Optimization of mastering language means of communication through interactive teaching methods

- the principle of systematic pedagogical control depends on its planning. An uneven increase in the frequency of inspections, their unexpectedness creates additional nervous and emotional tension in students, a decrease in the number of control inspections also leads to negative consequences. Systematic control is especially important for those who are not serious about learning and are used to studying poorly;

- the principles of objectivity and justice are closely related, since objectivity is a necessary condition of justice. Before solving questions about the choice of methods of implementation of the principles, it is necessary to introduce an idea about objective assessments. The problem of objectification of assessments is given special importance in connection with the attempt to implement the ideas of cooperation between the teacher and students in the educational process. This is far from an accidental combination, since biased grades are perceived by students as unfair, and the latter are the main cause of confrontation in the educational process. Therefore, the objectification of control results can be considered a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for establishing a relationship of cooperation between the teacher and students;

- the principle of comprehensiveness emphasizes the need for careful selection of the control content, which should representatively reflect the content of educational work. Tasks intended for the final inspection should not duplicate each other, and cover as much as possible the entire range of issues subject to control. The main focus is on checking the acquisition of basic knowledge, skills and abilities, and secondary elements are excluded from those that are checked [6].

Results and prospects

A significant role is played by the connection between control and the quality of education. If control is organized well, the learning results are always higher. Objective control creates additional incentives in the teacher's work, encourages students to study the subject more deeply. Therefore, pedagogical control is a means of improving the quality of education. Improving the quality of education is inextricably linked to the improvement of the control system, bringing its means and methods to the ideas of teacher-student cooperation.

In order to achieve the set goal in the educational process in higher education, the most objective, accessible and one that combines the advantages of all types and forms of control organization is, in our opinion, a modular rating system for assessing student achievements [5, 220]. The analysis of educational practice shows that ensuring the formation of foreign language communicative competence and successful learning becomes possible through the modular construction of the system of professional training of future specialists. The term “module” in the etymological sense means compression, arrangement of knowledge in a form convenient for use. In pedagogy, we consider a module to be a complete block of information, which contains a target program of actions and scientific and methodological support, which determines the achievement of the educational goal.

Since the 1990s, Ukraine has been developing and implementing modular education in various pedagogical systems. Thus, a pedagogical experiment was conducted on the implementation of modular developmental training, which is based on the optimization of “complex processes of psychosocial development of participants in developmental pedagogical interaction”, “which is achieved through the modular organization of developmental flows that are formed by combining the appropriate psychological and pedagogical potential (content) the main components of the educational space” [13]. At the same time, Ukrainian higher education institutions are developing and implementing ideas for modular training, which is based on the formation of professional knowledge, abilities, skills and professional qualities of higher education graduates. The works of T. Alekseenko, A. Aleksyuk, V. Bondar, I. Bogdanova, P. Husak, I. Romanyuk, L. Romanyshina, M. Seredyuk, V. Sushank, V. and others are known in this field.

In modern conditions, various means are used to create a modular system. Features of the modular organization of the educational process are: rational division of the subject material into modules and verification of mastering the theoretical and practical content of each module; systematic review of the quality of student preparation for each practical session; use of a wider scale of knowledge assessment; sti-mulation of systematic individual and independent work of students throughout the semester and impro-vement of the quality of their knowledge; increasing the objectivity of assessing students' knowledge; com-petition in education; identification and development of creative abilities of students.

The final component consists in involving students in a collective discussion of the didactic tools developed by them, evaluating them from the point of view of the system of requirements for visual content for educational purposes, clarifying the expediency of choosing an implementation tool, developing a proposal for possible ways of improving the presented presentation or development for the purpose of optimization mastering of students - future specialists with higher education in language means of communication through interactive teaching methods.

Conclusions

Thus, informatization of the professional training of future specialists with higher education through linguistic means of communication through interactive teaching methods is a necessary step in reforming this education in accordance with modern requirements of society and the market. This process is manifested in the introduction of modern educational information technologies and electronic platforms into the educational process. The latter provide opportunities to form an active, creative specialist who is able to learn independently, make appropriate decisions, and act in difficult professional situations.

During interactive learning, all students during the educational process, they interact with each other, exchange information, write questions together, model situations, evaluate the actions of colleagues and their own behavior, immersing themselves in a friendly atmosphere business cooperation for communication problems according to their interests, needs and requests. At the same time, there is a gradual change in the types of educational activities: games, discussions, work in small groups, mini-lectures, etc. Therefore, the use of the entire set of interactive methods of teaching students-future specialists with higher education makes it possible to arouse their interest in obtaining a specialty and to motivate information-creative activity according to their capabilities and abilities.

Modular rating control of educational achievements of students in a higher educational institution is particularly effective if it is given a systemic nature and only then control becomes an important factor in the process of training future specialists with higher education.

visualization education game computer

References

1. Bilan L.V., Gutsulyak Y.V. Modern methods of quality control of students education.

2. Fitsula M.M. (1997). Pedagogy: teaching. manual. Ternopil, 192 p.

3. Interactive learning technologies: theory, experience. Method. manual / automatic layout O. Pometun, L. Pyrozhen- ko. Kyiv, 2002. 136 p.

4. Hryshchenko, I.V. (2018). Communicative accents of teaching the Ukrainian language as a foreign language. Scientific notes of the Drohobytsk State Pedagogical University named after I. Franko. Series “Philological sciences. Linguistics”. № 10. pp. 26-28.

5. Kalashnik N. (2016). Diagnostics of levels of formation of intercultural communicative competence of foreign medical students. Modern information technologies and innovative teaching methods in the training of specialists: methodology, theory, experience, problems. Coll. of science works. Issue 45. Kyiv - Vinnytsia, pp. 219-223.

6. Kalashnik N. (2019). Interactive training of foreign medical students for verbal communication in the process of learning the Ukrainian language. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Fedagogical Sciences. Vol. 4 (99). pp. 56-66.

7. Kalashnik N.G. et al. (2005). Independent work is a powerful means of modern education and training: teaching method a manual on the formation of aesthetes tastes student youth in education and training process. Zaporizhia: Zaporizhia, 326 p.

8. Kalashnik N., Vovchasta N., Lenha E. (2021). Teaching foreign students Ukrainian language communication educational and professional spheres. Modern information technologies and innovations ofmethods of studying and preparation specialists: methodology, theory, information, problems. Issue 59, Kyiv-Vinnitsya, pp.105-114.

9. Kalashnik N., Shastko I., Pobirchenko O. (2024). Readiness for foreign language communication in a professional environment. Youth & market. № 3 (223), pp. 66-72.

10. Kushnir V.S. (2011). Peculiarities of criterion- oriented testing in the study of a foreign language of professional direction in higher education. Proceedings of the 1- 2nd All-Ukrainian Conference “Modern methods of teaching a foreign language of professional orientation in higher education”, March 21-25. Kyiv.

11. Lalak N.V. (2011). Interactive model of student education: problems and prospects. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhgorod National University: Series “Pedagogy. Social work”. Issue 20. pp. 69-70.

12. MS SQL, II S, and Perl - Windows Servers.

13. Solodka A. (2005). Multicultural upbringing and education - a step towards the integration of Ukrainian education into a single general cultural space. Scientific Bulletin of the Mykolaiv State University. Coll. Works. pp. 212-217.

14. Sysoeva S. (2011). Interactive technologies for teaching adults: teaching method. manual. Kyiv, 324 p.

15. The best online e-learning and e-teaching tools & resources - WizIQ.

16. Yukalo V.Ya. (1999). Language culture. Ternopil, 77 p.

17. Zhytenyov N.V. (2019). Visual didactic tools: Creation and use in educational practice. Educational and methodological manual. Kharkiv, 89 p.

18. Zhytyenova N.V. (2017). Principles of visualization as the basis of didactic design. Scientific Journal “ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education”. № 3 (11). ISSN 2519-4984 (Online), ISSN 2519-4976 (Print). pp. 11-14.

Размещено на Allbest.ru