Эволюция роботов и право XXI века

33. “GOST R 54344-2011. National standard of the Russian Federation. Fire equipment. Mobile robotic systems for rescue and fire fighting. Classification. General technical requirements. Test Methods, approved by the Order of RosStandart No. 158-st of June 28, 2011. (In Russian).

34. OK 029-2014 (NACE Ed. 2). All-Russian classifier of types of economic activity, approved by the Order of RosStandart No. 14-st of January 31, 2014. (In Russian).

35. ISO 8373:2012 “Robots and robotic devices. Classification”. [Online] Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/55890.html. (Accessed:

36. Russian Federation. (2017) Strategiya razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na 2017--2030 gody, utverzhdennaya Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 9 maya 2017 g. № 203 [Strategy for the development of the information society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030, approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 203 of May 9, 2017]. [Online] Available from: www.consultant.ru. (In Russian).

37. Kremlin.ru. (2014) Perechen' porucheniy po itogam vstrechi s uchastnikami foruma “Internet-predprinimatel'stvo v Rossii”, sostoyavsheysya 10 iyunya 2014 goda [The list of instructions following a meeting with the participants of the forum “Internet Entrepreneurship in Russia”, held on June 10, 2014]. [Online] Available from: http://kremlin.ru/acts/assignments/orders/46152. (Accessed: 01.09.2018).

38. Russian Federation. (2015) Strategiya natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31 dekabrya 2015 g. № 683 [National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation Approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 683 of December 31, 2015]. [Online] Available from: www.consultant.ru. (In Russian).

39. Russian Federation. (2017) Programma “Tsifrovaya ekonomika Rossiyskoy Federatsii”, utverzhdena rasporyazheniyem Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28 iyulya 2017 g. № 1632-r [The program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation”, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation da No. 1632-r of July 28, 2017]. [Online] Available from: www.consultant.ru.

40. Russian Federation. (2017) Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 7 maya 2018 g. № 204 “O natsional'nykh tselyakh i strategicheskikh zadachakh razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2024 goda ” [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 204 of May 7, 2018, “On the national goals and strategic objectives of the development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2024”]. [Online] Available from: www.consultant.ru.

41. Russian Federation. (2017) Perechen' porucheniy ot 16 marta 2018 po realizatsii Poslaniya Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 1 marta 2018 g. [The list of instructions of March 16, 2018, on the implementation of the Address of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of March 1, 2018]. [Online] Available from: www.consultant.ru.

42. VkK.com. (n.d.) Proyekt zakona “O vnesenii izmeneniy v Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii v chasti sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy v oblasti robototekhniki ” [The draft law “On Amendments to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in terms of improving the legal regulation of relations in the field of robotics”]. [Online] Available from: https://vk.com/doc3420_439923163? hash=0a76aafed49c254276.

43. Arkhipov, V.V. & Naumov, V.B. (2017) Informational and Legal Aspects of Drawing up Robotics Legislation. Informatsionnoye pravo -- Information Law. 1. pp. 19-27. (In Russian).

44. Shustikov, V.(2017)Kollizii “pravarobotov”[Collisions of the “rights ofrobots”]. [Online] Available from:

http://sk.ru/news/b/press/archive/2017/05/25/kollizii-_1c20_prava-robotov_1d20_aspx. (Accessed: 25.08.2018).

45. Elaw.klri.re.kr. (n.d.) Zakon ob umnykh robotakh [The law on smart robots]. [Online] Available from: http://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/ viewer. do?hseq=17399.

46. V1.juristaitab.ee.(2010)Road TrafficActof17 June 2010. [Online] Available from:http://www.juristaitab.ee/files/elfinder/ru-sea-dused/%D0%97%D0%90%D0%9A%D0%9E%D0%9D%20%D0%9E%20%D0%94%D0%9ED0%A0%D0%9E%D0%96%D0%9D%D0%9E% D0%9C%20%D0%94%D0%92%D0%98%D0%96%D0%95%D0%9D%D0%98%D0%98%2002.07.2018.pdf. (Accessed: 25.08.2018). (In Russian).

47. Bgbl.de. (2017)RoadTraffic Actof16June2017. [Online] Available from:https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?

start=%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl117s1648.pdf%27%5D#bgbl%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl117s1648.pdf%27%5D

1533560692630. (Accessed: 06.08.2018).

48. Cuthbert, O.(2017) Saudi Arabiabecomesfirstcountry to grant citizenship toa robot. [Online] Available from:

http://www.arabnews.com/node/1183166/saudi-arabia. (Accessed: 26.08.2018).

49. Greene, T. (2017) Opinion: Saudi Arabia was wrong to give citizenship to a robot. [Online] Available from: https://thenextweb.com/artificial- intelligence/2017/10/31/opinion-saudi-arabia-was-wrong-to-give-citizenship-to-a-robot/. (Accessed: 26.08.2018).

50. Solum, L. (1992) Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences. North Carolina Law Review. April. [Online] Available from: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3447&context=nclr. (Accessed: 26.08.2018).

51. Gray, J. (1909) The nature and sources of the Law. New York. The Columbia University Press.

52. Filipe, M. (2017) The Legal Status of Artificially Intelligent Robots: Personhood, Taxation and Control June 1, 2017. Available at SSRN. [Online] Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2985466. (Accessed: 26.08.2018Wein, L. (1992) The Responsibility of Intelligent Artifacts: Toward an Automation Jurisprudence. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. 6. Fall Issue. pp. 103-154.

53. Asaro, P.M. (2007) Robots and Responsibility from a Legal Perspective. [Online] Available from: http://www.peterasaro.org/writing/ASARO% 20Legal%20Perspective.pdf. (Accessed: 21.08.2018).

54. Dvorsky, G. (2017) When will robots deserve human rights. [Online] Available from: https://gizmodo.com/when-will-robots-deserve-human- rights-1794599063. (Accessed: 27.08.2018).

55. Darling, K. (2012) Extending Legal Rights to Social Robots. [Online] Available from:http://robots.law.miami.edu/wp-

content/uploads/2012/03/Darling_Extending-Legal-Rights-to-Social-Robots.pdf. (Accessed: 27.08.2018).

56. Callahan, M. (2017) Should robots have rights? [Online] Available from: https://phys.org/news/2017-12-robots-rights.html. (Accessed:

57. Dvorsky, G. (2012) When the Turing Test is not enough: Towards a functionalist determination of consciousness and the advent of an authentic machine ethics. [Online] Available from: http://www.sentientdevelopments.com/2012/03/when-turing-test-is-not-enough-towards.html. (Accessed: 21.08.2018).

58. Siddique, A. (2017) Robot rights? [Online] Available from: https://www.citylawsociety.co.uk/single-post/2017/12/18/ROBOT-RIGHTS. (Accessed: 21.08.2018).

59. Renstrom, J. (2017) Should Robots Have Rights? [Online] Available from: https://www.thedailybeast.com/should-robots-have-rights. (Accessed:

60. Bryson, J. (2010) Robots Should Be Slaves. [Online] Available from: http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~jjb/ftp/Bryson-Slaves-Book09.html. (Accessed:

61. Nevejans, N. (2016) European civil law rules in robotics: study for the JUKI Committee. European Parliament. Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C, Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Legal Affairs. [Online] Available from: http://www.europarl. europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ STUD/2016/571379/IPOL_STU(2016)571379_EN.pdf. (Accessed: 21.08.2018).

62. Azimov, A. (2018) Runaround /1, Robot. St. Petersburg: Antologiya.

63. European Parliament. (2017) European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). [Online] Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference= P8-TA-2017-0051#BKMD-12. (Accessed: 01.08.2018).

64. Caytas, J. (2017) European Perspectives on an Emergent Law of Robotics (April 4, 2017). Columbia Journal of European Law: Preliminary Reference. Apr. 4. Available at SSRN. [Online] Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2956958/. (Accessed: 21.08.2018).

65. Bickerstaff, R. (2017) Do we need robot law? [Online] Available from: https://www.britac.ac.uk/events/do-we-need-robot-law. (Accessed: .

66. Robotics-openletter.eu. (n.d.) Open letter to the European Commission. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. [Online] Available from: http://www.robotics-openletter.eu/. (Accessed: 21.08.2018).

67. Europa.eu. (2018) Artificial intelligence: Commission outlines a European approach to boost in-vestment and set ethical guidelines. [Online] Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-3362_en.htm. (Accessed: 21.08.2018).

68. Burri, T. (2018) The EU is right to refuse legal personality for Artificial Intelligence.[Online] Available from:

https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/opinion/the-eu-is-right-to-refuse-legal-personality-for-artificial-intelligence/. (Accessed: 29.08.2018).

69. Ec.europa.eu. (2018) Declaration of cooperation on Artificial Intelligence. [Online] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/communities/sites/ jrccties/files/2018aideclarationatdigitaldaydocxpdf.pdf. (Accessed: 29.08.2018).

70. Consultant.ru. (2017) Rasporyazheniye Evraziyskogo mezhpravitel'stvennogo soveta ot 7 marta 2017 g. № 2 “O sferakh ekonomiki, obladayush- chikh integratsionnym potentsialom v Evraziyskom ekonomicheskom soyuze, i merakh, napravlennykh na ego ispol 'zovaniye ” [Decree of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council no. 2 of 7 March 2017 “On the spheres of economy possessing integration potential in the Eurasian Economic Union and measures to use it”]. [Online] Available from: www.consultant.ru.

71. Arkhipov, S.I. (2004) Sub”yekt prava: teoreticheskoye issledovaniye [Subject of law: A theoretical study]. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo R. Aslanova “Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press”.

72. Darling, K., Nandy, P. & Breazeal, C. (2015) Empathic Concern and the Effect of Stories in Human-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (ROMAN). February 1, 2015. Available at SSRN. [Online] Available from:: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2639689. (Accessed: 21.08.2018).

73. Hartzog, W. (2015) Unfair and Deceptive Robots. 74 Md. L. Rev. 785 pp. 785-829.

74. Bayern, Sh. (2015) The Implications of Modern Business-Entity Law for the Regulation of Autonomous Systems. 19 Stanford Technology Law Review. 93 pp. 93-112.

75. Straub, J. (2017) Does regulating artificial intelligence save humanity or just stifle innovation? October 23. [Online] Available from: https://theconversation.com/does-regulating-artificial-intelligence-save-humanity-or-just-stifle-innovation-85718. (Accessed: 31.08.2018).

76. Etzioni, O. (2017) How to Regulate Artificial Intelligence. [Online] Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/01/opinion/artificial- intelligence-regulations-rules.html. (Accessed: 31.08.2018).

77. Yastrebov, O.A. (2017) [Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Space: Conceptual and Theoretical Approaches]. Pravosub”yektnost': obshcheteoret- icheskiy, otraslevoy i mezhdunarodno-pravovoy analiz [Legal personality: general theoretical, sectoral and international legal analysis]. Materials for XII Annual Readings in Memory of Professor S.N. Bratus. Moscow: Statut. pp. 271-283. (In Russian).

78. Zimmerman, E. (2015) Machine Minds: Frontiers in Legal Personhood. Available at SSRN. [Online] Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2563965 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2563965. (Accessed: 31.08.2018).

79. Benasayyag, M. (2018) Myshleniye za predelami mozga [Intelligence beyond brain]. [Online] Available from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002652/265211r.pdf. (Accessed: 31.08.2018).

80. Pakhman, S. (1861) O zadachakh predstoyashchey reformy aktsionernogo zakonodatel'stva. Rech', napisannaya dlya proizneseniya v torzhestvennom sobranii Imperatorskogo Khar'kovskogo universiteta, 30 avgusta 1861 goda [On the tasks of the forthcoming reform of corporate legislation. Speech written for the solemn assembly of Imperial Kharkov University]. Kharkov: V Universitetskoy Tipografii.

81. Kavelin, K. (1879) Prava i obyazannostipo imushchestvam i obyazatel'stvam. Vprimenenii k russkomu zakonodatel'stvu. Opyt sistematicheskogo obozreniya [Rights and obligations for property and obligations. In application to the Russian legislation. Experience of a systematic review]. St. Petersburg: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha.

82. Azarevich, D.A. (1882) Yuridicheskiye litsa [Legal entities]. Vremennik Demidovskogo yuridicheskogo litseya. Book 28. Yaroslavl: V tipografi- yakh: Gubernskogo Pravleniya, Zemskoy Upravy i g. Fal'ke v Yaroslavle. pp. 1-84.

83. Guihot, M., Matthew, A. F. & Suzor, N.P. (2017) Nudging robots: Innovative solutions to regulate artificial intelligence. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law. [Online] Available from: http://www.jetlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2_Guihot-Article_Final-Review- Complete_Approved.pdf. (Accessed: 01.09.2018).

84. Hallevy, G. (2010) The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities - from Science Fiction to Legal Social Control. Akron Intellectual Property Journal. 4(2). pp. 171-201.

85. Gless, S., Silverman, E. & Weigend, T. (2016) If Robots Cause Harm, Who Is to Blame? Self-Driving Cars and Criminal Liability. January 29. Available at SSRN. [Online] Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2724592. (Accessed: 01.09.2018). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2724592

86. Muehlhauser, L. & Salamon, A. (2012) Intelligence explosion: Evidence and import. In: Eden, A. Soraker, J., Moor, J.H. & Steinhart, E. (eds) Singularity hypotheses: A scientific and philosophical assessment. The Frontiers Collection. Berlin: Springer. [Online] Available from: https://intelligence.org/files/IE-EI.pdf. (Accessed: 01.09.2018).

87. Harari, Yu.N. (2017) Sapiens. Kratkaya istoriya chelovechestva [Sapiens : a Brief History of Humankind]. Translated from English by L. Summ. Moscow: Sindbad.

88. Anderson, K. & Waxman, M. (2012) Law and Ethics for Robot Soldiers. Policy Review. Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 12-313. American University, WCL Research Paper 2012-32. Available at SSRN. [Online] Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2046375. (Accessed: 01.09.2018).

89. Anderson, K. & Waxman, M. (2013) Law and Ethics for Autonomous Weapon Systems: Why a Ban Won't Work and How the Laws of War Can. Stanford University, The Hoover Institution (Jean Perkins Task Force on National Security and Law Essay Series). American University, WCL Research Paper 2013-11. Columbia Public Law Research Paper 13-351. Available at SSRN. [Online] Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2250126 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2250126. (Accessed: 01.09.2018).

90. Anderson, K. & Waxman, M. (2017) Debating Autonomous Weapon Systems, Their Ethics, and Their Regulation Under International Law. In: Brownsword, R., Scotford, E. & Yeung, K. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation, and Technology. Oxford University Press. Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-553. American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2017-21. Available at SSRN. [Online] Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2978359. (Accessed: 01.09.2018).

91. Asaro, P (2012). On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanisation of Lethal Decision-making. International Review of the Red Cross. 94(886). Summer. pp. 687-709.

92. Heyns, Ch. (2013) Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development. 9 April 2013. [Online] Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A- HRC-23-47_en.pdf. (Accessed: 30.08.2018).

93. UNOG. (2017) 2017 Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS). [Online] Available from: https://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/(httpPages)/F027DAA4966EB9C7C12580CD0039D7B5. (Accessed: 05.09.2018).

94. UNOG. (2018) Emerging Commonalities, Conclusions and Recommendations. [Online] Available from: https://www.unog.ch/

80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/EB4EC9367D3B63B1C12582FD0057A9A4/$file/GGE+LAWS+August_EC,+C+and+Rs_final.pdf.(Accessed: 05.09.2018).

95. UNOG. (2017) Rassmotreniye razlichnykh aspektov novykh tekhnologiy v sfere sozdaniya smertonosnykh avtonomnykh sistem vooruzheniy v kontekste tseley i zadach Konventsii (Predstavleno Rossiyskoy Federatsiyey). Zheneva, 13--17 noyabrya 2017 g. [Consideration of various aspects of new technologies in the field of the creation of deadly autonomous weapon systems in the context of the goals and objectives of the Conven-

tion (Presented by the Russian Federation). Geneva, November 13-17,2017]. [Online] Available from:

https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/E9178CB855E3D8EDC12581D70065EF31/$file/2017_GGEonLAWS_WP_Russian.pd f. (Accessed: 01.08.2018).

96. UN. (2017) Report of the Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons. A/HRC/36/48. [Online] Available from: http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx7sUA/HRC/36/48.

97. Russian Federation. (2010) Federal'nyy zakon ot 20 maya 2002 g. № 54-FZ (red. ot 29.03.2010) “O vremennom zaprete na klonirovaniye che- loveka” [Federal Law No. 54-FZ of May 20, 2002 (as amended on March 29, 2010) “On the temporary ban on human cloning”]. [Online] Available from: www.consultant.ru.

98. Shershenevich, G.F. (1910) Obshchaya teoriya prava. Lektsii professora Moskovskogo universiteta G.F. SHershenevicha, chitannyye v Mos- kovskom Kommercheskom institute v 1909/10 akadem. godu [The general theory of law. Lectures of Professor of Moscow University G.F. Shershenevich, read at Moscow Commercial Institute in the 1909/10 academic year]. S.l.: [s.n.].

99. Pereverzev, S. & Podolin, A. (n.d.) Sotsial'naya matematika = pravo. Novyy yazykyuridicheskoy nauki [Social mathematics = law. New language of legal science]. [Online] Available from: http://speranskylabs.ru/. (Accessed: 01.09.2018).

100. Ivanov, A.A. (2018) O glubine mashinizatsii prava [On the depth of the mechanization of law]. Zakon. 5. pp. 35-41.

101. Pasquale, F. (2015) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.

102. EU. (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. [Online] Available from: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3e485e15-11bd-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.

103. Goodman, B. (2016) A Step Towards Accountable Algorithms? Algorithmic Discrimination and the European Union General Data Protection. 29th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Barcelona, Spain. [Online] Available from: http://www.mlandthelaw.org/ pa- pers/goodman1.pdf. (Accessed: 01.09.2018).

104. Joshua, N. & Castro, D. (2018) How Policymakers Can Foster Algorithmic Accountability. May 21. [Online] Available from: https://itif.org/publications/2018/05/21/how-policymakers-can-foster-algorithmic-accountability. (Accessed: 01.09.2018).

105. Robolaw.eu. (2014) Guidelines on Regulating Robotics. [Online] Available from: http://www.robolaw.eu/RoboLaw_files/documents/robolaw_ d6.2_guidelinesregulatingrobotics_20140922.pdf. (Accessed: 15.08.2018).

Размещено на Allbest.ru