The law of the future: searching for new truths or conserving traditional values?

Размещено на http://www.Allbest.Ru/

The Secretariat of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union

The law of the future: searching for new truths or conserving traditional values?

Elena E. Rafalyuk

Minsk, Republic of Belarus

Abstract

The digitalization of the economy and society, the introduction of artificial intelligence in human activities actualize a number of new issues related to both the legal support of these processes, and areas of development of law as a regulatory system, and the relationship between law and technology. Understanding of law in conjunction with other social institutions determines its role not only as a normative regulator, but as a cultural and historical phenomenon. The aim of the article is to analyze the problem of changing the value (ethical and moral) element of law in the context of technology development. The investigation will be based on an interdisciplinary approach. The author concludes that the progress of law is defined by the values protected by it, which traditionally includes justice, equality, good faith, common sense, etc. The transformation of human-technology relations at the present stage raises the question of moving toward technological humanism or turning to traditional humanism. The author formulates the hypothesis that the law in its value component cannot be replaced by artificial intelligence. The research studies the forms of securing value ideas in international law. By the example of international acts and case law it is shown that international organizations are in search of a balance between the use of artificial intelligence and respect for human rights. It is concluded that the law is able to maintain its essential foundation without turning into technology, addressing universal principles of law, and searching for the balance between scientific and technological progress and human rights.

Key words: artificial intelligence, digitalization, transformation of law, human rights, international organizations, principles of law, axiology, values, neuroethics, interdisciplinarity

Law is a part of society and it reacts to all changes that occur in it. Digitalization as a global trend in the development of economy and society based on transformation of information into digital form (Khalin, Chernova, 2018:47), shift to other forms of communication through on-line technologies, introduction of remote working and studying, which were widely used during the fight against COVID-19 pandemic, undoubtedly influence the development of law as a regulatory system.

Legal theorist and philosopher Werner Krawietz noted that “...New technological possibilities have changed the practical possibilities that a person has in his/her legal actions, but with them and through them, the social reality of law has also changed” (Krawietz, 1998:123).

The change in the “human-technology” relationship (Vlasova, 2015:170-173, Kasavina, 2018:129-142, Rostova, 2019:50-59) as a philosophical problem raises before legal science a new range of issues related both to the legal support of digitalization and various legal aspects of artificial intelligence application and development of law in the digital age, and correlation between law and technology in general1.

The use of artificial intelligence is rapidly expanding, including in the field of legal activity. “Robotization and technologization of legal activity are quite common” (Khabrieva, 2018:13): self-learning algorithms are used for analyzing large amounts of data and investigating crimes Concerning the Russian legal doctrine we can mention a few articles devoted to the development of law in the digital age: Zaloilo, M.V., Pashentsev, D.A. (2019) National legal order of Russia in the conditions of digitalization. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Law. Vol. 10. Issue 2. 196-209; Mazhorina, M.V., Terentieva, L.V., Shakhnazarov, B.A. (2019) International private law in the context of the development of information and communication technologies. Topical issues of Russian law. No. 5 (102). 169-182; Muratova, O.V. (2019) The concept of transnational consumer law in the modern world. Lex Russica. No. 7 (152). 20-28; Ta- lapina, E.V. (2018) Law and digitalization: new challenges and prospects. Russian Law Journal. No. 2. 5-17; Khabrieva, T.Ya., Chernogor, N.N. (2018) Law in the conditions of digital reality. Russian Law Journal. No. 1. 85-102; etc. Donk, R. (2020) Using algorithms in police investigations,., artificial intelligence is used to perform certain tasks of a lawyer (Ponkin, Redkina, 2018:91-109), in judicial and banking activities, corporate procedures (Vojnikanis, Semenova, Tyulyaev, 2018:140), etc. The expanding digitalization generates a normative transformation (Tikhomirov, 2020).

The normative transformation seems to be taking place in several directions. Firstly, legal regulation of various aspects of artificial intelligence and robotics application is being developed (Neznamov, Naumov, 2017:14-25). Secondly, the law itself, as a social institution, is undergoing certain changes: “it gradually accepts, as subjects and new atypical objects, phenomena that, according to the old legal classification, have an inanimate, non-subjective and non-objective character like genome engineering, biotechnology, Internet, and artificial intelligence” (Sinyukov, 2019:11).

So, it can be noted that the Law of the Russian Federation No. 1-FKZ “On Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation” dated March 14, 2020 (Article 1, paragraph 6, subparagraphs “v”, “g”) revised Article 71, subparagraphs “I” and “m” of the Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12, 1993, according to which “information technologies, ensuring security of an individual, society and the state when applying information technologies, and circulation of digital data” are under the authority of the Russian Federation.

Transformation of law in a global sense (not only its normative “envelope”) owes to the multidimensional nature of law, interpreted as a part of culture (Garcia Civico, 2018:13), and as a system of social communications (Antonov, Polyakov, Chestnov, 2013:78-95).

The synthetic understanding of law in the context of combination of sciences and arts that make up the “great anthropology” of human culture (Haberle, 2006:151; 2002:104; Haberle, Kotzur, 2003:5) seems relevant today, when human and individual is replaced by technical and typical; therefore it is important to refer to art as “a form of creativity, way of spiritual self-realization of a person through sensory and expressive means” (Ivin, 2004), form of social consciousness, and specific kind of practical-spiritual development of the world” (Il'ichyov, Fedoseev, Kovalyov, Panov, 1983), and to law as to art. Let us recall the definition of law introduced by Celsus, the ancient Roman lawyer, as “the art of good and justice” (Jus est ars boni et aequi).

S.S. Alekseev, a Soviet and Russian legal theorist, devoted several his works to the study of social value of law. He justified the importance of the value-based characteristic of law as a necessary and socially useful tool for social development, identified specific properties of law (normativity, formal certainty, coercion, and dynamism) and showed their social value in regulation of public relations. The scientist described law as an independent value due to its specific content, which is also reflected in the fact that “legal norms embody the prevailing moral principles, i.e., the basics of justice” (Alekseev, 2019: 47). The author highlighted the relationship between law and culture, noting that the properties of law, legal technique, and legal language can be characterized “as gradually accumulating elements of intangible spiritual culture” (Alekseev, 2019:201).

Professor Jesus Garcia Civico studied the relationship between law, society and culture from the perspective of the “man-society-culture-law relationship” (Garda Civico, 2018:15).

Miguel Reale, legal theorist and philosopher, the author of the “threedimensional theory of law”, believed that law involve normative (norm), factual, social and historical (fact), and ethical and moral (the value of justice, which is put as the task to be preserved) elements. According to Reale, through multiple forms of correlation between facts, values, and norms, arise and develop various legal experiences, which, in their turn, are mutually influenced and overlap (Reale, 1985:203224, 1997).

A broad understanding of law in relation to other social institutions determines its role not only as a statutory regulator, but as a cultural and historical phenomenon. The increasingly spreading introduction of artificial intelligence into life effects the development of each of the elements of law (normative, factual and ethical). Legal science and philosophical thought are increasingly turning to the issue of future law. Several options for future law development have been substantiated (Khabrieva, 2018:15).

Using the Socratic method of posing questions in learning the truth, I will indicate several problems and judgments, which may encourage discussion about the future of law.

What is the role of the value-based core of law in the era of digitalization and robotization?

To analyze this issue, I will turn to the ideas of Emilio Serrano Villafane, the legal theorist and philosopher, who looked at the progressive development of law through its goals and values (Serrano Villafana, 1973-1974:466). The author did not deny the development of law in accordance with the spirit of the time: “...since social progress is, in its turn, the progress of civilization and culture, hence the progress of law reflects not only legal forms, but also the forms of civilization and culture of society that give it life. [] Law must perform a progressive function and develop in accordance with time and with the reality and relationships it regulates” (Serrano Villafana, 1973-1974:462-463). At the same time, Serrano distinguished “formal” and “substantial” progress of law. The former involves the technical aspect of law, the legislative expression of legal ideas, and their logical and clear expression (Serrano Villafana, 1973-1974:469). According to the scientist, it is not the concern for the legal technique but for the goals and values that the norms are designed to implement that constitutes a perfect law and defines its functions. “The function of law is to reflect this changing social reality and regulate numerous legal relationships for the benefit of security, certainty, and common good; these are the goals of law among which justice is of prime importance” (Serrano Villafana, 1973-1974:472).

It seems that this scholar's point of view can be accepted by modem scientific thought. Law regulates social relations, and therefore develops along with them. However, it is the goals and values of the law that determine its progressive development.

Is the new digital reality able to change the traditional values of law?

The formation of electronic culture which is taking place “on the basis of the process of global informatization of society, the development of digital technologies, creation of alternative computer reality, unified virtual environment of the Internet, is only a part of big changes associated with the emergence of a new type of society in line with scientific and technological development” (Kasavina, 2018:131).

New society - new values? Leaving this question open, I would like to note that the content of universal principles of law, including equality “Such transhumanistic perspectives, from the point of view of F. Fukuyama (Fukuyama, F. The World's Most Dangerous Ideas: Transhumanism. Foreign Policy. 2004. No. 144. 42-43), pose a threat to one of the most important ideas of a democratic society - the idea of equality. After all, there may be people more perfect than their peers, people who are physically more resilient and more intelligent” (Cit. by: Sinica, 2015: 419-423)., rationality, etc. is at risk of modification, since scientific and technical progress contributes to the formation of new standards of life and work, and artificial intelligence offers society “highly developed and intelligent machines” that compete with humans by analyzing large amounts of information and independently solving problems.

Can introduction of artificial intelligence into legal activities effect the relationship between law and human consciousness? As professor N.A. Vlasenko argued “Law is a phenomenon of consciousness that expresses the objective values and requirements of human existence and is the unconditional source and absolute criterion of all human institutions” (Vlasenko, 2012:121).

We cannot ignore the fact that besides human activity a “machine” is being introduced into legal practice, which makes the issues of acceptable limits and legal principles of artificial intelligence participation in the process of legal decisionmaking, as well as scientific verification and control of the operation of such artificial systems relevant.

Neuroethics, which claims to constitute morality of a new neuro-improved society, where cognitive improvement and artificial intelligence will prevail, and a naturalistic paradigm in understanding of morality is gaining popularity (Sidorova, 2018:79).

Thus, the relationship between “law and robotization” can be looked at as an ethical problem, where a new relationship between man and technology is being formed. What will they be like? Will they move towards “technical humanism” (Sanz Larruga, 1997:516) or return to traditional values of humanism, following the circle of “humanism - posthumanism - transhumanism - technohumanism - humanism” (Yakovleva, 2014:40-42)?

These neuroscience data allow us to replace part of the human intellectual operations with machine operations. The sensory and emotional spheres of a person, which are the basis of creative activity, have also become the “object of pretension” by artificial intelligence. Scholars express different opinions on this issue. One of them stems from the idea that “Art and feelings cannot be replaced by artificial intelligence” (Zhilkin, 2018:19). Another allows for the possibility of introducing artificial intelligence into the emotional domain, in case emotions are “recognized as another way of thinking” (Minsky, 2006), thus admitting “the possibility of a machine analog to such type of thinking” (Karpov, Gotovcev, Rojzenzon, 2018:91).

Law in the context of axiological methodology is based on values. The conditionality of values by human activity (“only for man and only through man does reality acquire a value character”) (Rasheva, Gomonov, 2006:173), allows us to assert that law at the value-based level cannot be replaced by artificial intelligence acting through algorithms and schemes, invented by person.

What are the mechanisms for preserving the essential core of law?

Universal principles of law, which are based on moral and ethical nature and express cultural and historical traditions, reflect the values of law.

International law demonstrates various forms of implementing the concept of justice (Tolstyh, 2009:188) and other legal values.

These include imperative norms of general international law (jus cogens), treaties and customary rules, general principles of law recognized by civilized nations, and a special mechanism for resolving disputes called ex aequo et bono (in justice and fairness).

Thus, in accordance with Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice: “The court, which is obliged to resolve disputes referred to it on the basis of international law, shall apply: a) international conventions, whether general or special, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states; b) international custom as evidence of universal practice recognized as a rule of law; c) general principles of law recognized by civilized nations; d) subject to the provision referred to in Article 59, the judicial decisions and doctrines of the most qualified public law specialists of various nations as an auxiliary means for determining the principles of law”. Under Article 38, paragraph 2, of the Statute, the Court may decide a case ex aequo et bono if the parties agree so Statute of the International Court of Justice, .

Article 34 of the MERCOSUR Permanent Appeals Court stipulates that ad hoc arbitrations and the Permanent Appeals Court may resolve disputes ex aequo et bono if the parties agree so Protocol de Olivos on the settlement of disputes in MERCOSUR of 18 February 2002, .

The possibility of applying generally recognized principles and norms of international law, as well as international customs as evidence of universal practice recognized as a legal norm, is stipulated in Clause 50 of the Statute of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union (Annex No. 2 to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union dd. May 29, 2014) Statute of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union (Annex No. 2 to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union of May 29, 2014). Computer-Assisted Legal Research System “Consultant Plus” (Accessed 10 June 2020)..

The application of general principles of law and international customs by courts makes it possible to form a value-based component in judicial decisions based on the provisions of natural justice. As Professor T.N. Neshataeva argues “The latest practice of European courts shows the need to provide a new understanding of human rights in order to resolve contradiction between natural justice and scientific progress: the courts deal with cases of euthanasia, sex change operations and human cloning. In the absence of positive law, all these disputes are considered in terms of priority of human rights” (Neshataeva, 2004).

The decision of the Court of the European Union of 8 April 2014 in the case “Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and Others and Kдrntner Landesregierung and Others” the Directive of the European Parliament and the Council 2006/24 /EC of 15 March 2006 on data retention obtained or processed by providing publicly available electronic communications services or networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC was considered invalid Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 8 April 2014, C-293/12 and C-594/12, because it entailed extensive and serious interference in the fundamental human rights concerning respect of private life and protection of personal data. moral right value artificial intelligence

Regarding the application of Article 8 of the European Convention on human Note: Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights “Right to respect for private and family life

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic wellbeing of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others” rights, the European Court of Human Rights explained that “in accordance with the development of modern technologies, the concept of “correspondence” covers telephone and fax communications, e-mail, pager communication and Internet use, as well as letters by regular mail Halford v. UK, 1997-III, 24 EHRR 523; Taylor-Sabori v. UK, HUDOC (2002), 36 EHRR 248; Copland v. UK, 2007-I, 45 EHRR 858; Kennedy v. UK, HUDOC (2010), 52 EHRR 207.. Other means of communication may also fall within the scope of Article 8 of the Convention in the future [...]” (Harris, O'Boyle, War- brick, 1995).

International organizations are searching for balance between application of artificial intelligence and respect for human rights.

The 2005 Declaration on Human Rights and the Rule of Law in the Information Society states that the rights and freedoms enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights must be guaranteed to all without exception, regardless of the technical means used Declaration of the Committee of Ministers on human rights and the rule of law in the Information Society CM (2005) 56 final Recommendation CM/Rec (2020)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the human rights impacts of algorithmic systems. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 April 2020 at the 1373^rd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies.

In April 2020, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted Recommendation CM/Rec (2020) 1 to member States on the impact of algorithmic systems on human rights11, which specifies a set of guidelines calling on governments to ensure respect for human rights when using, developing or purchasing algorithmic systems. States should ensure that algorithmic systems take into account reliability, confidentiality, data protection and security guarantees in order to prevent and reduce the risk of human rights violations and other adverse consequences for individuals and society Algorithms and automation: Council of Europe issues guidelines to prevent human rights breaches.

Earlier, the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice adopted the European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their Environment on December 3, 2018 European Charter of Ethics on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and the realities around them. This document sets forth the principles of using artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment:

1) the principle of respect for fundamental rights;

2) the principle of non-discrimination;

3) the principle of quality and safety;

4) the principle of transparency, impartiality, and reliability;

5) the principle of user control.

The document states that the use of tools and services based on artificial intelligence must be carried out in good faith, taking into account the basic human rights specified in the European Convention on Human Rights and the Convention on the Protection of Personal Data, as well as in accordance with other fundamental principles set forth in the Charter.

The conducted research allows us to look at law in the interdisciplinary context and ensure that modern problems of jurisprudence may only be studied with the holistic approach. The complex nature of modem jurisprudence, its “inseparable” inclusion in the system of scientific knowledge, implies making a fully justified “legal” decision of any type and level only in the interplay of legal knowledge and data of other, primarily social, sciences (Tarasov, 2019:126). Today, binding with natural science disciplines is also of great importance.

It is obvious that artificial intelligence is embedded in society, partially replacing the intellectual activity of a person. It is important to find the place of the human being and their humanistic nature in the emerging digital society, thus it is fundamental to preserve the value-based ideals of humanism.

Law, as a social institution, will undoubtedly undergo and is undergoing changes. At the same time, “it is necessary to overcome the obvious underestimation of the mechanisms of formation of legal consciousness and legal behavior in science and practice. Otherwise, only “textual” law will remain” (Tikhomirov, 2020). Raising the role of law and rule through education, upbringing, and ideology is one of the directions of development of the legal culture of society. At the same time, scientists have yet to comprehend the possibilities of harmonizing the values of law and digitalization of social life.

The important issue is how law can preserve its essence without turning into technology. Let us answer this question metaphorically: “I imagine this measure to be something extremely thin - a razor blade, because it is often as difficult to find it, implement, and observe it as it is to walk on a razor blade that is almost invisible due to its extreme sharpness” (Efremov, 2017:69). “You should not take my expression about walking on a razor blade literally ... it is rather the highest subtlety of decisions, research, laws and morals and, of course, the choice of direction” (Efremov, 2017:702). One of the ways is to appeal to the universal principles of law as a starting point from a moral and ethical basis, as well as to find a balance between scientific and technological progress and human rights.

References / Библиографический список

1. Alekseev, S.S. (2019) Social'naya cennost' prava v sovetskom obshchestve [The social value of law in Soviet society]. S.S. Alekseev; Foreword by S. A. Stepanov; Introductory article by A.P. Semitko. Yekaterinburg: University of the Humanities. LXXX. (Series “Purpose and Power of Law”). (in Russian).

2. Алексеев С.С. Социальная ценность права в советском обществе / С.С. Алексеев; предисловие С.А. Степанова; вступительная статья А.П. Семитко. Екатеринбург: Гуманитарный университет, 2019. LXXX, 223 с. (Серия «Предназначение и могущество права»).

3. Antonov, M.V., Polyakov, A.V., Chestnov, I.L. (2013) Kommunikativnyi podhod i rossiiskaya teoriya prava [The communicative approach and the Russian theory of law]. Jurisprudence. 6 (311), 78-95. (in Russian).

4. Антонов М.В., Поляков А.В., Честное И.Л. Коммуникативный подход и российская теория права // Правоведение. 2013. №6 (311). С. 78-95.

5. Garda Qvico, J. (2018) Derecho y cultura: una dimension cultural del derecho. Anuario Facultad de Derecho - Universidad de AlcalaXI. 3-43. (in Spanish).

6. Haberle, P. (2002) Pluralismo y Constitution. Espana. Editorial: Tecnos. (in Spanish).

7. Haberle, P. (2006) Verdady Estado constitutional. Mexico D.E., Instituto de investigaciones juridicas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. (in Spanish).

8. Haberle, P., Kotzur, M. (2003) De la soberama al derecho comun: palabras clave para un dialogo europeo-latinoamericano. Mexico: UNAM. (in Spanish).

9. Efremov, I.A. (2017) Lezvie britvy [Razor blade]. Saint-Petersburg, “Alphabet-Atticus” Publ. (in Russian).

10. Ефремов И.А. Лезвие бритвы. СПб.: «Издательская Группа «Азбука-Аттикус», 2017.

11. Harris, DJ, O'Boyle, М, Warbrick, C. (1995) Law of the European Convention on human rights. Butterworths, London, Dublin, Edinburgh.

12. Ivin, A.A. (ed.) (2004) Filosofiya: Enciklopedicheskii slovar' [Philosophy: Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ. (in Russian).

13. Философия: Энциклопедический словарь / под ред. А.А. Ивина. М.: Гардарики, 2004. 1072 c.

14. Il'ichyov, L.F., Fedoseev, P.N., Kovalyov, S.M., Panov, V.G. (eds.) (1983) Filosofskii enciklopedicheskii slovar' [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia Publ. (in Russian).

15. Философский энциклопедический словарь / гл. редакция: Л.Ф. Ильичёв, П.Н. Федосеев, С.М. Ковалёв, В.Г. Панов. М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1983. 840 c.

16. Karpov, V.E., Gotovcev, P.M., Rojzenzon, G.V. (2018) K voprosu ob etike i sistemah iskusstven- nogo intellekta [To the question of ethics and artificial intelligence systems]. Philosophy andSociety. (2), 84-105. (in Russian).

17. Карпов В.Э., Готовцев П.М., Ройзензон Г.В. К вопросу об этике и системах искусственного интеллекта // Философия и общество, 2018. №2. С. 84-105.

18. Kasavina, N.A. (2018) Chelovek i tekhnika: ambivalentnost' elektronnoi kul'tury [Man and technology: the ambivalence of electronic culture]. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. (55) 4, 129-142. (in Russian).

19. Касавина Н.А. Человек и техника: амбивалентность электронной культуры // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2018. Т. 55. №4. С. 129-142.

20. Khabrieva, T.Ya. (2018) Law Facing the Challenges of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law. (9), 5-16.

21. Хабриева Т.Я. Право перед вызовами цифровой реальности // Журнал российского права. 2018. №9. С. 5-16.

22. Khalin, V.G., Chernova, G.V. (2018) Digitalization and its impact on the russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks. Administrative Consulting. (10), 46-63. (in Russian).

23. Халин В.Г., Чернова Г.В. Цифровизация и ее влияние на российскую экономику и общество: преимущества, вызовы, угрозы и риски // Управленческое консультирование. 2018. №10. С. 46-63.

24. Krawietz, W. (1998) Sistemas juridicos modernos en transition. Sobre la comunicacion juridica en las teorias contemporaneas de las normas y de la action. Doxa. Universidad de Alicante. Area de Filosofia del Derecho. (21), 1. 123-143. (in Spanish).

25. Minsky, M. (2006) The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.

26. Neznamov, A.V., Naumov, V.B. (2017) Voprosy razvitiya zakonodatel'stva o robototekhnike v Rossii i v mire [Issues of the development of legislation on robotics in Russia and in the world]. Legal Studies. (8), 14-25. (in Russian).

27. Незнамов А.В., Наумов В.Б. Вопросы развития законодательства о робототехнике в России и в мире // Юридические исследования, 2017. №8. С. 14-25.

28. Ponkin, I.V., Redkina, A.I. (2018) Iskusstvennyi intellekt s tochki zreniya prava [Artificial Intelligence from the Point of View of Law]. RUDN Journal of Law. 22 (1), 91-109.

29. Понкин И.В., Редькина А.И. Искусственный интеллект с точки зрения права // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Юридические науки, 2018. Т. 22. №1. С. 91-109.

30. Rasheva, N.Yu., Gomonov, N.D. (2006) Cennost' prava v kontekste sistemy cennostej sovremennogo rossijskogo obshchestva [The value of law in the context of the value system of modern Russian society]. VestnikMSTU. (9) 1, 172-181. (in Russian).

31. Рашева Н.Ю., Гомонов Н.Д. Ценность права в контексте системы ценностей современного российского общества // Вестник МГТУ, 2006. Том 9. №1. С. 172-181. Reale, M. (1985) Situacion actual de la teoria tridimensional del derecho. Anales de la Catedra Francisco Suarez. (25), 203-224. (in Spanish).

32. Reale, M. (1997) Teoria tridimensional del Derecho: una vision integral del Derecho. Madrid. Editorial: Tecnos. (in Spanish).

33. Rostova, N.N. (2019) Opposition «Human and Technology» as a Problem of Modern Philosophy. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii. (6) 1, 50-59. (in Russian).

34. Ростова Н.Н. Оппозиция «человек и техника» как проблема современной философии // Вопросы философии и психологии. 2019. №6 (1). С. 50-59.

35. Sanz Larruga, J. (1997) El derecho ante las nuevas tecnologias de la information. Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruna. (1), 499-516. (in Spanish).

36. Serrano Villafane, E. (1973-1974) Funciones del derecho en la sociedad cambiante de nuestros dias. Anuario de filosofia del derecho. (17), 461-472. (in Spanish).

37. Sidorova, T.A. (2018) Neuroethics: between ethics and morality. Idei i idealy = Ideas and Ideals. 2 (1), 75-99.

38. Сидорова Т.А. Нейроэтика: между этикой и моралью // Идеи и Идеалы. 2018. №2. Т. 1. С. 75-99.

39. Sinica, A.S. (2015) Moral'no-eticheskie aspekty teorii iskusstvennogo intellekta [Moral and ethical aspects of the theory of artificial intelligence]. Young scientist. (18), 419-423. (in Russian).

40. Синица А.С. Морально-этические аспекты теории искусственного интеллекта // Молодой ученый. 2015. №18. С. 419-423.

41. Sinyukov, V.N. (2019) Digital Law and Problems of Gradual Transformation of the Russian Legal System. Lex Russica. 1(9), 9-18.

42. Синюков В.Н. Цифровое право и проблемы этапной трансформации российской правовой системы // Lex russica (Русский закон). 2019. №1(9). С. 9-18.

43. Tarasov, N.N. (2019) Istoriya i metodologiya yuridicheskoj nauki: metodologicheskie problemy yurisprudencii [History and methodology of legal science: methodological problems of jurisprudence]. Moscow, Yurait Publ. (in Russian).

44. Тарасов Н.Н. История и методология юридической науки: методологические проблемы юриспруденции. М.: Юрайт, 2019. 218 с.

45. Tikhomirov, Yu.A. (2020) Law: A Moment of Stillness or Anticipatory Impact on Social Processes. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava Journal of Russian Law, (4), 5-16.

46. Тихомиров Ю.А. Право: момент покоя или опережающее воздействие на социальные процессы // Журнал российского права. 2020. №4. С. 5-16.

47. Tolstyh, V.L. (2009) Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava [International Law Course]. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer Publ. (in Russian).

48. Толстых В.Л. Курс международного права. М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2009. 1031 с. Vlasenko, N.A. (2012) Razumnost', pravo, pravotvorchestvo [Reasonableness, law, law-making]. Legal Technique. (6), 121-125. (in Russian).

49. Власенко Н.А. Разумность, право, правотворчество // Юридическая техника. 2012. №6. С. 121-125.

50. Vlasova, E.M. (2015) Izmenenie otnosheniya chelovek - tekhnika v sovremennom obshchestve: problemy novogo gumanizma [Changing the relationship between man and technology in modern society: problems of the new humanism]. International Journal of Applied and Basic Research. (1-1), 170-173. (in Russian).

51. Власова Е.М. Изменение отношения человек - техника в современном обществе: проблемы нового гуманизма // Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2015. №1-1. С. 170-173.

52. Vojnikanis, E.A., Semenova, E.V., Tyulyaev, G.S. (2018) Iskusstvennyi intellekt i pravo: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti samoobuchayushchihsya algoritmov [Artificial Intelligence and Law: Challenges and Possibilities of Self-Learning Algorithms]. Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series Law. (4), 137-148.

53. Войниканис Е.А., Семенова Е.В., Тюляев Г.С. Искусственный интеллект и право: вызовы и возможности самообучающихся алгоритмов // Вестник ВГУ. Серия Право. 2018. №4. С. 137-148.

54. Yakovleva, E.L. (2014) Motion vector: humanism, posthumanism, transhumanism-tehnogumanizm and humanism. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. No. 2. 40-42. (in Russian). Яковлева Е.Л. Вектор движения: гуманизм-постгуманизм-трансгуманизм-техногуманизм-гуманизм // Балтийский гуманитарный журнал. 2014. №2. С. 40-42. Zhilkin, V.A. (2018) Iskusstvennyi intellekt i cifrovye tekhnologii v yuridicheskoi deyatel'nosti v cifrovoi real'nosti (na primere Finlyandii) [Artificial intelligence and digital technologies in legal activities in digital reality (on the example of Finland)]. Journal of Foreign Law and Comparative Law. (5), 16-21. (in Russian).

55. Жилкин В.А. Искусственный интеллект и цифровые технологии в юридической деятельности в цифровой реальности (на примере Финляндии) // Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения. 2018. №5. С. 16-21.

About the author:

Elena E. Rafalyuk - Candidate of Legal Sciences, Counsel of the Expert-Analytical Department of the Secretariat of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union; 5 Kirova str., Minsk, 220006, Republic of Belarus

Размещено на allbest.ru