Dividend policy as a factor for managing company value: Comparing trends in emerging markets

The testing of hypotheses about the influence of various dividend policy options on the value of oil and gas companies in emerging markets. Comparison actual value of the company according to market data and theoretical (intrinsic) value of the company.

Рубрика Финансы, деньги и налоги
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 17.06.2021
Размер файла 208,1 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

Table 2. Imitation of dividend distribution and company value calculation for Lukoil (per share), rub.

Iteration number

Annual dividend distribution according to the Monte Carlo method

Estimated share value

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

1

275.11

441.74

441.39

219.88

445.89

463.29

226.72

4 816.64

2

315.79

229.04

312.57

294.12

374.72

411.68

293.49

6 554.17

3

441.52

331.34

471.46

303.32

233.50

238.69

302.00

5 891.76

4

367.79

466.08

323.63

326.95

269.06

429.38

291.17

6 244.35

5

333.76

422.39

415.19

274.14

324.56

308.35

326.35

2 468.79

6

195.24

402.88

218.12

235.42

337.46

385.37

250.80

7 535.85

7

405.95

475.46

351.92

355.97

393.33

455.27

403.35

7 431.68

8

402.60

228.59

468.09

399.84

197.45

313.26

378.74

7 123.51

9

452.16

375.51

422.46

309.02

426.62

292.18

219.06

6 862.64

10

393.39

444.67

295.24

470.10

403.81

319.78

304.63

6 309.12

91

354.42

246.43

429.54

242.07

476.34

389.91

319.07

6 661.77

92

224.11

366.64

426.01

472.34

420.21

469.26

493.64

5 395.43

93

257.91

209.39

288.18

375.81

393.49

210.74

350.49

4 757.05

94

253.21

386.49

490.84

279.77

472.23

347.68

261.46

7 152.86

95

198.74

415.90

236.94

287.36

406.56

420.66

316.54

7 174.14

96

268.70

491.12

345.93

324.71

198.63

460.14

320.39

6 635.69

97

426.14

371.88

228.58

417.14

436.88

472.22

451.83

6 448.91

98

349.13

320.93

202.13

420.09

356.35

307.38

281.17

5 996.52

99

219.25

349.93

375.16

428.23

467.10

356.09

247.84

4 191.57

100

419.18

472.75

444.20

268.22

277.43

336.40

414.97

7 310.28

Note: the table is compiled using the Monte Carlo method. Based on the data, the average estimated share value was calculated

Using the obtained parameters of the intrinsic value, it is possible to determine the margins of its valid values. Figure illustrates the distribution of the obtained values. The histogram below shows that the largest number of simulated options of the estimated share value ranges from 5 500 to 7 500 rub. The average value in this case amounts to 5 983.02 rub.

Fig. 1. Fundamental value per share, rub

We have thus provided a detailed description of the capital valuation procedure for one company using simulation methods. Similar procedures should be carried out for other oil and gas companies in emerging markets. With the discount rate at 14.65 %, the estimates conducted with the help of Monte Carlo method resulted in obtaining forecasted values of dividend payments and, accordingly, made it possible to determine the margins of estimated equity (share value) of the analyzed companies (Table 3). Here and below, the estimated values for companies from different countries were calculated in their national currencies: peso for Argentina, real for Brazil, ringgit for Malaysia, rupee for Pakistan, zloty for Poland, ruble for Russia, and leu for Romania.

Values presented in columns 6 and 7 of Table 3 demonstrate that 8 out of 18 companies have simulated shares value above the market average. By contrast, estimated values of other companies are lower than market figures. It should be emphasized that the calculated value represents the forecasted value of the company's share based on future dividend projections (no other factors have been included). Thus, these company value estimates are conducted in view of the position of shareholders (future estimated dividend flows are discounted to conduct theoretical assessment of company share). A logical conclusion is that, with all the assumed conditions, company share value is viewed by the company owners either as undervalued or overvalued, depending on specific circumstances.

Let us now consider a less optimistic situation, when dividends in the forecast period (from 2019 to 2025) will be the same as the last accrued value, i.e. will show practically no. The algorithm of calculation remains the same. The results are presented in Table 4.

Table 3. Results of calculating model indicators with a constant growth rate: average DIV value for each period

Country

Company

Lowest value

Highest value

Standard diviation

Variation coefficient

Estimated share value

Average market share value in 2019

A

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Russia

LKOH

2 214.54

7 798.78

1 782.47

0.33

5 983.02

5 395.25

Russia

SIBN

124.04

414.27

74.97

0.31

234.19

371.62

Russia

ROSN

408.39

787.51

105.65

0.18

602.12

415.74

Russia

TATN

1 250.04

2 755.48

397.98

0.19

2 088.22

760.03

Russia

BANE

719.08

7 228.32

1 832.79

0.67

1 985.74

1 827.00

Russia

SNGS

56.69

313.55

69.47

0.38

180.11

25.81

Russia

GAZP

151.23

291.45

40.21

0.18

223.51

193.69

Russia

NVTK

302.84

808.08

128.73

0.21

632.59

1 220.18

Brazil

PBR

0.85

4.47

0.94

0.36

2.58

15.04

Malaysia

PETR

9.40

93.39

24.61

0.45

57.49

24.71

Pakistan

PPL

18.61

92.66

18.04

0.37

44.37

154.36

Pakistan

PKOL

356.46

537.38

42.93

0.10

439.86

420.74

Pakistan

OGDC

79.99

221.60

36.65

0.28

126.98

133.59

Pakistan

MGAS

56.93

136.56

22.18

0.25

84.02

1 092.07

Argentina

YPF

9.73

53.09

10.35

0.32

31.91

632.76

Romania

ROSNP

0.14

0.46

0.08

0.31

0.26

0.38

Poland

PKN

28.74

111.62

25.50

0.41

56.76

96.10

Poland

PGN

0.30

1.90

0.35

0.38

0.90

5.83

Table 4. Estimates of basic model indicators at constant dividend value per share (in national currencies)

Country

Company

Estimated share value

Average market share value in 2019

Russia

LKOH

1 706.13

5 395.25

Russia

SIBN

107.49

371.62

Russia

ROSN

176.82

415.74

Russia

TATN

579.47

760.03

Russia

BANE

1 084.76

1 827.00

Russia

SNGS

56.44

25.81

Russia

GAZP

113.36

193.69

Russia

NVTK

177.85

1 220.18

Brazil

PBR

1.64

15.04

Malaysia

PETR

21.63

24.71

Pakistan

PPL

33.98

154.36

Pakistan

PKOL

290.00

420.74

Pakistan

OGDC

68.23

133.59

Pakistan

MGAS

40.94

1 092.07

Argentina

YPF

13.04

632.76

Romania

ROSNP

0.18

0.38

Poland

PKN

23.88

96.10

Poland

PGN

0.48

5.83

Table 4 demonstrates that estimated values of company shares are, as a rule, lower than real market value (17 companies have estimated value below market values). Therefore, it is possible to draw a preliminary conclusion that the dividend stability is not typi-cal for the analysed sample. On the contrary, companies pursue the policy of a reasonable dividend increase (mostly periodic). This is a typical practice for companies that are regularly represented in the indices of the leading stock exchanges. Implicitly, investors expect companies to have a predictable sustainable dividend policy accompanied by an increase in dividend payments.

Interpretation of results obtained

In order to test the relevancy of the results obtained, it is necessary to draw up a regression equation to determine the relationship between the estimated and actual share price. First, we shall test the results obtained with a view to the forecasted dividend growth. Next step is to test the results assuming that the dividends will remain constant throughout the forecast period.

First, we shall construct a regression equation for a model in which the dividends are subject to change as calculated by simulation. Based on the results of the calculations, the model takes the following form:

The econometric interpretation of this model allows us to answer two questions: whether the given regression equation can explain the relationship between market and stimateed values of the company; and what properties the equation coefficients have. The answer to the first question is provided by the determinacy coefficient, which in the present model equals 0.89, indicating a high correlation between the current market and estimated company value based on dividends.

To answer the second question, we shall run the Student's and Fisher's f-tests, comparing the estimated test values in a model with a critical level. If the estimated value in the tests exceeds the critical level, the model is considered significant and, therefore, the relationship between the company intrinsic value and market capitalization is established and reliable. Otherwise, if the critical value exceeds the estimated value, the relationship between the variables is discarded. In our calculations the Student's and Fisher's f-tests, estimated to be equal to 11.74 and 137.93, respectively.

With 5 % significance level and 16 degrees of freedom, the f-statistics value is 2.12; and the F-test value is 4.49. In our case, the calculated Student's and Fisher's f-values exceed their significance values. This means that the market share value in existing emerging markets does correlate with the estimated value calculated solely on the basis of dividends.

The obtained results allow us to conclude that in both cases the observed correlation is significant, there is no autocorrelation, and the values of f-statistics and F-test suggest the reliability of regression equation coefficients. Thus, there is a justified statement that the company estimated value as a dividend function and market capitalization are in direct correlation.

Let us provide economic substantiation of the obtained results. From a theoretical point of view, the data on market capitalization in developed markets in balance conditions should correspond to estimated values. Obviously, there can be no absolute compatibility, because there are always incidental market factors affecting the share value at a particular moment in time. It is more accurate to say that when operating with the highefficiency market data, even a theoretically flawless model allows to obtain estimations which barely correspond to the actual ones, with some companies being overestimated (actual market capitalization is higher than the estimated value), and others being underestimated (actual market capitalization is lower than the estimated value). When the market is in equilibrium, the quality modeling shows no obvious shift in one direction or another: the proportion of undervalued and overvalued companies is approximately the same. If there is a shift to one side or the other (for example, the share of overvalued companies is significantly higher), and the market, again, is in equilibrium, it indicates that the forecast model does not adequately reflect actual market pricing trends.

The sample analysis was conducted according to two strategies: a growth strategy and a dividend invariability strategy. When investors in the sample companies focus on the growth of divisional dividends, the picture is typical of developed markets with a fairly high degree of efficiency. In our sample eight out of eighteen companies have an estimated value above the market, in contrast to the other ten. In case of dividend invariability strategy, the estimated values for the sample companies are within the same range (in this scenario, the estimated values for 17 out of 18 firms are lower than the market ones). This means that in the real market, investors include future increasing dividends in the share valuation of the sample, which results in the market price exceeding the estimated one. These two circumstances allow us to conclude that the companies in the sample are targeting continuous dividend growth.

Research findings and conclusions

This article examined the dependence between the actual market capitalization of a company and the estimation of its intrinsic value as a distinctive feature of dividend policy. The general proposition was that when diagnosing a stable correlation of this kind, the reviewed markets and companies in them transition from the emerging market phase to the developed one (i.e. they are governed by the corresponding regularities). Accordingly, there have been put forward the hypotheses that there is no correlation between the current market capitalization and the estimated value as to the impact of the dividend policy. This very criterion, in our opinion, can be used to determine the current level of market development and, with a certain degree of conditionality, to classify it as developed or emerging.

In order to either confirm or reject the hypotheses, the intrinsic value of a number of oil and gas companies representing emerging markets has been calculated. The information trends in the markets in question seem to be roughly the same, i.e. with companies evolving, their dividend policy is changing in the same way and the companies themselves are becoming more and more credible and predictive in providing information to their shareholders.

The study identified two key issues in calculating dividends: identifying the correct discount rate and determining meaningful forecast data on dividend payments. The discount rate in this study was obtained using the CAPM model for one of the emerging markets and extended to the others. The calculated discount rate of 14.65 %, with certain reservations, has been then extended to other emerging markets. The problem of assigning dividend forecast data was solved with the help of a Monte Carlo simulation model, which allows us to include relatively expected scenarios with predetermined deviation values. Also, we examined the case when the forecasted dividend values remained constant over a number of years. It should be noted that, in comparison with many researchers in this field, we were driven by the idea of determining the actual impact of dividends. The model excluded factors that could somehow affect the value of the business (profit, revenue, profitability factors, etc.), which is the distinctive feature of the research conducted. We have also excluded all accompanying trends that could give a false picture of the correlation between dividends and value. The research was undertaken from the perspective of the business owner, who sees a specific company share as a profitable financial instrument. This is expressed in the correlation between the incoming dividend flows and the outflow of the share's current market value. An extra focus of the research was to establish whether the share market value was overvalued or undervalued from the point of view of its holder. In order to offset the impact of other factors on the value of the share, the model was assigned only projectable dividend cash flows (whole number of factors, included as significant by other scholars, have been left out of this research).

The picture that emerges is interesting, provided that we consider not the entire conventional aggregate emerging market (18 companies from different countries), but a segment. In this study, the most significant representation in the sample is observed in the Russian market (8 companies). Based on the estimates, it is possible to assume that their values, based on dividends growth, are generally higher market capitalization values. This indicates that investors in the Russian market do not particularly pay attention to longterm dividend policy (the prevailing stock prices do not take into account dividend income). Thus, the Russian market is still more attractive for speculative players (gain on growth/decline), while investment savings (purchase of shares and receiving dividends) have not been fully formalized yet. All the obtained values have been tested for their correlation with market values based on econometric analysis. After checking a number of tests (t-statistics, F-test), as well as estimating the strength and significance of the identified relation, it was concluded that there is a correlation between the current market value and the estimated value of the company. Thus, the general hypothesis about the interdependence between dividends and the oil and gas companies' market value in the markets under consideration is confirmed.

The value calculation according to the model as proposed by the authors takes into consideration the investor's position (the infinite dividend flow is what determines the share price). Therefore, based on this study, it can be assumed that an average market investor is implicitly seeking to increase dividends paid by the company. Situations in which dividends do not increase lead to a significant undervaluation of the forecast company value as compared to the market ones. Thus, the markets expect the companies in our sample to increase dividends (the increase is included in investors' estimations). Strictly speaking, the dividend policy should not necessarily be characterized by an even growth throughout the entire existence of the company. Apparently, it is more correct to speak about an increasing piecewise linear trend, i.e. the company as a whole follows the policy of not reducing payments to shareholders, but periodically, as resources accumulate, the level of dividends can be increased. Similarly, it is necessary to take into account inflationary expectations of the investors (inflation in emerging markets are generally higher, which should be considered by the investors in the long-term).

It is thus reasonably possible to assume that there are the same dividend policy mechanisms as those that operate in developed markets, and that market forces and behavioural factors work in the same direction. This fact enables us to assert that emerging markets (at least in the oil and gas sector) are increasingly subject to the rules and regularities characteristic of the developed markets in terms of dividend distribution. The existing segmentation in this area is becoming more and more conditional and subjective. From the point of view of interrelation of dividends and the market value of the companies, the attribution of markets in the sample as emerging is not quite justified. Besides, we actually presented a verification criterion which determines whether the market (company) development is in a stable phase, namely, the net impact of dividends on the business value. The further direction of the research may involve determining the nature of investment in the analyzed market (savings or speculative motivation of investors operating in the market).

References

1. Amidu M. (2007) How does dividend policy affect performance of the firm on Ghana stock Exchange?

2. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 104-112.

3. Ashbaugh H., Olsson P. (2002) An exploratory study of the valuation properties of cross listed firm's IAS and US GAAP earnings and book values. Accounting Review, vol. 77, iss. 1, pp. 107-126.

4. Asquith P., Mullins D. (1983) The impact of initiating dividend payments on shareholders' wealth. Journal of Business, vol. 56, iss. 1, pp. 77-96.

5. Arnold G. (2000) Tracing the development of value-based management. In: Value-Based Management: Context and application. G. Arnold, M. Davies (Eds). Wiley & Sons, pp. 7-36.

6. Benartzi S., Michaely R., Thaler R. (1997) Do changes in dividends signal the future or the past? Journal of Finance, vol. 52, pp. 1007-1043.

7. Booth L., Zhou J. (2017) Dividend policy: A selective review of results from around the world. Global Finance Journal, vol. 34, pp. 1-15.

8. Brealey R., Myers S., Allen F. (2011) Principles of Corporate Finance. 10th ed. McGraw Hill, Irwin. 969 p. Copeland T., Koller T., Murrin J. (1995) Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies. New York, John Wiley & Sons. 576 p.

9. DeAngelo H., DeAngelo L. (1990) Dividend policy and financial distress: An empirical investigation of troubled NYSE firms. Journal of Finance, vol. 45, iss. 5, pp. 1415-1431.

10. De Cesari A., Huang-Meier W. (2015). Dividend changes and stock price informativeness. Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 35, pp. 1-17.

11. Donaldson G. (1963) Financial goals: Management versus stockholders. Harvard Business Review, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 116-129.

12. Fama E., Babiak H. (1968) Dividend Policy: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 63, iss. 324, pp. 1132-1161.

13. Frankel R., Lee C. (1998) Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross sectional stock returns.

14. Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 25, iss. 3, pp. 283-319.

15. Graham B., Dodd D. (1951) Security Analysis: Principles and Techniques. 3rd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company. 432 p.

16. Graham J., Kumar A. (2006) Do Dividend Clienteles Exist? Evidence on Dividend Preferences of Retail Investors. Journal of Finance, vol. 61, iss. 3, pp. 1305-1336.

17. Hauser R., Thornton J. (2017) Dividend policy and corporate valuation, Managerial Finance, vol. 43, iss. 6, pp. 663-678.

18. He W, Ng L., Zaiats N., Zhang B. (2017). Dividend policy and earnings management across countries. Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 42, February, pp. 267-286.

19. Jacob M., Jacob M. (2013). Taxation, dividends, and share repurchases: Taking evidence global. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1241-1269.

20. Joliet R., Muller A. (2015) Dividends and foreign performance signaling. Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 77-107.

21. Knight J. (1998) Value-Based Management: Developing a systematic approach to creating shareholder value. New York, McGraw-Hill. 307 p.

22. Kovalev V.V., Kovalev Vit.V/ (2019) Korporativnye finansy. 2nd ed. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. 640 p. (In Russian)

23. Lintner J. (1956) Distribution of Incomes of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes. American Economic Review, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 97-113.

24. Litzenberger R., Ramaswamy K. (1982) The Effects of Dividends on Common Stock Prices: Tax Effects or Information Effects. Journal of Finance, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 429- 443.

25. Miller M., Modigliani F. (1961) Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares. Journal of Business, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 411-433.

26. Morck R., Young B., Yu W (2000) The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 58, iss. 1, pp. 215-260.

27. Nissim, D., Ziv, A. (2001) Dividend Changes and Future Profitability. Journal of Finance, vol. 56, iss. 6, pp. 2111-2133.

28. Penman S. (2010) Financial statement analysis and security valuation. 4th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, Irwin. 786 p.

29. Penman S., Sougiannis T. (1998) Comparison of dividend cash flow and earnings approaches to equity valuation. Contemporary accounting research, vol. 15, iss. 3, pp. 343-383.

30. Rappaport A. (1986) Creating shareholder value: The new standard for business performance. New York, Free Press. 270 p.

31. Stewart B. (1991) The quest for value: A guide for senior managers. New York, Harper Business. 781 p.

32. Volkov D. (2001) Models for evaluating the fundamental cost of equity of companies: compatibility problems. St Petersburg University Journal of Management Studies, no. 3 (24), pp. 1-35. (In Russian).

33. Yegon C., Cheruiyot J., Sang J. (2014) Effects of Dividend Policy on Firm's Financial Performance: Econometric Analysis of Listed Manufacturing Firms in Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, vol. 5, iss. 12, pp. 136-144.

Размещено на Allbest.ru


Подобные документы

  • Brief description of PJSC "Kyivenergo". Basic concepts of dividend policy of the company. Practice of forming and assesing the effiiency of dividend policy of the company. The usual scheme of dividend policy formation consists of six main stages.

    курсовая работа [1004,4 K], добавлен 07.04.2015

  • Тhe balance sheet company's financial condition is divided into 2 kinds: personal and corporate. Each of these species has some characteristics and detail information about the assets, liabilities and provided shareholders' equity of the company.

    реферат [409,2 K], добавлен 25.12.2008

  • The General Economic Conditions for the Use of Money. Money and Money Substitutes. The Global Money Markets. US Money Market. Money Management. Cash Management for Finance Managers. The activity of financial institutions in the money market involves.

    реферат [20,9 K], добавлен 01.12.2006

  • Example of a bond valuing. Bond prices and yields. Stocks and stock market. Valuing common stocks. Capitalization rate. Constant growth DDM. Payout and plowback ratio. Assuming the dividend. Present value of growth opportunities. Sustainable growth rate.

    презентация [748,8 K], добавлен 02.08.2013

  • Основная деятельность Акционерного общества "SAT and Company". Баланс предприятия, структура активов. Анализ расходов, доходов, ликвидности. Показатели финансовой устойчивости, эффективности использования активов. Анализ показателей рентабельности.

    презентация [1,6 M], добавлен 07.06.2010

  • Study credit channel using clustering and test the difference in mean portfolio returns. The calculated debt-to-capital, interest coverage, current ratio, payables turnover ratio. Analysis of stock market behavior. Comparison of portfolios’ performances.

    курсовая работа [1,5 M], добавлен 23.10.2016

  • Strategy of foreign capital regulation in Russia. Russian position in the world market of investments. Problems of foreign investments attraction. Types of measures for attraction of investments. Main aspects of foreign investments attraction policy.

    реферат [20,8 K], добавлен 16.05.2011

  • Types and functions exchange. Conjuncture of exchange market in theory. The concept of the exchange. Types of Exchanges and Exchange operations. The concept of market conditions, goals, and methods of analysis. Stages of market research product markets.

    курсовая работа [43,3 K], добавлен 08.02.2014

  • History of formation and development of FRS. The organizational structure of the U.S Federal Reserve. The implementation of Monetary Policy. The Federal Reserve System in international sphere. Foreign Currency Operations and Resources, the role banks.

    реферат [385,4 K], добавлен 01.07.2011

  • Организационная структура строительной компании. Состав, функции звеньев аппарата управления. Изучение финансового состояния и результатов хозяйственной деятельности современного предприятия. Анализ бухгалтерского баланса, ликвидности, платежеспособности.

    отчет по практике [1,5 M], добавлен 04.04.2015

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.