Прогибиторный иск: прошлое, настоящее и будущее

18. . Усачева К . А . Негаторный иск в исторической и сравнительно-правовой перспективе // Вестник гражданского права . 2013 . № 5 . С . 87-119

19. . Юдин А . В . Иск о присуждении к бездействию в личной (неимущественной) сфере и его нераскрытый потенциал в гражданском процессе // Юрист . 2011. № 23 . С.7-12 .

20. . Amigud A . , Dawson P . The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020, vol . 45, no . 1, pp . 98-108 .

21. Baron J . Pandekten . 9 verm . Aufl. Leipzig: Duncker, 1896, 823 S .

22. . Benke J . Ancient, medieval and present issues in private law . Journal of European History of Law, 2021, vol . 12, no . 1, pp . 130-137 .

23. . Benjamin J . , Jud G . , Winkler D . The Value of Smoking Prohibitions in Vacation Rental Properties . Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2001, vol . 22, no . 1, pp . 117128 .

24. Diessel B.H. Trolling for trolls: The pitfalls of the emerging market competition requirement for permanent injunctions in patent cases post-eBay . Michigan Law Review, 2007, vol . 106, no . 2, pp . 305-345 .

25. . Fritzsche J . Unterlassungsanspruch und Unterlassungsklage . Berlin: Springer, 2000, 770 S

26. . Gergen M . , Golden J . , Smith H . The Supreme Court's accidental revolution? The test for permanent injunctions . Columbia Law Review, 2012, vol . 112, no . 2, pp . 203-249.

27. . Gross R . , Brammli-Greenberg S . Evaluating the effect of regulatory prohibitions against risk selection by health status on supplemental insurance ownership in Israel . Social Science and Medicine, 2004, vol . 58, no . 9, pp . 1609-1622 .

28. . Hufen F . Verwaltungsprozessrecht . MQnchen: Beck, 2021.660 S .

29. . Jehoram H . Prohibition of parallel imports through intellectual property rights . International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 1999, vol . 30, no . 5, pp . 495-511.

30. . La Feria R . On Prohibition of Abuse of Law as a General Principle of EU Law . EC Tax Review, 2020, vol . 29, issue 4, pp . 142-146 .

31. La Feria R . Prohibition of abuse of (community) law: The creation of a new general principle of EC law through tax Common Market Law Review, 2008, vol 45, no 2, pp 395-441

32. Mendonca P. Third-party ownership prohibition in football and European Union fundamental freedoms: CAS decision on RFC Seraing case International Sports Law Journal, 2018, vol . 18, no . 1-2, pp . 39-45 .

33. Munday R Prohibitions against assignment of choses in action Cambridge Law Journal, 1979, vol . 38, no . 1, pp . 50-53 .

34. . Schott H . Das ius prohibendi und die formula prohibitoria . Zeitschrift der Savigny- Stiftung fQr Rechtsgeschichte . Romanistische Abteilung, 1889, vol . 10, no . 1, pp . 173176 .

35. Seaman C Permanent injunctions in patent litigation after eBay: An empirical study Iowa Law Review, 2016, vol . 101, no . 5, pp . 1949-2019 .

36. Stagl J. The ratio behind the prohibition for spouses to donate to each other. Monopolising matrimonial property law in the dotal system . Legal History Review, 2017, vol . 85, no . 1-2, pp . 141-165 .

37. . SteinbrQck R . Unterlassungsklage nur bei illoyalem VerstoB gegen Konkurrenzklausel begrQndet . Klinische Monatsblatter fQr Augenheilkunde, 2014, vol . 231, no . 3, S . 201202

38. . Wu Q . Free speech in denial of a permanent injunction in US copyright practice . Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 2020, vol . 15, no . 5, pp . 320-321.

References

1. Abushenko D . B . (2013) On Material and Procedural features of the actions and decisions on the requests regarding the conclusion, alteration and cessation of contract . Vestnikgrazhdanskogo protsessa = Journal of Civil process, no . 2, pp . 60-108 . (in Russ . )

2. . Amigud A . , Dawson P. (2020) The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol . 45, no . 1, pp . 98-108 .

3. . Baron Yu . (2005) The System of Roman Civil Law. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 1102 p . (in Russ . )

4. . Baron J . (1896) Pandekten. 9. Aufl. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblott, 823 S .

5. . Benke J . (2021) Ancient, medieval and present issues in private law. Journal on European History of Law, vol . 12, no . 1, pp . 130-137 .

6. . Benjamin J . D . , Jud G . D . , Winkler D . T (2001) The Value of Smoking Prohibitions in Vacation Rental Properties . Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol . 22, no . 1, pp . 117-128 .

7. . Diessel B . H . (2007) Trolling for trolls: The pitfalls of the emerging market competition requirement for permanent injunctions in patent cases post-eBay. Michigan Law Review, vol . 106, no . 2, pp . 305-345 .

8. . Fritzsche J . (2000) Unterlassungsanspruch und Unterlassungsklage. Berlin: Springer, 770 S

9. . Gergen M . P , Golden J . M . , Smith H . E . (2012) The Supreme Court's accidental revolution? The test for permanent injunctions . Columbia Law Review, vol . 112, no . 2, pp . 203249

10. . Gross R . , Brammli-Greenberg S . (2004) Evaluating the effect of regulatory prohibitions against risk selection by health status on supplemental insurance ownership in Israel . Social Science and Medicine, vol . 58, no . 9, pp . 1609-1622 .

11. 11. Hufen F. (2021) Verwaltungsprozessrecht. MQnchen: Beck, 660 S .

12. . Ioffe O . S . , Musin V A . (1975) The Fundamentals of Civil Law. Leningrad: University, 156 p . (in Russ . )

13. . Germanov A . V (2009) From Use to Possession and Right in rem. Moscow: Statut, 700 p (in Russ )

14. . Grimm D . D . (2003) Lectures on the Dogma of Roman Law. Moscow: Zertsalo, 496 p . (in Russ )

15. . Jehoram H . C . (1999) Prohibition of parallel imports through intellectual property rights . International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol . 30, no . 5, pp . 495-511.

16. . Kopylov A . V (2000) Title to Land in Roman, Russian Pre-revolutionary and Modern Russian Civil Law Moscow: Statut, 255 p (in Russ )

17. . Kot A . A . (2017) Preventive ways of protecting the right of ownership in Ukranian Civil Law. In: Zaschita grazhdanskikh prav: izbrannye aspekty. Moscow: Statut, pp . 264-275. (in Russ )

18. . La Feria R . (2020) On Prohibition of Abuse of Law as a General Principle of EU Law. EC Tax Review, vol . 29, issue 4, pp . 142-146 .

19. . La Feria R . (2008) Prohibition of abuse of (community) law: The creation of a new general principle of EC law through tax . Common Market Law Review, vol . 45, no . 2, pp 395-441

20. . Mendonca P (2018) Third-party ownership prohibition in football and European Union fundamental freedoms: CAS decision on RFC Seraing case International Sports Law Journal, vol . 18, no . 1-2, pp . 39-45.

21. 21. Monakhov D . A . (2007) Vindicatio servitutis as the major way of the legal protection of easements in Russian Law. Pravo ipolitika = Law and Politics, no 5, pp . 70-75 (in Russ . )

22. . Munday R . (1979) Prohibitions against assignment of choses in action . Cambridge Law Journal, vol 38, no 1, pp 50-53

23. . Muradyan E . M . (2001) Preventive civil actions . Gosudarstvo ipravo = State and Law, no 4, pp 23-27 (in Russ )

24. . Novitskiy I . B . , Perterskiy I . S . (eds) (2008) Roman Private Law. Moscow: Zertsalo-M, 560 p (in Russ )

25. . Pereladov A . V , Lichman A . A . (2020) Improper Honey of Neighboring Law. VestnikKe- merovskogo universiteta, vol . 1, no . 1, pp . 78-87 (in Russ . )

26. . Pokrovskiy I . A . (1998) The History of Roman Law.Saint Petersburg: Letniy sad, 560 p . (in Russ . )

27. . Potapenko S . V , Zarubin A . V (2012) A Reference Book of Judge on Property Law Issues . Moscow: Prospekt, 248 p . (in Russ . )

28. . Pukhan I . , Polenak-Akimovskaya M . (2000) Roman Law. Moscow: Zertsalo, 448 p . (in Russ )

29. . Schott H . (1889) Das ius prohibendi und die formula prohibitoria . Zeitschrift der Savi- gny-Stiftung fQr Rechtsgeschichte . Romanistische Abteilung, vol . 10, no . 1, pp . 173-176 .

30. . Seaman C . B . (2016) Permanent injunctions in patent litigation after eBay: An empirical study. Iowa Law Review, vol . 101, no . 5, pp . 1949-2019 .

31. 31. Sklovskiy K . I . (2008) Property in Civil Law. Moscow: Statut, 922 p . (in Russ . )

32. . Stagl J . (2017) The ratio behind the prohibition for spouses to donate to each other. Monopolizing matrimonial property law in the dotal system . Legal History Review, vol . 85, no . 1-2, p . 141-165 .

33. . SteinbrQck R . (2014) Unterlassungsklage nur bei illoyalem VerstoB gegen Konkurrenzklausel begrQndet. Klinische Monatsblatter fQr Augenheilkunde, vol. 231, no . 3, S . 201-202 .

34. . Subbotin M . V. (2004) Special Ways of Protecting Property Rights . Zakonodatel'stvo = Legislation, no 3, pp . 16-23 (in Russ . )

35. . Sultanov A . P (2013) Protecting the Right of Conscience, Spreading Opinions through the prism of the European Court on Human Rights . Moscow: Statut, 544 p . (in Russ . )

36. . Usachyova K . A . (2013) Actio Negatoria in History and Comparison . Vestnikgrazhdan- skogo prava = Journal of Civil Law, no 5, pp . 87-119 (in Russ )

37. . Wu Q . (2020) Free speech in denial of a permanent injunction in US copyright practice . Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, vol . 15, no . 5, pp . 320-321.

38. . Yudin A . V (2011) Legal Action on Adjudging as to Inaction in Personal Area and its Potential in Civil Procedure . Yurist = Lawyer, no . 23, pp . 7-12 (in Russ . )

Размещено на Allbest.ru