Національна стійкість до демократії: український досвід

Thus, it is necessary to continue the research on the questions of psycho-political factors of national resilience, which will allow authorities, representatives of the government, to better understand the needs and concerns of citizens regarding the relevance of the threats to their livelihoods and to find the most effective measures and methods that can be used to prevent and/or resolve crisis situations. It is important to note that today there is an urgent need for scientists to study and explore the various factors that weaken and strengthen national resilience to improve, and where necessary, develop and implement an adequate authentically adapted to the realities of the national strategy results. It is also important that, notwithstanding such analyses by groups of scientists from Ukraine and Israel, we can state that the results of these studies have led to critical insights. The presence of the main threats and ensuring the stability of the political institutions of society are important components of the national resilience.

Given the current global threats, the data show that governance is a key element in strengthening national resilience as well as democracy when gaining the support and trust of citizens in government. On the other hand, the state must study the views of its citizens and the real needs, problems and threats in order to have a vital impact on the country's ability to cope with stressors and crises. The expediency of introducing the term “resilience” is still controversial in Ukraine, but we are convinced that the use of resilience is an extremely important issue to address to on the agenda of the Ukrainian scientific community today. The results of our study suggest that such public opinion polls require further implementation. The answers will be fundamental arguments for improving national resilience in Ukraine, which will help to better understand how to measure and shape it in order to implement and develop in the country, ensuring the resilience of nation and state.

References

1. Fernandez-Montesinjos, F.A. (2019). We need to be prepared to live with a lower level of security, without ceasing to fight for the necessary level of freedom. Retrieved from https:ZZm.tyzhden.ua/publication/235175.

2. Lahutin, V. (2017). Stable social development: The experience of interdisciplinary research. Economic Theory, 2, 5-18.

3. Korolchuk, O. (2019). Trends of the public management development in Ukraine. In R. Iserman, M. Dei, O. Rudenko, Ya. Tsekhmister, & V. Lunov (Eds.), Association agreement: Driving integrational changes (pp. 72-87). Chicago: Accent Graphics Communications.

4. Bilynska, M., & Korolchuk, O. (2018). The role of national resilience in public administration reforming. Administration and Management, 3, 24-45.

5. Bilynska, M.M., & Korolchuk, O.L. (2018). Public administration: Vocabulary of terminology. Kyiv: NADU.

6. Canetti, D., Waismel-Manor, I., Cohen, M., & Rapaport, C. (2014). What does national resilience mean in a democracy? Evidence from the United States and Israel. Armed Forces & Society, 40(3), 504-520.

7. Carver, C.S. (1988). Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages. Journal of Social, 54(2), 245-266.

8. Ben-Dor, G., Canetti-Nisim, D., & Halperin, E. (2007). The social aspect of national security: Israeli public opinion and the second Lebanon war. Haifa: National Security Studies Center.

9. Canetti, D., Rapaport, C., Wayne, C., Hall, B.J., & Hobfoll, S.E. (2013). An exposure effects? Evidence from a rigorous study on the psycho-political outcomes of terrorism. In S.J. Sinclair, D. Antonius (Eds.), The political psychology of terrorism fears (pp. 193-212). New York: Oxford University Press.

10. Bellany, I. (1981). Toward a Theory of International Security. Political Studies, 29(1), 100-105.

11. Luciani, G. (1989). The economic content of national security. Journal of Public Policy, 8(2), article number 151.

12. Sullivan, J.L., & Transue, J.E. (1999). The psychological underpinning of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 625-650.

13. Ben-Dor, G., Pedahzur, A., Canetti-Nisim, D., Zaidise, E., Perliger, A., & Bermanis, Sh. (2007). I vs. We: Collective and individual factors of reserve service motivation during war and peace. Armed Forces & Society, 34(4), 565-592.

14. Norris, F.H., Tracy, M., & Galea, S. (2009). Looking for resilience: Understanding the longitudinal trajectories of response to stress. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 2190-2198.

15. Wagnild, G.M., & Collins, J.A. (2009). Assessing resilience. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services, 47(12), 28-33.

16. Bonanno, G.A. (2005). Resilience in the face of potential trauma. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 135-138.

17. Norris, F.H., Stevens, S.P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyce, K.F., & Pfefferbaum, R.L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 1573-2770.

18. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

19. Kaplan, H.B. (1999). Toward an understanding of resilience: A critical review of definition and models. In D.G. Meyer (Ed.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations (pp. 17-83). New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers.

20. Beck, U. (2000). Risk society: Towards a different modern. Moscow: Prohress-Tradytsyia.

21. Shypunova, T.V (2016). Social security: The topic of a controversial field. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, XIX(2(85)), 101-112.

22. Luhmann, N. (2019). Risk concept. Thesis, 5, 135-160.

23. Vereshchahina, A.V., Samykhin, S.Y., & Khafyatulina, N.Kh. (2017). Sociology of security. Moscow: INFRA-M.

24. Ratushna, T.O. (2018). Formation of a barrier-free social environment in the modern urban space. In E.V. Prushkivska (Ed.), Generation of inclusive development innovations: National, regional, international dimension: Materials of the Zaporizhzhia - International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 73-77). Zaporizhzhia: ZNTU.

25. Magnoni, S. (2018). How civil society must adapt to survive its greatest challenges. Retrieved from weforum.org/agenda/2018/04/civil-society-must-adapt-to-survive-its-greatest-challenges/.

26. Havryliuk, O. (2014). Global risks and tools and minimization. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economy, 7, 9-13.

27. The outline of the world future. (2004). Report on Project 2020 by the US National Intelligence Council in consultation with independent experts around the world. Retrieved from https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=484392.

28. Kegley, Jr., & Ch.W. (Ed.). (2002). International terrorism. Characteristics, causes, controls. New York: Pearson.

29. Berger, P.L., & Hsiao, H.-H.M. (Eds.). (2004). In Search of an East Asian Development Model. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

30. Terrorism - a threat to democracy, human rights and civil society: the contribution of parliaments to combating international terrorism and addressing its causes in order to maintain international peace and security. (2002). Retrieved from http://archive.ipu.org/conf-e/107spl.htm.

31. Myrskyi, H. (2002). Modern terrorism in the context of globalization. The dragon rears up (On international terrorism). World Economy and International Relations, 3, 36-46.

32. Beck, U. (2001). What is globalization? The mistakes of globalism - answers to globalization. Moscow: Prohress-Tradytsyia.

33. Voitovych, R. (2010). Global terrorism as a challenge to common development. Bulletin of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, 4, 5-17.

34. Byman, D.L. (2019). Terrorism and threat to democracy. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/ terrorism-and-the-threat-to-democracy/.

35. Canetti, D., Galea, S., Hall, B.J., Johnson, R.J., Palmieri, P.A., & Hobfoll, S.E. (2010). Exposure to prolonged sociopolitical conflict and the risk of PTSD and depression among Palestinians. Psychiatry - Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 73(3), 219-232.

36. Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Hobfoll, S.E. (2012). A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal expo-sure to terrorism, psychological distress and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(2), 363-389.

37. Magwaza, A.S. (1999). Assumptive world of traumatized South African adults. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 622-630.

38. Guterres, A. (2020). This is, above all, a human crisis that calls for solidarity. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/ un-coronavirus-communications-team/above-all-human-crisis-calls-solidarity.

39. Chandra, A.,Acosta, J., & Stern, S. (2010). Building social resilience to catastrophes: The wayforward to strengthening the safety of national health. Santa-Monica: RAND Corporation.

40. Nuvayhid, I., Zurayuk, H., Yamoce, R., & Kortas, C. (2011). Summer 2006, the war in Levan: A lesson on social resilience. Global Public Health, 6(5), 505-519.

41. Galea, S., Ahern, J., Resnick, H., Kilpatrick, D., Bucuvalas, M., Gold, J., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorists attacks in New York city. New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 982-987.

42. Silver, R.C., Holman, E.A., McIntosh, D.N., Poulin, M., & Gil-Rivas, V. (2002). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. JAMA, 288(10), 1235-1244.

43. Fredrickson, B.L., Tugade, M.M., Waugh, Ch.E., & Larkin, G.R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365-376.

44. Small, D.A., Lerner, J.S., & Fischhoff, B. (2006). Emotion priming and attributions for terrorism: Americans' reactions in a national field experiment. Political Psychology, 17(2), 289-298.

45. Amit, K., & Fleischer, N. (2006). Between social resilience and social capital. In The Concept of Social Resilience (pp. 84-109). Haifa: The Technion Samuel Neaman Institute.

46. Barnett, M.D. (2004). Congress must recognize the need for psychological resilience in an age of terrorism. Families Systems & Health, 22, 64-66.

47. Kimhi, S., & Eshel, Y. (2009). Individual and public resilience and coping with long term outcomes of war. Journal of Applied Behavioral Research, 14, 70-89.

48. Friedland, N. (2006). Introduction - the “Elusive” concept of social resilience. In A. Arian (Ed.), The Concept of Social Resilience (pp. 7-10). Haifa: The Technion Samuel Neaman Institute.

49. Elran, M. (2006). Israel's national resilience. The influence of the second intifada on Israeli society. Tel Aviv: Jaffe Center for Strategic Studies.

50. Kirschenbaum, A. (2006). Terror, adaptation and preparedness: A trilogy for survival. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 3, article number 3.

51. Bar-Tal, D., Jacobson, D., & Klieman, A. (1998). The elusive concept of security and its expression in Israel. Greenwich: JAI.

52. Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Hobfoll, S.E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63, 363-389.

53. Galtoe, R., Silver, C., Holman, A., McIntosh, D.N., Poulin, M., & Gil-Rivas, V (2002). National longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 1235-1244.

54. Norris, F.H., Stevens, S.P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K.F., & Pfefferbaum, R.L. (2007). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127-150.

Размещено на Allbest.ru