Status of the victim in the adversary proceeding: Experience from Russia and recommendation for the Vietnam’s criminal procedures
The role of the victim in the competitive process of Russia. Analyzing the rights and responsibilities of the victim in adversarial proceedings. Approaches to improving victim participation in the adversarial process in Vietnam's criminal justice system.
| Рубрика | Государство и право |
| Вид | статья |
| Язык | английский |
| Дата добавления | 19.03.2024 |
| Размер файла | 30,1 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Sixth, Vietnam's CrPC needs to add some obligations to the victim to ensure that the adversary proceeding is conducted in the fairest and equal way among the subjects. We recommend adding the following obligations for the victim by amending and supplementing the corresponding provisions in the CrPC 2015: “If the victim agrees to testify, the victim must truthfully provide the facts he/she knows about the case. If the victim provides the information and documents he/she knows are untrue, he/she will be liable for criminal liability in accordance with Art. 382 of the Criminal Code unless otherwise specified in point... paragraph... this article” [14]. At the same time, we recommend adding the following content to Art. 382 (1) of the Criminal Code 2015: “The victim who provides the statements or documents that he knows to be untrue will be warned or fined from. dong “Dong” is the Vietnam's currency unit. to. dong” The “.” sign in this regulation refers to the highest and lowest levels for which a fine can be imposed on this offender. We recommend applying the fine in thisregulation because it matches the serious nature of this victim's behavior, and can apply this penalty for legal persons that has committed this crime..
Conclusion
In Russia's criminal proceedings, the victim is an independent adversary, participating in the adversary proceeding by himself/herself to protect his/her legitimate rights and interests. In Vietnamese criminal proceedings, the victim is not an independent adversary but only assists the accuser. The function and independent adversarial position of the victim has not been recognized by Vietnamese law. In the context of Vietnam's judicial reform to improve the quality of adversary in criminal proceedings, this article compares the provisions on the adversary of the victim in the laws of Russia and Vietnam and draws some experience to improve the provisions on the adversary proceeding in criminal proceedings in Vietnam.
References
1. Akulinicheva, Olga S. 2015. “Implementation of the constitutional principle of adversariality and equality of the parties in the administration of justice in criminal cases”. Molodoi uchenyi 16 (96): 330-332. (In Russian)
2. Boylan, Scott P. 1998. “The Status of Judicial Reform in Russia”. American University International Law Review 13 (5): 1330-1331.
3. Dao Van Cuong. 2018. Phap luat ve thu tuc xet xd sd tham cac vu an hinh sU d Viet Nam hien nay. Ha Noi, Vien han lam khoa hoc xa hoi Viet Nam.
4. Doan Duc Luong, Nguyen Ngoc Kien. 2015. “Mo hinh to tung hinh sti vdi yeu cau cai each td phap”. Tap chi Nghien cdu lap phap 16 (296): 3-8.
5. Gachechiladze, Nika D. 2020. “Problems and ways of solution of proceedings on cases of private prosecution”. Vestnik magistratury 2-3 (101): 88-94. (In Russian)
6. Gorsky, Vadim V. 2020. “Role of the victim in criminal proceedings in the works of representatives of the Samara school of processualists”. luridicheskii vestnik Samarskogo universiteta 6 (2): 74-80. (In Russian)
7. Gorsky, Vadim V, Mai Van 'I hang. 2017. “Chien thuat tham gia, bao ve cua luat sd dai dien bi hai trong To tung hinh sti d Nga va nhdng gpi md cho Viet Nam trong boi canh hien nay”. Tap chi khoa hoc Dai hoc Quoc gia Ha Noi 1: 73-81.
8. Ibragimov, Ibragim M. 2012. Conceptual problems of legitimate opportunities to protect the rights of the victim and issues of improving legislation in the process of proof in Russian criminal proceedings. Accessed January 27, 2020.
9. Kalinovsky, Konstantin B. 2002. Main types criminal proceedings. St. Petersburg, Iuridicheskii institut Publ. (In Russian)
10. Katomina, Viktoriia A. 2018. “The legal nature of the aversarial system”. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii 2 (121): 50-55. (In Russian)
11. Kim Thi Bich Ngoc. 2017. Chdc nang buoc toi tronggiai doan xet xdsd tham vu an hinh sd. Ha Noi, Vien han lam khoa hoc xa hoi Viet Nam.
12. Koblikov, Aleksandr S. 1999. Criminal process. Moscow, Norma Publ.; Infra-M Publ. (In Russian)
13. Kushkhov, Ruslan Kh. 2016. “Participation of a victim in the search activity of an investigator”. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo 3: 115-117. (In Russian)
14. Le Hong Ngoc. 2021. Bi hai trong To tung hinh sd td thdc ti&n tinh Dong Nai. Ha Noi, Vien han lam khoa hoc xa hoi Viet Nam.
15. Le Tien Chau. 2009. “Moi quan he gida mo hinh, hinh thdc to tung vdi viec hoan thien phap luat To tung hinh sti Viet Nam”. Tap chiKhoa hocphap ly 3 (52): 20-26.
16. Lesnikov, Gennady Yu., Sergey A. Kopytkin. 2018. “A deliberately false denunciation: The problems of legal assessment and law enforcement practice in the institutions of the penal system”. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve 3: 281-284. (In Russian)
17. Luu Binh Duong. 2017. Phap luat ve khdi to vu an hinh sd theo yeu cau cua ngddi bi hai trong to tung hinh sd Viet Nam hien nay. Ha Noi, Vien han lam khoa hoc xa hoi Viet Nam.
18. Ngo Cuong. 2021. “Ve nguyen tac `Tranh tung trong xet xd ddpc bao dam' cua BLTTHS nam 2015 -- So sanh vdi BLTTHS nam 2002 cua Lien bang Nga”. Tap Chi Toa an nhan dan dien td. Accessed January 22, 2022.
19. Nguyen Duc Thai. 2015. “Quyen buoc toi cua ngddi bi hai trong to tung hinh sd”. Tap chi Khoa hoc phap ly 1 (86): 8-13.
20. Nguyen Van Diep, Le Van Quyen. 2015. “Hien phap nam 2013 va Phap luat ve yeu cau tranh tung trong cai cach td phap d Viet Nam”. Tap chi Nghe luat 5: 3-6.
21. Popova, Irina P., Anastasiia L. Ivanova. 2020. “The implementation of the adversarial principle at the pretrial stages of criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation and in foreign countries”. Pravovoe gosu- darstvo: teoriia ipraktika 108-119.
22. Potokina, Olga V 2016. “Realization of the rights of the victim as a party to the criminal proceedings for the prosecution by a representative of an advocate”. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve 4: 49-52. (In Russian)
23. Pristavka, Arina А. 2020. “Victim of criminal proceedings”. Tribuna uchenogo 2: 1-6. (In Russian)
24. Pustovaya, Irina N. 2013. Procedural status of victims -- individuals and peculiarities of its implementation in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. Chelyabinsk, Iuzhno-Ural'skii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)
25. Pham Tien Dai. 2019. “Ban ve nguyen tac tranh tung trong Bo luat to tung hinh sti nam 2015”. Tap Chi Toa an nhan dan dien td. Accessed January 27, 2022.
26. Shestakova, Tatiana P. 2018. “Adversary and equality of the parties as a principle of criminal proceedings”. Molodoi uchenyi 8 (193): 99-101. (In Russian)
27. Sinenko, Sergei. A. 2015. Ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of the victim in criminal proceedings. Oryol, Orlovskii iuridicheskii institut MVD Rossii Publ. (In Russian)
28. Stelmakh, Vladimir Yu. 2016. “Some problems of adversary in the Russian criminal proceedings”. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Pravo 3: 292-302. (In Russian)
29. Ton Thien Phuong. 2016. “Quyen bao chda cua ngtidi bi buoc toi theo Bo luat to tung hinh sti nam 2015”. Tap chi Kiem sat 10: 42-46.
30. Tran Thi Lien. 2017. “Xac dinh td cach cua ngtidi tham gia to tung trong vu an hinh sti”. Tap chi Nha miclc va Phap luat 5 (349): 34-42.
31. Tran Thu Hanh. 2015. “Nguyen tac bao dam sti vo td cua ngtidi tien hanh to tung va ngtidi tham gia to tung trong Luat to tung hinh sti Viet Nam thdi ky phong kien va Phap thuoc”. Tap chi khoa hoc Dai hoc Quoc gia Ha Noi 2: 13-19.
32. Vetrova, Galina N. 2017. “Subsidiary Prosecution in Adversarial System”. Izvestiia Altaiskogo gosudarstven- nogo universiteta 3 (95): 32-36.
33. Vo Minh Ky. 2020. “Cac yeu to tranh tung trong mo hinh to tung tham van truyen thong cua Viet Nam”. Tap chiNghien cdu lap phap 7 (407): 13-19.
34. Zentsova, Valeriia M. 2021. “The procedures to ensure an adversarial criminal trial at the pre-trial stage”. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Pravo 1: 276-288.
Размещено на Allbest.ru
Подобные документы
Three models of juvenile system. The modern system of juvenile justice in Britain and Russia. Juvenile court. Age of criminal responsibility. Prosecution, reprimands and final warnings. Arrest, bail and detention in custody. Trial in the Crown Court.
курсовая работа [28,2 K], добавлен 06.03.2015Concept of the constitutional justice in the postsoviet Russia. Execution of decisions of the Constitutional Court. Organizational structure of the constitutional justice. Institute of the constitutional justice in political-legal system of Russia.
реферат [23,9 K], добавлен 10.02.2015Idea of human rights in constitutional legislation of Russia. The judicial review process. Establishing a certain period of appeal with supervisory complaint and limiting grounds for initiation of proceedings. The functions of the cabinet of Ministers.
реферат [16,6 K], добавлен 14.02.2015The role of constitutional justice in strengthening constitutional legality. Protection of the constitutional rights, freedoms, formation of the specialized institute of judicial power. The removal of contradictions and blanks in the federal legislation.
реферат [24,0 K], добавлен 14.02.2015The purpose of state punishment. Procedure of criminal case. The aim of punishment. Theories of Punishment. The Difficult Child. Last hired, first fired. The Health Professions. Traditional Collector's Editions. Hospital and Specialist Services.
шпаргалка [41,7 K], добавлен 23.03.2014The international collective human rights' concept is still in process of development, and that we may say about many of international human rights. However, such a view is particularly true with regard to this group of rights.
реферат [21,3 K], добавлен 10.06.2003Placing the problem of human rights on foreground of modern realization. The political rights in of the Islamic Republic Iran. The background principles of vital activity of the system of judicial authorities. The executive branch of the power in Iran.
реферат [30,2 K], добавлен 14.02.2015History of infantilism. Formation of the civil society and development of the lawful state. About the new constitution of Serbia. Introduction of obligatory examination for all state and municipal officials of knowledge of Constitution of the Russia.
контрольная работа [20,1 K], добавлен 10.02.2015Interaction of the courts of general jurisdiction and the Constitutional court of Ukraine. Impact of the institute of complaints on human rights. Analis of an independent function of the Constitutional court and courts of the criminal jurisdiction.
статья [19,6 K], добавлен 19.09.2017Proclaiming and asserting the principles of democracy, democratic norms of formation of the self-management Kabardin-Balkar Republic. Application and synthesis of regional experiences as a problem to be solved in the process of administrative reforms.
реферат [19,0 K], добавлен 07.01.2015
