Вивчення особистісних уявлень учнів 8-9 класів про можливість використання смартфонів для формування та розвитку наскрізних умінь

37. S. S. Shaukat, T. A. Rao, & M. A. Khan, "Impact of sample size on principal component analysis ordination of an environmental data set: effects on eigenstructure"Ј¬Ekologia (Bratislava), vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 173-190, 2016. doi:10.1515/eko-2016-0014.

38. J. C. F. de Winter, D. Dodou, & P. A. Wieringa, "Exploratory Factor Analysis with Small Sample Sizes"Ј¬ Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 147-181, 2009.

39. S. Jung, & S. Lee, "Exploratory factor analysis for small samples"Ј¬Behav. Res., vol. 43, pp. 701-709, 2011. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0077-9.

40. ^U.horenzo-Seva, How to report the percentage of explained common variance in exploratory factor analysis. Technical Report. Department of Psychology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 2013.

41. Case study by the UNESCO-Fazheng project on best practices in mobile learning (2018-2020). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/search/N-7557c38d-6ccd-406b-9290- 5f246a6c5ea6

42. UNESCO, Beyond disruption: technology enabled learning futures, 2020 edition of Mobile Learning Week, 12-14 October 2020 : report/ Fengchun, M., Wayne, H., [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно:https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/p^D000377753

43. REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

44. "Almost 23 million Ukrainians regularly use the Internet - research", 2019. [Online]. Available: https://mind.ua/news/20204323-majzhe-23-mln-ukrayinciv-regulyarno-koristuyutsya-internetom- doslidzhennya (in Ukrainian)

45. "Sexual violence against children and sexual exploitation of children on the Internet in Ukraine" Јє Analytical report based on the results of a quantitative study, ICO "Child Rescue Service" in partnership with the Commissioner of the President of Ukraine for Children's Rights, Proinsight Lab Agency (executor), 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cutt.ly/QzeSBgo (in Ukrainian)

46. M.A. Al-Mashhadani, & M.F. Al-Rawe, "The future role of mobile learning and smartphones applications in the Iraqi private universities". Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 5, no. 28, 2018. doi:

47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0077-7. (in English)

48. A. Sliwka, & B. Klopsch, "Disruptive Innovation! Wie die Pandemie die "Grammatik der Schule" herausfordert und welche Chancen sich jetzt fur eine "Schule ohne Wande" in der digitalen Wissensgesellschaft bieten"ЃCin Langsam vermisse ich die Scheie ... Scheie wahrend undnach de^ Corona- Pandemie, D. Fickermann and B. Edelstein (Hrsg.), Munster, New York: Waxmann, 2020, pp. 216-229. (in English)

49. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Resolution No. 898 dated September 30, 2020. State standard of basic secondary education. [Online]. Available: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-deyaki-pitannya-derzhavnih- standartiv-povnoyi-zagalnoyi-serednoyi-osviti-i300920-898 (in Ukrainian)

50. Recommendations for assessing the learning achievements of students in grades 5-6 who receive education in accordance with the new State Standard of Basic Secondary Education. Appendix to the Order of the Ministry of Education and Science №289 of April 01, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/npa/pro-zatverdzhennya-metodichnih-rekomendacij-shodo-ocinyuvannya- navchalnih-dosyagnen-uchniv-5-6-klasiv-yaki-zdobuvayut-osvitu-vidpovidno-do-novogo-derzhavnogo- standartu-bazovoyi-serednoyi-osviti (in Ukrainian)

51. A. A. Sama, "Gender differences in smartphone usage patterns of adolescents"Ј¬I^RAR, February 2020, Vol. 7, Issue 1, pp.355 - 362, 2020. (in English)

52. M. A. Alwraikat, "Smartphones as a New Paradigm in Higher Education Overcoming Obstacles", International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), \o\. 11, no. 4, 114, 2011. doi https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V1n4.6759. (in English)

53. H. Oz, "Prospective English teachers' ownership and usage of mobile device as m -learning tools"Ј¬Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 141, pp. 1031-1041, 2013. (in English)

54. V. Mizyuk, M. Dmitrieva. The use of mobile technologies in computer science lessons in the conditions of mixed learning, Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, no.3, pp.85-93, 2019. (in Ukrainian)

55. G. V. Tkachuk, "Features of the implementation of mobile learning: prospects, advantages and disadvantages", Information technologies and teaching aids, vol. 64, no,2, pp. 13-22, 2018. (in Ukrainian)

56. C. Steel, "Fitting learning into life: Language students' perspectives on benefits of using mobile apps"Ј¬ Ascilite, pp. 875-880, 2012. (in English)

57. L. Sha, C. K. Looi, W. Chen, & B. H. Zhang, "Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self- regulated learning", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 366-378, 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00461.x. (in English)

58. B. Klimova, "Mobile phones and/or smartphones and their apps for teaching English as a foreign language"Ј¬ Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, pp. 1091-1099, 2017. (in English)

59. O. G. Deniza et al. "Effects of short and long-term electromagnetic fields exposure on the human hippocampus"Ј¬J. Microscopy Ultrastruct, vol. 5, pp. 191-197, 2017. (in English)

60. Q. Chen, & Y. Zan, "Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review"Ј¬Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 54, pp. 34-42, 2016. (in English)

61. K. Hochberg, J. Kuhn, & A. Muller, "Using Smartphones as Experimental Tools - Effects on Interest, Curiosity, and Learning in Physics Education"Ј¬JSci Educ Technol, vol. 27, pp. 385-403, 2018/ doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9731-7. (in English)

62. B. Klimova, "Impact of Mobile Learning on Students' Achievement Results"Ј¬Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, 90, 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020090. (in English)

63. O. J. Sunday, O. O. Adesope, & P. L. Maarhuis, "The effects of smartphone addiction on learning: A meta - analysis", Computers in Human Behavior Reports, vol. 4, 100114, 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100114. (in English)

64. A. Lepp, J. E. Barkley, & A. C. Karpinski, "The relationship cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students", SAGE open, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015573169. (in English)

65. J. A. P. Roberts, I. H. Yaya, & C. Manolis, "The invisible addiction: Cell -phone activities and addiction among male and female college students"Ј¬Journal o^f Behavioral Addictions, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 254-265, 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.3.2014.015. (in English)

66. E. Sumuer, & D. N. Ka^ikci, "The role of smartphones in college students' mind-wandering during learning", Computers & Education, vol. 190, 104616, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104616. ISSN 0360-1315. (in English)

67. J. Smallwood, J. W. Schooler, "The Science of Mind Wandering: Empirically Navigating the Stream of Consciousness"Ј¬Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 487-518, 2015. doi:10.1146/annurev- psych-010814-015331. (in English)

68. R. Lavoie, & Y. Zheng, "Smartphone use, flow and wellbeing: A case of Jekyll and Hyde"Ј¬Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 138, 107442, 2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107442. (in English)

69. J. K. Nayak, "Relationship among smartphone usage, addict ion, academic performance and the moderating role of gender: A study of higher education students in India", Computers & Education, vol. 123, pp. 164173, 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.007. (in English)

70. Y. Park, & S. Lee, "Gender differences in smartphone addiction and depression among Korean adolescents: Focusing on the internal mechanisms of attention deficit and self-control"Ј¬Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 136, 107400, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107400. (in English)

71. D. O. S. Bulent, "The relationship between mobile phone use, metacognitive a wareness and academic achievement"Ј¬European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 192-200, 2015. (in English)

72. Y. Lin, Y. Liu, W. Fan, V. K. Tuunainen, Sh. Deng, "Revisiting the relationship between smartphone use and academic performance: A large-scale study"Ј¬Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 122, 106835, 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106835. (in English)

73. S. Han, "Impact of smartphones on students: How age at first use and duration of usage affect learning and academic progress", Technology in Society, vol. 70, 102002, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102002. (in English)

74. Yu. O. Zhuk, Theoretical and methodological principles of the organization of educational activities of high school students in the conditions of a computer-oriented learning environment: Monograph. Kyiv.: Pedahohichna dumka, 2017. (in Ukrainian)

75. Yu. O. Zhuk, "Dialectic of pedagogical knowledge in the conditions of computer-oriented learning process"Ј¬Computer in school and family, vol. 4, pp. 3-7, 2011. (in Ukrainian)

76. J. Grzegorek, & A. P. Wierzbicki, "Multiple Criteria Evaluation and Ranking of Social Penetration of Information Society Technologies", Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, vol. 4, pp. 3-13, 2012. (in English)

77. J. S. Hyde, "Gender and sex: So what has metaanalysis done for me?"Ј¬The Ps^ycholog^y Teacher Network Newsletter, vol. 2, pp. 2-6, 1992. (in English)

78. J. Cohen, Statistical p^^er a^al^sis fo^ the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1969. (in English)

79. M. A. Bujang, P. A. Ghani, S. A. Soelar, & N. A. Zulkifli, "Sample size guideline for exploratory factor analysis when using small sample: Taking into considerations of different measurement scales"Ј¬2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE), 2012, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ICSSBE.2012.6396605. (in English)

80. S. S. Shaukat, T. A. Rao, & M. A. Khan, "Impact of sample size on principal component analysis ordination of an environmental data set: effects on eigenstructure"Ј¬Ekologia (Bratislava), vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 173-190, 2016. doi:10.1515/eko-2016-0014. (in English)

81. J. C. F. de Winter, D. Dodou, & P. A. Wieringa, "Exploratory Factor Analysis with Small Sample Sizes"Ј¬ Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 147-181, 2009. (in English)

82. S. Jung, & S. Lee, "Exploratory factor analysis for small samples"Ј¬Behav. Res., vol. 43, pp. 701-709, 2011. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0077-9. (in English)

83. ^U. Lorenzo-Seva, How to report the percentage of explained common variance in exploratory factor analysis. Technical Report. Department of Psychology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 2013. (in English)

84. Case study by the UNESCO-Fazheng project on best practices in mobile learning (2018-2020). [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/search/N-7557c38d-6ccd-406b-9290-5f246a6c5ea6 (in English)

85. UNESCO, Beyond disruption: technology enabled learning futures, 2020 edition of Mobile Learning Week, 12-14 October 2020 : report/ Fengchun, M., Wayne, H., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377753 (in English)

Размещено на Allbest.ru