Contemporary approach to the generations transition and cooperation at modern working place
Exploring workplace interactions and building effective relationships with intergenerational staff. Determining the needs of employees, their values. recommendations to company managers on establishing communication and cooperation with the workforce.
Рубрика | Экономика и экономическая теория |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 04.12.2023 |
Размер файла | 29,3 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.Allbest.Ru/
University of Nikolaus Kopernikus
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
Contemporary approach to the generations transition and cooperation at modern working place
Lepeyko T., Dr. of Sci. Econ., professor
D. Zehetner, Phd student
Annotation
As the new generation of workers has entered the working environment so far, the issue of productive collaboration of different generations rises up becoming more and more crucial.
The purpose of this paper is to study the interaction between representatives of different generations, which makes it possible to develop recommendations for establishing interaction between employers and employees. The study defines that one of the key problems of modern companies is the change of generations in the work teams, which in many cases leads to a decrease in the efficiency of the companies' activities.
Thus, main characteristics of four generations were given for better understanding the peculiarities of each one. Social and political events that influences different generations were outlined, which formed the traits of whole generations, in particular, their attitude to work. It was established that in order to build effective relations with personnel belonging to four different generations, employers need to determine the basic needs of employees, their values, taking into account that the employers as a rule belong to elder generations than their employees.
To omit misunderstanding, managers should know the needs and wants of their subordinates belonging to younger generation to organize the working process effectively. In the article the strengths and weaknesses of the BB, X, Y and Z generations were considered and highlighted, the main expectations were formulated and recommendations were made on how company managers can better establish communication and effective cooperation with labor teams consisting of representatives of different generations.
The attention is paid to Generation Z that has entered the labor market recently because managers should be ready for specific demands of this generation in the working environment and they must realize the specific features of this generation, their motivation to make the company activities more productive at all possible levels.
Keywords: theory of generations, diversity of generations in the workplace, interaction of generations, labor market.
Анотація
Сучасний підхід до зміни поколінь та співпраці на робочому місці
Лепейко Т.І., д.е.н., професор Університету Миколая Коперника; Цихетнер Д., аспірант, Харківський національний економічний університет імені Семена Кузнеця
Оскільки нове покоління працівників увійшло в робоче середовище, питання продуктивної співпраці різних поколінь стає все більш і більш важливим.
Метою даної роботи є дослідження взаємодії між представниками різних поколінь, що дає змогу розробити рекомендації щодо налагодження взаємодії між роботодавцями та працівниками. У дослідженні визначено, що однією з ключових проблем сучасних компаній є зміна поколінь у робочих колективах, яка в багатьох випадках призводить до зниження ефективності діяльності компаній Таким чином, для кращого розуміння особливостей кожного з них наведено основні характеристики чотирьох поколінь. Окреслено суспільно-політичні події, що впливають на різні покоління, які сформували риси характеру цілих поколінь, зокрема, їх ставлення до праці. Встановлено, що для побудови ефективних відносин із персоналом, який належить до чотирьох різних поколінь, роботодавцям необхідно визначити базові потреби працівників, їх цінності, враховуючи, що роботодавці, як правило, належать до старших поколінь, ніж їхні працівники. Щоб уникнути непорозумінь, керівники повинні знати потреби та бажання своїх підлеглих, які належать до молодого покоління, щоб ефективно організувати робочий процес. У статті розглянуто та висвітлено сильні та слабкі сторони поколінь BB, X, Yта Z, сформульовано основні очікування та надано рекомендації щодо того, як керівникам компанії краще налагодити комунікацію та ефективну співпрацю з трудовими колективами, що складаються з представників різних поколінь. Увага приділяється поколінню Z, яке нещодавно вийшло на ринок праці, тому що менеджери повинні бути готові до специфічних вимог цього покоління в робочому середовищі та повинні усвідомлювати особливості цього покоління, свою мотивацію зробити діяльність компанії більш продуктивною. всі можливі рівні.
Ключові слова: теорія поколінь, різноманіття поколінь на робочому місці, взаємодія поколінь, ринок праці.
Introduction
According to the latest report, the key global demographic trends today are the increase of lifetime, as well as the retirement age and percentage of aging population. Considering UN data, expected lifetime for the world population as a whole was 45.7 years in 1950, 64.2 years in 1990, and 72.6 years in 2019; the retirement age in almost all developed countries reaches 65-67 years now [1]. These circumstances lead to a longer active economic life of a person than before, people work longer, and several generations interact at the working place at the same time.
The most important one is the fact that young people do not exert such pressure on labor markets as before. First of all, due to the fact that it is not enough and, besides, it is partially oriented to foreign markets. Moreover, young people are more reserved than other generations when it comes to such motives as career, earnings, and responsibility. Instead, young people focus on such values as interesting work, free time, and a flexible schedule. The paradigm of sharing, not ownership, is also quite common among young people. In general, unprecedented age diversity will mean that age will either lose its decisive importance in the labor market, or will be present in the market in the form of expanded requests such as "energetic young person", "experienced specialist", "expert in the prime of life", etc.
Formulation of the goals of the article. The goals of the article are to propose the contemporary approach to the generations transition and cooperation at modern working place.
Presenting main material
Nowadays actual tendency is the transition from Baby Boomer (BB) generation to generation X because the Baby Boomer generation will retire in the nearest future, leaving the subsequent generation X to take over, continue and possibly change the jobs and positions through their own values and attitudes.
A number of scientists investigate characteristics and features of different generations such as Absolventa, Berkup, Einramhof-Florian, Holste, Mangelsdorf, Y. Scholz, Schnetzer Simon and others [1-15]. Comparative analysis of the four generation's working at the modern labour market characteristics is presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Comparative analysis of main characteristics of the current generation occupying the working place.
Criteria |
Generation BB |
Generation X |
Generation Y |
Generation Z |
|
Period of birth |
1946-1964 |
1965-1979 |
1980-2000 |
2000 - 2015 |
|
Imprint Period |
1957-1979 |
1976-1994 |
1991-2015 |
2011-2030 |
|
Current Age |
55-73, years |
40-57, years |
19-39, years |
4-19, years |
|
Education |
Work enthusiasm Insistence Rules Clear division of hierarchy |
Triggering of rigid hierarchy's Early independence Relaxed parenting |
Long protective phase Protected by the parents |
Overprotective by parents Dangers are tried to be averted Supported in making decisions |
|
Formative Events |
First moon landing Oil crisis Cuba crisis Assassination of J.F. Kennedy nuclear danger Cold War rising prosperity growing stability |
Reunification of Germany in 1989 Disintegration of the Soviet Union, 1991 Watergate scandal, USA Arms race of the Great Powers Events of the Cold War Rise of the VW Golf in 1974 Continuing economic crisis Explosion of the Challenger, 1986 Reactor accident Chernobyl, 1986 |
Global financial and economic crisis, 2008 Climate change and environmental disasters Terrorist attack 11.09.2001 in NY War in and Afghanistan Joining the European Union Introduction of the Euro |
Events around Haiti and Fukushima Terrorist attacks and environmental crisis |
|
Environment |
Time of economic upswing Progress in technology Growing stability Political protests Changing social order |
Increase in divorces Open protests Possible freedom of expression Trend towards individuality |
Digital time Economic and financial crisis Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan Environmental disasters Terrorist attacks Uncertainties |
Ongoing economic and financial crisis Environmental crisis The age of digitalisation Climate change Raw materials and energy crisis |
|
Indicators |
Generation BB |
Generation X |
Generation Y |
Generation Z |
|
Developing education policy |
Wave of unemployment |
||||
Characteristics |
Helpful high social competence Able to work in a team High career ambitions Ready for action Performance- oriented Career-oriented Leadership quality |
Loner Works consciously Self-reflective Egocentric Rebellious Cheeky Complaining Impatient Lazy |
Questioning everything Thinking about the future and how to deal with each other Self-confident Disoriented Overwhelmed Independent Changeable and adaptable Fickle Well educated Demanding Willing to learn Selfish Spoiled |
Critical to modern technology Personal relationships are important Critical to politics Demanding Respectful Trustworthy Individualistic Tolerant Impatient Self-confident Cheerful Environmentally aware Intelligent Innovative Project-oriented Creative |
|
Setting |
Optimistic |
Pessimistic |
Optimistic |
Realistic |
|
Furt |
ier, we will discuss working conditions for a good cooperation in generation's transition at |
Some differences and similarities between the four generations in the labour market currently are important for cooperation. In order to determine what demands are on the working environment and what attitudes towards the employer are present, the following features are considered: attitude towards work, organisational structure, motivational factors, technology, cooperation, communication and technology.
According to the Edge study [4], generation BB is significantly more likely than generation X to have the freedom to conform at work while generation X has a higher need for authenticity and balance. It was also found that the three generations BB, X and Y put less emphasis on intrinsic motivation at work than previously thought. It was a widespread assumption that generation X is inquisitive and has great value on being able to learn at work. Generation Xs attitude to work is inspired by social change in the company if it matches their personal passion and commitment, whereas generation BB is more likely to be influenced by major social or political changes. Generation BB people are seen as committed, MAs who enjoy working [2], who are willing to work hard and do overtime. This was confirmed by a study [5].
If we compare the generations on the operational readiness now, we can see that this has changed significantly over the generations. Since the BBs were brought up in a time of discipline and obedience, they are ready to show full commitment in the field of work, because they are fixed to their professional success and the achievement of their personal goals. For payment they are also prepared to work overtime. The attitude of generation X, on the other hand, is somewhat different. Generation X, who are also characterised by a high level of commitment, but for whom time with family and friends is also important. Since they spent little time with their parents in their own childhood, as they spent a lot of time working, it is important to them not to repeat these mistakes. For these MAs, the flexible organisation of working hours is important in order to be able to organise their private life freely. For generation Y, the motivation to work is characterised by opportunities for personal development Young people are interested in finding personal fulfilment in their professional life and to have professional success. However, unlike the Baby Boomers, they have little interest in fully committing themselves to professional life. They are eager to complete the tasks assigned to them, but they want to determine the implementation and time allocation themselves. Compared to previous generations, generation Z is anxious to complete their tasks in a fixed working time, not to work overtime, and to have a clear separation between work and private life. In exceptional cases, they are also willing to work overtime, but they demand a free working day for that [8].
In terms of loyalty to the employer, generation X is inclined to keep the job because of the positive relationship with colleagues. For them, unlike generation BB, it is not the opportunity for development that is in the foreground, but the atmosphere in the team. Generation Y is comfortable with the idea of having several employers in their professional life. Due to the economic volatility, the loyalty towards the employer has decreased [5]. Generation BB MAs are described as loyal, committed and competitive workaholics [9]. Due to their good education, generation Z is not dependent on a specific employer and thus also has the freedom to change jobs if the working conditions or well-being suit them no longer. This flexibility is an advantage for young adults, but a great challenge for companies and managers. production interaction communication worker generation
Parry and Urwin mentioned that generation BB is part of the understanding of their work ethic when taking on responsibility and because of their good leadership skills, they currently make up the majority of managers [9, pp. 79-80]. Generation X does have career success as a goal; however, due to their openness to a quick change of job, this is often not only possible with their current employer. Compared to their predecessors, generation Y and generation Z have no ambition to take on major responsibilities. In particular, generation Z shows clearly an increase in rejection of taking on responsibility, because fewer and fewer young people want to take on leadership positions even though they have a better level of education. Generation BB hardly has a clear idea of what the younger generations are, how work is to be done and how assigned tasks must be completed. The understanding of other attitudes is often not present due to the lack of knowledge about the younger generation. The younger ones want to organise and organise the completion of the tasks assigned to them themselves [8, p. 126]. Transparency, autonomy and flexibility are particularly important to generation Z in their professional environment and are considered non-negotiable. Without consideration of these factors, morale and commitment will be significantly reduced.
The personal motivation of the generations is shaped differently. Whereas the Baby Boomers tend to act out of personal interest, generation X cares about the impression they make on their environment. Generation Y, like generation BB, has personal motivating factors such as luxurious status symbols and clothing. Generation Z, on the other hand, is anxious to satisfy the wishes and ideas of their parents and to make them be proud [8, pp. 14-23]. Thus, Einramhof-Florian identified seven factors that contribute significantly to the work motivation of generation [5, pp. 61-65]: challenge in the workplace, remuneration for work performance, collegial working environment, company location, career opportunity, work-life balance, further training opportunities.
According to Edge study, generation X is less patient than their predecessors, generation BB, as they are not willing to wait long for promotions, and they are clearly more dissatisfied with their careers progression. They usually demand immediate recognition for their work efforts through praise, promotion or more salary. Generation Y feels neglected in the recognition of their performance and feels that the respect they receive is too little [4, pp. 144-145]. Job stability, interesting tasks and the possibility of a fast career move are strong motivating factors for generation Y, as they are willing to make a commitment to their professional success. For them, success, career and money are the most important things to get ahead in the consumer society. For generation Z, on the other hand, career is not at the forefront of their motivation. They want to change the world and value job stability more. However, it is also important for them to develop their own talents, to receive recognition or even a promotion. For generation BB and generation X, a high salary, as well as stability and security in the workplace are the most important motivating factors as the main motivators for generation Z are fun, passion and also money.
Generation X wants to be independent and self-reliant and sees hierarchical levels mainly as a career goal. To achieve these goals, they prefer to work for themselves and require very little management control. However, they expect to be told exactly what is expected of them so that they can work efficiently on the realization of the goals. Due to the lack of role models, due to their resignation because of the economic crisis, they are distrustful of the leaders and often ask the existing authorities [8, pp. 14-23, 142-143]. Generation Z, on the other hand, needs mentors as leaders in order to be able to share their ideas openly and to satisfy their desire for recognition. Whereas generation Y would rather be independent and prefer freedom of development [10, pp. 480]. Generation BB has grown up under clear hierarchies, subordinates itself to the existing structures and can work well with them. They want to adhere to the structures so that they can move up the career ladder [8, pp. 14-23, 142-143]. In comparison to other generations, they perceive flat hierarchies as very important [13, p. 7]. The following generations are more skeptical about strict hierarchies. The younger generations were found to reject being subordinated by hierarchical structures. They prefer subordination on the basis of performance or expertise, which reduces acceptance of the seniority principle [13, p. 11]. Generation Y wants performance to mean more than age and work experience and therefore disagrees with the seniority principle practiced in many companies for the most part. As the following figure below, generation Y is primarily against preferential treatment according to the seniority principle [13, p. 11]. The younger generations have no understanding for hierarchies, based on seniority and not on experience and knowledge.
The following is a summary of the generational characteristics and factors related to the work environment presented in Table 2.
Table 2
The summary of the generational characteristics and factors related to the cooperation
Criteria |
Baby Boomer |
Generation X |
Generation Y |
Generation Z |
|
Characteristics |
team-oriented communicative promotion-oriented performance-oriented professionally self- sacrificing ready for action patient sensitive to criticism structured social helpful committed money-motivated responsible |
individualistic family-oriented solution-oriented ready for action impatient flexible egocentric self-reflective independent money-motivated promotion-oriented |
team-oriented communicative career-oriented goal-oriented self-confident open-minded versatile inquisitive adaptable questioning committed money-motivated |
team-oriented communicative project-oriented critical ready for action willing to perform environmentally aware questioning virtual innovative intelligent |
|
Motto for life |
live to work |
work to live |
First live then work |
Work is only one part of life |
|
Work-relevant characteristics of the generations |
|||||
Motivation |
Intrinsic (personal success) |
extrinsic (expectation of parents) |
Intrinsic (materialism) |
Extrinsic (social environment) |
|
Attitude towards the employer |
Loyalty Willingness to sacrifice High work ethic High commitment to work |
Ready for action, but not self-sacrificing Effective at work, critical of existing structures |
universally applicable Values & Goals must be part of the personal attitude fit personal fulfilment |
Loyalty Striving for Self-realisation in private life |
|
Expectations of the employer |
Stability Fairness Value stability Appreciate justice Opportunity for advancement |
Stability Open to criticism and feedback Local proximity and good accessibility Possibility of further training Opportunities for promotion |
Stability, demands regular, constructive Feedback Opportunity for further training Opportunities for promotion Freedom of decision Interesting tasks |
Stability demands regular, constructive Feedback Meaningful activities Project work Development opportunities |
|
Behaviour towards hierarchy |
Authority is recognised Structures are adhered |
Authority is accepted critical of authority |
Authority is questions questions existing structures |
Authority is ignored breaks structures |
When it comes to the introduction of new technologies, older people are often cited as the cause of conflict. It is said that they do not know what to do with it because of their age. Often, they are unable to understand the application due to short learning times [13, p. 8]. Due to age, they are often described as technology-phobic, which can be attributed to the increasing scepticism in old age. However, this conflict can be used for improvements and adaptations. Generation BB is often assumed to have a low willingness to learn. Generation BB has often come a long way in professional life without technical aids, but now they have also recognised the advantages of modern technologies and are willing to learn how to use them. The younger generations are often confronted with digital tools from an early age and have learned to use them. They already know how to use the digital advantages. Generation X likes to use new tools to organize their lives efficiently. They are tech-savvy, have learned to deal with technology from scratch. As a result, they readily use the new technological tools and digital communication media unlike generation Y who can use any new technology but lack an understanding of it. Generation Z is also very well acquainted with the use of technology and is considered to be constantly connected, which means that their attention span is considered to be strongly influenced [8, pp. 145-147].
Generation BB is very interested in passing on their knowledge and experience to the younger generations, even if they have lost their knowledge edge due to technological progress. In general, it can be said that the exchange among each other is desired irrespective of generation and age. In a survey, those involved in generation BB mentioned respectful interaction as a challenge, whereby the younger generations are considered to be the cause [13, pp. 7-8]. On the subject of collaboration, exchange and feedback the three younger generation X, Y and Z are clearly different from their BB predecessors. The generation BB likes to work in teams and exchange ideas personally, but is critical of feedback and tends to reject it. Generation X prefers to work for themselves and exchange ideas via digital means. They are open to feedback and constructive criticism [8, p. 165]. In comparison, generation Y is again more inclined towards teamwork and personal exchange. They demand open and regular feedback. Generation Z іs thirst for information is a challenge for leadership, especially for older supervisors. Generation Z has high expectations of their leaders, who need them for inputs and extensive feedbacks, they also prefer to conduct preferably face-to-face meetings. This generation likes to work on projects [2, p. 29]. The different preferences and attitudes are of great importance for generation transition because it shows that especially an employee of generation X is likely to be dissatisfied in teamwork.
Conclusion
Today, employers and managers have to show flexibility, which requires large-scale systemic changes: cultural and operational, together with adoption of a new way of thinking, openness in demonstrating socially responsible behavior, creating a new corporate culture that would support cultural diversity, recognition, development and opportunities for alternative employment.
With generation Z, a completely new type of employee enters the labor market. Unlike previous generations who worked hard and made a commitment to their company, Generation Z does not want to give too much of themselves to the company. It tries to separate private life and work, to which it does not want to devote too much time. To organize the best interaction of different generations in the workplace, it is necessary to understand what employee behavior the company needs to achieve its goals, identify the "pain points" of employees that prevent them from being effective, and work with the problems of each generation, taking into account their needs, which, having one and the same source of the problem can be completely different.
The direction of further research in this field is to identify the peculiarities of the interaction of generations in the conditions of online work.
Literature
1. Трендвотчінг ситуації на ринку праці.
2. Bejtkovsky J. «The current generations: The Baby Boomers, X, Y and Z in the context of human capital management of the 21st Century in selected corporations in the Czech Republic». Littera Scripta. 2016. vol. 9(2), pp. 25-45.
3. Berkup S.B. «Working with generations X and Y in generation Z period: Management of different generations in business life». Medіterranean journal оf social Sciences. 2014. vol. 5(19), pp. 218.
4. Einramhof-Florian H. Empirischer Teil. In: Die Arbeits zufriedenheit der Generation Y. Springer, Wiesbaden. 2017.
5. Engel J. We Asked Generation Z to Pick a Name. It Wasn't Generation Z. 2018.
6. Holste J.H. Arbeitgeberattraktivitat im demographischen Wandel: Eine multidimensionale Betrachtung. Vol. 1: Springer- Verlag. 2012.
7. Katz S. «Generation X: A critical sociological perspective». Generations. 2017. vol. 41(3), pp. 12-19.
8. Mangelsdorf M. Von Babyboomer bis Generation Z: Der richtige Umgang mit unterschiedlichen Generationen im Unternehmen: GABAL Verlag GmbH. 2015.
9. Ng E.S., Parry E. «Multgenerational research in human resource management». In Research in personne/ and human resources management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 2016. (pp. 1-41).
10. Ozelik G. «Engagement and retention of the millennial generation in the workplace through internal branding». Internationa/ Journa/ o/Business and Management. 2015. vol. 10(3), pp. 99.
11. Scholz C., Grotefend L.-D. «Generation Z in Germany: The (Un)Typical German?» In C. Scholz & A. Rennig (Eds.), The changing context o/managing peop/e. Generations Z in Europe: Inputs, insights and implications / edited by Christian Scho/z, Anne Rennig. 2019. (pp. 169-197). United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.
12. Statistik Austria Bevolkerung (Population). 2021.
13. Statistical Yearbook. 2015.
14. Timmermann S. «What a difference a generation makes: How our life experiences shape our viewpoints and behaviors». Journal of Financial Service Professionals. 2007. vol. 61(3), pp. 25.
15. Zemke R., Raines C., Filipczak B. Generations at work: Managing the clash of Boomers, Gen Xers, and Gen Yers in the workplace: Amacom. 2013.
References
1. Trendvotchinh sytuatsii na rynku pratsi. [Trendwatching of the labor market situation].
2. Bejtkovsky, J. (2016). «The current generations: The Baby Boomers, X, Y and Z in the context of human capital management of the 21st Century in selected corporations in the Czech Republic». Littera Scripta. vol. 9(2), pp. 25-45.
3. Berkup, S.B. (2014). «Working with generations X and Y in generation Z period: Management of different generations in business life». Mediterranean journal of social Sciences. vol. 5(19), pp. 218.
4. Einramhof-Florian, H. (2017). Empirischer Teil. In: Die Arbeits zufrieden heit der Generation Y. Springer, Wiesbaden.
5. Engel, J. (2018). We Asked Generation Z to Pick a Name. It Wasn't Generation Z.
6. Holste, J.H. (2012). Arbeit geberattr aktivitat im demographischen Wandel: Eine multidimensionale Betrachtung. Vol. 1: Springer-Verlag.
7. Katz, S. (2017). «Generation X: A critical sociological perspective». Generations. vol. 41(3), pp. 12-19.
8. Mangelsdorf, M. (2015). Von Babyboomer bis Generation Z: Der richtige Umgang mit unterschiedlichen Generationen im Unternehmen: GABAL Verlag GmbH.
9. Ng, E.S., Parry, E. (2016). «Multigenerational research in human resource management». In Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 1-41). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
10. Ozelik, G. (2015). «Engagement and retention of the millennial generation in the workplace through internal branding». International Journal of Business and Management. vol. 10(3), pp. 99.
11. Scholz, C., Grotefend, L.-D. (2019). «Generation Z in Germany: The (Un) Typical German?» In C. Scholz & A. Rennig (Eds.), The changing context of managing people. Generations Z in Europe: Inputs, insights and implications/ edited by Christian Scholz, Anne Rennig (pp. 169-197). United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.
12. Statistik Austria (2021). Bevolkerung (Population).
13. Statistical Yearbook 2015.
14. Timmermann, S. (2007). «What a difference a generation makes: How our life experiences shape our viewpoints and behaviors». Journal of Financial Service Professionals. vol. 61(3), pp. 25.
15. Zemke, R., Raines, C., Filipczak, B. (2013). Generations at work: Managing the clash of Boomers, Gen Xers, and Gen Yers in the workplace: Amacom.
Размещено на Allbest.Ru
Подобные документы
Project background and rationales. Development methodology, schedule planning. Company mission and vision. Organization of staff and company structure. Procurement system target market. Implementation of procurement system. Testing, user manual.
дипломная работа [6,8 M], добавлен 28.11.2013Concept and program of transitive economy, foreign experience of transition. Strategic reference points of long-term economic development. Direction of the transition to an innovative community-oriented type of development. Features of transitive economy.
курсовая работа [29,4 K], добавлен 09.06.2012Establishing a favorable environment for investments, removing administrative barriers. Establishing high-technology parks. Formation of financial mechanisms to attract and support investments, tax stimulation measures. Brand promotion of Russian regions.
реферат [15,9 K], добавлен 04.06.2013General characteristic of the LLC DTEK Zuevskaya TPP and its main function. The history of appearance and development of the company. Characteristics of the organizational management structure. Analysis of financial and economic performance indicators.
отчет по практике [4,2 M], добавлен 22.05.2015Transition of the Chinese labor market. Breaking the Iron Rice Bowl. Consequences for a Labor Force in transition. Labor market reform. Post-Wage Grid Wage determination, government control. Marketization Process. Evaluating China’s industrial relations.
курсовая работа [567,5 K], добавлен 24.12.2012The digital nervous system. The best way to put distance between company and the crowd. Accurate information about sales. A standardized system of accounts for the entire GM organization. Achieving advantage over competitors in the information age.
анализ книги [19,8 K], добавлен 16.06.2012Определение возможностей по повышению эффективности экономико-хозяйственной деятельности предприятия на примере ООО "Group of company Pixel". Организационная структура управления. Управление производством и персоналом. Методы коммерческой деятельности.
отчет по практике [238,9 K], добавлен 13.06.2014Репутация компании The Walt Disney Company и конкуренция. Стратегический маркетинговый план Диснея. История потребительских товаров Disney. Непрерывная реклама как одна из стратегий компании. Парки и курорты Disney. Особенности структуры компании.
реферат [656,6 K], добавлен 12.09.2013Directions of activity of enterprise. The organizational structure of the management. Valuation of fixed and current assets. Analysis of the structure of costs and business income. Proposals to improve the financial and economic situation of the company.
курсовая работа [1,3 M], добавлен 29.10.2014История зарождения предприятия "The Coca-Cola Company", характеристика его деятельности (место расположения, основные виды продукции). Масштабы предприятия, собственники и руководство. Прибыль и рентабельность, качество продукции и отзывы потребителей.
реферат [24,9 K], добавлен 20.12.2011