Valuing the joint effect of adult literacy and economic growth on renewable energy consumption in African zone
The author tries to find out how the major two variables in economy called Economic growth and adult literacy rate influence the behaviour of African people in different zones on renewable energy consumption. The research is quantitative in nature.
Рубрика | Социология и обществознание |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 19.03.2022 |
Размер файла | 50,1 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
Valuing the joint effect of adult literacy and economic growth on renewable energy consumption in African zone
Tanbir Hossain
Purpose: in this paper, the author tries to find out how the major two variables in economy called Economic growth (EG) and adult literacy rate (ALR) influence the behaviour of African people in different zones on renewable energy consumption (REC).
Design/Method/Approach: The research is basically quantitative in nature and 52 African counties have been selected zonal-wise considering time series database from 1990 to 2018 (nearly 29 years). It is observed that EG has positive and significant impact on REC in Northern Africa Zone (NAZ) and ALR has positive and significant on REC in NAZ and Eastern African Zone (EAZ). Conversely, EG and ALR act as joint effect, it emphasises positive and significant on REC in EAZ only.
To grab my most of the developing and underdeveloped economies, where their education level and economic growth can be influencing factors to change their behavioural characteristics to use renewable energy to ensure income and environmental sustainability.
Practical implications (if applicable): This paper is constructed by zonal-wise which will help future researchers to build-up behavioural changing polices on REC in zonal basis. The developing and under developing economies can be somehow dependent on the population-behaviour which can affect to ensure environmental and social-sustainability.
Paper type: theoretical.
Key words: renewable energy, economic growth, adult literacy rate, sustainable development, environmental sustainability.
Оцінка спільного впливу грамотності дорослих та економічного зростання на споживання відновлюваної енергії в африканській зоні
Танбір Хоссейн
Мета роботи: у статті автор намагається з'ясувати, як дві основні змінні економіки - економічне зростання та рівень грамотності дорослих впливають на поведінку африканців у різних зонах щодо споживання відновлюваної енергії.
Дизайн/Метод/Підхід дослідження: Дослідження в основному носить кількісний характер, для дослідження було відібрано 52 африканські країни за зонами з урахуванням бази даних часових рядів з 1990 по 2018 рік (майже 29 років). Помічено, що економічне зростання має позитивний і значний вплив на споживання відновлюваної енергії в зоні Північної Африки, а рівень грамотності дорослих має позитивний і значний вплив на споживання відновлюваної енергії в зоні Північної Африки і Східно- африканській зоні. І навпаки, економічне зростання та рівень грамотності дорослих діє як спільний ефект, він підкреслює позитивний і значуще споживання відновлюваної енергії тільки в Східно-африканській зоні.
Результати дослідження: Практика сталого розвитку та соціальний розвиток є взаємопов'язаними проблемами, які намагаються охопити більшість країн, що розвиваються та слаборозвинених економік, де їхній рівень освіти та економічне зростання можуть впливати на зміни їх поведінкових характеристик, щоб використовувати відновлювані джерела енергії для забезпечення доходів та екологічної стійкості.
Практична цінність дослідження: Ця стаття побудована зонально, що допоможе майбутнім дослідникам розробити політику зміни поведінки на REC на зональній основі. Економіка, що розвивається, і країни, що розвиваються, можуть якось залежати від поведінки населення, яка може вплинути на забезпечення екологічної та соціальної стійкості.
Тип статті: теоретична.
Ключові слова: відновлювані джерела енергії, економічне зростання, рівень грамотності дорослих, сталий розвиток, екологічна стійкість.
economic growth african people renewable energy
Introduction
Renewable is defined as clean and green energy, which collects generally from renewable resources, consider to ensure the environmental sustainability, is a booming innovation that can reduce the cost of energy production with ensuring the future development with sustainable way. Across the world, especially in European and North-American countries, the usage of solar and wind energy is growing as breaking record factor at the time of sluggish production of national electricity grid. Moreover, renewable energy means energy production and consumption from that source that is not depleted when used in daily activities. Renewable energy is considered budding chunk of energy production and consumption, ensuring the environmentally friendly energy with lower-cost of production, is well-renowned factor low or zero carbon emission to ensure future way of sustainability. The trend of using renewable energy has been drastically uplifted due to continuous supply of electricity with minimum level of costing. The government of middle-income countries and high-income countries consist policy based on huge participation of local people and shirt-term credit loan basis.
Renewable energy consumption helps to ensure uninterrupted power supply with fuel diversification method. IRENA (2016) measures that the usage of renewable energy guarantees to enhance macro-economic growth level, reduce unemployment, ensuring of social welfare with individual welfare. Engineers and experts have been able to formulate the consumption pattern of renewable energy in cost-effective way which can afford lower level consumer group. A report of (NRDC and ACERA, 2013) shows that the usage of renewable energy in Chile, can add the additional GDP into (USD 2.24 billion) with expanding 7,800 direct and indirect jobs scope in forecasting year 2028. Japan the Asian booming country, has been capable to add 23.3 gigawatts (GW) of solar PV, that can help the consumer to use electricity in cost-effective way and feel flexible to handle (IRENA and CEM, 2014).
Energy security is well connected and well-known issues that is solely related in our Marcoeconomic level, where energy security connects to use the energy in continuous and sustainable way with affordable cost. Energy security is vital factor for food production, water refinery, agricultural activities, fish-cultivation, social welfare with business opportunities creation. Energy security is correlated with political, economic, environmental, social, technical where a proper planning to consume energy can be handy tool to change social-scenario in lower-developed countries.
1. Review of Literature
In recent world, the demand for energy has been increasing recklessly due to population growth, economic and technological progress and innovation, where a major portion of population depends on the continuous flow of energy due to earn their daily livelihood. Haider et al. (2015) demonstrate the current energy scarcity and potential energy sources in Bangladesh. The energy security condition is not so satisfactory in Bangladesh because the reservation of gas, oil, coal, mineral is going to depletion for the huge demand fulfilment of infrastructure development purposes (Islam et al., 2014). According to the paper of Uddin et. al (2018), more than one-third portion of power production are solely depending on imported fossil-fuel energy while 65% power generation are well dependent on natural gas reservation in Bangladesh.
Gershon and Emekalam (2021) designs a research paper on the trend of renewable energy consumption in Nigerian economy based on Toda Yamamoto approach, where the author shows the real GDP and emissions level of Co2 are vital determinants for importing oil products in Nigeria. The renewable energy consumption has significant prospects for future production but no nation has acquired absolute advantage over their competitive nations on consuming renewable energy (Egbetokun et al, 2020). Some developing countries face huge challenges due to the use of fossil fuel that causes high-level costing and environmentally unsustainable (Gershon and Nwokocha, 2017). Energy consumption accelerate the economic growth and wide volume of industrialization but the production of renewable energy did not constitute significantly due to excess energy demand in world (Fubara et al., 2019).
Apergis and Payne (2010) analyse the effect of renewable energy consumption in Eurasian countries using the panel data. Omri (2013) denotes that there is tri-connection relation among society, environment and energy, where energy demand has been increasing due to higher population growth. U.S.E.I. Administration (2013) mentions that most of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries have been experiencing high demand of energy to ensure their long run economic acceleration. Azad et al. (2014) focus the Production, Consumption and Prospect of Renewable Energy in Australian economy,
Omri and Nguyen (2014) analysed the energy consumption on sixty-four countries where they found significant effect of trade openness on income clusters separately from the highest income earners countries. This study mentions that renewable energy consumption raises when the zonal GDP and carbon-emissions raises. Trading Economics (2017) analysed that Nigerian households use biomass and petroleum products to fulfil their daily needs, also 96.3% of Nigeria's exports most of the products made by crude oil. On the other hand, 61% of Nigerian households can normally access to 26.26TWh of electricity but shortage of electricity hinders the development of rapid industrialization and economic resource efficiency. Basically, under-developed countries face a huge crisis of using renewable energy which cannot help them for ensuring sustainability.
Most of the energy consumption happens in non-Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries where they think about long-term economic growth and development. Researchers are working as optimistic behaviour to enhance the image of energy without hampering environment, following the procedure of sustainable development as well. The population growth is the main factors for high-demand of energy usage, where around 9 billion people will demand energy in 2030 (Cohen, 2001).
Azad et al. (2014) developed a research paper based on Australian economy, Australian energy sector is developed based on non-renewable sources like: oil, gas, coal where 96% energy consumption came from non-renewable sources, this paper focuses the way and guidance to use the renewable energy usage ideas on their economy.
Methodology and Research Design
Guan et al. (2021) considers a panel data to measure the impact of Renewable Energy Sources on Financial Development, and Economic Growth on emerging economies, where the authors use Pooled Mean Group (PMG) and Cross-Sectional Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag (CS- ARDL) to estimate the effect of usage renewable energy on financial development and economic growth in Chinese economy. The author uses times series data from year 1990 to 2018 (nearly 29 years) to measure the trend of consuming renewable energy on low-income Countries. The author will compare zonal data based on world bank data sources in low-income countries.
Table 1 - Countries Name and World Bank Code
Country Name |
WB Country Code |
Region |
|
Algeria |
DZA |
Northern Africa |
|
Egypt |
EGY |
(NAZ) |
|
Libya |
LBY |
||
Morocco |
MAR |
||
Sudan |
SDN |
||
Tunisia |
TUN |
||
Burundi |
BDI |
Eastern Africa |
|
Comoros |
COM |
(EAZ) |
|
Djibouti |
DJI |
||
Eritrea |
ERI |
||
Ethiopia |
ETH |
||
Kenya |
KEN |
||
Madagascar |
MDG |
||
Malawi |
MWI |
||
Mauritius |
MUS |
||
Mozambique |
MOZ |
||
Rwanda |
RWA |
||
Seychelles |
SYC |
||
Somalia |
SOM |
||
South Sudan |
SSD |
||
Tanzania |
TZA |
||
Uganda |
UGA |
||
Zambia |
ZMB |
||
Zimbabwe |
ZWE |
||
Angola |
AGO |
Middle Africa (MAZ) |
|
Cameroon |
CMR |
||
Central African Republic |
CAF |
||
Congo (Democratic) |
COD |
||
Congo |
COG |
||
Equatorial Guinea |
GNQ |
||
Gabon |
GAB |
||
Sao and Principle |
STP |
||
Botswana |
BWA |
Southern Africa (SAZ) |
|
Eswatini |
SWZ |
||
Lesotho |
LSO |
||
Namibia |
NAM |
||
South Africa |
ZAF |
||
Benin |
BEN |
Western Africa (WAZ) |
|
Burkina Faso |
BFA |
||
Cape Verde |
CPV |
||
Cote de Ivory |
CIV |
||
Gambia |
GMB |
||
Ghana |
GHA |
||
Guinea |
GIN |
||
Guinea-Bissau |
GNB |
||
Liberia |
LBR |
||
Mali |
MLI |
||
Mauritania |
MRT |
||
Niger |
NER |
||
Senegal |
SEN |
||
Sierra Leone |
SLE |
||
Togo |
TGO |
Table 2 - Variables indication of independent variables that affect dependent variable
Independent Variable Name |
Variable Indication |
Measurement Unit |
World Bank Indicators |
Literature References |
|
1. Electricity Production from Renewable Resources |
EPRR |
Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (kWh) |
EG.ELC.RNWX.KH |
Zaharia et al., 2019 |
|
2. Electricity Production from Coal Resources |
EPCR |
Electricity production from coal sources (% of total) |
EG.ELC.COAL.ZS |
Zaharia et al., 2019 |
|
3. Electricity Production from Nuclear Resources |
EPNR |
Electricity production from nuclear sources (% of total) |
EG.ELC.NUCL.ZS |
Zaharia et al., 2019 |
|
4. Electricity Production from Oil Resources |
EPOR |
Electricity production from oil sources (% of total) |
EG.ELC.PETR.ZS |
Zaharia et al., 2019 |
|
5. Electricity Production from Natural Gas Resources |
EPGR |
Electricity production from natural gas sources (% of total) |
EG.ELC.NGAS.ZS |
Caruso et al., 2020 |
|
6. Electricity Access of People |
EAP |
Access to electricity (% of population) |
EG.ELC.ACCS. ZS |
Caruso et al., 2020 |
|
7. Labour Force |
LF |
Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, male (%) (national estimate) |
SL.TLF.ACTI.1524.MA.NE.ZS |
Zaharia et al., 2019 ; Ahmed and Shimada, 2019 |
|
8. Agricultural Land |
AL |
Agricultural land (sq. km) |
AG.LND.AGRI.K2 |
||
9. GDP per Capita |
GDP |
GDP per capita (current US$) |
NY.GDP.PCAP.CD |
IAEA, 2001 |
|
10. Population Density |
PD |
Population density (people per sq. km of land area) |
EN.POP.DNST |
IAEA, 2001 |
|
11. Population |
TP |
Population, total |
SP.POP.TOTL |
IAEA, 2001 |
|
12. Terms of Trade |
TOT |
Net barter terms of trade index (2000 = 100) |
TT.PRI.MRCH.XD.WD |
Zeng et al., 2018 |
|
13. Economic Growth |
EG |
GDP growth (annual %) |
NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG |
Nababan and Sihol, 2015 |
|
14. Literacy Rate (LR) |
ALR |
Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above) |
SE.ADT.LITR.ZS |
Caruso et al., 2020 |
|
15. Research and Development Cost |
RDC |
Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) |
GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS |
Zaharia et al., 2019 |
|
16. Private Participation Energy Investment |
PPEI |
Investment in energy with private participation (current US$) |
IE.PPI.ENGY.CD |
Eder et al, 2019 |
|
17. Natural Resources Usage |
NRU |
Total natural resources rents (% of GDP) |
NY.GDP.TOTL.RT.ZS |
Zeng et al., 2018 |
|
18. Trade Openness |
TO |
Trade (% of GDP) |
NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS |
Zeng et al., 2018 |
|
19. Gasoline Price |
GP |
Pump price for gasoline (US$ per liter) |
EP.PMP.SGAS.CD |
Nababan and Sihol, 2015 |
|
20. Capital Accumulation |
CA |
Gross capital formation (current US$) |
NE.GDI.TOTL.CD |
Ahmed and Shimada, 2019 |
|
21. Carbon Emission |
CE |
Total greenhouse gas emissions (KT of CO2 equivalent |
EN.ATM.GHGT.KT.CE |
IAEA, 2001 |
|
22. Urban People |
DU |
Urban population (% of total population) |
SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS |
Eder et al, 2019 |
|
23. Energy Import |
EI |
Energy imports, net (% of energy use) |
EG.IMP.CONS.ZS |
IAEA, 2001 |
|
24. Life Expectancy |
LE |
Life expectancy at birth, total (years) |
SP.DYN.LE00.IN |
Caruso et al., 2020 |
|
25. Income Inequality |
II |
Gini index (World Bank estimate) |
SI.POV.GINI |
IAEA, 2001 |
Dependent Variable: Renewable energy consumption (% of total final energy consumption)
Source: Author Own Compilation, 2022
2. Econometric Model
The author considers 25 independent variables, that can influence renewable energy consumption in different zones of Africa, affect positively or negatively on renewable energy consumption. The author divides two classifications to run regression. Firstly, the author considers only general variables and secondly the author considers only the socio-economic variables for different zones. Model type 1, the author considers only general variables and for model type 2, the author only socio-economic variables.
2.1 Multiple Regression Model Model Type 1: (For Unrestricted Model)
REC= Я0 + Я1 EAP + Я2 LF + Я3 AL + Я4 GDP + Я5 PD + Я6 TP+ Я7 TOT+ Я8 EG+ Я9 ALR +
+Я10 RDC + Я11 PPEI + Я12 NRU + Я13 TO+ Я14 GP + Я15 CA + Я16 CE + Я17 DU + Я18 EI +
+Я19 LE + Я20 II + u
Model Type 2: (For Restricted Model)
REC= Я0 + Я1 EAP + Я2 LF + Я3 AL + Я4 GDP + Я5 PD + Я6 TP+ Я7 TOT+ Я8 RDC + Я9 PPEI +
+Я10 NRU + Я11 TO+ Я12 GP + Я13 CA + Я14 CE + Я15 DU + Я16 EI + Я17 LE + Я18 II + u
2.2 Joint Hypothesis Testing
For analysing the joint hypothesis testing, the author considers some variables which do not include two variables named Economic growth (EG) and Average Literacy Rate (ALR) in model.
Ho: Null Hypothesis: EG=ALR=0
Ha: Alternative Hypothesis: EG * ALR * 0
In this paper, the author tries to find out the effect of independent variables on dependent variable name, named renewable energy consumption, in zonal-wise. The author compares the two different models named unrestricted and restricted to measure the impact in zonal-basis.
3. Research Result
From the table no 3, it is found that how does economic growth and adult literacy rate affect renewable energy consumption positively or negatively. On the other hand, from Table 4, is it observed that how economic growth and adult literacy rate jointly can affect REC level in zonal wise.
3.1 Multiple Regression Result for General and Socio-economic Variables
3.1.1 Multiple Regression Result of Northern Africa
3.1.1.1 Multiple Regression Result of General Variables in NAZ
In this area, EAP has negative connectivity with renewable energy usage, if the electricity access has been increased by 1 percent, then renewable energy usage will be reduced by 37 percent, that is 1 percent level of statistically significant. If the AL has been increased by 1,00,000 square kilometres, then renewable energy consumption will be reduced by 5 percent. If the Population density (people per sq. km of land area) has been increased by 1 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be reduced by 57 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level.
Table 3 - Zonal-wise multiple regression analysis for African countries
Dependent Variable: Renewable energy consumption [% of total final energy consumption) |
|||||||||||||
Variable Name |
Ј aj 'О c it .ЄР OJ о и |
1. Multiple Regression NAZ_ General Variables |
2. Multiple Regression NAZ_ SocioEconomic Variables |
3. Multiple Regression EAZ_ General Variables |
4. Multiple Regression EAZ_ SocioEconomic Variables |
5. Multiple Regression MAZ_ General Variables |
6, Multiple Regression MAZ_ SocioEconomic Variables |
7. Multiple Regression SAZ_ General Variables |
8, Multiple Regression SAZ_ SocioEconomic Variables |
9. Multiple Regression WAZ_ General Variables |
10. Multiple Regression WAZ_ SocioEconomic Va riables |
||
1 |
EPRR |
pi |
0.000 |
-0.000*** |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
||||||
2 |
EPCR |
рг |
0.110 |
0.154** |
NA |
-0.027 |
-0.210*** |
||||||
3 |
EPNR |
рз |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.520 |
|||||||
4 |
EPOR |
04 |
0.006 |
0.089*** |
-0.156 |
0.041 |
-0.058** |
||||||
5 |
EPGR |
05 |
0.041 |
-0.524*** |
-0.127 |
NA |
0.032* |
||||||
6 |
EAP |
06 |
-0.374*** |
-0.182*** |
0.540*** |
-0.131** |
-0.133** |
||||||
7 |
LF |
07 |
-0.047 |
-0.119 |
0.086** |
0.016 |
-0.170** |
0.060 |
-0.152** |
-0.325*** |
0.015 |
-0.119*** |
|
8 |
AL |
08 |
0.00005*** |
0.0001*** |
0.00001 |
-0.0001*** |
-0.0001*** |
||||||
9 |
GDP |
09 |
0.0001 |
-0.002*** |
-0.002*** |
-0.002*** |
-0.003*** |
-0.003*** |
0.0001 |
-0.001 |
-0.003** |
-0.009*** |
|
10 |
PD |
ЯlO |
-0.579*** |
0.425*** |
0.004 |
0.017* |
-0.197*** |
-0.295*** |
-0.467** |
0.282*** |
0.011 |
-0.004 |
|
11 |
TP |
Яll |
0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
0.00000 |
-0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
|
12 |
TOT |
012 |
-0.0004 |
0.276*** |
0.154*** |
0.147*** |
-0.025 |
||||||
13 |
EG |
Яl3 |
0.038** |
0.008 |
0.043 |
0.115 |
-0.015 |
-0.163** |
0.030 |
-0.044 |
-0.065 |
0.078 |
|
14 |
ALR |
Яl4 |
0.085 |
0.264** |
0.062 |
0.292*** |
-0.381*** |
-0.827*** |
-0.115 |
0.095 |
-0.082* |
-0.085* |
|
15 |
RDC |
015 |
10.958*** |
11.978*** |
3.941 |
1.442 |
-4.860*** |
||||||
16 |
PPEI |
Яl6 |
0.000* |
0.000 |
0.000*** |
-0.000 |
-0.000 |
||||||
17 |
NRU |
Яl7 |
0.070 |
-0.177*** |
-0.533*** |
-0.109 |
0.068 |
||||||
18 |
TO |
Яl8 |
-0.068** |
-0.029* |
0.030 |
0.061 |
0.051 |
||||||
19 |
GP |
Яl9 |
1.006 |
3.447*** |
-8.098*** |
-0.757 |
4.845*** |
||||||
20 |
CA |
Я20 |
0.000** |
0.000*** |
0.000*** |
-0.000 |
-0.000*** |
-0.000*** |
-0.000 |
0.000 |
-0.000*** |
-0.000** |
|
21 |
CE |
021 |
0.0001*** |
-0.001*** |
-0.0002*** |
-0.00000 |
-0.0005*** |
||||||
22 |
DU |
022 |
-3.579*** |
-0.253** |
-0.030 |
-0.588*** |
-0.945*** |
||||||
23 |
El |
023 |
0.033*** |
0.008*** |
0.005** |
-0.183 |
-0.330*** |
||||||
24 |
LE |
Я24 |
4.683*** |
-6.919*** |
-1.668*** |
-2.043*** |
-0.620 |
1.771*** |
0.239 |
-0.252* |
-0.220* |
-1.393*** |
|
25 |
II |
Я25 |
-0.075 |
-0.390 |
-0.407*** |
-0.313* |
0.026 |
-0.752* |
-0.178 |
-0.412*** |
-0.307*** |
-0.064 |
|
Constant |
-19.338 |
505.121*** |
142.528*** |
172.141*** |
135.525*** |
81.399*** |
102.642*** |
81.173*** |
138.463*** |
161.327*** |
|||
Observations |
120 |
120 |
360 |
360 |
160 |
160 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
300 |
|||
R2 |
0.593 |
0.896 |
0.895 |
0.552 |
0.924 |
0.806 |
0.970 |
0.934 |
0.899 |
0.693 |
|||
Adjusted R2 |
0.591 |
0.887 |
0.887 |
0.541 |
0.924 |
0.794 |
0.961 |
0.928 |
0.890 |
0.684 |
|||
F Statistic |
566.282*** |
104.956*** |
118.983*** |
47.964*** |
72.367*** |
69.247*** |
102.520*** |
142.635*** |
101.952*** |
72.902*** |
|||
Significance Level: *p<0.1; **p<0.05; |
***p<0.01 |
Source: Author's Own Compilation 2022
If the TP has been increased by 1,00,000 then renewable energy consumption will be reduced by 1 percent, it is it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the economic growth has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be increased by 0.38 percent. If the Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) has been increased by 1 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 10 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the PPEI (private Investment in energy sector) has been increased by 1000 US$, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by significant rate. If the Trade (% of GDP) has been increased by 100 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be reduced by 6.8 percent, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level. If the CA has been increased by 1000 US$, then renewable energy consumption will be increased. If the carbon emission has been increased by 10,000 KT, including all agro and non-agro product burning, then then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 1 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the density of urban population in total population has been increased by 1 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 3.5 percent, it is statistically significant rate 1 percent level. If the Energy imports, in net (% of energy use) has been increased by 10 percent, then then then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 0.33 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the LE has been increased by 1 year, people will be willing to search alternative energy to fulfil their daily demand, renewable energy will be increased by 8.6 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level.
Table 4 - Interacted Multiple Regression Analysis in Zonal-wise
Interacted Variable: Adult Literacy Rate (ALR)* Economic growth (EG) |
||||||||||
Dependent Variable: Renewable energy consumption {% of total final energy consumption) |
||||||||||
Variable Name |
Model 11 IRM.NAZ |
Model 12 IRM.EAZ |
Model 13 IRM_MAZ |
Model 14 IRM_5AZ |
Model 15 IRM_WAZ |
Maximum Positive Effect |
Maximum Negative Effect |
Comparative Analysis with EAZ (Referred Zone) |
||
EPRR |
0.000 |
-0.000*** |
0.000 |
-0.000 |
-0.000 |
0.000 |
-0.000 |
None of the zone possesses good position to consume renewable energy |
||
EPCR |
0.101 |
0.149** |
-0.034 |
-0.217*** |
||||||
EPNR |
0.341 |
|||||||||
EPOR |
0.002 |
0.083*** |
-0.167 |
0.035 |
-0.065** |
|||||
EPGR |
0.030 |
-0.494*** |
-0.127 |
0.029* |
||||||
EAP |
-0.377*** |
-0.151** |
0.549*** |
-0.136** |
-0.138** |
0.549*** |
-0.377*** |
Only MAZ affect positively on REC. When huge population demand more electricity, the authority |
||
LF |
-0.043 |
0.091** |
-0.166** |
-0.154** |
0.013 |
0.091*** |
-0.166**- |
No zones does not able to create positive impact to consume renewable energy compared to EAZ |
||
AL |
-0.00005*** |
0.0001*** |
0.00001 |
-0.0001*** |
-0.0001*** |
0.0001*** |
-0.00005*** |
When AL usage increases, developing countries will take initiatives to produce more renewable energy to fulfil local demand of households. Except EAZ, no other zone grabs good position |
||
GDP |
0.0001 |
-0.002*** |
-0.003*** |
0.0002 |
-0.003** |
0.0002 |
-0.003*** |
Generally, if GDP level create positive effect to consume renewable energy, it will be optimistic approach for these developing economics. No one the country belongs healthy position. |
||
PD |
-0.581*** |
0.005 |
-0.192*** |
-0.465** |
0.009 |
0.005 |
-0.581*** |
EAZ create positive impact of REC but it is not statistically significant to affect model. |
||
TP |
-0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
0.00000 |
0.00000*** |
0.00000*** |
-0.00000*** |
Except NAZ, all zone affects the model but SAZ does not create effect on model. |
||
TOT |
0.003 |
0.262*** |
0.159*** |
0.145*** |
-0.022 |
0.262*** |
0.003 |
Compared to EAZ, MAZ and SAZ affect nearly 10% and 11% less in model. |
||
EG |
0.415 |
-0.934*** |
-0.281 |
1.704 |
0.253 |
0.415 |
-0.934*** |
No of the Zone belongs in good position to create positive impact on REC |
||
Interacted Variable: Adult Literacy Rate (ALR)* Economic growth (EG) |
||||||||||
Dependent Variable: Renewable energy consumption {% of total final energy consumption) |
||||||||||
Variable Name |
Model 11 IRMJJAZ |
Model 12 IRM_EAZ |
Model 13 IRM_MAZ |
Model 14 IRM_SAZ |
ModellS IRM_WAZ |
Maximum Positive Effect |
Maximum Negative Effect |
Comparative Analysis with EAZ (Referred Zone) |
||
ALR |
0.106 |
0.014 |
-0.387*** |
-0.023 |
-0.056 |
0.106 |
-0.387*** |
No of the Zone belongs in good position to create positive impact on REC |
||
RDC |
11.060*** |
9.863*** |
3.885 |
1.457 |
-4.960*** |
11.060*** |
-4.960*** |
Compared to EAZ, NAZ creates nearly 1% more positive effect to REC |
||
PPEI |
0.000* |
0.000 |
0.000*** |
-0.000 |
-0.000 |
0.000* |
-0.000 |
Compared to EAZ, NAZ and MAZ creates more positive effect to REC |
||
NRU |
0.045 |
-0.131*** |
-0.543*** |
-0.056 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
-0.543*** |
If this variable affects REC positively, it may be optimistic for a specific zone. No zone belongs healthy position. |
||
TO |
-0.056 |
-0.033** |
0.032 |
0.060 |
0.050 |
0.060 |
-0.056 |
Trade openness does not affect the REC positively. |
||
GP |
0.822 |
2.415** |
-8.011*** |
-0.936 |
5.189*** |
5.189*** |
-8.011*** |
Compared to EAZ, WAZ affects 5.5% more and positive effect on REC. Only EAZ and WAZ affect and influence the model positively. |
||
CA |
0.000* |
0.000*** |
-0.000*** |
-0.000 |
-0.000*** |
0.000*** |
-0.000*** |
Except SAZ, all zones create positive effect on REC. |
||
CE |
0.0001*** |
-0.001*** |
-0.0002*** |
0.00000 |
-0.0005*** |
0.0001*** |
-0.0002*** |
Only NAZ zone affect positively on REC. No their zone affect REC positively. |
||
DU |
-3.555*** |
-0.244** |
-0.007 |
-0.588** |
-0.927*** |
No zone does not create positive effect on REC. |
||||
El |
0.032*** |
0.007*** |
0.005* |
-0.203 |
-0.330*** |
0.032*** |
0.005* |
Compared to EAZ, NAZ affect 2.5% more REC and affect positively on model. |
||
LE |
4.691*** |
-1.693*** |
-0.704 |
0.247 |
-0.200 |
4.691*** |
-1.693*** |
Compared to EAZ, NAZ affect positively on model on consume REC. |
||
II |
-0.078 |
-0.392*** |
0.044 |
-0.202 |
-0.293*** |
0.044 |
-0.392*** |
No zone does not create positive effect on REC. |
||
ALR*EG |
0.006 |
0.017*** |
0.003 |
-0.020 |
-0.008 |
0.017*** |
-0.006 |
Only the EAZ create positive and significant approach on REC. |
||
Constant |
-22.955 |
148.235*** |
137.543*** |
97.781*** |
135.720*** |
|||||
Observations |
120 |
360 |
160 |
100 |
300 |
|||||
R2 |
0.993 |
0.893 |
0,925 |
0.971 |
0.900 |
|||||
Adjusted R2 |
0.991 |
0.900 |
0.911 |
0.961 |
0.891 |
|||||
F Statistic |
542.585*** |
120.744*** |
69.117*** |
97.569*** |
98.327*** |
|||||
Significance Level: *p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01 |
Source: Author's Own Compilation 2022
3.1.1.2 Multiple Regression Result of Socio-economic Variables in NAZ
The author only considers socio-economic variables in this section. If the GDP level has been increased by 1000 US$, then renewable energy will be reduced by 2 percent. GDP level does not create positive impact on renewable energy consumption level in Northern African. If the Population density (people per sq. km of land area) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 4.25 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the Average Literacy Rate (LR) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 2.64 percent, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level. A Literate people will be eager to find out new and green energy sources with their existing knowledge. If the LE has been increased by 1-year, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 6.91 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level.
3.1.2 Multiple Regression Result of Eastern African Zone
3.1.2.1 Multiple Regression Result of General Variables (EAZ)
If the Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (kWh) has been increased, then renewable energy consumption will be reduced. People will not be conscious to usage alternative energy. But in the long run, it will hamper their renewable energy storage in future. If the Electricity production from coal sources (% of total) has been increased 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 1.54 percent, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level. If the Electricity production from oil sources (% of total) has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be increased by 0.891 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the Electricity production from natural gas sources (% of total) has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 5.24 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the Access to electricity (% of population) has been increased by 1 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 1.82 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the labour force participation rate for ages 15-24 has been increased by 100 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 8.6 percent, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level. If the AL has been increased by 10,000 square kilometres, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 1 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. Conversely, if the GDP level has been increased by 1000 US$, renewable energy consumption has been reduced by 2 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the TP has been increased by 1,00,000 then renewable energy consumption will be reduced, it is it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. The terms of trade (TOT) has positive connection with renewable energy consumption. If the Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) has been increased by 1 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by nearly 12 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the Pump price for gasoline (US$ per liter) has been increased, renewable energy consumption will be increased by 3.44 percent. When the gasoline price will be increasing at continuous rate, then people will take important steps to usage renewable energy. Renewable energy might be the important source to fulfil daily energy demand as well as to ensure energy security. If the CA has been increased by 1000 US$, then renewable energy consumption will be increased at significant rate. If the carbon emission has been increased by 1,000 KT, including all agro and non-agro product burning, then then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 1 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the density of urban population in total population has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 2.53 percent, it is statistically significant rate 1 percent level.
If the Energy imports, in net (% of energy use) has been increased by 100 percent, then then then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 0.80 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. When a country bears huge burden of cost for importing energy from abroad, those country will be optimistic to introduce renewable energy. If the LE has been increased by 1 year, people will be willing to search alternative energy to fulfil their daily demand, renewable energy will be decreased by 1.68 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level.
3.1.2.2 Multiple Regression Result of Socio-economic Variables in EAZ
If the GDP level has been increased by 1000 US$, then renewable energy will be reduced by 2 percent. GDP level does not create positive impact on renewable energy consumption level in Eastern African zone. If the Population density (people per sq. km of land area) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 0.17 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the Average Literacy Rate (LR) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 2.92 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. In addition, literacy rate in eastern African zone create positive impact to consume renewable energy. If the LE has been increased by 1 year, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 2.043 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. Moreover, income inequality has negative connection with renewable energy consumption, if the income inequality increases by 10 units, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 3.13 percent, it is statistically significant rate 10 percent level. When there are inequality exists between poorer and rich class, the government will not take any positive initiative to introduce renewable energy consumption in general people in Eastern Africa.
3.1.3 Multiple Regression Result of Middle African Zone
3.1.3.1 Multiple Regression Result of General Variables (MAZ)
In this area, EAP has positive connectivity with renewable energy usage, if the electricity access has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy usage will be increased by 5.4 percent, that is 1 percent level of statistically significant.
If the labour force participation rate for ages 15-24 has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 1.7 percent, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level. Conversely, if the GDP level has been increased by 1000 US$, renewable energy consumption has been reduced by 3 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the Population density (people per sq. km of land area) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 1.97 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. The terms of trade (TOT) has positive connection with renewable energy consumption. When the export exceeds than import, TOT stands positive, if the TOT increases by 10 percent, REC will be increased by 1.54%, it is statistically significant at 1 % level. If the average literacy rate has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be increased by 0.38 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 % level. If the investment on PPEI has been increased, then REC will be increased significantly. If the NRU has been increased by 10 percent, REC will be decreased by 5.33%, it is statistically significant at 1 % level. If the Pump price for gasoline (US$ per litre) has been increased by 1 %, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 8.098 percent. Adversely, CA and CE have negative and significant connectivity with REC. If the energy import cost has been increased by 1000 dollar, renewable energy consumption will be increased by 5 percent.
3.1.3.2 Multiple Regression Result of Socio-economic Variables in MAZ
If the GDP level has been increased by 1000 US$, then renewable energy will be reduced by 3 percent. GDP level does not create positive impact on renewable energy consumption level in Eastern African zone. If the Population density (people per sq. km of land area) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 2.95 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the economic growth has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 1.63 percent, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level.
If the Average Literacy Rate (LR) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 8.27 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. In addition, literacy rate in eastern African zone create positive impact to consume renewable energy. If the LE has been increased by 1 year, renewable energy consumption will be increased by 1.77 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. Moreover, income inequality has negative connection with renewable energy consumption, if the income inequality increases by 10 units, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 7.52 percent, it is statistically significant rate 10 percent level.
3.1.4 Multiple Regression Result of Southern African Zone
3.1.4.1 Multiple Regression Result of General Variables (SAZ)
In this area, EAP has negative connectivity with renewable energy usage, if the electricity access has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy usage will be decreased by 1.31 percent, that is 5 percent level of statistically significant.
If the labour force participation rate for ages 15-24 has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 1.52 percent, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level. If the Population density (people per sq. km of land area) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 4.67 percent, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level. The terms of trade (TOT) has positive connection with renewable energy consumption. When the export exceeds than import, TOT stands positive, if the TOT increases by 10 percent, REC will be increased by 1.47%, it is statistically significant at 1 % level. If the urban density has been increased, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 5.88 percent.
3.1.4.2 Multiple Regression Result of Socio-economic Variables in SAZ
If the labour force (LR) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 3.25 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level.
If the Population density (people per sq. km of land area) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be increased by 2.82 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the economic growth has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 1.63 percent, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level.
If the LE has been increased by 10 years, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 2.52 percent, it is statistically significant at 10 percent level. Moreover, income inequality has negative connection with renewable energy consumption, if the income inequality increases by 10 units, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 4.12 percent, it is statistically significant rate 1 percent level.
3.1.5 Multiple Regression Result of Western African Zone
3.1.5.1 Multiple Regression Result of General Variables (WAZ)
In this area, if energy production from coal resources has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be reduced at 2.1%, that is 1 percent level of statistically significant. Similarly, if energy production from oil resources has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be reduced at 0.58%, that is 1 percent level of statistically significant. Conversely, energy production from gas resources has positive and significant connectivity with REC. If the electricity access has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy usage will be decreased by 1.33 percent, that is 5 percent level of statistically significant. Agro-land has negative connectivity with REC, if the agro-land has been increased by 10,000 Sq, then REC will be reduced by 1 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. Moreover, if the GDP level has been increased by 1000 US$, renewable energy consumption has been.
If the average literacy rate has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 0.82 percent, it is statistically significant at 10 % level. If the research and development cost (RDC) has been increased by 1 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 4.86 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 % level. If the Pump price for gasoline (US$ per litre) has been increased by 1 %, renewable energy consumption will be increased by 4.85 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 % level. When the gasoline price is rising, people will try to find alternative energy sources to fulfil their demand. Adversely, CA, CE, DU, EI, LE and II has negative and significant connectivity with REC.
3.1.5.2 Multiple Regression Result of Socio-economic Variables in WAZ
If the labour force (LR) has been increased by 10 percent, then renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 1.19 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level. If the GDP level has been increased by 1000 US$, then renewable energy will be reduced by 9 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level.
If the average literacy rate has been increased by 10 percent, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 1.39 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 % level. If the LE has been increased by 1 year, renewable energy consumption will be decreased by 1.39 percent, it is statistically significant at 1 percent level.
3.2 Multiple Regression Result Interacted or Joint Variables
In this multiple, the author considers economic growth and average literacy rate as joint variable and measure their joint effect on renewable energy consumption. In the zone EAZ, the joint effect of economic growth average literacy rate affects positively on renewable energy consuming level. If the joint variable value increase by 10 units, the renewable energy consuming level will be increased by 1.7%.
3.3 Hypothesis Testing
From the restricted and unrestricted regression, the author tries to find out whether there are any effect of economic growth (EG) and average literacy rate (ALR) on the model or not.
Null Hypothesis: EG =ALR = 0 Alternative Hypothesis: EG * ALR * 0
Model 1: Restricted Model
REC ~ EAP + LF + AL + GDP + PD + TP + TOT + RDC + PPEI + NRU + TO + GP + CA + CE +UPD + EI + LE + II
Model 2: Unrestricted Model
REC ~ EAP + LF + AL + GDP + PD + TP + TOT + EG + ALR + RDC + PPEI + NRU + TO + GP +CA + CE + UPD + EI + LE + II
Hypothesis Testing for NAZ |
|||||||
Res.Df |
RSS |
Degree of Freedom |
Sum of Square |
F Statistics |
Pr(>F) |
||
1 |
101 |
587.45 |
|||||
2 |
99 |
543.87 |
2 |
43.582 |
3.9666 |
0.02202 * |
|
Hypothesis Testing for EAZ |
|||||||
Res.Df |
RSS |
Degree of Freedom |
Sum of Square |
F Statistics |
Pr(>F) |
||
1 |
341 |
46635 |
|||||
2 |
339 |
45251 |
2 |
1384.2 |
5.1848 |
0.006054 ** |
|
Hypothesis Testing for MAZ |
|||||||
Res.Df |
RSS |
Degree of Freedom |
Sum of Square |
F Statistics |
Pr(>F) |
||
1 |
141 |
7650.6 |
|||||
2 |
139 |
7213.9 |
2 |
436.71 |
4.2073 |
0.01682 * |
|
Hypothesis Testing for SAZ |
|||||||
Res.Df |
RSS |
Degree of Freedom |
Sum of Square |
F Statistics |
Pr(>F) |
||
1 |
81 |
971.94 |
|||||
2 |
79 |
965.47 |
2 |
6.4733 |
0.2648 |
0.768 |
|
Hypothesis Testing for WAZ |
|||||||
Res.Df |
RSS |
Degree of Freedom |
Sum of Square |
F Statistics |
Pr(>F) |
||
1 |
281 |
22187 |
|||||
2 |
279 |
22125 |
2 |
62.623 |
0.3948 |
0.6742 |
|
Significance Level: ***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 0.05 |
Source Author's Own Compilation 2022
From the above table, it is observed that there are statistically significant effect of economic growth and literacy rate on NAZ economy, it is statistically significant at 5 percent level. For EAZ, the value of economic growth and literacy rate are statistically significant at 1 percent level. Furthermore, for the zone MAZ, values are statistically significant at 5 percent level. Conversely, there are no statistically impact of EG and ALR on SAZ and WAZ.
4. Policy Recommendation
In this research, the author wants to focus mainly two major variables named economic growth and average literacy rate, where these values differ from zonal-wise because of general and socio- economical changes. The government of some zones named MAZ, SAZ, WAZ should introduce adult school and stipend policies due to attending the classes compulsory, cash transfer polices or food for work program (FFW) to enhance the interest among them. From economic growth perspective (EG), except the NAZ, none of the region does not able to produce positive and significant impact on REC. Economic growth can be improved with changing the pattern of fiscal and monetary policies, when the bank and non-bank sectors should provide loan in flexible-condition and make the easier repayment systems. Renewable energy consumption is not only the issues of households or consumer, if the government and non-government institutions provide monetary support to set up solar-plant for each households, and those households will not get all electricity, because households need to change their behaviour on using renewable energy. Example: In rural areas, most of the households have Cattel and housing wastage that may be used to produce biogas, the households may use the biogas to produce renewable energy in daily basis. Firstly, it can lessen their daily cost to consume electricity and convert their mentality to consume renewable energy.
Conclusions
Renewable energy is one of the foundations for modern economies because it is mandatory factor economic development, life-standard. Access and use of renewable energy are one of the major issues in SDGs, which should be grabbed within 2030. Therefore, renewable energy technologies offer reasonable and sustainable energy usages for millions of people who are affected in energy- poverty. Policy-makers should consider different policies and planning in different zone.
References
1. IRENA (2016), Renewable Energy in Cities, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Abu Dhabi, Retrieved from: www.irena.org.
2. NRDC and ACERA (2013), Beneficios Economicos de Energfas Renovables No Convencionales en Chile, Natural Resources Defense Council and Asociacion Chilena de Energfas Renovables. Retrieved from:
https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/chi le-ncre-IB-sp.pdf
3. IRENA and CEM (2014), The Socioeconomic Benefits of Solar and Wind Energy, International Renewable Energy Agency and Clean Energy Ministerial, Abu Dhabi, UAE
4. Halder, P.K. & Paul, N. & Joardder, M.U.H. & Sarker, M., 2015. Energy scarcity and potential of renewable energy in Bangladesh, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1636-1649. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v51y2 015icp1636-1649.html
5. Islam, A., Chan, E. S., Taufiq-Yap, Y. H., Mondal, M. A. H., Moniruzzaman, M., & Mridha, M. (2014). Energy security in Bangladesh perspective - an assessment and implication. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, 154-171. DOI : 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.021
6. Uddin, M.N., Rahman, M.A., Mofijur, M., Taweekun, J., Techoto, K., and Rasul, M.G. (2018). Renewable energy in Bangladesh: Status and prospects, 2nd International Conference on Energy and Power, ICEP2018, 13-15 December 2018, Sydney, Australia. DOI : 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.218
7. Egbetokun, S; Osabuohien, E; Akinbobola, T; Onanuga, O; Gershon, O; & Okafor, V. (2020) Environmental pollution, economic growth and institutional quality: exploring the nexus in Nigeria. Management of Environmental Quality, 31(1), 18-31. DOI : 10.1108/MEQ-02- 2019-0050
8. Gershon, O. & Nwokocha, A., (2017) Oil Price Volatility and Inflation Rate: Lessons for Overcoming Recession? Presentation at 10th NAEE/IAEE International Conference, 23rd - 26th April, Abuja Nigeria
9. Fubara, S., Iledare, O., Gershon, O. & Ejemeyovwi, J. (2019) Natural Resource Extraction & Economic Performance of the Niger Delta Region in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (IJEEP) 9(4), 188-193.
10. Apergis, N. & Payne, J. E., (2010). Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1392-1397.
11. Omri, A. (2013). CO2Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in MENA Countries: Evidence from Simultaneous Equations Models. Energy Economics,40, 657-664. DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.003
12. Azad, A. K., Rasul, M. G., Khan, M.M.K., Ahasan, T. and Ahmed, S.F. (2014) Energy Scenario: Production, Consumption and Prospect of Renewable Energy in Australia. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering,2,19-25. DOI : 10.4236/jpee.2014.24004
13. Omri, A., and Nguyen, D.K. (2014), On the determinants of renewable energy consumption: International evidence, Energy, 72, (C), 554-560. Retrieved from: https://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/showci tes.pf?h=repec:eee:energy:v:72:y:2014:i:c:p: 554-560
14. Cohen, J.E. (2001). World Population in 2050: Assessing the Projections. Conference on Series-Federal Reserve Bank of A. K. Azadet al. 25 Boston, 2001, 83-113. Retrieved from: https://www.bostonfed.org
15. Guan, D., Comite, U., Sial, M.S., Salman, A., Zhang, B., Zhang, B., Gunnlaugsson, S.B., Mentel, U., Mentel, J. (2021). The Impact of Renewable Energy Sources on Financial Development, and Economic Growth: The Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy, Energies, 14(23), 8033; DOI : 10.3390/en14238033 Economic Performance of the Niger Delta Region in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (IJEEP) 9(4), 188-193.
Размещено на Allbest.ru
Подобные документы
The nature and content of the concept of "migration". The main causes and consequences of migration processes in the modern world. Countries to which most people are emigrating from around the world. TThe conditions for obtaining the status of "migrant".
презентация [4,8 M], добавлен 22.03.2015Race discriminations on ethnicity backgrounds. The Globalization and Racism in Media Age. African American writers about racism. Comparative analysis of the novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" Harper Lee and story "Going to Meet The Man" by James Baldwin.
дипломная работа [135,9 K], добавлен 29.03.2012Overpopulation, pollution, Global Warming, Stupidity, Obesity, Habitat Destruction, Species Extinction, Religion. The influence of unemployment in America on the economy. The interaction of society with other societies, the emergence of global problems.
реферат [21,1 K], добавлен 19.04.2013Study the opinion of elderly people and young people about youth culture. Subculture as a group of people with the same interests and views on life. Passion for today's youth to heavy music, computers, dance parties and special styles of clothing.
презентация [654,6 K], добавлен 28.10.2014Understanding of social stratification and social inequality. Scientific conceptions of stratification of the society. An aggregated socio-economic status. Stratification and types of stratification profile. Social stratification of modern society.
реферат [26,9 K], добавлен 05.01.2009The concept, definition, typology, characteristics of social institute. The functions of social institution: overt and latent. The main institution of society: structural elements. Social institutions of policy, economy, science and education, religion.
курсовая работа [22,2 K], добавлен 21.04.2014Problems in school and with parents. Friendship and love. Education as a great figure in our society. The structure of employed young people in Russia. Taking drugs and smoking as the first serious and actual problem. Informal movements or subcultures.
контрольная работа [178,7 K], добавлен 31.08.2014Four common social classes. Karl Marx's social theory of class. Analysis the nature of class relations. The conflict as the key driving force of history and the main determinant of social trajectories. Today’s social classes. Postindustrial societies.
презентация [718,4 K], добавлен 05.04.2014The essence of social research communities and their development and functioning. Basic social theory of the XIX century. The main idea of Spencer. The index measuring inequality in income distribution Pareto. The principle of social action for Weber.
реферат [32,5 K], добавлен 09.12.2008American marriage pattern, its types, statistics and trends among different social groups and ages. The reasons of marriage and divorce and analyzing the statistics of divorce and it’s impact on people. The position of children in American family.
курсовая работа [48,3 K], добавлен 23.08.2013