Ecological features of terrestrial insect fauna of the botanical garden of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian national university

Study of terrestrial insect fauna of the Botanical Garden of the Carpathian National University named after V. Stefanyka. Comparison of species composition of insects in different areas. Factors and trends in the decrease of their biodiversity in August.

Рубрика Экология и охрана природы
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 16.09.2022
Размер файла 156,6 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

Ecological features of terrestrial insect fauna of the botanical garden of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian national university

Tetiana Mykytyn, Neonila Dolynko, Nataliia Bielova, Vasyl Kuzenko

Abstract

In 2018, we conducted a study of the terrestrial insect fauna of the Botanical Garden. Research was conducted at six areas: three areas in the meadow-steppe biotope, one area near a pond, and two areas in the forest part of the botanical garden.

As a result, 54 species of terrestrial insects were found to be inhabited, among which beetles from two families - Ground beetle and Darkling beetle (Coleoptera). The basis of the fauna of the botanical garden is widespread species (cosmopolitan, trans- and western Palearctic, trans- and western Eurasian, Scythian) - 88%; in most cases, these are evrybiont species that are well adapted to life in agrocenoses and in urbanized areas. The terrestrial insect fauna of the botanical garden is dominated by steppe and polyzonal species (57%), as well as a large share of field, steppe-field and meadow-field species (29%).

Comparing the species composition of insects in different areas, it can be noted that in the meadow areas of the botanical garden (Areas 2, 3, 6) there are no virgin species such as Amara pastica, Pterostichusmacer, Taphoxenusgigas, and in the areas near the lake (Area 1) and in the forest part of the botanical garden (Areas 4-5) there are no field species Pterostichuspunctulatus, Harpaluszabroides, Harpalusdistringuendus, Silphaobscura; thus, the fauna of the meadow areas of the Botanical Chad is closer to the virgin steppe than the fauna of Areas 1, 4, 5.

56% of terrestrial insect species in the botanical garden are species with one or another degree of phytophagy, zoophagy is characteristic of 40% of species; pure phytophages make up 32% of species, pure zoophages 24%. Predominance of phytophages is a characteristic of agrocenoses and disturbed ecosystems.

one trend is observed - a decrease in the biodiversity of entomofauna in August; this is explained by the drying of biotopes at the end of summer, especially in 2018. If we compare the indices by biotopes, then in June biodiversity is much higher in the meadow areas of the botanical garden, and in August these indicators are slightly higher in the areas near the pond and in the forest part of the botanical garden, which can also be explained by environmental factors and their influence on terrestrial insect organisms.

Keywords: insects, fauna, botanical garden, biodiversity indices, trophic specialization.

Микитин Тетяна, Долинко Неля, Бєлова Наталія, Кузенко Василь. Екологічні особливості фауни наземних комах ботанічного саду Прикарпатського національного університету імені Василя Стефаника

У 2018 році нами проведено дослідження фауни наземних комах Ботанічного саду Прикарпатського національного університету імені Василя Стефаника. Дослідження проводилися на шістьох дослідних ділянках: 3 пробні ділянки на території лучно-степового біотопу, 1 ділянка біля ставка та 2 ділянки на території лісової частини ботанічного саду.

В результаті встановлено проживання 54 видів наземних комах, серед яких переважають жуки з двох родин - Туруни і Чорнотілки ряду Твердокрилі або Жуки.

Основу фауни ботанічного саду становлять широко поширені види (космополіти, транс- і західнопалеарктичні, транс- і західноєвразійські, скіфські) - 88%; в більшості випадків це еврибіонтні види, які добре пристосовуються до життя в агроценозах і на урбанізованих територіях. У фауні наземних комах ботанічного саду переважають степові і полізональні види (57%), також велика частка польових, степово-польових і лучно-польових видів (29%).

Порівнюючи видовий склад комах на різних ділянках, можна відзначити, що на лучних територіях ботанічного саду (Ділянки 2, 3, 6) немає таких цілинних видів, як Amara pastica, Pterostichusmacer, Taphoxenusgigas, а на ділянках поблизу озера (Ділянка 1) і в лісовій частині ботанічного саду (Ділянки 4-5) немає польових видів Pterostichuspunctulatus, Harpaluszabroides, Harpalusdistringuendus, Silpha obscura; таким чином фауна лучних територій ботанічного чаду ближча до цілинної степової, ніж фауна Ділянок 1, 4, 5.

56 % видів наземних комах ботанічного саду становлять види з тим або іншим ступенем фітофагії, зоофагія властива 40 % видів; чисті фітофаги становлять 32% видів, чисті зоофаги 24%. Переважання фітофагів характерно для агроценозів і порушених екосистем.

Простежується одна тенденція - зниження біорізноманіттяентомофауни в серпні; це пояснюється висушування біотопів в кінці літа, особливо в 2018 році. Якщо порівнювати індекси по біотопах, то в червні біорізноманіття значно вище на лучних територіях ботанічного саду, а в серпні ці показники трохи вищі на ділянках поблизу ставка і в лісовій частині ботанічного саду, що можна також пояснити екологічними факторами та їх впливом на організми наземних комах.

Ключові слова: комахи, фауна, ботанічний сад, індекси біорізноманіття, трофічна спеціалізація.

Introduction

As a result of anthropogenic load, the entomofauna undergoes significant changes. This is due to the strengthening of the transformation of nature, which led to a radical transformation of biogeocenoses. This influence was expressed in the change in the quantitative and species composition of insects, namely, many species die out or become rare, while some species gain advantages in access to food and an ecological niche and become massive. The degree and nature of changes in biocenoses are determined by the genus and the intensity of its economic use [3, 5].

According to the research of scientists, in the absolutely protected steppe, where both grazing and haymaking are prohibited, the species composition of insects has noticeably decreased and they are mainly represented by orthoptera and bugs [1, 2]. Currently, there is a huge anthropogenic impact on natural objects. This topic is becoming the most important for scientists all over the world, as our planet is losing its bright colors. Therefore, it is very important to know which species of terrestrial insects have managed to adapt to life in urbanized cities, and therefore this study is relevant [2, 5].

Materials and methods of research

The main purpose of the research we conducted in June-September 2018 was to study the features of the terrestrial entomofauna of the botanical garden of VasylStefanykPrecarpathian National University, in areas with different anthropogenic loads. For this purpose, we chose three biotopes: the area near the pond (one sample plot), forest (two sample plots) and meadow-steppe ecosystems (three sample plots).

Experimental area 1 - site near the pond - 48°56'33.1”N 24°40'42.4”E;

Experimental area 2 - meadow-steppe ecosystem - 48°56'29.6”N 24°40'30.1”E;

Experimental area 3 - meadow-steppe ecosystem - 48°56'23.7"N 24°40'12.2”E;

Experimental area 4 - forest - 48°56'43.8”N 24°40'04.1”E;

Experimental area 5 - forest - 48°56'43.1”N 24°39'57.5"E;

Experimental area 6 - meadow-steppe ecosystem - 48°56'35.4”N 24°39'50.2”E (see on the map).

Terrestrial insects were caught in the experimental areas. The species composition of the entomofauna was determined with the help of identifiers and scientific articles in the zoological museum of the department biology and ecology.

The results of catches using various traps were used to determine the number of insect populations. For the quantitative assessment of biological diversity, a large number of indices of varying degrees of complexity are used, which allow an objective assessment of the state of communities and ecosystems. We calculated four indices characterizing biodiversity: Shannon, Menkhinik, Simpson and BergerParker [4, 6, 7].

Fig. 1. Map of the botanical garden of VasylStefanykPrecarpathian National University

Research results and their discussion

We discovered 54 species of insects during the research in June-September 2018 (Table 1). The analysis of the species composition showed that the terrestrial insect fauna in the botanical garden is mainly represented by beetles from two families - Ground beetle (CarabidaeLatreille, 1802) and Darkling beetle (TenebrionidaeLatreille, 1802).

Tab.l.The relative abundance of terrestrial insects in the botanical garden of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University (2018, insects/100m2)

Speaces, families

June-July

August-September

Areas 1, 4, 5

Areas 2, 3, 6

Areas 1, 4, 5

Areas 2, 3, 6

Ground beetle Total: Including:

68

148

330

237

Amara aulicaPanzer, 1797

16

10

26

-

Amara bifronsGyllenhal, 1810

4

38

6

7

Amara desertaKrynicki, 1832

-

6

2

-

Amara pasticaDejean, 1831

-

4

-

-

Amara ingenuaDuftschmid, 1812

2

-

-

-

Amara convexiusculaMarsham, 1802

-

2

-

-

Amara equestrisDuftschmid, 1812

-

10

-

-

OphonusrufipesDeGeer, 1774

12

40

28

8

OphonusazureusFabricius, 1775

2

-

-

-

PterostichussericeusFischer von Waldheim, 1824

6

10

-

2

PterostichusmacerMarsham, 1802

-

4

-

2

PterostichuspunctulatusSchaller, 1783

2

-

2

-

CalathusambiguusPaykull, 1790

-

16

106

152

CalathuserratusC.R. Sahlberg, 1827

-

-

141

55

TaphoxemagigasFischer von

-

2

-

7

Waldheim, 1823

HarpalussmaragdinusDuftschmid,

4

2

2

-

1812

HarpaluszabroidesDejean, 1829

2

-

-

-

HarpalusdistinguendusDuftschmid,

4

-

-

-

1812

Harpalusrubripes

6

-

-

-

Duftschmid, 1812

HarpalusamplucalisSchrank, 1781

-

-

-

2

CymindusvariolosaFabricius, 1794

-

2

4

-

CymindusscapularisSchaum, 1857

-

-

4

2

CymindusangularisGyllenhal, 1810

-

-

4

-

NotiophiluspalustrisDuftschmid,

-

-

5

-

1812

Syntonus sp.

2

-

-

-

Microlestes sp.

2

-

-

-

CalosomaauropunctatumHerbst,

2

2

-

-

1784

Larvae

2

-

-

-

Darkling beetle Total:

92

86

2

29

Including:

BlapshalophilaFischer von

20

38

-

17

Waldheim, 1832

BlapslethiferaMarsham, 1802

4

10

-

-

OpatrumsabulosumLinnaeus, 1761

16

22

-

2

OodoscelispolitaSturm, 1807

52

14

2

10

CrypticusquisquiliusLinnaeus, 1761

-

2

-

-

PedinusfemoralisLinnaeus, 1767

-

2

-

-

Other bugs

224

108

14

30

Total:

Including:

OtiorhynchusvelutinusGermar, 1823

146

32

2

10

OtiorhynchusovatusLinnaeus, 1758

-

-

-

2

OtiorhynchusligusticiLinnaeus, 1758

-

2

-

-

EusomusovulumGermar, 1824

-

4

-

-

PsalidiummaxillosumFabricius, 1792

6

2

-

-

CleonispigraScopoli, 1763

34

4

-

-

Sitona sp.

2

-

-

-

PseudocleonuscinereusSchrank, 1781

-

2

-

-

TanymecuspalliatusFabricius, 1787

-

2

-

-

DermesteslaniariusIlliger, 1801

16

14

-

2

CoccinellaseptempunctataLinnaeus,

-

-

-

2

1758

SilphaobscuraLinnaeus, 1758

4

-

-

-

Chrysomelalimbata

-

8

4

2

Fabricius, 1775

ChrysomelasanguinolentaLinnaeus,

-

2

-

-

1758

AgriotessputatorLinnaeus, 1758

10

24

-

-

Alticini

-

-

2

2

DorcadioncarinatumPallas, 1771

2

2

-

2

Cassida

2

-

-

-

ByrrhuspilulaLinnaeus, 1758

-

6

-

4

Staphylinus sp.

-

-

4

2

OnthophagussemicornisPanzer, 1798

2

-

-

2

MaladeraholosericeaScopoli, 1772

-

4

2

-

Hemiptera

14

8

61

0

Total:

Including:

EmblethisverbasciFabricius, 1803

14

2

40

-

Emblethisgriseus

-

-

8

-

Wolff, 1802

EmblethisdenticollisHorvath, 1878

-

-

4

-

DicranomerusagilisScopoli, 1763

-

2

-

-

MegalonotuschiragraFabricius, 1794

-

-

7

-

Cydnusaterrimus

-

2

2

-

Forster, 1771

Myodochidae

-

2

-

-

Orthoptera

0

2

35

26

Total:

Including:

DecticusverrucivorusLinnaeus, 1758

-

2

4

-

Gryllulusdesertus

-

-

4

-

Pallas, 1771

CalliptamusitalicusLinnaeus, 1758

-

-

-

-

OedipodacaerulescensLinnaeus, 1758

-

-

17

5

ChorthippusbiguttulusLinnaeus,

-

-

5

10

1758

ChorthippusmacrocerusFischer de

-

-

5

-

Waldheim, 1846

Locust larvae

-

-

-

9

Ovocestushaemorrhoidalis

-

-

-

2

Charpentier, 1825

On the site near the pond and two experimental areas in forest, 68 insects/100m2 of Ground beetle were found in June-July, in August-September the number of Ground beetles increased sharply - up to 330 insects/100m2. 148 insects/100m2 were found in the meadow-steppe plots (3 research areas) in June- July, and 237 insects/100m2 in August-September. The increase in number of Ground beetle in the experimental territories in August-September can be explained by their mass reproduction and activation of their physiological processes.

The following species of Ground beetle were most abundant in the area near the pond and in two forest areas: Amara aulica, Ophonusrufipes, Calathusambiguus and Calathuserratus. The following species of Ground beetle were not found at all in these research areas: Harpalusamplucalis, Taphoxemagigas, Pterostichusmacer, Amara equestris, Amara convexiuscula and Amara pastica.

The following species of Ground beetle were the most common in the meadow-steppe areas: Amara aulica, Amara bifrons, Amara equestris, Ophonusrufipes, Calathusambiguus and Calathuserratus. The following species of Ground beetle were not found at all in these research areas: Amara ingenue, Ophonusazureus, Pterostichuspunctulatus, Harpaluszabroides, Harpalusdistringuendus, Harpalusrubripes, Cymindusangularis, Notiophiluspalustris, Syntonus sp., Microlestes sp. and larvae.

In the experimental plots, the number of Ground beetle, mostly of all species, was quite low, only in August-September, a mass appearance of Calathusambiguus, Calathuserratus was observed in all experimental areas.

In the area near the pond and two experimental plots in forest, 92 insects/100m2 Darkling beetle were found in June-July, in August-September the number of Darkling beetle decreased sharply - to 2 insects/100m2. 86 insects/100m2 were found in the meadow-steppe area (three research areas) in June- July, and 29 insects/100m2 in August-September. The decrease in the number of Darkling beetle in the experimental areas in August-September can be explained by their mass destruction due to their ability to damage field plantings, because the country estate is located next to the botanical garden. The country estate and human settlements are located closer to experimental plots 1, 4 and 5, therefore, in these areas too, we observe a mass death of Darkling beetle in August-September.

The followingDarklingbeetlespeciesweremost abundant in theareanearthepond and in twoforest areas: Blapshalophila, Opatrumsabulosum and Oodoscelispolita. The following species of Darkling beetle: Crypticusquisquilius, Pedinusfemoraliswere not found at all in these research areas.

The most common species in the meadow-steppe areas were all species of Darkling beetle, which are common in the study area, except for Crypticusquisquilius and Pedinusfemoralis.

In the experimental areas, thenumber ofDarklingbeetle, mostly of all species, was quitehigh in June-July, except for Crypticusquisquilius and Pedinusfemoralis, which were observed only in the meadow-steppe areas of the botanical garden, and in August-September, a decrease in the number of Darkling beetle was observed in the experimental areas near the pond and in the plots in the forest, and in the meadow-steppe research plots of the botanical garden were quite common.

On the area near the pond and two experimental sites in forest, no one individual of the order Orthoptera was not found in June-July, in August-September their number was 35 insects/100m2. In the meadow-steppe area (three research areas) 2 insects/100m2 were found in June-July, and 26 insects/100m2 in August-September. The increase in the number of representatives of the order Orthoptera can be explained by their massive reproduction and development during this period.

The following species order Orthoptera were most abundant in the area near the pond and in two forest areas: Oedipodacaerulescens, Chorthippusbiguttulus, Chorthippusmacrocerus. The following orthopteran species: Calliptamusitalicus, locust larvae, and Ovocestushaemorrhoidalis were not found at all in these research areas.

The following species of Orthoptera were most abundant in the meadow-steppe areas: Oedipodacaerulescens, Chorthippusbiguttulus and locust larvae. Gryllulusdesertus, Calliptamusitalicus and Chorthippusmacrocerus were not found at all in the experimental areas.

In June-July, 14 insects/100m2 of Hemiptera were found in the area near the pond and two experimental plots in forest, in August-September their number was 61 insects/100m2. In the meadow- steppe area (three research areas) 8 insects/100m2 were found in June-July, and in August-September no bugs were found at all. This situation with the number of Hemiptera can be explained by the lack of fodder for young and adults in the meadow-steppe research areas.

The following species of Hemiptera were most abundant in the area near the pond and in two forest areas: Emblethisverbasci, Emblethisgriseus and Megalonotuschiragra. Dicranomerusagilis, Myodochidae were not found at all in the experimental areas.

Emblethisverbasci was the most widespread in the meadow-steppe areas. The following species of Hemiptera: Emblethisgriseus, Emblethisdenticollis and Megalonotuschiragra were not found at all in these research areas.

The basis of the fauna of the botanical garden is widespread species (cosmopolitan, trans- and western Palearctic, trans- and western Eurasian, Scythian) - 88%.

In most cases, these are evrybiont species that are well adapted to life in agrocenoses and in urbanized areas; thus, the terrestrial insect fauna of the botanical garden has an appearance characteristic of human-disturbed areas. It has practically no species characteristic of virgin steppes.

The terrestrial insect fauna of the botanical garden is dominated by steppe and polyzonal species (57%), as well as a large share of field, steppe-field and meadow-field species (29%). The analysis of the abundance of field (evrybiont) and virgin species showed that quantitatively the basis of the fauna is field species.

The analysis of the trophic specialization of the insect fauna of the botanical garden showed that it contains representatives of 7 trophic groups:

1 - Phytosaprophages: Blapshalophila; Opatrumsabulosum;

2 - Phytophages: Otiorhynchusligustici; Eusomusovulum ;

3 - Phytophages: Onthophagussemicornis;

4 - Zoophages: Cymindusangularis; Taphoxenusgigas;

5 - Necrosaprophages: Silphaobscura;

6 - Zoosaprophages: Taphoxenusgigas;

7 - Zoophytophages: Harpaluszabroides; Ophonusrufipes.

56% of species are species with one or another degree of phytophagy, zoophagy is characteristic of 40% of species; pure phytophages make up 32% of species, pure zoophages 24%.

Predominance of phytophages is characteristic of agrocenoses and disturbed ecosystems.

We used four indexes for the assessment of the biodiversity of the insect fauna of the botanical garden: Shannon, Simpson, Menhinick and Berger-Parker. The following values were obtained, which are presented in

Table 2.

Indexes

Biotopes

Areas 1, 4, 5

Areas 1, 4, 5

Areas 2, 3, 6

Areas 2, 3, 6

June

August

June

August

Shannon

2,4

2,2

3,5

1,9

Simpson

5,8

5,7

17,6

4,0

Menhinick

1,5

1,3

2,2

1,4

Berger-Parker

2,7

3,1

9,1

2,1

One trend can be clearly observed when analyzing the data - a decrease in the biodiversity of entomofauna in August; this is explained by the drying of biotopes at the end of summer, especially in 2018. If we compare the indices by biotopes, then in June biodiversity is much higher in the meadow areas of the botanical garden, and in August these indicators are slightly higher in the areas near the lake and in the forest part of the botanical garden, which can also be explained by environmental factors and their influence on terrestrial insect organisms.

Conclusions

The terrestrial entomofauna of the Botanical Garden is a highly degraded variant of the steppe entomofauna with a pronounced anthropogenic character.

References

fauna terrestrial insect carpathian botanical garden

1Zlotin A.Z. Insects - friends and enemies of man. Harvest, Kyiv, 1987.

2Paliy M.M. Fox entomology.USHA, Kyiv, 1993.

3Perspectives of victory, conservation and development of agro-innovation in Ukraine. (Patika V.P., Solomakha V.A.). Himjest, Kyiv, 2003. 254 p.

4Magurran A. E. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2004. 256 p.

5Schowalter, Timothy Duane. Insect ecology: an ecosystem approach (2(illustrated) ed.). Acadmic Press. 2006. p. 572.

6Shannon C. E., Warren Weaver. The mathematical theory of communication.Urbana: the University of Illinois Press. 1949. Р. 27-45.

7WDPA. The World Data Base on Protected Areas Consortioum. IUCN, UNEP. 2004.

Размещено на Allbest.ru


Подобные документы

  • The global ecological problems and the environmental protection. Some problems of "Greenhouse effect". Explanation how ecological problems influence on our life. Ecological situation nowadays. Climate and weather. Environmental protection in Ukraine.

    курсовая работа [898,6 K], добавлен 13.02.2011

  • Environmental standard. Economic regulation of protection environment. The prices for the energy, existing ecological standards and more effective productions. The ecological nature of Technology of mass-media and the equipment of technological processes.

    реферат [12,8 K], добавлен 18.03.2009

  • Nuclear tragedy of Kazakhstan. Emergence and development of the ecological tragedy of Aral sea. The history of Semipalatinsk test polygon. Impact of nuclear tests for environment. Economic solution of public health care and victim of nuclear tests.

    реферат [19,6 M], добавлен 12.05.2012

  • Ecology as the scientific study of the relation of living organisms to each other and their surroundings. Overuse of pesticides. Climate change. Urban development. Scale rise in the average temperature of the Earth's climate. Genetically modified foods.

    презентация [3,3 M], добавлен 17.03.2017

  • Global ecological crisis. Pollution of atmosphere. The preservation of the biosphere of an ozone layer of the atmosphere absorbing ultra-violet radiation harmful for live oragnizm of the Sun. Reduction of number of the woods. Exhaustion of rainforests.

    презентация [368,2 K], добавлен 03.10.2012

  • Greenpeace is like a non-political organization which dials with most urgent ecological problems and protests against weapon tests, sea and soil pollution. The structure of organization and arrangement its headquarters. The goal and common mission.

    презентация [11,8 M], добавлен 22.03.2012

  • Principles of green analytical metrics. National environment method index. Application of GAC metrics. Complementary green analytical procedure index. Additive color model to analytical method evaluation. Examples of analytical eco-scale calculation.

    дипломная работа [2,0 M], добавлен 27.11.2022

  • Sources of pollution. Climate and weather conditions 1952 years that led to the emergence of smog in London. Effect on town. Health effects townspeople. Environmental impact. Factors that caused the repetition of this environmental disaster in 1962.

    презентация [748,6 K], добавлен 24.04.2015

  • Water - the beauty of nature. Description of several ways to determine if good water you drink or not. The study of the quality of bottled water producing in Ukraine. The definition of bottled water given by the International Bottled Water Association.

    презентация [2,0 M], добавлен 21.05.2013

  • An analysis of the origins of the modern environmental movement. Description of the causes of environmental problems. List of defects of the market economy in relation to the environment according to Robin Hahnel. Features of the radical environmentalism.

    реферат [24,8 K], добавлен 23.12.2010

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.