Візуалізовані цінності у соціальних практиках користувачів української соціальної мережі "Інстаграм"

Centre for European Policy, 2020. URL: v2.0https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/

WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp

32. Сокурянская Л. “Модернизация” и “постмодернизация” ценностных ориентаций студенчества как фактор модернизации общества. Методология, теория и практика социологического анализа современного общества: Сборник научных работ. Харьков: ХНУ им. В.Н. Каразина, 2012. Вып. 18. C. 421-427.

33. Бодрийяр Ж. Общество потребления. Его мифы и структуры. Москва: Республика; Культурная революция, 2006. 269 с.

34. Bauman Z. From pilgrim to tourist - or a short history of identity. Questions of cultural identity /

S. Hall, P. Du Gay (Eds.). New York: Sage Publications, Inc., 1996. P. 18-36.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221907.n2

35. Haerpfer C., Inglehart R., Moreno A., Welzel C., Kizilova K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos M., Norris P., Ponarin E., Puranen B. et al. (eds.). World Values Survey: Round Seven - Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat, 2020. URL: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp

36. Особливості релігійного і церковно-релігійного самовизначення українських громадян: тенденції 2010-2018 рр. (інформаційні матеріали). Київ: Центр Разумкова, 2018. URL: https://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2018_Religiya.pdf

37. Релігія в житті громадян України: у що вірять українці? TNS MMI. 2016. URL: https:// tns-ua.com/news/religiya-v-zhitti-gromadyan-ukrayini-u-shho-viryat-ukrayintsi

38. DeWall C.N., Buffardi L.E., Bonser I., Campbell W.K. Narcissism and implicit attention seeking: Evidence from linguistic analyses of social networking and online presentation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011. Vol. 51 (1). P. 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.paid.2011.03.011

39. Panek E.T., Nardis Y., Konrath S. Mirror or megaphone? How relationships between narcissism and social networking site use differ on Facebook and Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013. Vol. 29 (5). P. 2004-2012.

40. Sheldon P., Bryant K. Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. Vol. 58. P. 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059

41. Shane-Simpson C., Manago A., Gaggi N., Gillespie-Lynch K. Why do college students prefer

Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018. Vol. 86. P. 276-288.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041

42. Ходина Е. Культурно-антропологический аспект Instagram. Молодой ученый. 2014. Vol. 21. P. 738-741.

References

1. Mirzoeff, N. (1999). An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York: Routledge.

2. What social networks are the most popular in Ukraine and do we trust them: a survey. (2020, January). R&B Group. URL: https://rb.com.ua/blog/socmerezhi-jak-dzherelo-informacii [in Russian]

3. How Ukrainians use Facebook and Instagram. (2020, March). PlusOne social impact. URL: https://tech.liga.net/technology/novosti/kak-ukraintsy-polzuyutsya-facebook-i-instagram---issledovanie

[in Russian]

4. Toshchenko, Zh. (2013). Values and value orientations. Sociology thesaurus. Moscow: Unity-Dana [in Russian]

5. Sztompka, P. (2007). Visual Sociology. Moscow: Logos [in Russian]

6. Foster, H. (Ed.). (1988). Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press.

7. Bourdieu, P. (1996). Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. Stanford University.

8. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

9. Hilsen, A.I., Helvik, T. (2014). The construction of self in social medias, such as Facebook. AI & society, 29 (1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0426-y

10. Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54 (3), 402-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009

11. Smith, S., Watson, J. (2014). Virtually me: A toolbox about online self-presentation. In A. Poletti, J. Rak (Eds.), Identity technologies: Constructing the self online (pp. 70-95). Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

12. Smith, L.R., Sanderson, J. (2015). I'm Going to Instagram It! An Analysis of Athlete Self Presentation on Instagram. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59 (2), 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029125

13. Barnett, C. (2009). Towards a methodology of postmodern assemblage: adolescent identity in the age of social networking. Philosophical Studies in Education, 40, 200-210.

14. Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

15. Pink, S. (2007). Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media, and Representation in Research. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857025029

16. Back, M.D., Stopfer, J.M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S.C., Egloff, B., Gosling, S.D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21 (3), 372-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609360756

17. Bataeva, E.V. (2012). Flanering and video mania: Modern and postmodern visual practices. Voprosy Filosofii, 11,61-68 [in Russian]

18. Bataeva, B.V., Polyakova, Y.A. (2018). Motive-analysis of TV-advertising visual content. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal -- Sociological Journal, 24 (2), 66-89. https://doi.org/10.19181/ socjour.2018.24.2.5845 [in Russian]

19. Sartre, J.-P. (2001). The Imaginary. A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. Saint Petersburg: Nauka [in Russian]

20. Nancy, J.-L. (2005). The Ground of the Image. New York: Fordham University Press.

21. Deleuze, G. (2004). Cinema. The Movement-Image. Moscow: Ad Marginem [in Russian]

22. Barbatsis, G. (2005). Reception theory. In Handbook of visual communication. Theory, methods, and media (pp. 271-294). New Jersey; Mahwah: Lowrence Erlbaum Associates.

23. Kress, G., Leeuwen, T. van. (2006). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.

24. Mitchell, W.J.T. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

25. Sokuryanskaya, L. (2006). Students on the way to another society: value discourse of the transition. Kharkiv: KhNU im. V.N. Karazin [in Russian]

26. Bevzenko, L. (2007). Life success, values, lifestyles. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 4, 132-151 [in Russian]

27. Inglehart, R., Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28. Inglehart, R. (2000). Globalization and postmodern values. The Washington Quarterly, 23 (1), 215-228.

29. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

30. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Pinguin Books.

31. Ukraine in World Values Survey 2020. Resume of the Analytical Report. (2020). Kyiv: NGO

Ukrainian Centre for European Policy. URL: v2.0https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/

WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp

32. Sokuryanska, L. (2012). “Modernization” and “postmodernization” of students' value orientations as a factor of the modernization of society. In Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society (pp. 421-427). Kharkiv: KhNU im. V.N. Karazin [in Russian]

33. Baudrillard, J. (2006). The Consumer Society. Myths and Structures. Moscow: Respublika, Kulturnaya revolyutsiya [in Russian]

34. Bauman, Z. (1996). From pilgrim to tourist - or a short history of identity. In S. Hall, P. Du Gay

(Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 18-36). New York: Sage Publications, Inc.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221907.n2

35. Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., Puranen, B. et al. (Eds.). (2020). World Values Survey: Round Seven - Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain, Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. URL: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp

36. Features of religious and church-religious self-determination of Ukrainian citizens: trends of

2010-2018 (information materials). (2018). Kiev: Razumkov Center. URL:

https://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2018_Religiya.pdf [in Russian]

37. Religion in the life of Ukrainian citizens: what do Ukrainians believe in? (2016). TNS MMI. URL: https://tns-ua.com/news/religiya-v-zhitti-gromadyan-ukrayini-u-shho-viryat-ukrayintsi [in Russian]

38. DeWall, C.N., Buffardi, L.E., Bonser, I., Campbell, W.K. (2011). Narcissism and implicit attention seeking: Evidence from linguistic analyses of social networking and online presentation. Personality and Individual Differences, 51 (1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.paid.2011.03.011

39. Panek, E.T., Nardis, Y., Konrath, S. (2013). Mirror or megaphone? How relationships between narcissism and social networking site use differ on Facebook and Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (5), 2004-2012.

40. Sheldon, P., Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059

41. Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276-288.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041

42. Khodina, E. (2014). Cultural and anthropological aspect of Instagram. Molodoi uchenyi - Young scientist, 21, 738-741 [in Russian]

Размещено на Allbest.ru