To a question of the specificity of using modular-rating system in course of higher mathematics
The organizing the educational process, allowing it to adapt to the capabilities and abilities of students, developing cognitive independence. The advantages of the rating system for assessing knowledge. Organization of work of the modular-rating system.
Рубрика | Педагогика |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 13.04.2021 |
Размер файла | 14,7 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
Mathematical Physics National Technical University of Ukraine
Kyiv Polytechnic Institute
To a question of the specificity of using modular-rating system in course of higher mathematics
Rudyk Tetyana
Igor Sikorsky
Sulima Olga
Polishchuk Olena
Abstract
The main goal of modular educational system is a such organization of studying process that would allow to adapt it to individual skills of students and would improve their cognitive independence. The rating system helps to get objective and precise marks fast. The organization of work of modular rating system is shown basing on example of one semester of higher mathematics course in NTUU «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute».
Key words: modular-rating system, higher mathematics, knowledge assessment.
Аннотация
mathematics educational rating modular
К вопросу об особенностях применения модульно-рейтинговой системы в курсе высшей математики
Основной целью модульно - рейтинговой системы контроля является такая организация учебного процесса, которая позволяет адаптировать его к индивидуальным возможностям и способностям обучаемых, развивает их познавательную самостоятельность. Рейтинговая система оценки знаний способствует получению более точной, объективной и оперативной оценки. Показана организация работы по модульно-рейтинговой системе на примере одного семестра курса высшей математики в НТУУ «Киевский политехнический институт имени Игоря Сикорского».
Ключевые слова: модульно-рейтинговая система, высшая математика, оценка знаний.
Main part
The context of modernization and integration of Ukrainian education into the European educational space, the problem of the quality of higher professional education is relevant. The introduction of a modularrating system is one of the factors for improving the quality of education.
The main goal of modular education is a such organization of studying process that would allow to adapt it in accordance with the individual skill of students and would improve their cognitive independence. One of the tools for realization of this system is rating control system.
The rating system has significantly expanded possibilities of traditional five-point system, it allows to get objective and precise marks fast. Results are public and based on objective criteria [1, p. 88].
There are some advantages of modular rating system:
- increases educational motivation;
- it individualizes and differentiate the studying process;
- decreases workload of students during session period;
- it includes different forms of independent study and knowledge control;
- decreases the subjectivity considering final marks.
The goal of this article is to show organization of work considering modular rating system on the basis of one semester of course of higher mathematics in NTUU «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute».
To describe organization of work considering modular rating system we will take one semester of course of higher mathematics in NTUU «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute» as an example.
Course material is divided into four logical modules. For example, there are four modules (themes) in first semester: linear and vector algebra, analytical geometry and introduction to mathematical analysis, differential function calculation of one real variable. There are some independent studies are conducted on every module (20-60 minutes each). Each task in the work is assessed in accordance with its difficulty with estimated amount of points. For clever students there are additional tasks that have higher difficulty. These tasks cost only 1 or 2 points and it gives a possibility to increase rating for students who solved them, but they will not be far ahead of all other students. At the same time weak students have a possibility to do independent study using literature and syllabus. In that case points are multiplied by coefficient k=0,7.
During the semester student can also rewrite badly done work (k=0,8). In case of missing independent study by a compelling reason (documentary evidence is meant) student has a right to rewrite it later without decreasing coefficient. If work is done not in time without any reason, the coefficient is 0,8.
The independent study includes calculating and graphic work (includes tasks from all modules) that students do themselves at home. Additionally, students can find out and discuss questions they have with a teacher on consultations.
A student can get additional points for taking part in
mathematical olympiads, papers and reports preparation for student scientific conference etc.
Theoretical knowledge in accordance with the module's theme (except last) is tested. Thus, before the exam student has all his points by all themes, that are summarized and make up his rating. In NTUU «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute» maximal score before the higher mathematics exam is 60.
The exam is written and with use of examination papers that have module structure. Maximal score that student can get for the exam is 40. Student who has positive mark for the module (amount of points is estimated by a teacher) has a right to pass that module on the exam automatically. A student who worked hard all semester and has good results in accordance with actual control, has to pass only last theme om the exam. All requirements and explanations considering rating are provided by the teacher for the first time he meets students in the semester.
The big motivational and educational matter for students is rating system transparency. Students are regularly provided with information about their rating changes. Students can not only monitor their results, but also can compare themselves with other students. Rating transparency allows to clear teachers considering their subjective methods. When information about current rating is public, students are stimulated to study regularly and systematically and therefore it leads to increasing of knowledge level. Rating system prepares students psychologically for life in conditions of market economy and fierce competition.
Conclusions. In general, modular rating system allows to realize effective differential and individualized mathematics teaching, provides flexibility and dynamism of educational process that allows to talk about possibility of increasing mathematics teaching quality.
References
1. Кузнецова Л.Г. Модульно-рейтинговая система как фактор повышения качества обучения математике // Современные проблемы науки и образования, 2006. №3. С. 88-90.
Размещено на Allbest.ru
Подобные документы
The education system in the United States of America. Pre-school education. Senior high school. The best universities of national importance. Education of the last level of training within the system of higher education. System assessment of Knowledge.
презентация [1,4 M], добавлен 06.02.2014History of school education system in the USA. The role of school education in the USA. Organisation of educational process in American schools. Reforms and innovations in education that enable children to develop their potential as individuals.
курсовая работа [326,6 K], добавлен 12.01.2016Development of skills of independent creative activity in the process of game on the lessons of English. Psychological features of organization of independent work and its classification. Development of independence student in the process of teaching.
курсовая работа [35,8 K], добавлен 03.04.2011The impact of the course Education in Finland on my own pedagogical thinking and comparison of the Finnish school system and pedagogy with my own country. Similarities and differences of secondary and higher education in Kazakhstan and Finland.
реферат [15,2 K], добавлен 01.04.2012Studying the system of education in Britain and looking at from an objective point of view. Descriptions of English school syllabus, features of infant and junior schools. Analyzes the categories of comprehensive schools, private and higher education.
презентация [886,2 K], добавлен 22.02.2012School attendance and types of schools. Pre-school and elementary education. Nursery schools and kindergartens which are for children at the age of 4 - 6. The ideal of mass education with equal opportunity for all. Higher education, tuition fees.
реферат [20,5 K], добавлен 01.04.2013Disclosure of the concept of the game. Groups of games, developing intelligence, cognitive activity of the child. The classification of educational games in a foreign language. The use of games in the classroom teaching English as a means of improving.
курсовая работа [88,5 K], добавлен 23.04.2012Study the history of opening of the first grammar and boarding-schools. Description of monitorial system of education, when teacher teaches the monitors who then pass on their knowledge to the pupils. Analysis the most famous Universities in Britain.
презентация [394,4 K], добавлен 29.11.2011Modern education system in the UK. Preschool education. The national curriculum. Theoretical and practical assignments. The possible scenarios for post-secondary education. Diploma of higher professional education. English schools and parents' committees.
презентация [3,3 M], добавлен 05.06.2015The purpose and psychology-pedagogical aspects of extracurricular work on a foreign language. Requirements to extracurricular work. Forms of extracurricular educational work on a foreign language. Using the Internet in extracurricular work on English.
курсовая работа [38,9 K], добавлен 19.03.2015