Control of the number of sucking pests of winter wheat in the conditions of the right-bank forest steppe

Entomological monitoring of winter wheat in the conditions of the Vinnytsia region. Evaluation of the effectiveness of modern insecticides against dominant pests and optimized methods of their application. The yield of polling stations was determined.

Рубрика Сельское, лесное хозяйство и землепользование
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 04.12.2023
Размер файла 375,0 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

As follows, the highest efficiency in winter wheat crops against sucking pests of seedlings was ensured by the insecticides Cruiser 350 FS t.c.s. and Promet 400, m.c.s.

The use of poisoners makes it possible not only to protect seedlings from pests, but also to increase the yield and quality of winter wheat grain (Table 4).

According to research results, the decrease in the number of sucking pests had a positive effect on the density of seedlings. The highest plant stand density is observed with the Kruiser 350 FS preparation, t.c.s. - 547,0 plants/m2, while in the version with the preparation Gaucho, 70% z.p., of - only 522,0 plants/m2.

The analysis of yield data of winter wheat shows that the use of poisoners led to a significant increase in yield in all variants compared to the control.

Table 4 Economic efficiency of winter wheat seed dressing (average 2021-2022)

Variant

Consumption rate of the drug, kg (l)/t

Plant density, ekz./m2

Mass of 1,000 grains, g

Yield, t/ha

Preserved yield, t/ha

Control ( without insecticides)

-

443,0

33,0

2,5

0

Gaucho 70% z. р.

2,0

522,0

43,0

3,5

1,0

Promet 40% m.c.

2,0

530,0

45,5

4,4

1,9

Cruiser 350 FC, t.s.c.

0,5

547,0

47,8

4,9

2,6

the source is formed on the basis of own research results

The highest yield was observed in the version using the insecticide Cruiser 350 FS t.c.s., where the preserved yield was 2,6 t/ha. The lowest grain yield - 3,5 t/ha was in the version with the use of the drug, the saved harvest of Gaucho was 70% of the crop. did not exceed 0,1 t/ha. The treatment with pro-poisoners had a positive effect not only on yield, but also on seed quality, in particular, on the weight of 1,000 grains. In variants using insecticides, the weight of 1000 grains compared to the control increased by 10,0, 12,5, 14,8 g compared to the control.

Thus, the use of poisons in winter wheat crops against sucking pests makes it possible to ensure reliable protection of seedlings and significantly increase plant productivity. It is most expedient to treat winter wheat seeds with Kruiser 350 FS t.c.s. and Promet 400, mc.s.

Effectiveness of insecticides for winter wheat spraying against sucking pests. To ensure the realization of the potential opportunities of crop-forming processes of agricultural plants at various stages of organogenesis, a complex of protective measures is necessary, among which the chemical method plays a rather significant role, as it is characterized by high economic and economic efficiency.

Among the pests of winter wheat, a special place belongs to sucking pests, which is due to the peculiarities of their nutrition and the negative impact of damage not only on the quantitative indicators of the wheat harvest, but also on its quality. Therefore, it is no coincidence that the development of chemical protection of crops is primarily related to these phytophages. Spraying of crops was carried out during the period of mass appearance of larvae of wheat thrips, shell bug and cereal aphids (the end of flowering - the beginning of milky grain maturity).

The obtained results indicate that the number of sucking pests in the control did not exceed the EPS. On the 3rd day, their number decreased compared to the control in all variants - by 4,7, 5,2, 9,1 times (Table 5).

Table 5. The influence of modern insecticides on the number of sucking pests in winter wheat crops, 2022

Variant

Consumpti on rate of the drug, kg (l)/g

Density of phytophages on …day after spraying

cereal aphids

Eurygaster integriceps Put.

Haplothrips tritici Kurd.

3

7

14

3

7

14

3

7

14

Control ( without insecticides)

-

3,5

5,0

10,7

3,4

4,1

5,0

6,6

20,5

35,0

Bi-58 New, к.о.

1,5

0,4

1,2

3,6

0,4

0,9

1,7

0,8

5,0

10,7

Engeo 247 SC, k.s.,

1,8

0,9

0,9

2,9

0,1

0,3

0,9

0,2

3,7

7,8

Nurelle D, КЕ

1,1

0,3

1,0

3,2

0,2

0,5

1,1

0,5

4,1

8,3

Karate-Zeon 050 CS, m.s.

0,20

0,6

1,4

4,0

0,6

1,0

2,0

1,0

5,3

11,5

the source is formed on the basis of own research results

The studied drugs were characterized by different effectiveness when used. Thus, the most effective against sucking phytophages in the course of research was the drug Engeo 247 SC, k.s., which, at the rate of consumption of 0,18 l/ha, on the 3rd day provided a reduction in numbers at the level of 98,4-99,0%. A slightly lower efficiency was provided by the drug Nurelle D, КЕ - 92,4% and 94,2%. The efficiency of the standard Bi-58 New, 40% k.o. after application was 87,9% to 91,4%, and the insecticide Karate Zeon, 5% k.s. - 82,3% and 84,8, respectively (Table 6).

On the 7 th day after spraying, the number of phytophages increased, reducing the technical effectiveness of the preparations in all variants. The least effective in our studies was the drug Karate-Zeon 050 CS, m.c., the effectiveness of which is 11,2-34,0% lower than that of Engeo 247 SC, k.s.

In 14 days after spraying winter wheat, the number of pests continued to increase, exceeding the number of EPS. The highest efficiency in this period was provided by Engeo 247 SC, k.s., Nurelle D, КЕ and Karate Zeon, 5% k.s., which reduced the number of pests on average by 73,4% compared to the standard Bi-58 New, 40% k.o. - by 67,2%.

As for Haplothrips tritici Kurd., according to the results of research, it was established that the effectiveness of insecticides was lower than against the Eurygaster integriceps Put., especially by 1,03 and 1,04 times. Obviously, this is related to the hidden way of life, which is characteristic of this phytophagous.

Table 6. Technical efficiency of insecticides against pests of winter wheat, 2022

Variant

Consumption rate of the drug, kg (l)/g

Technical efficiency on ... day after spraying %

3

7

14

cereal aphids

Eurygaster integriceps Put.

Haplothrips tritici Kurd.

cereal aphids

Eurygaster integriceps Put.

Haplothrips tritici Kurd.

cereal aphids

Eurygaster integriceps Put.

Haplothrips tritici Kurd.

Control ( without insecticides)*

-

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bi-58 New, к.о.

1,5

91,4

88,2

87,9

76,0

78,0

75,6

66,3

66,0

67,2

Engeo 247 SC

1,8

99,0

99,0

98,4

84,0

92,7

81,9

72,9

82,0

77,7

Nurelle D, КЕ

1,1

94,2

94,1

92,4

80,0

87,8

80,0

70,1

78,0

76,3

Karate-Zeon 050 CS, m.s.

0,20

82,8

82,3

84,8

72,0

75,6

74,1

62,6

60,0

67,1

*Note: In all variants, winter wheat seeds were treated with the fungicide Maxim Star 025 FS, t.c.s. (fludioxonil), 1 l/t the source is formed on the basis of own research results

It should be noted that all drugs increased economic efficiency compared to the control. However, the highest one was provided by Engeo 247 SC, k.s., and Nurelle D, k.e. When using them, an increase in productivity was observed by - 4,5-4,9 t/ha, in the control - 4,0 t/ha.

As evidenced by the obtained results, an increase in the mass of 1,000 grains is observed in almost all variants after spraying the plants (Table 7).

The positive effect of spraying wheat crops with insecticides on the parameters of the crop structure was noted. In the version where Engeo 247 SC, k.s. at consumption rates of 1,8 l/ha, the mass of grain from an ear and the mass of 1000 grains exceeded the control indicator by 0,02 and 1,46 g, respectively.

Table 7. Economic efficiency of winter wheat insecticide spraying against sucking pests, 2022

Variant

Grain yield, t/ha

Technological indicators

Mass 1000 grains, g

energy sprouting, %

similarity, %

Control ( without insecticides)*

4,0

33,0

83,2

85,1

Bi-58 New, к.о.

5,1

43,1

85,2

86,2

Engeo 247 SC

5,8

48,4

89,5

91,7

Nurelle D, КЕ

4,5

48,2

88,6

90,2

Karate-Zeon 050 CS, m.s.

4,9

45,5

87,8

89,4

SSD05

0,29

0,34

0,28

0,26

the source is formed on the basis of own research results

In variants with the use of Karate Zeon preparations, 5% k.s., the weight of 1000 grains, g was higher compared to the control, from 11,4 to 12,5 g, respectively, the value of the saved harvest was 1,2-1,3 t/ha. The combined drugs Engeo 247 SC, k.s. and Nurelle D, КЕ most effectively controlled the number of pests, which can be explained by the fact that they include two substances of different classes that provide an expansion of the spectrum of action, an increase in toxicity and the duration of the protective actions.

During the processing of sucking phytophages, their physiological state worsened, which affected their numbers and sensitivity to insecticides. Therefore, treatment with insecticides should be carried out taking into account the EPS, then spraying with insecticides is appropriate.

Therefore, during the accounting, we established that the use of the investigated insecticides showed high effectiveness in controlling aphids, bedbugs and thrips. However, it should be noted that the use of drugs Engeo 247 SC, k.s., 1,8 l/ha and Nurelle D, k.e. 1,1 l/ha best limited the abundance of these phytophages.

winter wheat yield insecticide

Conclusions

As a result of the conducted research, the species composition of the entomocomplex of pests in winter wheat crops and the control of their number, depending on the use of plant protection products, were clarified.

It was established that in the conditions of the Vinnytsia region, 34 species of pests from 16 familyes that damage this crop were found in winter wheat crops. The Diptera range consisted of 11 species, the Coleoptera range was characterized by the greatest species diversity (14 species), their share in the structure of the entomocomplex was 30% of the total. 9 types of phytophages from a number of bugs, or Hemiptera, were identified. The share of Lepidoptera and homoptera (Homoptera) in the structure of the entomocomplex was 10% each. The orders of Thysanoptera and hymenoptera (Hymenoptera) had 2 species each. Orthoptera represented the smallest number of species - 2%.

The main and most dangerous phytophages that cause significant damage to winter wheat crops from a complex of insect pests have been identified, namely: thrips, cereal aphids, and bread bugs.

The effectiveness of modern insecticides against the dominant pests of winter wheat and the optimized methods of their application were evaluated. According to the results of winter wheat seed treatment with insecticides-protozoans, it was established that the lowest number of phytophagous was noted in variants with protozoans Cruiser 350 FS t.c.s. (0,5 l/t), the aphid occupancy rate was 0,04%, in the version where Promet 400 poison was used, ^.s. (2,0 l/t) occupancy rate 0,06%. The highest index of aphid population was noted in the control version, where the population ratio was 0,43%. Accordingly, the technical efficiency of the Cruiser 350 FS t.c.s. (0,5 l/t) was 90,7%; Promet 400, m.s. (2,0 l/t) - 86,0%, while in the control, the density of larvae of these types of pests was almost 4,5 times higher.

It was noted that the highest yield was observed in the version using the insecticide Cruiser 350 FS t.c.s., where the preserved yield was 2,6 t/ha. The lowest grain yield - 3,5 t/ha was noted in the variant with the use of the drug Gaucho 70% s.p. the saved yield did not exceed 0,1 t/ha. It was established that the treatment with protoxins had a positive effect not only on yield, but also on seed quality, in particular, on the weight of 1000 grains. In variants using insecticides, the weight of 1000 grains compared to the control increased by 10,0, 12,5, 14,8 g compared to the control.

It was established that the use of insecticides during the winter wheat growing season, which were studied, showed high effectiveness in controlling aphids, bugs and thrips. However, it should be noted that the use of drugs Engeo 247 SC, k.s., 1,8 l/ha and Nurelle D, k.e. 1,1 l/ha best limited the abundance of these phytophages. When using them, an increase in productivity was observed by - 4,5-4,9 t/ha, in the control - 4,0 t/ha.

Список використаної літератури

1. Державна служба статистики України. Сільське господарство України 2020. 2021.230 с.

2. Станкевич С.В. Управління чисельністю комах-фітофагів: Навчальний посібник. Харків: ФОП Бровін О.В. 2015. 178 с.

3. Стригун О.О., Судденко Ю.М. Видовий склад шкідливої ентомофауни агробіоценозу пшениці озимої в Правобережному Лісостепу України. Вісник Полтавської державної аграрної академії. 2016. № 3. С. 15-18.

4. Вергелес П.М., Пінчук Н.В., Коваленко Т.М. Ефективність протруйників насіння озимої пшениці у регулюванні хвороб її агрофітоценозу. Сільське господарство та лісівництво. 2019. № 1 (12). С. 176-186.

5. Топчій Т.В. Хлібні клопи. Видовий склад та сезонна динаміка чисельності у сортових посівах пшениці озимої. Карантин і захист рослин. 2012. № 6. С. 2-5.

6. Рудська Н.О., Пінчук Н.В., Ватаманюк О.В. Лісова ентомологія. Навчальний посібник. Вінниця: ТОВ «Твори», 2020. 288 с.

7. Секун М.П., Бабич С.М., Курцев В.О. Сисні шкідники пшениці озимої. Карантин і захист рослин. 2014. № 4. С. 7-14.

8. Фещин Д.М., Орлова О.М. Прогноз розмноження клопа шкідливої черепашки та загроза посівам колосових культур. Карантин і захист рослин. 2012. № 6. С.1-8.

9. Секун М.П. Шкідлива черепашка. Київ : Світ, 2012. С. 9-11.

10. Довгань С.В., Фещин Д.М., Сядриста О.Б. Клоп черепашка. Заходи захисту посівів від клопа черепашки. Захист і карантин рослин. 2018. № 6. С. 7-11.

11. Погоріла Л.Г., Рудська Н.О. Якість зерна пшениці озимої залежно від розвитку патогенної мікрофлори. Корми і кормовиробництво. 2019. Вип. 87. С.121-128.

12. Рубан М.Б., Біляк С.М., Лікар Я.О. Трипси - небезпечні шкідники зернових злакових культур. Захист і карантин рослин. 2012. Вип. 58. С. 171-179.

13. Топчій Т.В. Оцінка стійкості сортозразків пшениці озимої проти злакових попелиць. Карантин і захист рослин. 2009. № 8. С. 2-4.

14. Рубан М.Б., Біляк С.М. Попелиці - шкідники пшениці озимої та регуляція їх чисельності в Центральному Лісостепу України. Науковий вісник Національного університету біоресурсів і природокористування України. 2012. Вип. 176. С. 271-276.

15. Трибель С.О., Стригун О.О. Хімічний метод: успіхи-проблеми- перспективи. Захист і карантин рослин. 2012. Вип. 58. С. 263-276.

16. Топчій Т.В. Проти сисних шкідників - ефективність інсектицидів за обприскування пшениці озимої. Карантин і захист рослин. 2013. № 2. С. 1-3.

17. Перелік пестицидів і агрохімікатів, дозволених до використання в Україні. К.: Юнівест Медіа, 2020. 862 с.

18. Секун М.П. Роль сучасних інсектицидів в інтегрованих системах захисту рослин від шкідників. Захист і карантин рослин. 2017. Вип. 53. С. 348-356.

19. Трибель С.О., Сігарьова Д.Д., Секун М.П., Іващенко О.О. та ін. (2001). Методика випробування і застосування пестицидів. під. ред. Трибеля С.О. К. 448.

Список використаної літератури у транслітерації / References

1. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. Sil's'ke hospodarstvo Ukrayiny 2020. (2021). [State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Agriculture of Ukraine 2020] Kyyiv. 230. [in Ukrainian].

2. Stankevych S.V. (2015). Upravlinnya chysel'nistyu komakh-fitofahiv [Management of the number of phytophagous insects]. Navchal'nyy posibnyk - Educational manual. Kharkiv: FOP Brovin O.V.178. [in Ukrainian].

3. Stryhun O.O., Suddenko Yu.M. (2016). Vydovyy sklad shkidlyvoyi entomofauny ahrobiotsenozu pshenytsi ozymoyi v Pravoberezhnomu Lisostepu Ukrayiny [Species composition of harmful entomofauna of winter wheat agrobiocenosis in the Right Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine]. Visnyk Poltavs'koyi derzhavnoyi ahrarnoyi akademiyi - Bulletin of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy. № 3. 15-18. [in Ukrainian].

4. Verheles P.M., Pinchuk N.V., Kovalenko T.M. (2019). Efektyvnist' protruynykiv nasinnya ozymoyi pshenytsi u rehulyuvanni khvorob yiyi ahrofitotsenozu. [Effectiveness of winter wheat seed poisoners in controlling diseases of its agrophytocenosis]. Sil's'ke hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo - Agriculture and forestry. № 1 (12). 176-186. [in Ukrainian].

5. Topchiy T.V. (2012). Khlibni klopy. Vydovyy sklad ta sezonna dynamika chysel'nosti u sortovykh posivakh pshenytsi ozymoyi [Bread bugs. Species composition and seasonal dynamics of numbers in varietal crops of winter wheat]. Karantyn i zakhyst roslyn - Quarantine and plant protection. № 6. 2-5.

6. Ruds'ka N.O., Pinchuk N.V., Vatamanyuk O.V. (2020). Lisova entomolohiya [Forest entomology]. Navchal'nyy posibnyk - Educational manual. Vinnytsia: LLC Works. 288. [in Ukrainian].

7. Sekun M.P., Babych S.M., Kurtsev V.O. (2014). Sysni shkidnyky pshenytsi ozymoyi [Weevils of winter wheat]. Karantyn i zakhyst roslyn - Quarantine and plant protection. № 4. 7-14. [in Ukrainian].

8. Feshchyn D.M., Orlova O.M. (2012). Prohnoz rozmnozhennya klopa shkidlyvoyi cherepashky ta zahroza posivam kolosovykh kul'tur [Prediction of the reproduction of the harmful shell bug and the threat to crops of ear crops]. Karantyn i zakhyst roslyn - Quarantine and plant protection. № 6. 1-8. [in Ukrainian].

9. Sekun M.P. (2012). Shkidlyva cherepashka [Harmful turtle]. Kyyiv: Svit. 9-11 [in Ukrainian].

10. Dovhan' S.V., Feshchyn D.M., Syadrysta O.B. (2018). Klop cherepashka. Zakhody zakhystu posiviv vid klopa cherepashky [Turtle bug. Measures to protect crops from the turtle bug]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn - Protection and quarantine of plants. № 6. 7-11. [in Ukrainian].

11. Pohorila L.H., Ruds'ka N.O. (2019). Yakist' zerna pshenytsi ozymoyi zalezhno vid rozvytku patohennoyi mikroflory [The quality of winter wheat grain depends on the development of pathogenic microflora]. Kormy i kormovyrobnytstvo - Fodder andfodder production. Issue 87. 121-128. [in Ukrainian].

12. Ruban M.B., Bilyak S.M., Likar YA.O. (2012). Trypsy - nebezpechni shkidnyky zernovykh zlakovykh kul'tur [Thrips are dangerous pests of cereal crops]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn - Protection and quarantine of plants. Issue. 58. 171-179.

13. Topchiy T.V. (2009). Otsinka stiykosti sortozrazkiv pshenytsi ozymoyi proty zlakovykh popelyts' [Evaluation of resistance of winter wheat cultivars against cereal aphids]. Karantyn i zakhyst roslyn - Quarantine and plant protection. № 8. 2-4. [in Ukrainian].

14. Ruban M.B., Bilyak S.M. (2012). Popelytsi - shkidnyky pshenytsi ozymoyi ta rehulyatsiya yikh chysel'nosti v Tsentral'nomu Lisostepu Ukrayiny [Aphids - pests of winter wheat and regulation of their number in the Central Forest-Steppe of Ukraine]. Naukovyy visnyk Natsional'noho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannya Ukrayiny - Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine. Issue 176. 271-276.

15. Trybel' S.O., Stryhun O.O. (2012). Khimichnyy metod: uspikhy-problemy- perspektyvy [Chemical method: successes-problems-prospects]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn - Protection and quarantine of plants. Issue 58. 263-276.

16. Topchiy T.V. (2013). Proty sysnykh shkidnykiv - efektyvnist' insektytsydiv za obpryskuvannya pshenytsi ozymoyi [Against sucking pests - the effectiveness of insecticides for spraying winter wheat]. Karantyn i zakhyst roslyn - Quarantine and plant protection. № 2. 1-3. [in Ukrainian].

17. Perelik pestytsydiv i ahrokhimikativ, dozvolenykh do vykorystannya v Ukrayini (2020). [List ofpesticides and agrochemicals approved for use in Ukraine]. Kyyiv: Yunivest Media. 862. [in Ukrainian].

18. Sekun M.P. (2017). Rol' suchasnykh insektytsydiv v intehrovanykh systemakh zakhystu roslyn vid shkidnykiv [The role of modern insecticides in integrated systems of plant protection from pests]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn - Protection and quarantine of plants. Issue. 53. 348- 356. [in Ukrainian].

19. Trybel S.O., Siharova D.D., Sekun M.P., Ivashchenko O.O. ta in. (2001). Metodyky vyprobuvannya i zastosuvannya pestytsydiv. [Methods of testing and application ofpesticides]; pid red. S.O. Trybel. Kyyiv. 448 [in Ukrainian].

Размещено на Allbest.ru


Подобные документы

  • World forest region map. Deforestation as the conversion of forest land to non-forest land for use (arable land, pasture). Effect of destruction of large areas of forest cover on the environment and reduce biodiversity. The methods of forest management.

    презентация [1,4 M], добавлен 06.05.2012

  • A mini-history of New Zealand agriculture. How the farmer was impacted by lack of government assistance: evaluation of policy developments. Agrarian policy of New Zealand for support of the farmers dealing with adverse events, such as climatic disasters.

    реферат [23,2 K], добавлен 05.12.2011

  • The nature and terms of the specialization of agricultural enterprises. The dynamics of the production of corn for grain. Deepening of specialization and improve production efficiency. The introduction of mechanization and advanced technologies.

    курсовая работа [67,7 K], добавлен 13.05.2015

  • The symbol of the Olympic Movement is 5 bound rings on a white background: blue, yellow, black, green and red. History and main stages of development of the Paralympic Winter Games. participants in these games in Sochi, the 21014 received awards.

    презентация [1,1 M], добавлен 16.04.2014

  • What things make you happy? It may be simply winter, pets or walking in the forest. There is such comfort in having friends who knows and loves you. Sunrise, as a favorite time of the day. White peonies in your own garden, birthdays party and family.

    презентация [1,0 M], добавлен 20.10.2013

  • Every day the world economy becomes more global. This tendency hasn't avoided Ukraine. Many domestic companies have already felt on themselves negative consequences of this process. New conditions of business dealing is first of all new possibilities.

    реферат [26,9 K], добавлен 27.10.2010

  • The model of training teachers to the formation of communicative competence. How the Web 2.0 technology tools affect on secondary school students in communication. The objective of the model is instantiated a number of conditions. Predicting the Future.

    курсовая работа [30,3 K], добавлен 11.06.2012

  • Definition of Leadership. Trait theory. How this theory works. Origin and Analysis and basics Pre-conditions for effective use of Trait theory. Inborn leadership characteristics. Process of impact and interaction among the leader and his followers.

    реферат [436,9 K], добавлен 24.09.2014

  • The general information of Victor Wild, who won gold medals in the parallel slalom and parallel giant slalom at 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi (his sport career, achievements and awards, childhood, ptinciples of training and diet, methods of relax).

    презентация [644,1 K], добавлен 28.06.2017

  • Testing as a form of control the level of students’ skills and abilities. The classification of tests in learning English. Problems in the control of education. The final results on the evaluation system of knowledge. The main stage of the lesson.

    курсовая работа [37,8 K], добавлен 08.05.2014

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.