Unleashing the power of computer-mediated anonymous peer feedback in enhancing self-regulated learning

9. Bin Dahmash, N. (2020). `I couldn't join the session': Benefits and challenges of blended learning amid COVID-19 from EFL students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(5), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n5p221

10. Blake, R., & Delforge, A. (2006). Online language learning: The case of Spanish without walls. In B. Lafford, & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Spanish second language acquisition: The art of teaching Spanish (pp. 3-20). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

11. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00014-2

12. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712, doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 Bradley, R. L., Browne, B. L., & Kelley, H. M. (2017). Examining the influence of self-efficacy and self-regulation in online learning. College Student Journal, 51(4), 518-530.

13. Braun, V, & Clarke, V (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

14. Butler, D. L. (1998). The strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning: A report of three studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 682-697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.682

15. Cai, R., Wang, Q., Xu, J., & Zhou, L. (2020). Effectiveness of students' self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Insights, 34(1), 175-182.

16. Callan, G. L., Longhurst, D., Ariotti, A., & Bundock, K. (2020). Settings, exchanges, and events: The SEE framework of self-regulated learning supportive practices. Psychology in the Schools, 58(5), 773-788. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22468

17. Can, E. (2019). The effect of written peer feedback training on Turkish EFL students' feedback types and writing performance (Master's thesis). Anadolu University, Eski§ehir, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/giris.isp

18. Carson, J., & Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0

19. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson.

20. Csizer, K., & Tanko, G. (2015). English majors' self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 386-404. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv033

21. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.

22. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 0(0), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

23. DiGiovanni, E., & Nagaswami, G. (2001). Online peer review: an alternative to face-to-face? ELT Journal, 55(3), 263272. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.3.263

24. Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ramot, R. (2020). Opportunities and challenges: Teacher education in Israel in the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1799708

25. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

26. Dornyei, Z., & Dewaele, J. M. (2022). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Taylor & Francis.

27. Dursun Surmeli, Z., & Unver, G. (2017). Oz-duzenleyici ogrenme stratejileri, epistemolojik inanglar ve akademik benlik kavrami ile matematik ba§ansi arasindaki ili§ki. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 8(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.298393

28. Efe, B. (2014). The effect of peer feedback on students' overall writing performance and their attitudes toward peer feedback (Master's thesis). Qag University, Mersin, Turkey.

29. Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(3), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(03)00045-9 Ellis, R. (1989). Second language learning and second language learners: Growth and diversity. TESL Canada Journal, 7(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v7i1.562

30. Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 91113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586953

31. Erarslan, A. (2021). English language teaching and learning during Covid-19: A global perspective on the first year. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(2), 349-367. doi:10.31681/jetol.907757

32. Fahim, M., & Rajabi, S. (2015). Applying self-regulated strategy development model of instruction to teach writing skill: Effects on writing performance and writing motivation of EFL learners. International journal of research studies in education, 4(2), 29-42. d https://doi.org/10.5861/iirse.2015.1009

33. Farahani, A. K., & Faryabi, F. (2017). The role of self-regulated learning capacities in Iranian EFL undergraduates' argumentative writing task performance. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 203-222.

34. Fathi, J., Mohebiniya, S., & Nourzadeh, S. (2019). Enhancing second language writing self-regulation through selfassessment and peer assessment: A case of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(3), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.3p.110

35. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). Self-regulation and writing: Where do we go from here? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 102-114. doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0920

36. Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., & Steffens, N. K. (2020). Life change, social identity, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 1.1-1.27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060120-111721

37. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

38. Higgins, J. (1995). Computers and English language learning. London: Intellect Ltd.

39. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between- emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

40. Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321-342. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr169oa

41. Huang, M. (2004). The use of process writing and internet technology in a Taiwanese college English writing class: A focus on peer reviews. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University.

42. Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4, 3354. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400103

43. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

44. Jacobs, H. L., Zingraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.

45. Jiang, J., & Yu, Y. (2014). The effectiveness of internet-based peer feedback training on Chinese EFL college students' writing proficiency. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 10(3), 3446. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014070103

46. Kalajahi, S. A. R., & Abdullah, A. N. (2015). Discourse connectors and cohesion in writing. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 441-447. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s2p441

47. Karabenick, S. A., & Dembo, M. H. (2011). Understanding and facilitating self-regulated help seeking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 126, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.442 Karabulut, H. І. (2020). Teknoloji destekli alternatif ogretim yontemlerinin Ingilizce bagarisi uzerindeki etkililigi: Bir meta-analiz gali§masi (Doctoral dissertation). Eski§ehir Osmangazi University, Eski§ehir, Turkey.

48. Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., Olpak, Y. Z., & Yilmaz, R. (2018). The effect of the metacognitive support via pedagogical agent on self-regulation skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117707696

49. Kerres, M. (2020). Against all odds: Education in Germany coping with Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(2), 690-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00130-7

50. Klein, P., Ivanjek, L., Dahlkemper, M. N., Jelicic, K., Geyer, M. A., Kuchemann, S., ... Susac, A. (2021). Studying physics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Student assessments of learning achievement, perceived effectiveness of online recitations, and online laboratories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010117

51. Koc, S., & Liu, X. (2016). An investigation of graduate students' help-seeking experiences, preferences and attitudes in online learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 27-38.

52. Kogdar, S., Karadeniz, A., Bozkurt, A., & Buyuk, K. (2018). Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3255

53. Konig, J., Jager-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650 Kulu§akli, E. (2022). Exploring self regulated online learning skills of EFL learners in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1050356

54. Lam, R. (2015). Feedback about self-regulation: Does it remain an “unfinished business” in portfolio assessment of writing? TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 402-413. doi:10.1002/tesq.226

55. Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 writing classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada Journal, 22(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84

56. Lee, M. K. (2017). To be autonomous or not to be: Issues of subsuming self-determination theory into research on language learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 220-228. doi:10.1002/tesq.343 Liaw, M. L. (1998). Using electronic mail for English as a foreign language instruction. System, 26(3), 335-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00025-6

57. Lim, C. L., Ab Jalil, H., Ma'rof, A. M., & Saad, W. Z. (2020). Self-regulated learning as a mediator in the relationship between peer learning and online learning satisfaction: A study of a private university in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 51-75. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.3

58. Lin, J. W., Huang, H. H., & Chuang, Y S. (2015). The impacts of network centrality and self-regulation on an e-learning environment with the support of social network awareness. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 3244. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet. 12120

59. Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3), 193-227.

60. Lizarraga, M. L. S., Villanueva, O. A., & Baquedano, M. T. S. (2011). Self-regulation of learning supported by web 2.0 tools: An example of raising competence on creativity and innovation. In G. Dettori, & D. Persico (Eds.), Fostering self-regulated learning through ICT (pp. 295-313). New York: Information Science Publishing.

61. Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002

62. Mahmud, Y. S., & German, E. (2021). Online self-regulated learning strategies amid a global pandemic: Insights from Indonesian university students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 45-68. doi: 10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.2

63. Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 15-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

64. Mickwitz, A., & Suojala, M. (2020). Learner autonomy, self-regulation skills and self-efficacy beliefs - How can students' academic writing skills be supported? Language Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2020-2026

65. Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033

66. Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003

67. Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of training peer review on EFL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjslw.2006.01.003

68. Naibaho, L. (2016). Improving students' essay writing ability through consultancy prewriting protocol at Christian University of Indonesia. The Asian EFL Journal, 3, 147-160.

69. Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1992). An L2 writing group: Task and social dimension. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 171-192.

70. Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 283-301). Mahwah, DJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

71. Octaberlina, L. R., & Muslimin, A. I. (2020). EFL students' perspective towards online learning barriers and alternatives using Moodle/Google classroom during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p1

72. Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of l2 learner autonomy. In D. D. Palfreyman, & R. C. D. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 75-91). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504684_5

73. Ozturk Karata§, T., & Tuncer, H. (2020). Sustaining language skills development of pre-service EFL teachers despite the COVID-19 interruption: A case of emergency distance education. Sustainability, 12(19), 1-34. doi:10.3390/su12198188

74. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman's cyclical model of self- regulated learning. Anales de Psicolog^a, 30(2), 450-462. https://doi.org/0.6018/analesps.30.2.167221

75. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

76. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

77. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878-912. doi:10.1111/lang.12079

78. Pritchard, R. J., & Honeycutt, J. (2006). The process approach to writing instruction examining its effectiveness. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 275-290). New York: Guilford Press.

79. Rahimi, M. (2013). Is training students' reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students' feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research, 17, 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168812459151

80. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

81. Razi, S. (2016). Open and anonymous peer review in a digital online environment compared in academic writing context. In C. Goria, O. Speicher, & S. Stollhans (Eds), Innovative language teaching and learning at university: Enhancing participation and collaboration (pp. 49-56). Dublin: Researchpublishing.net.

82. Reeve, J., Ryan, R., Deci, E. L., & Jang, H. (2008). Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A selfdetermination theory perspective. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 223-244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

83. Richards, J., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

84. Rinekso, A. B., & Muslim, A. B. (2020). Synchronous online discussion: Teaching English in higher education amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of English Educators Society, 5(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.646

85. Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003

86. Schultz, R. B., & DeMers, M. N. (2020). Transitioning from emergency remote learning to deep online learning experiences in geography education. Journal of Geography, 119(5), 142-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2020.1813791

87. Setyowati, L., Sukmawan, S., & El-Sulukiyyah, A. A. (2019). Investigating the students' writing ability in responding to environmental issue. Arab World English Journal, 10(4) 238-250. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no4.18

88. Son, C., Hegde, S., Smith, A., Wang, X., & Sasangohar, F. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on college students' mental health in the United States: Interview survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2196/21279

89. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Inc.

90. Suba§i, G. (2002). Peer written feedback training and its impact on students ' writing outcomes (Master's thesis). Anadolu University, Eski§ehir, Turkey. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/giris.jsp§endogan

91. Erdogan, K. (2020). Foreign language education during COVID-19 pandemic: An evaluation from the perspectives of preparatory class students. Milli Egitim, 49(1), 1079-1090. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.788274

92. Tanaka, M. (2015). Exploring Taiwanese college students' perceptions of text-based, computer-mediated communication technology in learning Japanese as a foreign language. The JALT CALL Journal, 11 (2), 123-142.

93. Ta§gi, S. (2021). Evaluation of emergency distance language education: Perspectives of ELT students. Nev§ehir Haci Bekta§ Veli Universitesi SBEDergisi, 11(1), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.877657

94. Tatsanajamsuk, P., & Saengboon, S. (2011). The roles of indirect asynchronous electronic feedback and direct corrective feedback in improving students' L2 writing: A multiple case study of Thai undergraduate students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 397-426.

95. Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 674-701. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12339

96. Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning of writing in English as a second/foreign language. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 213-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9171-4

97. Thorne, S. L., & Payne, J. S. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, Internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 371-397.

98. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249

99. Tung, I., & Chin, K. (2011). Using video as a retrospective tool to understand self-regulated learning in mathematical problems. In G. Dettori, & D. Persico (Eds.), Fostering self-regulated learning through ICT (pp. 194-209). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-901-5

100. Uka, A., & Uka, A. (2020). The effect of students' experience with the transition from primary to secondary school on self-regulated learning and motivation. Sustainability, 12, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208519

101. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23(1), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496492231004

102. Vasu, K. A., Mei Fung, Y., Nimehchisalem, V, & Rashid, S. (2020). Self-regulated learning development in undergraduate ESL writing classrooms: Teacher feedback versus self-assessment. RELC Journal, 00(0), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220957782

103. Villamil, O. S., & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social- cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In K. Hyland, & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 23-41). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524742.004

104. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

105. Wandler, J., & Imbriale, W. (2017). Promoting undergraduate student self-regulation in online learning environments. Online Learning, 21(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.881

106. Wood, R., Bandura, A., & Bailey, T. (1990). Mechanisms governing organizational performance in complex decisionmaking environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90028-8

107. Wulandari, Y. (2022). Effective feedback to improve students' writing skills. English Education, Linguistics, and Literature Journal, 1(1), 10-17.

108. Xu, J. (2021). Chinese university students' L2 writing feedback orientation and self-regulated learning writing strategies in online teaching during COVID-19. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30, 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00586-6

109. Yalgin, A., & Karadeniz, A. (2016). Relationship between the writing quality and self-regulation skills of secondary education students. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, Special Issue for INTE, 345354.

110. Yamashita, T. (2021). Corrective feedback in computer-mediated collaborative writing and revision contributions. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 75-93.

111. Zaini, A., & Mazdayasna, G. (2014). The effect of computer assisted language learning on the development of EFL learners' writing skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1975-1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.631

112. Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2021). A blended learning model supported by MOOC/SPOC, Zoom, and Canvas in a project- based academic writing course. In N. Radic, А. Atabekova, M. Freddi, & J. Schmied (Eds.), The world universities ' response to COVID-19: Remote online language teaching (pp. 179-197). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.52.1272

113. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209-222.

114. Zhao, Y. (1998). The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4(4), 311-345.

115. Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Sociocultural influence and student's development of academic self-regulation: A social- cognitive perspective. In D. M. Mclnerney, & S. V. Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 139-164). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

116. Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Размещено на Allbest.ru