Linguistic Picture of the World and Language Personality

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

Kazakh ablay khan university of international relations and world languages

Faculty of translation and philology

The department of simultaneous interpreting

Referat

Linguistic Picture of the World and Language Personality

Done by: 102 group

Sarypbekova S.

Nabatova A.

Saduakhas A.

Ilyassova U.

Tolenbai B

Checked by: Seri L.T.

In this work we tried to define the notion of the Picture of the world from the linguistic view. In this way we examined with books, theories, definitions and opinions about The Linguistic Picture of the World.

The aim of the work is to provide the reader with some material on The Linguistic Personality, The Functions of Linguistic, The National Picture of the World, Linguistic Aspects of Intercultural Communication. Our mission to find the way to overcome international misunderstandings, which arise during the intercultural communication. The work gives a detailed analysis of influence of language and culture in creation of human world view. We investigated to find out differences between linguistic picture of the world and national picture of the world.

Linguistic picture of the world (LPW) is the human mind accepts and transmits his thoughts by using the language.The picture in Ojegov's dictionary means that it is possible to see, survey or represent in language images, and also a look, a state, situation something. The LPW bears in itself the image of the world by means of language means which creates evident idea of subjects and the phenomena people around of reality. Finally the language picture of the world is reproduction in language by language of subjects and the phenomena of surrounding reality. Reflecting the world in its infinite variety and integrity, the language picture of the world indicates the making pictures, their state, situation, communications on the relation to each other. The language picture of the world represents set of the naive knowledge of the world recorded at the different levels (subtotals) of language system: lexical, phraseological, grammatical.

J.N. Karaulov, who understands linguistic personality as “a complex of abilities and characteristics of a human, determining his creation of speech production (texts)”. After Karaulov, who suggested analysing linguistic personality according to three levels (structural-linguistic, cognitive, motivational), other linguists suggested their own three level model. For example, I.P. Susov points out three levels in linguistic personality: formal-semantic, cognitive-interpretational and social-interactive. V.D. Lyutikova holds different opinion: “The level model of linguistic personality, developed by linguists, reflects a general type of a personality. She suggests the following definition of linguistic personality: “Linguistic personality is a set of linguistic characteristics, typical for a specific human”. Linguistic personality can be characterized from the point of linguistic consciousness and verbal behavior as well as linguistic conseptology of discourse. In terms of communication linguistic personality can be considered as a generalized image of a carrier of cultural-linguistic and communicative values, knowledge, sets and behavioral reactions. As far as communicative personality is concerned, value, cognitive and behavioral plans of this concept can be singled out.

A linguistic personality is a level of language proficiency as well as a degree of a certain human's influence upon the language development, first of all literal. The communication is not just a conversation between two individuals, it is their grasp of culture of this or that nation, society, as the culture (spiritual culture) reveals a measure of human and sociable in a man. This feature of a linguistic personality is revealed in language knowledge, in the ability to use it, in style, in syllable, and, finally, in concrete sentences.

Any national language carries out some main functions: communicative function, informative functions, function of influence and, especially, function of fixing and storage of all complex of knowledge and ideas of this language community of the world. According to Heidegger if "the world becomes a picture, the position of the person is understood as outlook" that's way the world of the nature and society are united within uniform by LPW. LPW is not an absolute truth, not existing reality and speculative construction. This is - a kind weapon. Goals researchers different, so they have the right and choose the most suitable for achieve them, some of which may be and all sorts of they create abstract categories, criteria, methods systematization of the material analyzed. Different researchers can fill different concept LPW content, mean by it something different from the other interpretations, however, each researcher must make explicit the meaning given to them in such an imaginative and frequently used determining.

Kornilov suggests to allocate two imperative of introduction to scientific use of concept PW: CULTUROLOGICAL and LINGUISTIC. Representatives of these two sciences felt need for creation and use the cape - the litelny artifact which received this very figurative designation. Acquaintance to any culture, its studying will always be incomplete and somewhat even superficial, if under review the person who addressed to this culture, won't appear such fundamental component as the WAREHOUSE of thinking of the nation and national logic of attitude very laconically and precisely Edward told about communication of culture and language Sepir in work "Language. Introduction to studying of the speech"."Culture it is possible to define some how that this society does and thinks. Language is how think".Having agreed with such definition, we have to recognize that we get into the image thinking of the nation, in its way of vision of the world,we understand features of mentality of carriers of this culture and this language, only having learnt the plan of the maintenance of this language, and deep acquaintance to semantics of foreign language, in turn, assumes, on our belief, mastering language picture of the world (LPW) this national language as system of its vision world. according to A. Vezhbitskaya data on national character appear result of the linguistic analysis, but not its initial prerequisite" At such approach of LPW -- it is a database on the basis of which research only and it is possible to do the conclusions about features national outlook.That language--this window in national attitude and outlook, we really submitted the provision things also didn't close an eye to the obvious fact: acquaintance to LPW the nations -- this necessary condition of acquaintance to national culture, with national mentality, but not sufficient. It surely it has to be supplemented with studying of all complex of elements of national culture: stories, folklore, poetry, painting and many other, including physical geography of the country. for example on commercials' Sony electronics' which are made in Japan, were shown jellyfishes as a beauty symbol. but for most of Russians of a jellyfish can hardly appear a bait for acquisitions of the new camera" there is only one way to overcome such international misunderstandings - the appeal to national character and mentality and establishment of communications of the last with means of language.

By N. Chomsky's some facts we can define or khow that each of us and any animal sees the world differently. What makes each of us is a direct experience. Also - any animal, they have some experience. Bee sees the world differently than we do, because it is - a different organism. And other organisms are just trying to work my way around the world of their experiences. People as far as we know, unique in the world of animals in this - they are reflective beings. Thus, they try to make some sense out of their experience and all this is being studied in various fields of science. Science is a particular one -- it's a particular form of trying to gain some understanding of our experiences, organize them. Intercultural communication is characterized by the fact that its members by direct contact using special language versions and discursive strategies that are different from those that they use when communicating within the same culture. Often used the term "cross-cultural communication" usually refers to the study of a particular phenomenon in two or more cultures, and has the added value of comparing the communicative competence of communicating from different cultures.

When it comes to communication, especially intercultural, to distinguish between sociological and psychological studies conducted in the field of social psychology, it is very difficult. Both deal with arising in the process of communication, or transmitted through its complex categories - values, motives, attitudes, stereotypes and prejudices. Task as those, and others - to identify the observed phenomenon (perhaps associating it with others) and show differences from similar reactions and attitudes to the situation of intra-rather than inter-cultural interaction.

Only linguists are primarily interested in how this happens. That in language message indicates the presence of cross-cultural interaction? What exactly characterizes the messages exchanged between the representatives of different cultures? Which communicative contexts is it manifested? How it happens misunderstanding, incomplete understanding of what language features and mechanisms that allow or do not allow to compensate for not (to) understanding?

The phenomenon which received the name "world picture" - same is more ancient, as well as the person. Nevertheless this reality became a subject of scientific studying only in recent time. The concept of a picture of the world until now isn't created yet: scientists make attempts of a formulation of its developed definition, discuss questions of theoretical restriction of a picture of the world from close phenomena, try to characterize and reveal properties and forms of its existence.

Need for application of the concept "world picture" of various spheres of activity of the person arises usually in two cases: in a situation of polyalternativeness of the positions coexisting in any area and in a situation of the paradigms replacing each other.

The picture of the world represents the basic concept of the concept of the person expressing features of his life therefore properly it can be characterized only in the general theory of the person.

The most adequate understanding of a picture of the world its definition as the initial global image of the world which is the cornerstone of a worldview of the person representing intrinsic properties of the world in understanding of its carriers and being result of all spiritual activity of the person is represented.

The picture of the world represents a complete image of the world. From the point of view of a semiologiya in any image as semiotics object it is possible to mark out its substantial and formal properties. From dialectics positions the picture of the world is intense and inconsistent whole, being in process of continuous formation.

At research of reflection of a picture of the world in human language proceed from the following triad: surrounding reality, reflection of this reality in a brain of the person and expression of results of this reflection in language.

Summing up the results, it should be noted that the materials and results received by us during this work can be used for further scientific development in the field of studying the linguocultural of features of language pictures of the world as the offered approaches can be applied to the description as language pictures of the world in the general, and their separate elements.

References

1. Karaulov, Y.N. Russian language and linguistic personality/ AS USSR. Dep.lit. and lang. M.: 1987. 247 p.

2. Alefirenko N.F. Protoverbal generation of cultural concepts and them frazeolo-gichesky representation//Filol. sciences. 2002. No. 5. Page 72-81.

3. Alefirenko N.F. Ethnolanguage coding of sense in a culture mirror//the World of the Russian word. SPb., 2002a. No. 2. Page 60-74.

4. Kornilov O.A. «Языковые картины мира как производные национальных менталитетов». 2002.

5. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/.

6. www.translate.ru.

Glossary

Speculative construction- structure according to in advance set idea of object borrowed from ethics.

Systematization -- procedure of association, data of groups of units, uniforms in the certain signs existing between additional communications with the outside world.

Informative functions- use of language for the objective message on events, the facts, etc.

Abstract categories- categories of derivation in knowledge insignificant properties of the parties to isolate their material and the correct lines.

Criteria- discernment, judgment means, sign base, the decision rule to assess anything to meet the required specification.

Intercultural communication is a form of communication that aims to share information across different cultures and social groups.

Cross cultural communication is a field of study that looks at how people from differing cultural backgrounds communicate, in similar and different ways among themselves.

Phenomenon - is an observable occurrence.

Mechanisms - a mode of behavior that helps an individual deal with the physical or psychological environment.

Compensate - to make amends to (someone), esp for loss or injury

Lexicon -vocabulary of a language.

Analyze-to break up a whole into its parts, to examine in detail so as to determine the nature of, to look more deeply into an issue or situation.

Model-a verbal or pictorial description or representation of a process.A way of looking at something. A representation of something else.

Language picture of the world-set of the data on the world which are made active by means of various mechanisms of verbalization and also stored and transmitted from generation to generation by means of a verbal code.

Communication is an activity in which a sender transmits a message, with or without the aid of media and vehicles, to one or more receivers, and vice versa.

Language acquisition is the process by which humans acquire the capacity to perceive and comprehend language.

Universal grammar (UG) is a theory in linguistics, usually credited to Noam Chomsky, proposing that the ability to learn grammar is hard-wired into the brain.

Grammatical relations (grammatical functions, grammatical roles, syntactic functions) refer to functional relationships between constituents in a clause.

linguistic language world

Размещено на Allbest.ru