Лінгвістична екологія - маргінальний напрям мовознавства: понятійно-категоріальний апарат з позицій екології

24. Мірченко М.В. (2014). Основи екології української літературної мови: проблеми, можливості, перспективи. URL : https://lingvj.oa.edu.ua/articles/2014/n50/5.pdf

25. Мова - ДНК нації - освітній проєкт для тих, хто хоче вдосконалити свої знання української мови (2014). URL : https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%E2%80%94_%D0%94%D0%9D%D0%9A_ %D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%96%D 1%9

26. Морозова О. (2015). Екологічний підхід до аналізу неправдивих висловлень. Мовні і концептуальні картини світу. Вип.55. Київ: ВПЦ «Київський університет». С. 258-166. URL : https://core.ac.uk/download/pdl/84006701.pdf

27. Овсейчик С.В. (2006). Формування української екологічної термінології: дис. ... канд. філолог. наук: 10.02.01 / Київський нац. ун-т ім. Тараса. Шевченка. К., 199 с.

28. Пайтген Х. О., Рихтер П. Х. (1993). Красота фракталов. Москва: Мир. 176 с

29. Пестунов В. П., Стеценко О. С. (2009). Екологія душі і здоров'я людини URL: http://dspace.kntu.kr.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/5181/1/35_9_2009-121-129.pdf

30. Потіш А. Ф., Медвідь О. Г., Гвоздевський О. Г., Козак З. Я. (2000). Екологія: основи теорії і практикум : навч. посібник для студентів вищих навч. закл. Львів : Новий Світ, 2000. 296 с.

31. Пригожин И., Стенгерс И. (1986). Порядок из хаоса. Новый диалог человека с природой. Москва: Эдиториал УРСС. 420 с.

32. Прищак М.Д. (2019). Дискурс методологічних засад екологічної освіти. URL: http://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/24660

33. Проблеми трансформації хімічних термінів (2012). URL: https://science.lpnu.ua/uk/terminologiya/vsi-vypusky/visnyk-no -733-2012/problemy-transformaciyi-himichnyh-terminiv

34. Раду А. (2013). Мовна екологія: напрями та проблеми дослідження. Гуманітарна освіта в технічних вищих навчальних закладах. No 27, Київ, 2013. С. 191-197. URL : file:///C:/Users/WoT/Downloads/alexi,+7871-19631-1-CE-1.pdf

35. Реймерс Н. Ф. (1994). Экология: Теория, законы, правила, принципы и гипотезы. Москва, 1994. 366 с. URL : https://kzref.org/99-rejmers-n-f-ekologiya-teorii-zakoni-pravila-principi-i-gipo.html

36. Розмаріца І. О. (2004). Лінгвокогнітивні особливості комунікації у сфері екології: автореф. дис. ... канд. філ. наук: спец. 10.02.04. Київ. 15 с.

37. Розроблення освітніх програм. Методичні рекомендації (2014) / авт.: В. М. Захарченко, В. І. Луговий, Ю. М. Рашкевич, Ж. В. Таланова; за ред. В. Г. Кременя. Київ: ДП «НВЦ «Пріоритети». 120 с. URL: http://ibhb.chnu.edu.ua/uploads/files/metodrada/Rozroblennya_osv_program.pdf

38. Руденко Н. С. (2011). Екологічна лексика як об'єкт перекладу (на матеріалі словникової статті, анотації, звіту, а також публіцистичної статті на екологічну тематику): автореф. дис. ... канд. філол. наук: 10.02.16 / Таврійський нац. ун-т ім. В. І. Вернадського. Херсон. 22 с.

39. Рудишин С.Д (2009). Біологічна підготовка майбутніх екологів : теорія і практика: монографія. Вінниця : ВМГО «Темпус». 394 с.

40. Рудишин С. (2012). Мова в Україні: погляд з позицій вищої нервової діяльності та психолінгвістики. Педагогіка і психологія професійної освіти. 2012. № 5. С. 113-117.

41. Рудишин С. Д. (2013). Основи біогеохімії: навч. посібник для студ. вищ. навч. закл. Київ: ВЦ «Академія». 248 c.

42. Рудишин С. Д., Мельник О. С., Коренева І. М.(2018). Екологізація освіти на засадах сталого розвитку в Глухівському національному педагогічному університеті імені Олександра Довженка. Вісник Глухівського національного педагогічного університету імені Олександра Довженка. Серія: Педагогічні науки. Глухів. Вип. 2 (37). С. 230-236.

43. Рудишин С. Д (2013). Системний підхід до вищої освіти в Україні: освіченість, компетентність, національні цінності. Педагогіка і психологія. 2013. № 3. С. 69-75

44. Рудишин С. Д (2021). Екологія та лінгвістична екологія: понятійно-категоріальний дискурс. VIII Міжнародний з'їзд екологів (Екологія/Ecology - 2021, 22-24 вересня, 2021) : збірник наукових праць. Вінниця: ВНТУ. URL: https://conferences.vntu.edu.Ua/index.php/ecology/ecology2021/paper/viewFile/13541/11611

45. Рудишин С. Д., Кмець А. М., Самілик В. І., Гулакова І. М. (2021). Біологія і екологія. 10 клас: навч. посібник: Вінниченко М. Д., Суми, 388 с.

46. Самохіна В. О. (2019). Креативна дискурсивна особистість В екосистемі творчої діяльності. URL: fle:///C:/Users/WoT/Downloads/15307-%D0%A2%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%82%20%D1%81%D1%82% D0%B0%D1%82%D1%82%D 1%96-30139-1-10-20200119.pdf

47. Селіванова О.О.(2010). Лінгвістична енциклопедія. Полтава: Довкілля. С. 147

48. Сербенська О. (2002). Сучасна українська термінографія і проблеми екології мови. Вісник НУ `Львівська політехніка' „Проблеми української термінології». № 453. С. 17-20. URL: https://science.lpnu.ua/terminology/all-volumes- and-issues/visnik-no-453-2002/suchasna-ukrayinska-terminografiya-i-problemi

49. Серпак Н.Ф., Сидорчук, Сапун К.В. (2021). Особливості екологічної лексики сучасної німецької мови. Вчені записки ТНУ імені В.І Вернадського. Серія: Філологія. Журналістика. 32 (71). № 1, С. 240-244. URL: https://www.philol.vernadskyjournals.in.ua/journals/2021/1_2021/part_1/43 .pdf

50. Сидоров М. О., Гріненко О. О. (2013). Моделювання екосистем програмного забезпечення. URL: http://jrnl.nau.edu.ua/index.php/IPZ/article/view/6022

51. Стасюк Т.В. (2020). Терміносфера новітніх технологій : лінгвосоціокогнітивні чинники формування та розвитку: дис. ... д-ра. філолог. наук: 10.02.01 / Ін-т української мови НАН України. К., 518 с.

52. Тараненко К.В. (2021). Екологічна комунікація в медіапросторі : монографія. Рига, Izdevnieciba «Baltija Publishing». С. 146-161. URL ^л . http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/omp/index.php/bp/catalog/download/139/4073/8504-1?inline=1

53. Троян А.О.Кантаржи Н. І. (2019). Проблеми екології української мови. URL: http://eprints.library. odeku.edu.ua/id/eprint/6465/1/Troyan_%D0%90_0,%20Kantarzhi_N_I_Problemy_ekologii_ukrainskoi_movy.pdf

54. Хакен Г. (1980). Синергетика. М. : Мир, 406 с.

55. Bertalanffy L. von. (1968). General System Theory. Foundations, Development, Applications. N.Y.: Braziller.

56. Halliday М. (2001). New ways of meaning - the challenge to applied linguistics. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/New-ways-of-meaning-the-challenge-to-applied- Halliday/a6deedff78d42610ec59ea3c594af34e089af879

57. Fill A. (2000). Language and Ecology: Ecolinguistic Perspectives for 2000 and Beyond. Applied Linguistics for the 21st Century. Tokyo. P. 61.

58. Fill А., Muhlhausler Р. (2001). The ecolinguistics reader: language, ecology and environment. London, New York : Continuum. 296 p. URL: https://linguisticstudentindonesia.ffles.wordpress.com/2019/11/alwin-fill-peter-muhlhausler-the- ecolinguistics-reader_-language-ecology-and-environment-2001 .pdf

59. Finke P. (2013). The ecology of science and its consequences for the ecology of language. Language Sciences, 41 (PA), 71-82 URL: https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.elsevier-78b9a0ed-df5f-38f6-aca5-647f30f9c9b7

60. Haugen E.(1972). The Ecology of language. Standford: Standford University Press.396 p.

61. Haugen E. (2001). The Ecology of language . The ecolinguistics Reader. Language, Ecology and Environment / [ed. by A. Muhlhausler]. L. ; N.-Y. : Continuum. P. 57-66.

62. Halliday M. (2001). New Ways of Meaning: the Challenge to Applied Linguistics / ed. by A. Fill, P. Muhlhausler, The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology, and Environment. Continuum: London, UK. 1991/2001. P. 175-202. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/New-ways-of-meaning-the-challenge-to-apphed-Halhday/a6deedff78d42610ec 59ea3c594af34e089af879

63. Herring, S. C. (2005). Computer-Mediated Discourse, in The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (eds D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. E. Hamilton), Blackwell Publishers Ltd,Malden, Massachusetts. P. 612-634.

64. Lechevrel N. (2009). The intertwined histories of ecolinguistics and the ecological approach of language. Historical and theoretical aspects of a research paradigm. In: Paper Presented at the Symposium on Ecolinguistics and the Ecology of Science. University of Southern Denmark. URL: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00413983/document

65. LeVasseur T. (2015). Defining «Ecolinguistics?»: Challenging Emic Issues in an Evolving Environmental Discipline.Environmental Studies. No 5 (1). P. 21-28. URL: https://religiousstudies.cofc.edu/images/lavasseur-stuff/Defming%20Ecohnguistics%200fficial%205-1%20%202015%20JESS.pdf

66. Nettle D., Romain S.(2002). Vanishing Voices: the Extinction of the World's Languages. New York: Oxford University Press/ URL: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/993487.Vanishing_Voices

67. Pennycook A. (2004). Language policy and the ecological turn. Language Policy. № 3. P. 232. URL: https://www.academia.edu/12919866/Language_Policy_and_The_Ecological_Turn

68. Steciag M. (2010). Environmental Discourse in Public Debate in Poland: Relativization, Exclusion and Acceptance. Language and Ecology. 3.No 2. P. 1-16.

69. Steffensen S. V., Fill A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences. 41 (2014) 6

25. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/pubhcation/259129590_Ecohnguistics_The_state_of_the_art_and_future_horizons

70. Stibbe А. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By, London, New York: Routledge. 2015. 210 p. URL: https://www.academia.edu/31815240/Ecolinguistics_Language_ecology_and_the_stories_we_hve_by



Abstract

Linguistic ecology - a marginal direction of linguistics: conceptual and categorical apparatus in the context of ecology

Rudyshyn Serhii

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Full Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Methods of Teaching Natural Sciences Oleksandr Dovzhenko Hlukhiv National Pedagogical University

Introduction. Today, environmental security andfood are two of the most important scientific and political problems of mankind that need to be urgently solved.

All other - political, social, economic, energy, demographic, and problems of modern technologies are directly or indirectly related to them.

Therefore, the issues and terminology of ecology take on a special meaning in such fields as the humanities, social and behavioral sciences, and information technology, in which it becomes a special terminology, a means of expressing professional and social problems in the form of marginal terms, in particular: language ecology, soul ecology, spiritual ecology, an electronic ecosystem of education management, creativity ecosystem, software ecosystem, etc.

Thus, ecologists and biologists have faced «terminological entropy» - metaphorical interpretations of the conceptual apparatus of natural sciences by linguo-ecologists and uncertainty in the theoretical and practical use of new terms.

Purpose. The article aims to make a critical review, summary, and classification of theoretical and methodological developments in the marginal area of linguistics - linguistic ecology, to understand the environmental discourse in linguistic descriptions and its practical implementation

Methods. The following methods were used in the work:

1) analytical and descriptive (to study the developments of linguistic ecologists);

2) comparing and analyzing the main provisions (to study the perspectives of the research of terms both from the standpoint of linguistics and ecology);

3) contextual study of the terms of linguistic ecology.

Results. The article provides an overview of the theoretical and methodological approaches of linguists, psychologists, and philosophers to the formation of the terminosphere of linguistic ecology - a marginal branch of linguistics that studies the relationship between language and the environment, which is based on how people behave with the natural world under the influence of thoughts, concepts, ideologies, and worldviews that are expressed in language.

The author made a critical review of the terms «language ecosystem» and «biolinguistic tradition»; the potential negative risks of adapting biomorphic metaphors into language policy are pointed out, as the objectification, enumeration, and biologization of languages make them natural objects rather than cultural artifacts. It is argued that the ecological term is an element of the ecological term system, names a special concept, and requires a clear definition.

Preservation of the primary scientific and natural meaning of the concepts «ecology» and «ecosystem» is urgent since the solution of ecological problems requires the definition and intensification of those areas of research where it is possible to find ways of human existence by nature.

The author points out the perspective of the practical application of ecological discourse in teaching practice, lexicographic work, and the formation of soft skills in the form of language culture, national unity, and ecological values among native speakers according to the «principle of complementarity».

Originality. The interpenetration of the terminosphere of linguistics into ecology can be compared to the horizontal transfer of genes (information), which is used by genetic engineers; in contrast to the traditional vertical transfer of conceptual and categorical apparatus within each science separately.

The result of the transfer is the creation of «GMO» - linguistic ecology as a new reality; the vehicle (vector) of horizontal transfer is a person.

Linguo-ecologists metaphorically transfer the methods and terms of ecology to the language, so the expression «linguistic ecology» refers to the so-called «oxymoron» (Latin oxymoron - nonsense) - a literary and poetic technique (stylistic form) that combines opposite in content contrasting concepts and creates a semantic paradox, but together gives a new idea.

Examples of oxymorons are the expressions: old New Year, ordinary miracle, dead souls, a living corpse, hot ice, optimistic tragedy, noble bandit, honest crook, end of eternity, deafening silence, and sustainable development.

As a result, wish language ecology/linguistic ecology/ecological linguistics to gain wide recognition by the world scientific community by analogy with the recognition of the term «sustainable development», standardized in the documents and textbooks of all countries.

Conclusion. 1. An ecological term is an element of the ecological terminology system, it names a special concept and requires a clear definition. Ecology - biocentric interdisciplinary science about the relationship of organisms, their groups (populations, communities) between themselves and their habitat.

Preservation of the primary scientific and natural meaning of the concepts «ecology» and «ecosystem» is urgent since the solution of ecological problems requires the definition and intensification of those areas of research where it is possible to find ways of human existence by nature.

2. Ecolinguistics is a new interdisciplinary field of knowledge that studies the relationship between language and the environment based on the way people deal with the natural world under the influence of thoughts, concepts, ideologies, and worldviews expressed in language.

The pragmatic in the model called «linguistic ecology» is a psycholinguistic construct that unites enthusiastic linguists and encourages them to communicate on environmental topics.

We think this model uses the positive energy of emotional and cognitive perception of the words «ecology» and «ecological» as clean (without pollution), balanced, healthy, and positive for human life in the environment.

3. We are critical of the «bilingual tradition »/biomorphic view of linguistic diversity as biological. We believe that this creates negative risks of adapting biomorphic metaphors into language policy since the enumeration, objectification, and biologization of languages make them natural objects rather than cultural artefacts.

Key words: Linguistic Ecology, Language Ecosystem, Ecological Discourse, Ecology



References

1. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro zabezpechennia funktsionuvannia ukrainskoi movy yak derzhavnoi» [Law of Ukraine «On Ensuring the Functioning of the Ukrainian Language as the State Language»]. (2019). zakon.rada.gov.ua. URL: https://zakonrada.gov.ua/laws/show/2704-19#Text [in Ukrainian].

2. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro vyshchu osvitu» [Law of Ukraine «On Higher Education»]. (2019). fedmet.org. URL: http://fedmet.org/analytics/zakon-ukraini-pro-vishhu-osvitu/ [in Ukrainian].

3. Bertalanfy L. von. (1968). General System Theory. Foundations, Development, Applications. N.Y.: Braziller.

4. Bevzo, H. A. (2017). Dzherela pokhodzhennia ekolohichnoi terminolohii v anhliiskii ta ukrainskii movakh [Linguistic ecology as a branch of science]. Candidate's thesis. Lviv: Lvivskyi nats. un-t imeni Ivana Franka. [in Ukrainian].

5. Bondar, O. (2003). Linhvistychna ekolohiia yak haluz nauky [Linguistic ecology as a branch of science]. dspace.onu.edu.ua:8080. URL: http://dspace.onu.edu.ua:8080/bitstream/123456789/17406/1/6-13.pdf [in Ukrainian].

6. Bondar, O. (2006). Linhvistychna ekolohiia: stanovlennia novoi haluzi nauky [Linguistic ecology: formation of a new branch of science]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu - Lviv University Bulletin, 38(2), 79-85 [in Ukrainian].

7. Bushman, I. O. (2005). Systema osvity yak zasib modernizatsii ukrainskoi kultury [The system of education as a means of modernization of Ukrainian culture]. Candidate's thesis. Kyiv: Instytut vyshchoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy. 225 s. [in Ukrainian].

8. Hardashuk, T. V. (2005). Ekolohichna spravedlyvist yak kryterii hromadianskoho suspilstva (refleksiia nad dosvidom SShA) [Environmental justice as a criterion of civil society (reflection on the US experience)]. dspace.nbuv.gov.ua. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/ bitstream/handle/123456789/11910/33-Gardashuk.pdf?sequence=1 [in Ukrainian].

9. Hordun, S. M., & Kalynovska, I. M. (2021). Tendentsii rozvytku ekolinhvistyky ta yii rol u vyrishenni ekolohichnykh problem [Trends in the development of ecolinguistics and its role in solving environmental problems]. www.baltijapublishing.lv. URL: http ://www.baltijapublishing.lv/ omp/index.php/bp/catalog/download/139/4049/8480-1?inline= 1 [in Ukrainian].

10. Hrinenko, O. O. (2014). Ekosystema prohramnoho zabezpechennia yak systema system [Software ecosystem as a system of systems]. Naukovoiemni tekhnolohii - Science-intensive technologies, 3(23), 280-284. [in Ukrainian].

11. Hudz, N. (2013) Ekolohichnyi dyskurs v linhvistychnykh opysakh [Ecological discourse in linguistic descriptions]. eprints.zu.edu.ua. URL: http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/9603/1/%D0%93%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B7%D1%8C%204.pdf [in Ukrainian].

12. Hudz, N. O. (2015). Anhlomovnyi ekolohichnyi internet-resurs : aksiolohichnyi ta komunikatyvno-prahmatychnyi apekty (na materiali veb-saitiv neuriadovykh pryrodookhoronnykh orhanizatsii) [An English-language environmental Internet resource: axiological and communicative-pragmatic appeals (based on the material of websites of non-governmental environmental organizations)]. Extended abstract of candidate's thesis. Kyiv: Kyivskyi un-t im. Borysa Hrynchenka. [in Ukrainian].

13. Zhukovska, V. V., & Derkach, N. O. (2011) Ekolinhvistyka: stanovlennia ta osnovni napriamy doslidzhen [Ecolinguistics: formation and main directions of research]. Naukovyi visnyk Volynskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Lesi Ukrainky - Scientific Bulletin of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 1(2), 66-70. [in Ukrainian].

14. Zahorodniuk, V. P. (2019). Suchasnyi naukovyi dyskurs: antropolohichni i humanistychni vymiry. Filosofski osnovy naukovykh doslidzhen [Modern scientific discourse: anthropological and humanistic dimensions. Philosophical foundations of scientific research]. Kyiv: Interservis. [in Ukrainian].

15. Karpenko, K. I. (2006). Hendernyi vymir ekolohichnoi komunikatsii [Gender dimension of ecological communication]. Doctor's thesis. Kharkiv: Kharkivskyi derzhavnyi medychnyi universytet. [in Ukrainian].

16. Klochko, S. (2017) Ekolinhvistychna paradyhma u movoznavstvi: vytoky [Ecolinguistic paradigm in linguistics: origins]. pa.journal.kspu.edu. URL: https://pa.journal.kspu.edu/index.php/pa/article/view/250 [in Ukrainian].

17. Komar, O. (2009). Humanizatsiia nauky chy humanitaryzatsiia filosofii [Humanization of science or humanization of philosophy]. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu - Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University, 466-467, 82-86. URL: http://www.philsci.univ.kiev.ua/biblio/OKomar.pdf [in Ukrainian].

18. Kutsa, V. A.(2021). Ekolinhvistyka yak novitnii napriam doslidzhen u suchasnii naukovii paradyhmi [Ecolinguistics as the newest area of research in the modern scientific paradigm]. Naukovyi visnykMizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu - Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University, 52(1), 120-1222. URL: http://www.vestnik-philology.mgu.od.ua/archive/v52/part_1/28.pdf [in Ukrainian].

19. Kvietnyi, R. N., Palamarchuk, Ye. A., Bisikalo, O. V., & Kovalenko, O. O. (2022). Kontseptsiia suchasnoho universytetu na osnovi instrumentiv elektronnoi ekosystemy upravlinnia osvitnimy protsesamy jetiq VNTU [The concept of a modern university based on the tools of the electronic ecosystem for managing educational processes JETIQ VNTU]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pedahohichnykh nauk Ukrainy - Bulletin of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, 4(2), 1-7. URL: https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2022.4220 [in Ukrainian].

20. Linhvistychnyi analiz khimichnykh terminiv, analiz khimichnykh istorychnykh dzherel dlia vykorystannia na urotsi khimii [Linguistic analysis of chemical terms, analysis of chemical historical sources for use in the chemistry lesson] (2022). medialiteracy.org.ua. URL: https://tinyurl.com/s4f4tupf [in Ukrainian].

21. Linhvistychna heohrafua [Linguistic geography] (2021). www.wiki.uk-ua.nina.az. URL: https://tinyurl.com/4e5tt3dp [in Ukrainian].

22. Lukianets, V. S., Kravchenko, O. M., & Ozadovska, L. V. (2000). Suchasnyi naukovyi dyskurs: onovlennia metodolohichnoi kultury [Modern Scientific Discourse: Renewal of Methodological Culture]. Kyiv: Tsentr praktychnoi filosofu. [in Ukrainian].

23. Manakin, V. M. (2021). Mova i mizhkulturna komunikatsiia [Language and intercultural communication]. Kyiv: VTs «Akademiia. [in Ukrainian].

24. Marvan, Yi. (1993). Mova v konteksti zavdan dukhovnoi ekolohii (Ekolinhvistyka ta yii rol u vidrodzhenni posttotalitarnoho suspilstva) [Language in the context of the tasks of spiritual ecology (Ecolinguistics and its role in the revival of post-totalitarian society)]. Proceedings from: Movoznavstvo: Druhyi mizhnarodnyi konhres ukrainistiv - Linguistics: Second International Congress of Ukrainian Studies (pp. 197-198). Lviv: Dopovidi i povidomlennia. [in Ukrainian].

25. Matematychna linhvistyka [Mathematical linguistics] (2018). Entsyklopediia suchasnoi Ukrainy - Encyclopedia of modern Ukraine. URL: https://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=66930 [in Ukrainian].

26. Mirchenko, M. V. (2014). Osnovy ekolohii ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy: problemy, mozhlyvosti, perspektyvy [Fundamentals of the ecology of the Ukrainian literary language: problems, opportunities, prospects]. lingvj.oa.edu.ua. URL: https://lingvj .oa.edu.ua/articles/2014/n50/5.pdf [in Ukrainian].

27. Mova - DNK natsii - osvitnii proiekt dlia tykh, khto khoche vdoskonalyty svoi znannia ukrainskoi movy [Language is the DNA of the Nation - an educational project for those who want to improve their knowledge of the Ukrainian language ]. (2014). uk.wikipedia.org. URL: https://tinyurl.com/28bbzsuh [in Ukrainian].

28. Morozova, O. (2015). Ekolohichnyi pidkhid do analizu nepravdyvykh vyslovlen [An ecological approach to the analysis of false statements]. Movni i kontseptualni kartyny svitu - Linguistic and Conceptual Pictures of the World, 55, 258-166. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84006701.pdf [in Ukrainian].

29. Ovseichyk, S. V. (2006). Formuvannia ukrainskoi ekolohichnoi terminolohii [Formation of the Ukrainian ecological terminology]. Doctor's thesis. Kyiv: Kyivskyi nats. un-t im. Tarasa. Shevchenka. [in Ukrainian].

30. Paithen, Kh O., & Rykhter, P. Kh (1993). Krasota fraktalov [The beauty of fractals]. Moscow: Myr. [in Russian].

31. Pestunov, V. P., & Stetsenko, O. S. (2009). Ekolohiia dushi i zdorovia liudyny [Ecology of the soul and human health]. dspace.kntu.kr.ua. URL: http://dspace.kntu.kr.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/5181/1/35_9_2009-121-129.pdf [inUkrainian].

32. Potish, A. F., Medvid, O. H., Hvozdevskyi, O. H., & Kozak, Z. Ia. (2000). Ekolohiia: osnovy teorii i praktykum [Ecology: the basics of theory and practice]. Lviv: Novyi Svit. [in Ukrainian].

33. Pryhozhyn, Y., & Stenhers, Y. (1986). Poriadokyz khaosa. Novii dyaloh cheloveka spryrodoi [Order out of chaos. A new dialog between man and nature]. Moscow: Editorial URSS. [in Russian].

34. Pryshchak, M. D. (2019). Dyskurs metodolohichnykh zasad ekolohichnoi osvity [Discourse of methodological foundations of environmental education]. ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua. URL: http://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/24660 [in Ukrainian].

35. Radu, A. (2013). Movna ekolohiia: napriamy ta problemy doslidzhennia [Language ecology: directions and problems of research]. Humanitarna osvita v tekhnichnykh vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladakh - Humanitarian education in technical higher education institutions, 27, 191-197. URL: file:///C:/Users/WoT/Downloads/alexi,+7871-19631-1-CE-1.pdf [in Ukrainian].

36. Reimers, N. F. (1994). Ekolohyia: Teoryia, zakoni, pravyla, pryntsypi y hypotezi [Ecology: Theory, laws, rules, principles and hypotheses]. Moscow, Russia. [in Russian].

37. Rozmaritsa, I. O. (2004). Linhvokohnityvni osoblyvosti komunikatsii u sferi ekolohii [Linguistic and cognitive features of communication in the field of ecology]. Extended abstract of candidate's thesis. Kyiv: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi un-t im. Tarasa Shevchenka. [in Ukrainian].

38. Zakharchenko, V. M., Luhovyi, V. I., Rashkevych, Yu. M., Talanova, Zh. V. (2014) Rozroblennia osvitnikh prohram. Metodychni rekomendatsii [Development of educational programs. Methodical recommendations]. V.H. Kremen (Ed.). Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». URL: http://ibhb.chnu.edu.ua/ uploads/files/metodrada/Rozroblennya_osv_program.pdf [in Ukrainian].

39. Rudenko, N. S. (2011). Ekolohichna leksyka yak obiekt perekladu (na materiali slovnykovoi statti, anotatsii, zvitu, a takozh publitsystychnoi statti na ekolohichnu tematyku) [Ecological vocabulary as an object of translation (based on the material of a dictionary entry, annotation, report, and journalistic article on ecological topics)]. Extended abstract of candidate's thesis. Kherson: Tavriiskyi nats. un-t im. V.I. Vernadskoho.[in Ukrainian].

40. Rudyshyn, S. D. (2009). Biolohichna pidhotovka maibutnikh ekolohiv: teoriia i praktyka [Biological training of future ecologists: theory and practice]. Vinnytsia: VMHO «Tempus». [in Ukrainian].

41. Rudyshyn, S. D. (2012). Mova v Ukraini: pohliad z pozytsii vyshchoi nervovoi diialnosti ta psykholinhvistyky [Language in Ukraine: a view from the standpoint of higher nervous activity and psycholinguistics]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia profesiinoi osvity - Pedagogy and psychology of professional education, 5, 113-117. [in Ukrainian].

42. Rudyshyn, S. D. (2013) Osnovy bioheokhimii [Fundamentals of biogeochemistry]. Kyiv: VTs «Akademiia». [in Ukrainian].

43. Rudyshyn, S. D., Melnyk, O. S., Koreneva, I. M. (2018). Ekolohizatsiia osvity na zasadakh staloho rozvytku v Hlukhivskomu natsionalnomu pedahohichnomu universyteti imeni Oleksandra Dovzhenka [Ecologization of education on the basis of sustainable development at Oleksandr Dovzhenko Hlukhiv National Pedagogical University]. Visnyk Hlukhivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Oleksandra Dovzhenka - Bulletin of Hlukhiv Oleksandr Dovzhenko National Pedagogical University, 37(2), 230-236. [in Ukrainian].

44. Rudyshyn, S. D.(2013). Systemnyi pidkhid do vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini: osvichenist, kompetentnist, natsionalni tsinnosti [A systematic approach to higher education in Ukraine: education, competence, national values]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia - Pedagogy and psychology, 3, 69-75. [in Ukrainian].

45. Rudyshyn, S. D. (2021). Ekolohiia ta linhvistychna ekolohiia: poniatiino-katehorialnyi dyskurs [Ecology and linguistic ecology: conceptual and categorical discourse]. VIII Proceedings from: Mizhnarodnyi zizd ekolohiv - VIIIInternational Congress of Ecologists. Vinnytsia: VNTU. URL: https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/ecology/ecology2021/paper /viewFile/13541/11611 [in Ukrainian].

46. Rudyshyn, S. D., Kmets, A. M., Samilyk, V. I., & Hulakova, I. M. (2021). Biolohiia i ekolohiia. 10 klas [Biology and ecology. 10th grade]. Sumy, Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].

47. Samokhina, V. O. (2019). Kreatyvna dyskursyvna osobystist V ekosystemi tvorchoi diialnosti [Creative discursive personality in the ecosystem of creative activity]. [in Ukrainian].

48. Selivanova, O. O.(2010). Linhvistychna entsyklopediia [Linguistic encyclopedia]. Poltava: Dovkillia. [in Ukrainian].

49. Serbenska, O. (2002). Suchasna ukrainska terminohrafiia i problemy ekolohii movy [Modern Ukrainian terminology and problems of language ecology]. Visnyk NU `Lvivska politekhnika' «Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii» - Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University «Problems of Ukrainian terminology», 453, 17-20. URL: https://science.lpnu.ua/terminology/all- volumes-and-issues/visnik-no-453-2002/suchasna-ukrayinska-terminografiya-i-problemi [in Ukrainian].

50. Serpak, N. F., Sydorchuk, T. M., & Sapun, K. V. (2021). Osoblyvosti ekolohichnoi leksyky suchasnoi nimetskoi

movy [Features of environmental vocabulary of the modern german language]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I Vernadskoho - Scientific Notes of Vernadsky Kyiv Polytechnic National University, 32(71), 240-244. URL:

https://www.philol.vernadskyjournals.in.ua/journals/2021/1_2021/part_1/43 .pdf [in Ukrainian].

51. Sydorov, M. O., & Hrinenko, O. O. (2013). Modeliuvannia ekosystem prohramnoho zabezpechennia [Modeling of software ecosystems]. jrnl.nau.edu.ua. URL: http://jrnl.nau.edu.ua/index.php/IPZ/article/view/6022 [in Ukrainian].

52. Stasiuk, T. V. (2020). Terminosfera novitnikh tekhnolohii: linhvosotsiokohnityvni chynnyky formuvannia ta rozvytku [Terminosphere of the latest technologies: linguosociocognitive factors of formation and development]. Doctor's thesis. Kyiv: In-t ukrainskoi movy NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].

53. Taranenko, K. V. (2021). Ekolohichna komunikatsiia v mediaprostori [Environmental communication in the media

space]. Ryha, Izdevnieciba «Baltija Publishing». URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/omp/index.php/bp/catalog/

download/139/4073/8504-1?inline= 1 [in Ukrainian].

54. Troian, A. O., & Kantarzhy, N. I. (2019). Problemy ekolohii ukrainskoi movy [Problems of ecology of the Ukrainian

language]. eprints.library.odeku.edu.ua. URL: http://eprints.library. odeku.edu.ua/ id/eprint/6465/1/ Troyan_%D0%90_ O,%20Kantarzhi_N_I_ Problemy_ekologii_ukrainskoi_movy.pdf [in Ukrainian].

55. Khaken, H. (1980). Synerhetyka [Synergetics]. Moscow: Myr. [in Russian].

56. Fill, A. (2000). Language and ecology: Ecolinguistic perspectives for 2000 and beyond. Applied Linguistics for the 21st Century. Tokyo.

57. Fill, A., & Muhlhausler, P. (2006). The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment. London, NY: Continuum.

58. Finke, P. (2014). The ecology of science and its consequences for the ecology of language. Language Sciences, 41(A), 71-82. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.langsci.2013.08.008

59. Gopferich, S. (1995). Type of texts in environment and engineering: Pragmatic typology - Contrast - Translation. Forum of Specialized language research. Tubingen: Narr, 27, 117-138.

60. Haarmann, H. (1986). Language in ethnicity: A view of basic ecological relations. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110862805

61. Halliday, M. (2001). New ways of meaning - The challenge to applied linguistics. In A. Fill, & P. Muhlhausler (Eds.) The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology, and Environment (pp. 175-202). London, UK: Continuum. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/New-ways-of-meaning-the-challenge-to-applied- Halliday/a6deedff78d42610ec59ea3c594af34e089af879

62. Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of language. Standford, CA: Standford University Press.

63. Herring, S. C. (2005). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.) The

Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612-634). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch32

64. Lechevrel, N. (2009). The intertwined histories of ecolinguistics and the ecological approach of language(s): Historical and theoretical aspects of a researchparadigm. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Ecolinguistics: The Ecology of Science. University of Southern Denmark. URL: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00413983/document

65. LeVasseur, T. (2015). Defining «Ecolinguistics?»: Challenging emic issues in an evolving environmental discipline. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(1), 21-28. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0198-4

66. Nettle, D., & Romaine, S. (2002). Vanishing voices: The extinction of the world's languages. New York: Oxford University Press.

67. Pennycook, A. (2004). Language policy and the ecological turn. Language Policy, 3, 213-239. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-004-3533-x

68. Steciag, M. (2010). Environmental discourse in public debate in Poland: Relativization, exclusion and acceptance. Language and Ecology, 3(2), 1-16. https://tinyurl.com/47nmezxa

69. Steffensen, S. V., Fill, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences. 41(A), 6-25. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003

70. Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. New York: Routledge. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000112

Размещено на Allbest.ru