The phase-out of nuclear power in Germany
Highlight and characteristic of the legislative steps taken by Germany to the abandon nuclear energy. In particular, with regard to the analysis of the adopted legislative acts for compliance with the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.
| Рубрика | Государство и право |
| Вид | статья |
| Язык | английский |
| Дата добавления | 14.09.2022 |
| Размер файла | 48,7 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
15. Twelfth Amending Act of 8 December 2010. BGBl. 2010. I. P 1818.
16. Kloepfer M. Verfahrene Atomausstiegsverfahren (A deadlocked nuclear phase-out). Munich: Verlagsgruppe Huthig Jehle Rehm, 2012.UPR, Vol. 32. P 43; Sauer H. Kooperierende Rechtssetzung - Reaktionen einer herausgeforderten Verfassung (Co-operative law-making - the responses of a constitution under attack. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2004. Der Staat, Vol. 43. P 574.
17. Schorkopf F. Die `vereinbarte' Novellierung des Atomgesetzes (The “pre-agreed” Amendment to the Atomic Energy Act). Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, Neue Zeitschrift fur Verwaltungsrecht (NVwZ), 2000. Vol. 19. P 1113.
18. Morlok M. Informalisierung und Entparlamentarisierung politischer Entscheidungen als Gefahrdung der Verfassung? (The informalisation and deparliamentarisation of political decisions as a threat to the constitution?). Berlin: De Gruyter Recht, Veroffentlichung der Vereinigung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer (VVDStRL), 2003. Vol. 62. P 76; Sauer H., 2004, supra note 16, p. 572.
19. Schorkopf F., 2000, supra note 17, 1112; Hellfahrt, 2003, supra note 1, p. 102; Schoch F. “Entformalisierung staatlichen Handelns” (The deformalisation of state action), Isensee, J. and P. Kirchhof Handbuch des Staatsrechts (Handbook of Constitutional Law) (HStR). Heidelberg: C. F. Muller Verlag, 2005. Vol. 3. Section 37. Recital 41; for a different view, see Frenz W Atomkonsens und Landesvollzugskompetenz” (Nuclear consensus and the federal states' enforcement competencies). NVwZ. 2002. Vol. 21, p. 562, which refers to a binding obligation on the grounds of the detail and accuracy of the agreement, the way it was presented to the public and the political confidence established on this basis.
20. Langenfeld C. Die rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen fur einen Ausstieg aus der friedlichen Nutzung der Kernenergie (The legal framework for a phase-out of the peaceful use of nuclear power). Die offentliche Verwaltung (DOV). 2012. Vol. 53, p. 936; Schorkopf F., 2000, supra note 18, p. 1112.
21. Motion for a resolution by the CDU/CSU and FDP coalition of 16 March 2011. BT-Drs. 17/5048, p. 2.
22. Draft of the 13th Act Amending the Atomic Energy Act. BT-Drs. 17/6070, p. 5; Ziehm C. Atomausstieg und Energiewende (The Nuclear Act and the Energy Revolution). Bochum: Ponte Press Verlag, ZNER, 2012. Vol. 16. P. 221.
23. 13th Act Amending the Atomic Energy Act of 31 July 2011. BGBl. 2011. I. P 1704.
24. Draft law by the CDU/CSU and FDP groups. BT-Drs. 17/6070. P 5.
25. 54% of those questioned in the same survey believed that a phase-out by 2022 was a good idea, and 27% wanted the date to be even earlier. URL: www.tagesschau.de/inland/ deutschlandtrend1342.html.
26. Final report of the Ethics Committee. A Safe Energy Supply. P 18 et seq.; BT-Drs. 17/6070, supra note 22, p. 5.
27. The rulings of the Higher Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) (VGH) of Kassel of 27 February 2013 - 6 C 824/11 and 6 C 825/11. Zeitschriftfur Umweltrecht (ZUR). 2013. 367 et seq. in the actions brought by RWE AG (as operator of the switched-off nuclear power plants Biblis A and B) against the Federal State of Hessen. See also the interim judgment of the Higher Administrative Court of Kassel of 4 July 2012 - 6 C 824/11.T, ZUR 2012, 632 et seq.
28. Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG), ruling of 20 December 2013 - 7 B 18.13, ZUR 2014, p. 236 et seq.
29. We will suspend the recently adopted lifespan extensions for German nuclear power plants. This is a moratorium, and it will last for three months. Angela Merkel, extract from the press conference held on 14 March 2011. URL: www.bundeskanzlerin.de/nn_683698/Content/DE/Mitschrift/Pressekonferenzen/2011/03/2011-03-14bkin-lagejapan-atomkraftwerke.html.
30. Kloepfer M., 2012, supra note 16, p. 45; Kloepfer M. and D. Bruch, 2011, supra note 9, p. 378.
31. Kloepfer, M., 2012, supra note 16, p. 45; Rebentisch M. Kraftwerks-Moratorium versus Rechtsstaat (Power plant moratorium versus the rule of law. Munich: C. H. Beck Verlag, NVwZ, 2011. Vol. 15. P 536.
32. Ewer W. and A. Behnsen. Das “Atom-Moratorium” des Bundesregierung und das geltende Atomrecht (The „nuclear moratorium“ of the Federal Government and the applicable nuclear law). Munich: C. H. Beck Verlag, Neue Juristische wochenschrift (NJW), 2011. Vol. 64. P 1183.; Kloepfer M., 2012), supra note 16, p. 45.
33. Huster S. and J. Rux in Epping, V and C. Hillgruber. Grundgesetz Kommentar (Commentary on the Basic Law). Munich: C. H. Beck Verlag, 2013. 2nd Edition. GG Article 20, recital 164; Sachs M. in Sachs. Grundgesetz Kommentar (Commentary on the Basic Law). Munich: C. H. Beck Verlag, 2011. 6th Edition. GG Article 20, recital 103; Ewer W. and A. Behnsen, 2011, supra note 32, p. 1183.
34. Kloepfer M. and D. Bruch, 2011, supra note 9, p. 386; Papier H. J. Die Zeit. 17 March 2011.
35. This is a regulatory measure. This is not a deal, this is not an agreement, this is nothing of the sort. This is the application of the Atomic Energy Act in a new context. Schmale, H. (17 March 2011), “Die Atomwendekanzlerin - Kein Mangel an Chuzpe” (The nuclear revolution Chancellor - no shortage of chutzpah). FR-Online. URL: www.fr-online.de/politik/die-atomwende-kanzlerin- kein-mangel-an-chuzpe.1472596,8238158.html.
36. VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 369.
37. Schoch F. Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht (Special administrative law): in Schmidt-ABmann E. and F. Schoch. Berlin: De Gruyter Recht, 2008. Chapter 2. Recital 84; Mann T. Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht (Special Administrative Law): in Tetinger P.J., W. Erbguth, and T. Mann. Heidelberg: C. F. Muller Verlag, 2012. Recital 463.
38. Amtliche Entscheidungssammlung (Reports of Judgments and Decisions) judgment of 19 December 1985. Federal Administrative Court. (BVerwGE). 7 C 65.82. Vol. 72. P 300; Schoch F., 2008, supra note 37, chapter 2, recital 95; Mann T., 2012, supra note 37, recital 478; Rebentisch M., 2011, supra note 31, p. 534; in the same vein, see also the grounds put forward by the competent Federal Minister for the Environment and Reactor Safety on 18 March 2011, who regarded “the abstract prevention of risks and the mere suspicion of risk” as sufficient to establish that the requirements set out in AtG section 19(3) have been met.
39. VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 371; Kloepfer M. and D. Bruch, supra note 9, p. 386.
40. Amtliche Entscheidungssammlung (Reports of Judgments and Decisions) ruling of 8 August 1978. Federal Constitutional Court. (BVerfGE). - 2 BvL 8/77. Vol. 49, p. 89 (142 f.).
41. BVerfGE ruling of 5 April 1989. NVwZ. 1989. 7 B 47/89. P 1170; VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 371.
42. VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 373.
43. VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 373; Battis U. and M. Ruttloff. Vom Moratorium zur Energiewende - und wieder zuruck (From the moratorium to the energy revolution - and back again). NVwZ. 2013. Vol. 32. P 819.
44. VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 373.
45. Rebentisch M., 2011, supra note 31, p. 535; Battis U. and M. Ruttloff, 2013, supra note 43, p. 819.
46. VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 374.
47. Mann T., 2009, supra note 8, p. 17 et seq.
48. In this respect, see also Schneehain A.W., 2005, supra note 7; Di Fabio U., 1999, supra note 1; Hellfahrt D., 2003, supra note 1; Langenfeld C., 2000, supra note 20; Koch H. J. Der Atomausstieg und der verfassungsrechtliche Schutz des Eigentums [The nuclear phaseout and the constitutional protection of property]. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift [NJW], 2000. Vol. 53. P 1529 et seq.; Kruis K. Der gesetzliche Ausstieg aus der Atomwirtschaft und das Gemeinwohl (The legislative phasing out of the nuclear industry and the common good). Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag. DVBl., 2000. Vol. 115. P 441 et seq.; Rebentisch M. Rechtliche Zweifelsfragen der gesetzlichen Beendigung der Kernenergienutzung durch Strommengenregelungen (Legal questions regarding the statutory discontinuation of the use of nuclear power on the basis of residual electricity volume regulations). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag. Festschrift fur Jurgen F. Baur, 2002. P 623 et seq.; Wagner H. Atomkompromiss und Atomausstiegsgesetz (Nuclear compromise and the Nuclear Phase-Out Act). Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck. NVwZ, 2001. Vol. 20. P. 1089 et seq.
49. Mann/Sieven. Verwaltungsarchiv. 2015. 106. P 184 et seq.
50. Case numbers 1 BvR 2821/11 (E.ON), 1 BvR 321/12 (RWE) and 1 BvR1 456/12 (Vattenfall).
51. Ziehm C., 2012, supra note 22, p. 225.
52. Energy Charter Treaty (1994), 2080 UNTS 95. Buntenbroich, D. and M. Kaul. Transparenz in Investitionsschiedsverfahren - Der Fall Vattenfall und die UNCITRAL-Transparenzregeln (Transparency in investment arbitration proceedings - the Vattenfall case and the UNCITRAL transparency rules). Zeitschrift fur Schiedsverfahren (SchiedsVZ). 2014. Vol. 12, p. 2.
53. Buntenbroich D. and M. Kaul, 2014, supra note 52, p. 2.
54. Winter G. The Rise and the Fall of Nuclear Energy Use in Germany: Processes, Explanations and the Role of Law. Journal of Environmental Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2013. Vol. 25, p. 117 et seq.; Buntenbroich D. and M. Kaul, 2014, supra note 52, p. 2.
55. VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 634.
56. Hessischer VGH zu Kernkraftwerk Biblis Abschalten war rechtswidrig from 27 February 2013. Legal Tribune Online. URL: www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/hessischer-vgh-urteil-6-c- 824-11-t-biblis-atomkraftwerk-abschaltung-rechtswidrig/.
57. Eon fordert Schadenersatz fur Atom-Moratorium from 15 April 2014. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ). URL: www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftspolitik/eon-fordert- schadenersatz-fuer-atom-moratorium-nach-fukushima-12897078.html.
58. VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 634 et seq.; Battis U. and M. Rutloff, 2013, supra note 43, p. 823.
59. VGH Kassel, supra note 27, p. 373 et seq.
60. Wagner G. Entschadigung der Energieversorgungsunternehmen wegen des Kernenergieausstiegs 2011 - Verfassungsrechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und legislatorische Optionen (Compensation for the energy supply companies in connection with the 2011 nuclear phase-out - constitutional framework and legislatory options): Kernenergieausstieg 2011 (Nuclear phase-out 2011) I in Durner, W., U. Di Fabio and G. Wagner. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag, 2011. P 176.
61. Bruch D. and H. Greve, 2011, supra note 9, p. 794.
62. Atomausstieg: Energieriesen fordern 15 Milliarden Schadensersatz from 13 June 2012. Spiegel-online. URL: www.spiegel.delwirtschaftlunternehmenlatomausstieg-energieriesen- fordern-15-milliarden-euro-schadensersatz-a-838527.html.
63. Battis U. and M. Ruttloff, 2013, supra note 43, p. 824.
64. Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGE), ruling of 6 February 2016 - 1 BvR 2821I11, 1 BvR 321I12, 1; BvR 1456I12. Vol. 143, p. 246.
65. 16th Amendment to the AtG (§§ 7e - 7g AtG) from 10.07.2018. BGBl. I S. 1122.
66. Fiscal Court of Hamburg, ruling of 16 September 2011 - 4 V 133I11, ZUR 2012. Baden- Baden: Nomos-Verlag, 2011. Vol. 23. P 54 et seq.; Fiscal Court of Munich, ruling of 5 October 2011, ref.: 14 V 2155I11, ZUR 2012. Vol. 23. P 255 et seq.
67. Fiscal Court of Hamburg, ruling of 29 January 2013 - 4 K 270I11. Munich: C. H. Beck Verlag. Zeitschrift fur das gesamte Recht der Energiewirtschaft (EnWZ). 2013. Vol.2.P. 422.ProceedingsarependingbeforetheFederalConstitutionalCourtundercasenumber2 BvL 6I13 and before the ECJ under case number C 5I14.
68. Fiscal Court of Hamburg, ruling of 11 April 2014 - ref.: 4 V 154I13I Bonn: StollfuB Medien GmbH. Entscheidungen der Finanzgerichte (EFG). 2014. Vol. 53. P 1172 et seq.
References
1. Di Fabio, U. (1999). Der Ausstieg aus dem wirtschaftlichen Nutzen der Kernenergie [The decision to phase out the commercial use of nuclear power]. Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag [in German]; Hellfahrt, D. (2003). Rechtsfragen des Atomausstiegs [Legal issues relating to the nuclear phase-out]. Frankfurt am Main: Europaische Hochschulschriften [in German]; Radkau, J. (1983). Aufstieg und Krise der deutschen Atomwirtschaf [The rise and crisis of the German nuclear industry]. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Verlag [in German]; Becker, P (2011). Das Ende der Atomverstromung - Zu den Empfehlungen der Ethik-Kommission, zur 13. Atomgesetznovelle” [The end of nuclear power - on the recommendations of the Ethics Committee concerning the 13th Amendment to the AtG]. Zeitschrift far neues Energierecht (ZNER). Journal for new energy law, Vol. 15, p. 742 [in German].
2. Radkau, J. (1983), supra note 3, p. 116 et seq.; Becker, P (2011). Aufstieg undKrise der deutschen Stromkonzerne [The rise and crisis of the German electricity companies]. Bochum: Ponte Press [in German].
3. Becker, P (2011), supra note 3, p. 742; Radkau, J. (1983), supra note 3, p. 18 et seq.
4. AtG section 1 of 23 December 1959. Bundesgesetzblatt (BGBl) - Federal Law Gazette [in German], but this clause was removed in 2002; see also Becker, P (2011), supra note 3, p. 742.
5. Agreement between the Federal Government and the energy suppliers dated 14 June 2000. bmub.de. Retrieved from: www.bmub.bund.delservicelpublikationenldownloadsldetailslartikell vereinbarung-zwischen-der-bundesregierung-und-den-energieversorgungsunternehmen-vom-14- juni-2000I.
6. Act on the Controlled Phasing Out of the Use of Nuclear Power for the Commercial Generation of Energy of 22 April 2002 [Gesetz uber das kontrollierte Auslaufen der Nutzung von Kernkraft zur kommerziellen Energieerzeugung vom 22. April 2002]. BGBl. 2002 I, p. 1351 [in German].
7. Annex 1 to the Agreement between the Federal Government and the energy suppliers dated 14 June 2000, supra note 8; Schneehain, A.W (2005). Der Atomausstieg [The nuclear phase-out]. Gottingen: Cuviller Verlag [in German]; Fillbrandt, M. and M. Paul in Danner W. and C. Theobald (2012), Energierecht[Energy Law]. Minich: C. H. Beck Verlag [in German].
8. De Witt, S. (2012). 1st der Atomausstieg 2011 mit Artikel 14 GG vereinbar? [Is the 2011 nuclear phase-out compatible with GG Article 14?]. Munich: Umwelt und Planungsrecht (UPR), VerlagsgruppeHuthig JehleRehm [in German]; for a detailed examination of whether residual electricity volumes from new power stations can be transferred to old power stations in order to extend their lifespans, see Mann, T. (2009). Rechtsfragen der Elektrizitatsmengenubertragung nach § 7 Abp. 1b Satz 2 Atomgesetz [Legal issues relating to the transfer of electrical volumes pursuant to section 7(1b) sentence 2 of the Atomic Energy Act]. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag [in German].
9. Kloepfer, M. and D. Bruch (2011). Die Laufzeitverlangerung im Atomrecht zwischen Gesetz und Vertrag” [Lifespan extensions under the Nuclear Act - between law and contract]. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck Verlag [in German].
10. Federal Government (2010). Energiekonzept fur eine umweltschonende, zuverlassige und bezahlbare Energieversorgung [Energy Concept for an Environmentally Friendly, Reliable and Affordable Energy Supply]. bundesregierung.de. Retrieved from: www.bundesregierung.de/ ContentArchiv/DE/Archiv17/_Anlagen/2012/02/energiekonzept-final.pdf [in German]; see also Fillbrandt, M. and M. Paul (2012), supra note 10, recital 11 [in German].
11. Elftes Anderungsgesetz vom 8. Dezember 2010 [Eleventh Amending Act of 8 December 2010]. BGBl 2010 I, p. 1814 [in German]; Bundestags-Drucksache (BT-Drs.) [Bundestag document] 17/3051, p. 1 [in German]; Energy Concept for an Environmentally Friendly, Reliable and Affordable Energy Supply (2010), supra note 13, p. 18.
12. Development Funds Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the nuclear power plant operators and their group parent companies in Germany, dated 6 September 2010.
13. The Act on the Creation of a Special Energy and Climate Fund of 8 December [Das Gesetz zur Schaffung eines besonderen Energie - und Klimafonds vom 8. Dezember 2010]. BGBl 2010 I, p. 1807, later amended by Article 1 of the Act of 29 July 2011, BGBl 2011 I, p. 1702 [in German].
14. Nuclear Fuel Tax Act of 8 December 2010 [Kernbrennstoffsteuergesetz ab 8. December 2010], BGBl 2010 I, p. 1804 [in German].
15. Twelfth Amending Act of 8 December 2010 - Zwolftes Anderungsgesetz vom 8. Dezember 2010, BGBl 2010 I, p. 1818 [in German].
16. Kloepfer, M. (2012). Verfahrene Atomausstiegsverfahren [A deadlocked nuclear phaseout]. Minich: Verlagsgruppe Huthig Jehle Rehm [in German]; Sauer, H. (2004). Kooperierende Rechtssetzung - Reaktionen einer herausgeforderten Verfassung [Co-operative law-making - the responses of a constitution under attack]. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot [in German].
17. Schorkopf, F. (2000). Die `vereinbarte'Novellierung des Atomgesetzes [The “pre-agreed” Amendment to the Atomic Energy Act]. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck [in German].
18. Morlok, M. (2003). Informalisierung und Entparlamentarisierung politischer Entscheidungen als Gefahrdung der Verfassung? [The informalisation and deparliamentarisation of political decisions as a threat to the constitution?]. Berlin: De Gruyter Recht [in German]; Sauer, H. (2004), supra note 21, p. 572.
19. Schorkopf, F (2000), supra note 22, 1112; Hellfahrt (2003), supra note 3, p. 102; Schoch, F. (2005). Entformalisierung staatlichen Handelns” [The deformalisation of state action]: Handbuch des Staatsrechts [Handbook of Constitutional Law] I Isensee, J. and P Kirchhof. Heidelberg: F. Muller Verlag [in German]; for a different view, see Frenz, W. (2002). Atomkonsens und Landesvollzugskompetenz [Nuclear consensus and the federal states' enforcement competencies]. NVwZ Vol. 21, p. 562 [in German], which refers to a binding obligation on the grounds of the detail and accuracy of the agreement, the way it was presented to the public and the political confidence established on this basis.
20. Langenfeld, C. (2000). Die rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen fur einen Ausstieg aus der friedlichen Nutzung der Kernenergie [The legal framework for a phase-out of the peaceful use of nuclear power]. Die offentliche Verwaltung (DOV). Vol. 53, p. 936 [in German]; Schorkopf F. (2000), supra note 22, p. 1112.
21. Motion for aresolution by the CDUICSU and FDPcoalition of 16March2011 [Beschlussantrag der Koalition CDU I CSU und FDP vom 16. Marz 2011]. BT-Drs. 17I5048, p. 2 [in German].
22. Draft of the 13th Act Amending the Atomic Energy Act [Entwurf des 13. Gesetzes zur Anderung des Atomgesetzes]. BT-Drs. 17I6070, p. 5 [in German]; Ziehm, C. (2012). Atomausstieg und Energiewende [The Nuclear Act and the Energy Revolution]. ZNER. Vol. 16. P 221 [in German].
23. 13th Act Amending the Atomic Energy Act of 31 July 2011 [13. Gesetz zur Anderung des Atomgesetzes vom 31. Juli 2011]. BGBl. 2011. I. P 1704 [in German].
24. Draft law by the CDUICSU and FDP groups [Gesetzesentwurf der CDU I CSU- und FDP- Gruppen]. BT-Drs. 17I6070, p. 5 [in German].
25. 54% of those questioned in the same survey believed that a phase-out by 2022 was a good idea, and 27% wanted the date to be even earlier. Retrieved from: www.tagesschau.delinlandl deutschlandtrend1342.html.
26. Final report of the Ethics Committee, A Safe Energy Supply, p. 18 et seq.; BT-Drs. 17I6070, supra note 28, p. 5.
27. The rulings of the Higher Administrative Court of Kassel of 27 February 2013 [Die Urteile des Oberverwaltungsgerichtshof Kassel 27. Februar 2013] - 6 C 824I11 and 6 C 825I11. Zeitschrift fur Umweltrecht (ZUR). 2013, 367 et seq. in the actions brought by RWE AG (as operator of the switched-off nuclear power plants Biblis A and B) against the Federal State of Hessen. See also the interim judgment of the Higher Administrative Court of Kassel of 4 July 2012 - 6 C 824I11.T, ZUR 2012, 632 et seq [in German].
28. Federal Administrative Court [BVerwG], ruling of 20 December 2013 - 7 B 18.13, ZUR 2014, p. 236 et seq [in German].
29. We will suspend the recently adopted lifespan extensions for German nuclear power plants. This is a moratorium, and it will last for three months. [Wir werden die kurzlich verabschiedeten Verlangerungen der Lebensdauer deutscher Kernkraftwerke aussetzen. Dies ist ein Moratorium, das drei Monate dauern wird]. bundeskanzlerin.de. Retrieved from: www.bundeskanzlerin.deI nn_683698IContentIDEIMitschriftIPressekonferenzenI2011I03I2011-03-14bkin-lagejapan- atomkraftwerke.html [in German].
30. Kloepfer, M. (2012), supra note 21, p. 45; Kloepfer, M. and D. Bruch (2011), supra note 12, p. 378.
31. Kloepfer, M. (2012), supra note 21, p. 45; Rebentisch, M. (2011), supra note 40, p. 536.
32. Ewer, W. and A. Behnsen (2011), supra note 40, p. 1183; Kloepfer, M. (2012), supra note 21, p. 45.
33. Huster, S. and J. Rux (2013). GrundgesetzKommentar [Commentary on the Basic Law]: in Epping, V. and C. Hillgruber. Munich: C. H. Beck Verlag, [in German]; Sachs, M. (2011). GrundgesetzKommentar [Commentary on the Basic Law]: in Sachs. Munich: C. H. Beck Verlag [in German]; Ewer, W and A. Behnsen (2011), supra note 40, p. 1183.
34. Kloepfer, M. and D. Bruch (2011), supra note 12, p. 386; Papier, H. J., Die Zeit dated 17 March 2011.
35. This is a regulatory measure. This is not a deal, this is not an agreement, this is nothing of the sort. This is the application of the Atomic Energy Act in a new context.” Schmale, H. (17 March 2011), Die Atomwendekanzlerin - Kein Mangel an Chuzpe [The nuclear revolution Chancellor - no shortage of chutzpah], FR-Online. Retrieved from: www.fr-online.de/politik/die- atomwende-kanzlerin-kein-mangel-an-chuzpe.1472596,8238158.html [in German].
36. VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 369.
37. Schoch, F. (2008). Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht[Specialadministrative law]: in Schmidt- ABmann, E. and F. Schoch. Berlin: De Gruyter Recht [in German]; Mann, T. 2012. Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht [Special Administrative Law]: in Tetinger, P.J., W. Erbguth, and T. Mann. Heidelberg: C. F. Muller Verlag[in German].
38. Federal Administrative Court, judgment of 19 December 1985 - 7 C 65.82 - Amtliche Entscheidungssammlung [Reports of Judgments and Decisions] (BVerwGE), Vol. 72, p. 300 [in German]; Schoch, F. (2008), supra note 51, chapter 2, recital 95; Mann, T. (2012), supra note 51, recital 478; Rebentisch, M. (2011), supra note 40, p. 534; in the same vein, see also the grounds put forward by the competent Federal Minister for the Environment and Reactor Safety on 18 March 2011, who regarded “the abstract prevention of risks and the mere suspicion of risk” as sufficient to establish that the requirements set out in AtG section 19(3) have been met.
39. VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 371; Kloepfer, M. and D. Bruch, supra note 12, p. 386.
40. Federal Constitutional Court, ruling of 8 August 1978 - 2 BvL 8/77 - Amtliche Entscheidungssammlung [Reports of Judgments and Decisions] (BVerfGE), Vol. 49, p. 89 (142 f.) [in German].
41. BVerfGE, ruling of 5 April 1989 - 7 B 47/89, NVwZ 1989, p. 1170; VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 371.
42. VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 373.
43. VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 373; Battis, U. and M. Ruttloff (2013). Vom Moratorium zur Energiewende - und wieder zuruck [From the moratorium to the energy revolution - and back again]. NVwZ. Vol. 32 p. 819 [in German].
44. See VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 373.
45. Rebentisch, M. (2011), supra note 40, p. 535; Battis, U. and M. Ruttloff (2013), supra note 57, p. 819.
46. VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 374.
47. Mann, T. (2009), supra note 11, p. 17 et seq.
48. In this respect, see also Schneehain, A.W (2005), supra note 10; Di Fabio, U. (1999), supra note 3; Hellfahrt, D. (2003), supra note 3; Langenfeld, C. (2000), supra note 25; Koch H. J. (2000). Der Atomausstieg und der verfassungsrechtliche Schutz des Eigentums [The nuclear phase-out and the constitutional protection of property]. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift [NJW] - New legal weekly. Vol. 53, Verlag C. H. Beck, Munich, p. 1529 et seq. [in German]; Kruis, K. (2000). Der gesetzliche Ausstieg aus der Atomwirtschaft und das Gemeinwohl” [The legislative phasing out of the nuclear industry and the common good]. Gologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag [in German]; Rebentisch, M. (2002). Rechtliche Zweifelsfragen der gesetzlichen Beendigung der Kernenergienutzung durch Strommengenregelungen [Legal questions regarding the statutory discontinuation of the use of nuclear power on the basis of residual electricity volume regulations]. Festschrift fur Jurgen F Baur, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, p. 623 et seq.'[in German]; Wagner, H. (2001). Atomkompromiss und Atomausstiegsgesetz [Nuclear compromise and the Nuclear Phase-Out Act]. NVwZ. Vol. 20, Verlag C. H. Beck, Munich, p. 1089 et seq. [in German].
49. Mann/Sieven, Verwaltungsarchiv [Administrative archive]. 106 (2015), p. 184 et seq. [in German].
50. Case numbers 1 BvR2821/11 (E.ON), 1 BvR 321/12 (RWE) and 1 BvR1 456/12 (Vattenfall) [in German].
51. Ziehm, C. (2012), supra note 28, p. 225.
52. Energy Charter Treaty (1994), 2080 UNTS 95. Buntenbroich, D. and M. Kaul (2014). Transparenz in Investitionsschiedsverfahren - Der Fall Vattenfall und die UNCITRAL- Transparenzregeln [Transparency in investment arbitration proceedings - the Vattenfall case and the UNCITRAL transparency rules], Zeitschrift fur Schiedsverfahren (SchiedsVZ) - Arbitration Journal. Vol. 12, p. 2 [in German].
53. Buntenbroich, D. and M. Kaul (2014), supra note 157, p. 2.
54. Winter, G. (2013). The Rise and the Fall of Nuclear Energy Use in Germany: Processes, Explanations and the Role of Law [Der Aufstieg und Fall der Kernenergienutzung in Deutschland: Prozesse, Erklarungen und die Rolle des Rechts]. Journal of Environmental Law - Zeitschrift fur Umweltrecht, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Vol. 25, p. 117 et seq. [in German]; Buntenbroich, D. and M. Kaul (2014), supra note 157, p. 2.
55. VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 634.
56. Hessischer VGH zu Kernkraftwerk Biblis Abschalten war rechtswidrig (27 February 2013) [Hessian VGH on Biblis nuclear power plant shutdown was illegal (27. Februar 2013]. Legal Tribune Online - Legal Tribune Online. Retrieved from: www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/ hessischer-vgh-urteil-6-c-824-11-t-biblis-atomkraftwerk-abschaltung-rechtswidrig/ [in German].
57. Eon fordert Schadenersatz fur Atom-Moratorium (15 April 2014) [Eon damage compensation for nuclear moratorium (15. April 2014)]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) - Frankfurt General Journal. Retrieved from: www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftspolitik/ eon-fordert-schadenersatz-fuer-atom-moratorium-nach-fukushima-12897078.html [in German].
58. VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 634 et seq.; Battis, U. and M. Rutloff (2013), supra note 57, p. 823.
59. VGH Kassel, supra note 38, p. 373 et seq.
60. Wagner, G. (2011). Entschadigung der Energieversorgungsunternehmen wegen des Kernenergieausstiegs 2011 - Verfassungsrechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und legislatorische Optionen [Compensation for the energy supply companies in connection with the 2011 nuclear phase-out - constitutional framework and legislatory options]: Kernenergieausstieg 2011 [Nuclear phase-out 2011] / Durner, W., U. Di Fabio and G. Wagner. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag [in German].
61. Bruch, D. and H. Greve (2011), supra note 32, p. 794.
62. Atomausstieg: Energieriesen fordern 15 Milliarden Schadensersatz (13 June 2012) [Nuclear phase-out: energy giants are demanding 15 billion in damages (13. Juni 2012]. Spiegel- online. Retrieved from: www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/atomausstieg-energieriesen- fordern-15-milliarden-euro-schadensersatz-a-838527.html [in German].
63. Battis, U. and M. Ruttloff (2013), supra note 57, p. 824.
64. Federal Constitutional Court ruling of 6 February 2016 - 1 BvR 2821/11, 1 BvR 321/12, 1; BvR 1456/12 -, BVerfGE, Vol. 143, p. 246.
65. 16th Amendment to the AtG (§§ 7e - 7g AtG) from 10.07.2018, BGBl. I S. 1122.
66. Fiscal Court ofHamburg, ruling of 16 September 2011 [FiskalgerichtHamburg, Urteil vom 16. September 2011]- 4 V 133/11, ZUR 2012. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag. Vol. 23. p. 54 et seq.; Fiscal Court of Munich, ruling of 5 October 2011, ref.: 14 V 2155/11, ZUR 2012, Vol. 23, p. 255 et seq. [in German].
67. Fiscal Court of Hamburg, ruling of 29 January 2013 [Fiskalgericht Hamburg, Urteil vom 29. Januar 2011] - 4 K 270/11, Zeitschriftfur das gesamte Recht der Energiewirtschaft (EnWZ) - Journal for the entire law of the energy industry. 2013, C. H. Beck Verlag, Munich, Vol. 2, p. 422. Proceedings are pending before the Federal Constitutional Court under case number 2 BvL 6/13 and before the ECJ under case number C 5/14 [in German].
68. Fiscal Court of Hamburg, ruling of 11 April 2014 [Fiskalgericht Hamburg, Urteil vom 11. April 2014] - ref.: 4 V 154/13, Entscheidungen der Finanzgerichte (EFG) 2014 [Decisions by the Fiscal Courts 2014]. Bonn: StollfuB Medien GmbH. Vol. 53, p. 1172 et seq. [in German].
Размещено на Allbest.ru
Подобные документы
Establishment of the Federal judicial system and the setting of the balance between the Federal and the local judicial branches of power. Nowdays many things that the First Judiciary Act required have been swept aside.
доклад [9,7 K], добавлен 23.10.2002Like many other countries, the Constitution of Ukraine defines three branches of government – the legislative, the executive and the judicial. President also has the power, although it is not a branch, but it is the highest official in the country.
презентация [7,8 M], добавлен 13.05.2015Concept, importance of the Constitution as the fundamental law of the state, the history of development. Features of the constitutions of the leading powers of the European continent. Factors that influence the content of the Constitution of Bulgaria.
реферат [21,4 K], добавлен 14.02.2015Consideration of sovereignty as a basic constitutional principles of state law (for example, the countries - members of the Commonwealth of Independent States). Legislative support in Ukraine national development in the socio-cultural (spiritual) sphere.
реферат [20,1 K], добавлен 13.02.2015General characteristics of the personal security of employees. Bases of fight against a corruption in the tax service of Ukraine. Personal safety of the tax police, concept, content, principles. Legislative regulation of non-state security activity.
реферат [24,7 K], добавлен 08.10.2012General characteristics of the Ministry of Oil and Gas of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Main tasks, functions, and rules of the Department of development of oil industry. Perspective directions of the Ministry of Oil and Gas of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
отчет по практике [37,4 K], добавлен 21.04.2013Concept of development basic law. Protection of freedom through the implementation of the principle of subsidiarity. Analysis of the humanitarian aspects of the legal status of a person. Systematic review of articles of the constitution of Russia.
реферат [21,2 K], добавлен 14.02.2015The role of constitutional justice in strengthening constitutional legality. Protection of the constitutional rights, freedoms, formation of the specialized institute of judicial power. The removal of contradictions and blanks in the federal legislation.
реферат [24,0 K], добавлен 14.02.2015The first steps promoting creation of the judicial organs of the constitutional control in the subjects of the Russian Federation. Creation of the constitutional (charter) courts. System of organization of the power in the subjects of the Federation.
реферат [17,4 K], добавлен 07.01.2015Placing the problem of human rights on foreground of modern realization. The political rights in of the Islamic Republic Iran. The background principles of vital activity of the system of judicial authorities. The executive branch of the power in Iran.
реферат [30,2 K], добавлен 14.02.2015
