Вклад Европейского суда по правам человека в понимание прав человека в сфере труда

1. Актуальные проблемы трудового права / под ред. Лютова Н.Л. М.: Проспект, 2017. 688 с.

2. Cullen H. (2006) Siliadin v France: Positive Obligations under Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, no 3, pp. 585-592.

3. Cabrelli D. (2016) Employment Law in Context. Oxford University Press, 944 p.

4. De Schutter O. (2005) The Prohibition of Discrimination Under European Human Rights Law Relevance For EU Racial And Employment Equality Directives. European Commission. Luxembourg: Official Publications of the European Communities, 58 p.

5. Mundlak G. (2002) Human Rights and Labor Rights: Why Don't the Two Tracks Meet. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, vol. 34, pp. 217-246.

6. Kolben K. (2009) Labor rights as human rights. Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 50, pp. 449-481.

7. Dorssemont F., Lorcher K. (2013) The European Convention on Human Rights and the employment relation. Oxford: Hart, 482 p.

8. Harris D.J., O'Boyle M., Warbrick C. (2009) Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 902 p.

9. Hendrick F., Van Bever A. (2013) Article 8 ECHR: judicial patterns of employment privacy protection. F. Dorssemont et al, eds. The European Convention on Human Rights and the employment relation. Oxford: Hart, 482 p.

10. Jacobs A. (2013) Article 11 ECHR: The Right to Bargain Collectively under Article 11 ECHR. F. Dorssemont et al, eds. The European Convention on Human Rights and the employment relation. Oxford: Hart, 482 p.

11. Leka S., Jain A. (2016) International Initiatives to Tackle Psychosocial Risks and Promote Mental Health in the Workplace: Is There a Good Balance in Policy and Practice? Psychosocial Factors at Work in Asia Pacific. New York: Springer, pp. 23-43. Mantouvalou V. (2006) Servitude and Forced Labour in the 21st Century: The Human Rights of Domestic Workers. Industrial Law Journal, no 4, p. 395-414.

12. Pati R. (2011) “States' Positive Obligations with Respect to Human Trafficking: The European Court of Human Rights Breaks New Ground in Rantsev v. Cyprus & Russia. Boston University International Law Journal, no 1, pp. 82-142.

13. Peers S. (2016) `Is Workplace Privacy Dead? Comments on the Barbulescu Judgement'. EU Law Analysis, 14 January. Available at: http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.hu/2016/01/is- workplace-privacy-dead-comments-on.html (дата обращения: 20-08-2017)

14. Reidy A. (2002) A guide to the implementation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human rights handbooks, no 6. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/168007ff4c (дата обращения: 20-06-2018)

15. Rushton K. (2017) Bosses can now read staff's private messages sent on WhatsApp and similar forums during work hours, European court rules. Available at: http://www. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3397433/European-court-says-bosses-read-staff-s- private-messages.html (дата обращения: 20-08-2017)

16. Van der Sloot B. (2015) Privacy as Personality Right: Why the ECtHR's Focus on Ulterior Interests Might Prove Indispensable in the Age of “Big Data”? Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, vol. 31, pp. 25-50.

17. Van Hiel I. (2013) The Right to Form and Join Trade Unions Protected by Article 11 ECHR. F. Dorssemont et al, eds. The European Convention on Human Rights and the employment relation. Oxford: Hart, 482 p.

References

1. Cabrelli D. (2016) Employment Law in Context. Oxford: University Press, 944 p.

2. Cullen H. (2006) Siliadin v France: Positive Obligations under Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, no 3, pp. 585-592.

3. De Schutter O. (2005) The Prohibition of Discrimination Under European Human Rights Law Relevance For EU Racial And Employment Equality Directives. European Commission. Luxembourg: Official Publications of European Communities, 58 p.

4. Dorssemont F, Lorcher K. (eds.) (2013) The European Convention on Human Rights and the employment relations. Oxford: Hart, 482 p.

5. Harris D., O'Boyle M., Warbrick C. (2009) Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: University Press, 902 p.

6. Hendrick F, Van Bever A. (2013) Article 8 ECHR: judicial patterns of employment privacy protection. F Dorssemont et al (eds.)The European Convention on Human Rights and the employment relations. Oxford: Hart, 482 p.

7. Jacobs A. (2013) Article 11 ECHR: The Right to Bargain Collectively under Article 11 ECHR. The European Convention on Human Rights and the employment relations. Oxford: Hart, 482 p.

8. Kolben K. (2009) Labor rights as human rights. Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 50, pp. 449-481.

9. Leka S., Jain A. (2016) International Initiatives to Tackle Psychosocial Risks and Promote Mental Health in the Workplace: Is There a Good Balance in Policy and Practice? Psychosocial Factors at Work in Asia Pacific. New York: Springer, pp. 23-43.

10. Lutov V.L. et al (2017) Issues of Labor Law. Moscow: Prospect, 688 p. (in Russian)

11. Mantouvalou V. (2006) Servitude and Forced Labour in the 21st Century: The Human Rights of Domestic Workers. Industrial Law Journal, no 4, p. 395-414.

12. Mundlak G. (2002) Human Rights and Labor Rights: Why Don't the Two Tracks Meet. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, vol. 34, pp. 217-246.

13. Pati R. (2011) “States' Positive Obligations with Respect to Human Trafficking: The European Court of Human Rights Breaks New Ground in Rantsev v. Cyprus & Russia. Boston University International Law Journal, no 1, pp. 82-142.

14. Peers S. (2016) `Is Workplace Privacy Dead? Comments on the Barbulescu Judgement'. EU Law Analysis, 14 January. Available at: http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.hu/2016/01/is- workplace-privacy-dead-comments-on.html (accessed : 20-08-2017)

15. Reidy A. (2002) A guide to the implementation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human rights handbooks, no 6. Available at: https://rm.coe. int/168007ff4c (accessed: 20-06-2018)

16. Rushton K. (2017) Bosses can now read staff's private messages sent on during work hours, European Court rules. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti- cle-3397433/European-court-says-bosses-read-staff-s-private-messages.html (accessed: 20-08-2017)

17. Van der Sloot B. (2015) Privacy as Personality Right: Why the ECtHR's Focus on Ulterior Interests Might Prove Indispensable in the Age of “Big Data”? Utrecht Journal of International and European Law,vol. 31, pp. 25-50.

18. Van Hiel I. (2013) The Right to Form and Join Trade Unions Protected by Article 11 ECHR. The European Convention on Human Rights and the employment relations. Oxford: Hart, 482 p.

Contribution of the European Court of Human Rights to Interpretation of Human Rights in the Sphere of Labor

Elena Sychenko. Associate Professor, Department of Labor and Social Law, Law Faculty, Saint Petersburg State University, Candidate of Juridical Sciences.

Abstract. The article examines the most important judgments of the European Court of Human Rights relating to the protection of labour rights. The author analyzed the cases were considered in recent years under articles 3, 4, 8 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In particular, the cases on the investigation of occupational accidents, prohibition of forced labor, protection of the private life of workers and of their right for freedoms of expression and association are dealt with in the paper. Author positively evaluates that European Court on Human Rights has prepared a whole system of reviewing actions of the employer for a control over fulfilling by the employers theirs working duties and functions (among control ways and means now it is possible to discover for example videotaping, reviewing electronic post and phone talks, etc.) The Court has formulated an opinion that it has a sense for national judicial bodies follow the widened understanding of the Article in cases concerning issue of non-legitimate behavior of employers. Also majority of the judges of European Court on Human Rights believe in necessity of the widened understanding of such phenomena as forced labor and trade by human persons. Author is sure that transplantation of that practice of the European Court at the Russian Federation soil would turn to be quite useful for interests of most unprotected social strata/groups -- that is, in particular, invalids, inner and foreign migrants. Object of author's critic is overall ban over railway strikes contradicting to norms of Article 11 of the Convention as the European Court of Human Rights has claimed in the case Ognevenko vs. Russian Federation.

Keywords. European Court of Human Rights; European Convention; forced labour; protection of privacy; labor rights; courts; trade unions; true justice.

Размещено на Allbest.ru