Features of the inheritance rights of children born as a result of artificial insemination

These circumstances demonstrate that the legislation of Ukraine does not fully consider the current achievements of reproductive medicine. At present, the legislator must clearly identify possible options for the development of events, because these issues are increasingly arising in practice and remain, unfortunately, unresolved. Furthermore, as a result of the proposals made by lawyers, it will be possible to avoid many controversial issues in establishing the inheritance rights of children born with the help of assisted reproductive technologies.

REFERENCES

[1] A comparative study on the regime of surrogacy in EU member states. The European Parliament. (2013, May). Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ etudes/STUD/2013/474403/IPOL-JURI_ET(2013)474403_EN.pdf

[2] Surrogacy. VARTA. Retrieved from https://www.varta.org.au/information-and- support/surrogacy

[3] Garner, B.A., & Black, H.C. (2004). Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.

[4] Glossary of terms of ART. Revised ICMART and WHO Glossary of VTR terms

(IKMART - ICMART - International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies). Fertility and Sterility, 92(5). Retrieved from

http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/art_terminology2/ru/index.html

[5] Dakhno, F.V., & Kutsenko, A.O. (2009). Auxiliary reproductive technologies and problems of postmortem (postmortem) reproduction. Zhinochyi Likar, 2, 15.

[6] Anikina, G.V. (2013). On the issue of legal regulation of postmortem reproduction. Electron. scientific Journal “Science. Society. State”, 2, 8.

[7] Valakh, V.V. (2012). Hereditary relations in Ukraine, the Russian Federation, France, Germany and the USA (comparative legal research). Kharkiv: Burun kniga.

[8] Yavor, O. A., Nadon, V. V., & Ruban, O. O. (2019). Transformation of legal regulation of family relations under the impact of scientific progress. Astra Salvensis, 1, 523-537.

[9] Hudyma, D. (2010). Died man as a subject of law (non-trivial thoughts). Law of Ukraine, 12, 260-265.

[10] Zhuravlova, E.M. (2014). Status of nasciturus in the inheritance law of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Russian Academy of Public Administration and State Service under the President of the Russian Federation.

[11] Kasatkina, A.Y. (2014). Realization of the hereditary rights of the child in the Russian Federation. Moscow: Russian Law Academy of the Ministry of Justice Russian Federation.

[12] D'Almaine, J., & Zaal, F.N. (2018). Inheritance rights for posthumously procreated children: A growing challenge for the law. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 21, 87-94.

[13] Kirichenko, K.A. (2008). Modern theories of the basis of parental rights. Family and Housing Law, 6, 3.

[14] Kukharev, O.E. (2018). Some aspects of the legal status of postmortem children of the testator in the inheritance law of Ukraine. Bulletin of Zaporizhia National University, 1, 46-54.

[15] Malkin, O.Y. (2014). Persons called upon to inherit by law. Inheritance Law, 4, 14-21.

[16] Rosenblum, I. (2013). The Biological Will™ - a New Paradigm in ART?

Retrieved from http://www.newfamily.org.il/en/4905/the-

biologicalwill%E2%84%A2-%E2%80%93-a-new-paradigm-in-art/

[17] Razgon, O. (2018). Legal status of a person conceived but not yet born in hereditary relations. Legal adviser. Magazine “MEN”, 5(71), 34-47.

[18] Xavier, M. J., Roman, S. D., Aitken, R. J., & Nixon, B. (2019). Transgenerational inheritance: How impacts to the epigenetic and genetic information of parents affect offspring health. Human Reproduction Update, 25(5), 519-541.

[19] Ryabokon, E.A. (2017). Conceived child as a potential subject of relations arising from hereditary succession. Nasciturus Pro lam Nato Habetur o Ochronc Dziecka Pocz^tego i JegoMatki, 5, 258-281.

[20] Tremellen, K., & Savulescu, J. (2015). A Discussion Supporting Presumed Consent for Posthumous Sperm Procurement and Conception. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 30(1), 6-13.

[21] Stefanchuk, R.O. (2008). Personal non-property rights of individuals (concept, content, system, features of implementation and protection). Kyiv: KNT.

[22] Simana, Sh. (2018). Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 5(2), 329-354.

[23] Shishka, O.R. (2011). The right of a non-existent participant in civil relations as a legal fiction. Law and Administration, 1, 489-511.

[24] Dakin, A. (2020, January). An Arizona woman cannot use her frozen embryos after divorce, state Supreme Court rules. CNNhealth. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/26/health/arizona-embryo-court-ruling- trnd/index.html

[25] Trachman, E. (2020, January). AZ supreme court gets embryo case right, but it feels so wrong. above the law. Retrieved from https://abovethelaw.com/2020/01/az- supreme-court-gets-embryo-case-right-but-it-feels-so-wrong/

[26] New family organization. Retrieved from https://www.newfamily.org.il/en/

[27] The official portal of the courts of general jurisdiction of the city of Moscow. Information on the case No 33-9401 / 2015. Retrieved from https://www.mos- gorsud.ru/mgs/services/cases/appeal-civil/details/dce955df-2ef5-4965-9203- 9804b1ae114b?caseNumber=33-9401&courtInternalName=mgs

[28] Petrova, E.Y. (2015). Fundamentals of inheritance law in Russia, Germany, France. Moscow: Statute.

Размещено на Allbest.ru