Technique of generalization of results of comparative historical and legal research

[13] Vasilkova, V.V., & Legostaeva, N.I. (2020). Social bots as an instrument of influence in social networks: Typologization problems. In Culture, personality, society in the conditions of digitalization: Methodology and experience of empirical research conference (pp. 823-830). Dubai: Knowledge E.

[14] Duran, J.M. (2021). A formal framework for computer simulations: Surveying the historical record and finding their philosophical roots. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 105-127.

[15] Lopatka, K.A. (2020). Mathematical modeling as a method of studying the factors influencing the economic security of the enterprise. Economic Space, 156, 144-150.

[16] Nicholls, J., Allaire, B., & Holm, P. (2021). The capacity trend method: A new approach for enumerating the Newfoundland cod fisheries (1675-1790). Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 54:2, 80-93.

[17] Petrunia-Pyliavska, N.A. (2020). Typology of culture: Conceptual approaches. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal “ЛОГОЕ. The Art of Scientific Thought”, 9, 81-84.

[18] Putsenteilo, P.R., & Kostetskyi, Ya.I. (2020). The use of cluster analysis methods to predict the investment development of agricultural enterprises. Innovative Economy, 7-8, 88-99.

[19] Poltavskaja, E.I. (2018). Typology is the process of primary ordering of libraries. Scientific and Technical Libraries, 7, 16-31.

[20] Serohina, S.H. (2008). Typology of forms of government by methods of index and cluster analysis: Current status and perspectives. State Building and Local Self-Government, 16, 3-15.

[21] Lukianov, D.V. (2015). Religious legal systems in the modern world. Kharkiv: Pravo.

[22] Lukianov, D.V. (2012). Problems of classification and typology of modern legal systems. Comparative Jurisprudence, 3-4, 56-62.

[23] Nastasiak, I. (2014). Typology or classification of modern legal systems of the world? Bulletin of the National Academy of the Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine, 5(38), 41-46.

[24] Luc, L.A. (2004). Methodological possibilities of typology of legal systems. Law and Democracy, 15, 38-49.

[25] Pronina, T.S., Fedotov, Ju.S., & Fedotova, E.Ju. (2018). Typology of new religious movements based on values and needs. Sociological Research, 1, 73-82.

[26] Tkachenko, V.D. (2000). The principle of legality as a classification criterion of the typology of states. Actual problems of formation of the rule of law in Ukraine. In To the 50th Anniversary of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference. Part 1 (pp. 96-100). Kharkiv: National Law Academy of Ukraine named after Yaroslav Mudryi.

[27] Romashov, R.A. (2009). Typology of the state in the context of comparative political science: Open lectures of the fourth international seminar “Comparative Law: current status andprospects ofdevelopment”. Kyiv: Logos.

[28] Malikov, A.V. (1998). Review of non-traditional typologies of the state. Bulletin of Moscow University, 6, 102-111.

[29] Rosen, L. (2020). Expert testimony in the social sciences: A historical overview of contemporary issues. Law and History Review, 38(1), 123-142.

[30] Serohina, S.H. (2009). Problems of typology of modern states with different forms of government by methods of cluster analysis. In Science of constitutional law of Ukraine: Current state and directions of development (pp. 100-103). Kharkiv: Pravo.

[31] Pysarkova, V.R., & Naumenko, N.Yu. (2019). Approaches to cluster analysis to assess the financial and economic performance of enterprises. Computer Modeling: Analysis, Control, Optimization, 1, 63-69.

[32] Shenderjuk, M.G. (1996). Quantitative methods in source studies. Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad University.

[33] Stepin, V.S., & Elsukov, A.N. (1974). Methods of scientific knowledge. Minsk: Vysshaya shkola.

[34] Zharov, S.N. (2009). Comparative analysis of medieval acts of a constitutional nature. In Yu.S. Shemshuchenka, L.V. Huberskoho, & I.S. Hrytsenko (Eds.), Comparative jurisprudence: Current status and prospects (pp. 195-197). Kyiv: Logos.

[35] Demichev, A.A. (2009). Methodological principles of the scientific school of chrono-discrete monogeographic comparative jurisprudence. University Scientific Notes, 2(30), 6-12.

[36] Kmetyk-Podubinska, Kh. (2020). Legal modeling as a method of modern constitutional and legal research. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 7, 211-215.

[37] Batoroev, K.B. (1974). Cybernetics and the method of analogies. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.

[38] Ferguson, J. (2019). Proletarian politics today: On the perils and possibilities of historical analogy. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 61(1), 4-22.

[39] Andreev, I.D. (1964). On the methods of scientific knowledge. Moscow: Nauka.

[40] Ekamper, P., Bijwaard, G., Van Poppel, F., & Lumey, L.H. (2017). War-related excess mortality in the Netherlands, 1944-45: New estimates of famine- and nonfamine-related deaths from national death records. Historical Methods:

A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 50(2), 113-128.

[41] Filippenko, M.M. (1975). Analogy as a means of knowledge. Moscow: Mysl.

Размещено на Allbest.ru