General type of legal regulation and practice of the supreme court in Ukraine: features of objectification

[6] Pylypenko, V.P., Pylypyshyn, P.B., & Radanovych, N.M. (2021). Features of legal regulation of human rights in armed conflicts. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(1), 43-51.

[7] Yaroshenko, O.M., & Tomashevski, K.L. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on labour and social security relations: Rule-making experience of Belarus and Ukraine. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(2), 211-221.

[8] Bukhanevych, O.M., Melnyk, A.M., & Petryshyn, O.O. (2021). Approaches to understanding the category “special legal regimes”. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(1), 71-78.

[9] Zarosylo, V.O., Yevchuk, T.V., Muraviov, K.V., Gunchenko, O.V., & Smirnova, V.V. (2020). Theoretical, legal and practical regulation of public relations, which determine and guarantee the rights of citizens and compliance with the constitution of Ukraine during a pandemic. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(4), 134-144.

[10] Mahendra, P. (1985). Singh judicial review of discretionary powers. In German Administrative Law (pp. 83-101). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

[11] Hill, N., Rotter, R., Burridge, A., & Allsopp, J. (2017). The limits of procedural discretion: Unequal treatment and vulnerability in Britain's asylum appeals. Social & Legal Studies, 27(1), 49-78.

[12] Regimbald, G. (2016). Legal limits on the exercise of discretion. Canadian Institute: The 16^th advanced administrative law & practice. In Canadian administrative law (pp. 215-258).

[13] Krasheninikova, N.A. (2009). Digests of justinian. Textbook on the history of state and law of the foreign states (Vol. 1). Moscow: Norma.

[14] Fucuiama, F. (2020). Identity. The need for dignity and the politics of resentment. Kyiv: Nash Format.

[15] Kolodii, A.M. (1991). On the regulatory possibilities and limits of the principle “everything that is not expressly prohibited by law is allowed”. Problems of Jurisprudence, 52, 10-15.

[16] Matuzov, N.I. (1999). Once again about the principle “not prohibited by law is permitted”. Jurisprudence, 3, 14-32.

[17] Omelchuk, O.M., Hrynko, S.D., Ivanovska, A.M., Misinkevych, A.L., & Antoniuk, V.V. (2021). Protection of human rights in the context of the development of the rule of law principle: The international aspect. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(1), 32-42.

[18] Law of Ukraine No. 2453-VI. “On the Judicial System and Status of Judges”. (2016, June).

[19] Declaration on Human Rights (1789).

[20] Humboldt, V. fon (2009). About the limits of state activity. Cheliabinsk: Socium.

[21] Constitution of Ukraine. (1996, June).

[22] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 8-r/2018. (2018, October).

[23] Law of Ukraine No. 1484-III “On Ratification of Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty”. (2000, February).

[24] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 11-rp/1999. (1999, December).

[25] Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine No. 2 “On Jurisprudence in Cases of Crimes Against Life and Health”. (2003, February).

[26] Law of Ukraine No. 2801-XI “Fundamentals of Ukrainian Legislation on Health Care”. (2018, June).

[27] The Supreme Court Judgement in the Case No. 522/18103/14-c. (2020, June).

[28] DSTU 2293:2014. “Occupational Health. Terms and definitions of basic concepts”. (2014). Kyiv: Ministry of Economic Development of Ukraine.

[29] Tykhyi, V.P. (2016). Human security: Concept, legal support, meaning, types. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 2(85), 31-46.

[30] Law of Ukraine No. 2469-VIII “About the National Security”. (2018, June).

[31] Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine “On the Application of the Constitution of Ukraine in the Administration of Justice. (1996, November).

[32] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 1-r/2017. (2017, November).

[33] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 12-rp/2011. (2011, October).

[34] Law of Ukraine No. 2411-VI “On the Principles of Domestic and Foreign Policy”. (2010, July).

[35] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 2-rp/2016. (2016, June).

[36] Family Code of Ukraine. (2002, January).

[37] Law of Ukraine No. 1296-IV. “On the Protection of Public Morality”. (2003, November).

[38] Petryshyn, O.V., Pogrebniak, S.P., Smorodynsikyj, V.S., Benedyk, E.V., Bylia-Sabadash, I.O., & Yakoviuk, E.V. (2015). Theory of state and law. Kharkiv. Pravo.

[39] Koziubra, M.E., Pohrebniak, S.P., Tseliiev, O.V., & Matvieieva, Y.E. (2015). General theory of law. Kyiv: Vaite.

[40] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 3-rp/2010. (2010, January).

[41] Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2001, April).

[42] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 13-r/2018 (2018, December).

[43] Case of Ringeisen v. Autstria: (Merits) (Application No. 2614/65). (1971, July).

[44] Case of Allan Jacobson v. Sweden (No. 1) (Application No.10842/84). (1989, October).

[45] Case of Benthem v. The Netherlands (Application No. 8848/80). (1985, October).

[46] Case of Salesi v. Italy (Application No. 13023/87). (1993, February).

[47] Case of Deumeland v. Germany (Application No. 9384/81). (1986, May).

[48] Case of Feldbrugge v. The Netherlands (Application No. 8562/79). (1993, February).

[49] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 686/13619/17. (2019, December).

[50] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 241/1510/16-k. (2020, April).

[51] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 754/11171/19. (2020, April).

[52] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 693/26/18. (2020, February).

[53] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 727/11479/17. (2020, April).

[54] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 0306/7567/12. (2021, January).

[55] Cherdantsev, A.F. (2002). Theory of state and law. Moscow: Pravo.

[56] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 910/6471/18. (2019, December).

[57] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 285/4411/18. (2020, April).

[58] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 705/2583/17. (2020, January).

[59] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 686/6276/19. (2020, September).

[60] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 308/452/19. (2020, February).

[61] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 127/25395/18 (2020, September).

[62] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. (2018, October). Report on the Rule of Law. Adopted by the European Commission for Democracy through Law at its 86^th Plenary Session (Venice, 2011, March). Retrieved from

[63] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case of Chorherr v. Autstria No. 13308/87. (1993, August).

[64] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case of Kokkinakis v. Greece No. 14307/88. (1993, May).

[65] Perepeliuk, V. (2018). Scientific conclusion on the limits of discretionary power of the subject ofpower and judicial control over its implementation. Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 643/13256/17. (2020, February).

[66] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 9901/337/19. (2019, November).

[67] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 591/2221/19. (2020, March).

[68] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 199/6713/14-^ (2019, March).

[69] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 18-rp/2004 (2004, December).

[70] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 754/613/18-c. (2020, January).

[71] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case of Chapman v. The United Kingdom No. 27238/95. (2001, January).

[72] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 265/6582/16-c. (2019, September).

[73] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 522/3665/17. (2019, February).

[74] Supreme Courts' Judgement in the Case No. 640/11643/19. (2020, May).

Размещено на Allbest.ru