is seen also in the case of South Africa which despite frequent collision between the government and the traditional institution the democratically elected president recognizes and makes reference to these institutions as well as urging cooperation.
Traditional institutions in different African countries have gained legitimacy in different ways however; the question is whether Africa still needs traditional leaders who cost millions of taxpayers' money for their upkeep. An example of legitimacy at play is in south Africa where two cases regarding divorce and encroachment on public land was handled by chief Luthando Diwayo and a tribal council of men and women yet there are courts run by the central government that can adjudicate on the same matters. (Wilson Quaterly, 2013) and indeed a survey done on legitimacy of African traditional leadership found that 17 out of 19 African countries thought these kings had significant influence while respondents in 16 of these countries believed the power of these leaders should be increased (Wilson Quarterly, 2013) . However, let us not forget legitimacy of these traditional institutions in the past was also at stake because these kings and chiefs had to provide fertility (in the soil and rainfall for the people (Kavykin, 2016).
Representative systems of democracy and traditional systems of governance in southern Africa have had to combine forces and work together despite frequent collisions, however the power of the traditional authority has been significantly diminished.
A very important issue to point out is why these systems of governance have not enabled the African people to live within their borders and achieve self-reliance. Why is the African continent referred to as the land of emigration yet so it is rich with resources? Should these traditional leaders also influence economic capacities of the African people?
Africa has lagged behind in economic and educational improvement despite being blessed with immense natural resources due to constant conflict, corruption and lack of funds to development, improving infrastructure and education system. Many aspects fight against Africa's prosperity. For example, trade between Africa and Europe has not been fair as the west has gained more from Africa's raw materials and Africa gained little and so growth has been slow. Africa will export its raw materials to Europe at a cheaper rate and in return, Europe will sell finished goods at a much expensive price than the cost of the raw materials. However, the tide is changing towards Africa where Africa now negotiates as a bloc thus earning more benefits, increasing percentage of young educated conscious Africans who seeks modernity of their countries. Some of these young Africans believe studying and working abroad enables them to learn from their western counterparts thus impacting them with knowledge and technology to drive change in their home countries. Despite this assumption the word abroad has two meanings; first for those studying and working outside their country in other global south countries or in the global north.
According to (IOM, 2015) the number of people migrating between developing countries was much more than to those moving to the developed countries and statistics done in 2015 indicate 90.2 million people migrated between the global south while 85.3 million people from the global south migrated to global north. This is in addition to Uganda in 2016 hosting 1.2 million asylum seekers and highest number of refugees hosted by developing countries. We cannot refute the importance of the Africans who emigrate to the west or to other global south countries such as china and India which are considered second world countries. As indicated on the table below sourced from the OECD and United Nations population database, the importance of these immigrants to Africa is astronomical as the remittances to Africa is quite a lot and keeps Africa developing.
Table 1. Remittances from Europe, Asia to Africa (bilateral) by World Bank, 2017
Country of origin
Amount (millions US)
Britain to Ghana
France to Senegal
America to Nigeria
America to Kenya
America to South Africa
China to Nigeria
India to Kenya
China to Kenya
However, the most important change is the mindset of many African people tired of their continent's constant referral to as a basket case of donations from the west to become an active participant in the global scene while taking initiatives into their own hands to solve their own problems. For example the famous phrase `solve African problems with African solutions' has been embraced by many Africans as an African Marxist approach to finally solving Africa's problems as western methods have failed. The question is whether these African solutions will maintain and respect the dignity of all African people both rich and poor and maintain democracy and encouraging pan Africanism.
The above Marxist approach emanates from African union's charter where the leaders acknowledged the need to `try Africa first' in cases of crisis and this was to ensure Africa controlled its own issues to prevent external interference. This was also due to the ability of Africans to know the dynamic of situations in Africa unlike the west who mostly interfered only when their interests were attacked and so all these created the need for Africa to manage itself. However many critics both foreign and domestic question the intent and ability of African leaders to achieve this as questionable decisions have been made especially by the African union. For example the silent support by the African Union to Burundi's president Nkurunzinza's successful bid to extend his term in office which caused bloodshed, the inability of the African union to protect the sovereignty of Libya and coming as second fiddle after the west in resolving the Libyan conflict. Truth be told is many of the African governments and its leaders have been accused of corruption and selfish tactics without a care about the citizens. All these are some of the reasons why many young Africans have left their countries to look for greener pastures as they lack the collective power like in the Arab spring to change their countries some of which the regimes are been supported and funded by some rich nations.
Africa's institutions need to wake up and face this challenge as the image of Africa abroad is tarnished and respect of the African people has been at a lowest however the change of guard from the old to the new is giving a glimpse into a bright future for Africa where for example from forecast statistics in 2018, the following countries are considered by the world bank as a `watch out' list of countries with a diversified economy which in 2018 will have an increase in their GDP. (Adegoke, 2018) Ethiopia is estimated the GDP will grow at 8.2 % at market prices, Ghana 8.3 %, Cфte d'Ivoire 7.2 %, Djibouti 7 %, Senegal 6.9 %, Tanzania 68 %. Much of the African countries have relied on export of agricultural produce to earn foreign exchange which unfortunately due to lack of stability on global prices have come bit their economies hard leading to African countries diversifying their economies. Furthermore, Africa's growth may be small but more people are increasingly capacitated with higher income and higher purchasing power and this can be enhanced through collaboration between the different systems of governance in some countries.
In year 2018, more developments will be embraced in Africa such as increased mobility of Africans within Africa through free entry into countries such as Seychelles, Rwanda, Kenya and a few others. This may boost investment and trade which is badly needed within Africa. Improved infrastructure in both Ethiopia and Tanzania which expects to boost GDP levels in both countries, more internet connectivity for example in Rwanda which will improve access to education and most importantly advocating for democracy and respect of presidential terms for example in Togo where there have been ongoing protests to kick out the current president who took over from his father who ruled the country since 1967. The fight by the LGBT community in Kenyan courts for constitutional protection. This shows the desire for change in Africa in many facets.
Despite this slow progress, many Africans are migrating from their home countries to other African countries especially in southern Africa, which they consider much better and industrialized while others decide to migrate to the west and East for better wages. The migration of west Africans to western Africa is seven times higher than the number of west Africans migrating to other parts of the world (International Center For Migration Policy Development, 2015) this in short means west Africans will create a much more integrated bond which will enable them to invest more in each other and keep the wealth in Africa.
This research will be based on neo-institutionalism, which emanates from institutional theory. Neo institutionalism according to John Meyer and Brian rowan in 1997 believed that institutions are forced to adapt to what their environment expects them to be or wants them to be thus ensuring their legitimacy. For example the representative systems of government needs to abide by some rules given by the traditional institutions and similarly vice versa as both institutions have support from the citizenry and so are expected to behave in a certain way that suits each other's ambitions as well which is power and control over the people. This means that they can counteract each other and thus constrained in the much any of them can do in trying to increase their influence.
The ability of these two institutions to counteract each other especially in South Africa shows their ability to influence each other on immigration matters especially regarding south-to-south migration. These two bodies formulate and implement policies in various ways that may make migration a positive effect to their economies as will be seen in the subsequent chapters.
This chapter will touch on how the parallel forms of governance in southern African states c exit. This entails how the traditional leadership and the constitutional forms of governance have evolved and interact despite competition for legitimacy.
1.1 Evolution and survival of traditional and constitutional governing institutions in South African states
1.1.1 Traditional Governance
In this chapter, the author will analyze the powers and roles of the traditional institutions and their development since historical times. Prior to the introduction of colonialism, social organization in South Africa was characterized by many tribal regimes that existed and operated within certain areas of jurisdiction. Such tribal regimes were primarily based on the principles of patriarchy and inscriptive norms. Each tribe was led by a particular traditional or tribal leader, who was the central figure in that tribe. The tribal leader or traditional leader was further vested with the highest authority in a particular territory, however the colonial government for example in South Africa, segregated the African majority into their own states (Bantustans) with the traditional kings as the leaders of these territories with much massive power. This was a colonial way to create an independent white South Africa while the Africans were allowed independent states which was 20% of the original South Africa. This gave the traditional leaders powers and control over their jurisdiction and some independence, they had a difficult time adjusting to their reduction of powers in modern South Africa. However in South Africa for example we find that path dependency gave so much power to political traditional institutions despite outmaneuvers by the ruling ANC party to curtail powers of these political traditional institutions. These institutions had been used by both the British and the Apartheid government to maintain their rule on the masses and so were still needed at independence or else face resistance from the South African citizenry. According to (scheepers, plessis, 2000),The 1996 south African Constitution also states that national legislation must provide for the role of traditional leadership as an institution at local level on matters affecting local communities. Legislation may provide for the establishment of a national council of traditional leaders and provincial houses of traditional leaders. Provincial constitutions may also provide for the institution, role, authority and status of a traditional monarch. Provinces have concurrent legislative powers with parliament regarding traditional authorities and customary law. This clearly shows the power of the traditional institutions enshrined in the constitution of South Africa.
The former South African president Jacob Zuma (news24, 2015) acknowledged the importance of these political traditional institutions as a means of unifying the South Africans by breaking away from the colonial oppression. This was because the government intended to reform the role of the traditional institutions from a colonial tool of oppression to a tool of democratic society, however this has not been without problems as these traditional institutions have managed at some levels to play muscle with the government over policy issues especially regarding land.
South Africans after independence wanted the recognition of the customary law in their constitution. Customary law means the customs and usages traditionally observed among the indigenous African peoples of South Africa and which form part of the culture of those peoples (recognition of customary marriages act 120 of 1998) customary law recognizes issues on customary marriages, inheritance, divorce and many things. But mostly exalts the man as the dominant figure. The South African constitution gives the traditional institutions power to influence and make policies especially regarding land issues and reduction of poverty. The traditional institutions insisted on the constitution recognizing traditional institution itself and customary law too, however at this time, scholars (Mwere, mawekiso, 2014) site that in South Africa, the new government of the time ANC recognized and acknowledged traditional leaders but the nature of their role in the advancement of democracy and social equality among other common goods was still largely unclear and in fact underestimated. However in the subsequent years (Nthai 2003) a minister for provincial and local government acknowledged the South African peoples' desires to maintain these institutions as they have a deep role in ensuring democratic governance at local level.
Chiefs and south Africa's ruling party (ANC) have many times joined forces to push through their policies (Logan, 2008) the two parties with at times similar interests of increasing their power base and recognition have had to work together to achieve their goals. More importantly was for the traditional institutions in the 80's and 90's where their recognition was essential and at risk in ushering the new South Africa. This led to changing of ideals and attitudes between the ANC and the traditional institutions; where ANC supported their stance to recognizing the institutions while the institutions gave overwhelming support to ANC (van kessel and ocmen, 1997).
Zambia's traditional governance is a not as powerful as the south African but yet again they have the ability to influence a lot. Zambia achieved independence in 1964 from the British like many of the former African countries colonized by the British. Originally known as northern Rhodesia, from Cecil Rhodes a businessperson. (History world, N.D) gives a broad insight on the British interest on Zambia, which was mainly because of expansion by the British South African company which aimed at conquering more lands for the whites and consequently stumbled on the vast copper minerals in Zambia which were more than in the United States of America.
However achievements of this company and the British as well who later took control of the country could not have worked without the assistance and help of some of the Zambian chiefs such as Lewanika where they set up agreements to allow the company to administer the mineral rich regions. Therefore, this shows the extent to which the chiefs were respected or perhaps seen as the entry to Africa, as if you convince the king to cooperate then the people will cooperate as well.
The power of the chiefs or traditionally known as Indunas was immense and there was hierarchy among them dependent on the strength of one leader. The British used Lewanika of the lozi people who was the strongest of 38 indunas to subdue the rest of the indunas into signing concessions that gave away their lands and more rights to the British, in exchange for protection by the British, eventually even Lewanika lost administrative power and respect to the British protectorate (Patriotic Zambian, 2017). This ensured the British took control of the country but used indirect rule to subdue the people through the Indunas. Africans as previously noted are loyal to a system of leadership where in many cases, trust is conferred to the leaders and to whom they believe that their decisions or choices are for the good of the general masses and this is how Africans lost their lands to the colonialists through their tribal chiefs or tribal kings.
According to (Zambian economist, 2008), the original nature of the traditional kingdoms were remodeled to be native authorities that were structured by the colonial government to become more 'efficient' and as a go between the local people and the colonial government. This shows how important it was for the British as well to use these leaders leading to their recognition post-independence with 233 junior and senior chiefs. Most critiques on the African chiefs during the colonial period and their associations with the colonial government are negative. Empirical evidence that showcases chiefs and kings as selfish, power seeking leaders out to hang their subjects to dry by western scholars is lately coming under sharp criticisms especially from African scholars. According to (Zambian economist, 2008), Zambian chiefs have become a good example to counteract this narrative of chief brutality. The Zambian economist vindicates the chiefs by noting how the chiefs on many forms did not firmly apply the negative colonial laws and policies that would have otherwise negatively affected the people and as a result weakened their legitimacy in the eyes of the local Zambians.
As per agreement with the colonialists, the chiefs collected revenue, which was tax, and they were careful on how they received this tax and did not use colonial tactics that would have deemed them corrupt. The chiefs used this money to invest in the Zambian people through offering loans, building schools and building hospitals. We have chiefs such as Mukobela and Bunda Bunda who openly campaigned for some forms of taxation that was unjust. The chiefs also ensured law and order was upheld and this was usually in terms of revenue discipline. Everyone had to pay their taxes but the chiefs were sure to have a balance between their relationship with both the colonial government and the people. All in all Zambian chiefs were opportunistic and knew how to balance the relations which in the end ensured their continued relevance to both the people and the colonial government.
Focusing on traditional authority in post independent Zambia, these traditional institutions still tend to influence the political and social life of the Zambian people. Regardless of increased political and educational exposure of the local Zambians, they still tend to rely on the traditional authorities for guidance. Despite the constitution limiting the power of the traditional authorities to just customary matters, these traditional institutions have managed to evolve and influence political matters and hence maintain their relevance in the society.
The Zambian government created the ministry of chiefs and traditional affairs in 2011 with the purpose of promoting the affairs of the traditional institutions through formulation and initiation of policies that affect the cultural aspects of the Zambian people. Some chiefs like chief Macha (LT, 2012) laments on the need to add more powers to the traditional institutions in their areas of their jurisdiction so they can involve themselves in other matters that affect the people such as early marriages as the chiefs can deal with those matters within a short time.
There have been confrontations between the government and the traditional institutions where the chiefs have accused the politicians of misuse of power and threatening to take away power back to the people. However, the question is whether the Zambian citizens feel the importance of having traditional institutions.
African chiefs will continue to be an important facet in the African communities as they do hold important roles that are highly held by the Africans such as inheritance issues, property rights and land rights, so it is important for these traditional institutions to show their legitimacy.
1.1.2 Representative governance
South Africa is a democracy run under a constitution with a three-tier system of government and the power of the government which are the national, provincial and the local governments which are independent in terms of legislative and executive powers. The head of South Africa is the president who is the head of government with a mandate of two terms, has a deputy president and ministers and since the end of the apartheid regime, the ruling party has been the ANC, which is the African National Congress that has majority of support from the South African people. Institutions of power in South Africa have been distributed to its different cities. Cape Town serves as the seat of parliament, Pretoria serves the presidency and it's cabinet and so is the administrative capital, Bloemfontein is the judicial city that hosts the appeals court and finally Johannesburg which is the largest city in south Africa and hosts the constitutional court.
The structure of government is divided into the Executive, legislature and the judiciary, which are independent of each other. At the executive, there is the president who is the head of state and head of the national executive he/she is elected by the national assembly that in this case has majority of its members from the ANC.
The ANC which has been in power since 1994 was previously known as The South African Native National Congress traces its roots to 1912 where John Langalibalele Dube was its founder with the intentions of advocating for voting rights for the blacks and mixed races in south Africa and as a result end the apartheid rule. The party was also known as a guerrilla movement which used guerrilla tactics after its banning by the apartheid government in 1960 where it had to leave its operations from south Africa to other friendly neighboring southern African countries.
It is difficult to talk about South Africa without mentioning ANC. In all elections since 1994, the south Africans largely the black majority have always voted overwhelmingly for the ANC is credited with bringing back the dignity of the black south Africans, however with the recent loss of some elections such as municipal elections it has become a wake up call that all is not rosy between the ANC and the African electorates who accuse the government of corruption, economic mismanagement and not delivering on their promises to the people.
The representative governance system of South Africa has been in such a way it revolves around ANC, which is the dominant political party in South Africa. The constant bickering in the ruling party has totally discredited the South African ruling party in front of other African countries that have always looked at ANC as the beckon of hope for Africans under Nelson Mandela whose intentions was to bring equality for all south Africans regardless or race. As late as 2018, the south African democracy has been under pressure as its former president Zuma was forced to step down from power same way as his predecessor Thabo Mbeki who fell out of favor and pushed out. The ANC problems and lack of trust from the citizens has cost it support from the electorate and this evidently shown by the loss of some administrative regions in local elections to the Democratic Alliance which is affiliated to the white minority. This evidently shows the South African people's mindset on election is changing from race to important issues that affect them such as economy.
South Africa has undergone through different presidents since independence and all were under the ruling party ANC. Nelson Mandela was the first president from 1994-1999, Thabo Mbeki 1998-2008, Kgalema Motlanthe 2008- 2009, Jacob Zuma 2009 to 2018 and currently Cyril Rhamaphosa. However, two of these presidents have been plagued with scandals leading to their ouster.
The judiciary contains the appeals courts, high court, magistrate's court and lower courts such as land claims court which deals with land distribution. Usually this is under the jurisdiction of the traditional authorities.
The legislature consists of the elected representatives who make laws, selection of a new president and overseeing the executive. The country has two houses of parliament' the upper house of parliament consists of 90 provincial representatives from the nine south African provinces namely; Eastern Cape, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga, North West, Northern Cape, and Western Cape.
The second house of parliament is the lower house of parliament which is known as the national assembly and it consists of 400 members elected every five years and who come from the nine provinces mentioned above. This is the main house that hosts the ruling party members of the ANC and the opposition party members from the Democratic alliances and other minor opposition parties. A major opposition political party that seems to challenge ANC's status quo is the EFF which stands for Economic Freedom Fighters under Julisu Malema who was ANC's leader for the youth however his party seeks nationalization of major institutions and of late has been a challenger to the ANC.
Despite all these, assessing the changes ANC has done to South Africa, we can point out some changes and policies that the successive governments have made to the South African people. It has provided education to many of its citizens who had been denied quality education by the apartheid government, it did not kick out the white minority but rather urged them to stay and help in developing the nation, more jobs for the African people although there exists many cases of widespread unemployment, the dignity of the African people was restored although the wealth of south Africa has shared by a few minority. Despite some of these, the ANC will continue to be the dominant power in the governing system for quite sometimes as people feel a natural allegiance for its liberating the people from colonialism and apartheid.
Zambia on the other hand is a representative democratic country with a president at its helm and Lusaka as its capital city. It is a multiparty democracy system where the president has executive powers that enable him run the government with a deputy at his/her side that he appoints.
The current Zambian president is Edgar Lungu from the Patriotic Front party that was a broke away from the party of the Movement for Multiparty Democracy in 2001. Lungu who has been at the helm of power since 2015 after taking over from Guy Scott who was interim president after the death of president Michael Sata on October 2014. Lungu's predecessors are; Kenneth Kaunda, Frederick Chiluba, Levy Mwanawasa, Rupiah Banda, Michael Sata and Guy Scott. Unfortunately, president Lungu's presidency has been engulfed with resistance and conflict with the opposition party, which has also led to the detention of its opposition leader, conflict with the traditional leaders as well as with his own party members and some opposition members who seek to impeach him due to alleged constitutional breaches.
The president who is the head of state and head of government in which he has the power to appoint the cabinet members from the national assembly.
Other arm of the government is the legislature that consists of the national assembly, which has 158 members of which the people directly elect 150 and 8 members are appointed by the government. In the third arm of the government is the judiciary, which consists of the Supreme Court, the appeals court, high court, magistrate court and the local courts. The Supreme Court consists of the chief justice, deputy chief justice and 11 other judges; the constitutional court of Zambia, which began operations in June 2016, consists of a president and his vice president. The judges of the Supreme Court like in many other African countries are appointed by the president however with advice from the judicial service commission and finally receiving final blessings from the national assembly.
The representative system is enhanced by Multiparty system in Zambia which has allowed the freedom of existence of other political parties such as ADD, UPND, FDD, MMD and PF. However, under president Lungu freedom of expression in Zambia has been under threat due to government interference. For example the shutting down of `the post' that was critical of the government and the suspension of licenses for other media outlets critical of the government. The escalation on the infringement of these rights came with the invoking of the public Act order by the police which severely limited the ability of political parties to campaign in many parts of the country in 2016 (Freedom House, 2017).
Zambia has gone through tremendous change and growth since independence and running of its own affairs. Thanks to the high copper prices in the 1960's Zambia was able to formulate educational developmental policies that were instrumental in its growth and this changed the dependence of Zambia on foreign workers in its institutions to where now Zambians are well educated and lead their own country. Unfortunately poor copper prices at later years slowed Zambian growth and indeed led to radical changes by the Zambian resident Kaunda with the intention of salvaging the economy and some of these changes led to declaration of a one party state which would ensure the government's ability to control the country from threats that could affect its ability to govern and enact economic change. In the successive years Zambia has undergone fairly peaceful times however with a bit of political turmoil in the late 1990's which led to a failed coup by a junior army officer and leading to arrest of some opposition leaders such as former predict Kaunda.
Presently the government is trying to balance the development, borrowing and foreign debt. There has been the introduction of some acts such as The banking Act, Insurance Act which will contribute to accountability and transparency especially on developmental projects that will be assessed on their viability and importance to economic growth in Zambia. In 2017, the Zambian government embarked on the seventh national development plan -2017-2021 with the aim of diversifying Zambian economy from agricultural and copper mining as sources of revenue. This plan intends to cover the following areas:
· reduction of poverty;
· increase in development;
· enhancing human development;
· Diversification of economy and creation of job opportunities for the people.
All in all the Zambian representative form of governance has tried to improve the lives of the Zambian people but more needs to be done while ensuring social and political freedoms for all.
1.2 Functions of traditional institutions and how traditional institutions implement policies
In South Africa, the political traditional institutions are divided into several umbrella bodies; the local house of traditional leaders, provincial house of traditional leaders and the national house of the traditional leaders.
Figure 1. Position of the traditional leaders.
The national house of the traditional leaders is made up of members elected from the provincial houses. The main work of this national house is to represent their interests at national level, provincial house at province level and local house at local level ensuring distribution of power in the structure arms of government in South Africa (Cooperative governance and political affairs, 2016). Other functions of the traditional authority are:
· land adjudication;
· solving disputes;
· resource management;
· promote traditional leadership within the constitution;
· promotion of peace and harmony;
· stability of communities;
· preservation and promotion of culture and traditions of communities;
· approval of parliamentary bills affecting the community;
· participating in intergovernmental opportunities;
· advising the national government.
The current Zambian constitution recognizes and protects the rights of the traditional rulers. According to (WIPO, N.D), the Zambian constitution gives the chiefs the powers under a house of chiefs to mainly act as an advisory body to the government on traditional and customary matters. (WIPO, N.D) points the following as the other duties of the chiefs through the house of chiefs:
· review policy and legislation relating to Chiefs Affairs;
· create an enabling environment for Chiefs to participate in Governance and National issues;
· consider and discuss any Bill dealing with custom or tradition;
· initiate, discuss and decide on matters that relate to customary law and practice;
· consider and discuss any other matters referred to it by the President;
· submit resolutions on any Bill or other matters referred to it by the President and the President shall cause such resolutions to be laid before the National Assembly;
· ensure that relevant legislation is sourced and made available to members so as to facilitate smooth functioning of the House;
· develop and implement schedules of sessions for the House of Chiefs;
· develop sustainable liaison between the House and relevant stakeholders;
· Under the House of Chiefs Regulations of 1998, a Minister or a representative from his Ministry may address the House on a matter within his portfolio which appears on the approved list of business of the House;
· House of Chiefs also exercises its discretion and allows non-governmental organizations to address it on matters affecting people in Chiefdoms;
· Other functions of the House of Chiefs include resolution of succession and Chiefdom boundary disputes.
Below is the structure of Zambian governance system and position of the traditional authority (sourced from Fitile and Hamu, 2010).
Figure 2. Structure of Zambian governance system and position of the traditional authority.
Despite their low position in the hierarchy the traditional institutions cannot be ignored as they wield much legitimacy from the black Zambian people who identify more with them and hence the need for representative governments to acknowledge them though reluctantly.
1.2.1 Surveys and Data on Influence of Traditional institutions in Zambia and South Africa
A survey carried out in 2005 by the South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS) was aimed at analyzing information about people's attitudes towards the different governance structures in south Africa and where a sample of 5 734 people above the age of 16 were surveyed. This research will use this survey to assess two things; first the level of trust between the South African nine provinces and the different levels of governance. In the first survey indicated in Table 2, the questions asked were like; `how much do you trust each of the following? And the responses ranged from `strongly trust' `trust', `neither trust nor distrust,' distrust and strongly distrust'. In table two, the survey indicated the level of trust between urban and rural people to the different governance structures.
The nature and content of the concept of "migration". The main causes and consequences of migration processes in the modern world. Countries to which most people are emigrating from around the world. TThe conditions for obtaining the status of "migrant".
презентация [4,8 M], добавлен 22.03.2015
Migration policies: The legal framework. The evolution of migration flows. Percentage of Portuguese emigration by district. Key migrant characteristics. Characteristics of legal migrants. Return migration. Portuguese emigration by destination, 1950-1988.
реферат [65,6 K], добавлен 25.06.2010
The study of human populations. Demographic prognoses. The contemplation about future social developments. The population increase. Life expectancy. The international migration. The return migration of highly skilled workers to their home countries.
реферат [20,6 K], добавлен 24.07.2014
The concept, definition, typology, characteristics of social institute. The functions of social institution: overt and latent. The main institution of society: structural elements. Social institutions of policy, economy, science and education, religion.
курсовая работа [22,2 K], добавлен 21.04.2014
Social structure as one of the main regulators of social dynamic. The structure of the social system: social communities, social institutions, social groups, social organizations. The structure of social space. The subsystem of society by T. Parsons.
презентация [548,2 K], добавлен 06.02.2014
The need for human society in the social security. Guarantee of social security in old age, in case of an illness full or partial disability, loss of the supporter, and also in other cases provided by the law. Role of social provision in social work.
презентация [824,4 K], добавлен 16.10.2013
Race discriminations on ethnicity backgrounds. The Globalization and Racism in Media Age. African American writers about racism. Comparative analysis of the novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" Harper Lee and story "Going to Meet The Man" by James Baldwin.
дипломная работа [135,9 K], добавлен 29.03.2012
Understanding of social stratification and social inequality. Scientific conceptions of stratification of the society. An aggregated socio-economic status. Stratification and types of stratification profile. Social stratification of modern society.
реферат [26,9 K], добавлен 05.01.2009
Four common social classes. Karl Marx's social theory of class. Analysis the nature of class relations. The conflict as the key driving force of history and the main determinant of social trajectories. Today’s social classes. Postindustrial societies.
презентация [718,4 K], добавлен 05.04.2014
The essence of modern social sciences. Chicago sociological school and its principal researchers. The basic principle of structural functionalism and functional imperatives. Features of the evolution of subprocesses. Sociological positivism Sorokina.
реферат [34,8 K], добавлен 09.12.2008