Word-formation complexity: a learner corpus-based study

The word-formation complexity of educational texts as a system of measurements showing the variety of word-formation methods at different levels, from simple to advanced. The relationship between complexity and the mistakes that make in word formation.

Рубрика Педагогика
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 16.08.2023
Размер файла 256,6 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

22. Lahuerta, Ana Cristina. 2018. Study of accuracy and grammatical complexity in EFL writing. International Journal of English Studies 18 (1). 71-89.

23. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/1/258971

24. Laufer, Batia, Stuart Webb, Su Kyung Kim & Beverley Yohanan. 2021. How well do learners know derived words in a second language? The effect of proficiency, word frequency and type of affix. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 172 (2). 229-258. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.20020.lau

25. Laws, Jacqueline & Chris Ryder. 2014. Getting the measure of derivational morphology in adult speech a corpus analysis using MorphoQuantics. University of Reading Language Studies Working Papers 6. 3-17. http://morphoquantics.co.uk/Resources/ Laws % 20&%20Ryder % 20 (2014).pdf (accessed 25.06.2021)

26. Leontjev, Dmitri. 2016. L2 English derivational knowledge: Which affixes are learners more likely to recognise? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6 (2). 225-248. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.3

27. Lyashevskaya, Olga, Irina Panteleev & Olga Vinogradova. 2021. Automated assessment of learner text complexity. Assessing Writing 49, article 100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100529

28. Lyashevskaya, Olga, Olga Vinogradova & Anna Scherbakova. (forthc.) Accuracy, syntactic complexity, and task type at play in examination writing: A corpus-based study. In Agnieszka Lenko-Szymanska & Sandra Gotz (eds.), Complexity, accuracy, andfluency in learner corpus research.

29. Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. 2nd ed. Munich: C.H. Beck.

30. Nation, Paul. 2021. Thoughts on word families. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43 (5). 969-972. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312100067X

31. Norris, John & Lourdes Ortega. 2009. Measurement for understanding: An organic approach to investigating complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA. Applied Linguistics 30 (4). 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044

32. Plakans, Lia, Atta Gebril & Zeynep Bilki. 2019. Shaping a score: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in integrated writing performances. Language Testing 36 (2). 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216669537

33. Plag, Ingo, Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Harald Baayen. 1999. Morphological productivity across speech and writing. English Language & Linguistics 3 (2). 209-228.

34. R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org (accessed 25.06.2021).

35. Robinson, Peter. 2001. Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22 (1). 27-57. https://doi-org.proxylibrary.hse.ru/10.1093/applin/22.1.27

36. Robinson, Peter. 2011. Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance, 3-39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1

37. Skehan, Peter. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

38. Skehan, Peter. 2009. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30 (4). 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047

39. Stein, Gabriele. 2007. A Dictionary of English Affixes: Their Function and Meaning. Munich: Lincom Europa.

40. Tywoniw, Rurik & Scott Crossley. 2020. Morphological complexity of L2 discourse. In Eric Friginal & Jack A. Hardy (eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus approaches to discourse analysis, 269-297. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259982-17

41. van der Slik, Frans, Roeland van Hout & Job Schepens. 2019. The role of morphological complexity in predicting the learnability of an additional language: The case of La (additional language) Dutch. Second Language Research 35 (1). 47-70. https://doi.org/10.! 177/026765 8317691322

42. Vasylets, Olena, Roger Gilabert & Rosa M. Manchon. 2017. The effects of mode and task complexity on second language production. Language Learning 67 (2). 394-430 https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.1222

43. Vinogradova, Olga, Olga Lyashevskaya & Irina Panteleeva. 2017. Multi-level student essay feedback in a learner corpus. In Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Proceedings of the International Conference Dialogue 2017. 373-387. Moscow.

44. Yee, Thomas W. 2015. Vector Generalized Linear and Additive Models. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2818-7

45. Yoon, Hyung-Jo. 2017. Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topic, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality. System 66. 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.007

Appendix

Figure A. Complexity at level 5 and number of errors (both task types)

Figure B. Complexity at level 6 and number of errors (both task types)

Размещено на Allbest.ru


Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.