Психологічні проблеми вимірювання схильності до відтворювання фашизму, авторитаризму, тоталітаризму в суспільстві: до конструювання синтетичної шкали (аналіз міжнародного досвіду)

Українськомовна адаптація психологічних методик вимірювання окремих параметрів і граней тоталітаризму (ФАТ) є надзвичайно актуальним завданням політико-психологічної спільноти, яке має важливе самостійне значення. Це значення не вичерпується суто теоретичним чи діагностичним контекстом. Перспективою посилення запобіжників сповзання поствоєнного українського суспільства до тоталітаризму є розширення і популяризація політико -психологічних знань в освітньому контексті фахової підготовки державних управлінців, політологів, психологів, соціологів та інших дотичних професій.

Список використаних джерел

Бескова, Т. В. (2012). Методика исследования завистливости личности. Вопросы психологии, 2, 127-141.

Бескова, Т. В. (2013). Социально-психологическая структура и детерминанты зависти. Саратов: Изд-во Сарат. ун-та.

Найдьонов, М. І. (2012). Збагаченість взаємодії суспільства та освіти: груп-рефлексивний підхід. Психологічні перспективи. Спец. вип. «Актуальні проблеми психології малих, середніх та великих груп». Т. 2. Проблема цілісності суспільства, групи та особистості, с. 186-204.

Найдьонов, М. І. (2010). Потенціал та актуалізація суб'єктності з позицій переосмислення її як ресурсу. Вісник Одеського національного університету. (Серія «Психологія»). Т. 15. Вип. 11. Ч. 2, с. 84-93.

Найдьонов, М. І. (2009). Рефлексивний інтенціонал дискурсу: до лідерської позиції психології в міжгалузевому знанні. Наукові студії із соціальної та політичної психології, 23 (26), 46-66.

Найдьонов, М. І. (2011). Фільтри групової рефлексії в соціальній ситуації особистісного та суспільного розвитку. Актуальні проблеми психології. Т. XII. Психологія творчості, 13, 306-310.

Саннікова, О. П., & Лісовенко, А. Ф. (2015). Уявлення студентів про феномен «заздрість». Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology, III(29), 57, 72-75.

Слюсаревський, М. (ред.) (2022). Термінологічний словник російсько- української війни. Київ: Ін-т соціальної та політичної психології НАПН України. Взято з https://ispp.org.ua/2022/04/05/terminologichnij-slovnik-rosijsko-ukraіnskoі- vijni/

Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other is «authoritarian personality». In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). Orlando, FL: Academic. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2.

Arendt, H. (1973). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

Baehr, Р. (2010). Hannah Arendt, Totalitarianism, and the Social Sciences. Stanford University Press.

Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology,

4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225

Bruno Castanho Silva, loannis Andreadis, Eva Anduiza, Nebojaa Blanuaa, Yazmin Morlet Corti, Gisela Delfino, Guillem Rico, et al. (2018). Public Opinion Surveys: A New Scale. In Kirk Hawkins, Ryan Carlin, Levente Littvay, & Cristуbal Rovira Kaltwasser (by edited), The Ideational Approach to Populism: Theory, Method & Analysis, рр. 150-178. London: Routledge. (Executive Memo on a new Populist Attitudes Scale)

Bruno Castanho Silva, Sebastian Jungkunz, Marc Helbling, & Levente Littvay. (2019). An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales. Political Research Quarterly, 1-16. doi: 10.1177/1065912919833176

journals.sagepub.com/home/prq

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116

Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., Esses, V. M. (2010). The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065- 2601(01)80004-6

Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861-1894. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x

Eatwell, R., & Goodwin, M. (2018). National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. Pelican Books.

Filimowicz, M. (2022). Digital Totalitarianism: Algorithms and Society. Routledge.

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42. doi:10.1257/089533005775196732

Klicperova-Baker, M., Kostal, J. (2017). Post-communist democracy vs. totalitarianism: Contrasting patterns of need satisfaction and societal frustration. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 50, № 2, pp. 99-111.

Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2014). Dispositional Envy Revisited: Unraveling the Motivational Dynamics of Benign and Malicious Envy. Personality and Social Psychology. Bulletin, 41(2), 284-294. doi:10.1177/0146167214564959 (BeMas)

Leach, C. W., Zomeren, M. van, Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., ... Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144-165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144

Magalhres, P. C. (2013). Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 77-97. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12024

Magalhres, P. C. (2014). Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475- 6765.12024

Marchlewska, M., Castellanos, K. A., Lewczuk, K., Kofta, M., & Cichocka, A. (2018). My way or the highway: High narcissism and low self-esteem predict decreased support for democracy. British Journal of Social Psychology. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12290

Mehrabian, A. (1996). Relations Among Political Attitudes, Personality, and Psychopathology Assessed With New Measures of Libertarianism and Conservatism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(4), 469491. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1804_7. To link to this article:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1804 7

Moore, B. Jr. (1973). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Penguin Books

Passmore, K. (2002). Fascism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Paxton, R.O. (2004). The Anatomy of Fascism. Knopf.

PetroviK. M. B., & Rebel], I. (2021). Thinking Inconsistently: Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Proneness to Doublethink. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online

publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000645

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.

Roberts, C. P., Uden, D. R., Allen, C. R., & Twidwell, D. (2018). Doublethink and scale mismatch polarize policies for an invasive tree. PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0189733. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189733

Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335-340.

Tang, W. (2016). Populist authoritarianism: Chinese political culture and regime sustainability. Oxford University Press.

Traverso, E. (2019). The New Faces of Fascism: Populism and the Far Right. Verso.

Zavala, A. G. de, Cichocka, A., & Bilewicz, M. (2013). The Paradox of InGroup Love: Differentiating Collective Narcissism Advances Understanding the Relationship Between In-Group and Out-Group Attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 16-28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x

Zavala, A. G. de, Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N.

(2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074-1096. doi:10.1037/a0016904

Zavala, A. G. de, Cichocka, A., & Iskra-Golec, I. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1019-1039. doi:10.1037/a0032215

lemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowski, J., Sedikides, C., Sawicki, A., Czarna, A. Z., Fatfouta, R., & Baran, T. (2021). Communal collective narcissism. Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/jopy.12636

References

Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other «authoritarian personality». In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). Orlando, FL: Academic. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2. (in English)

Arendt, H. (1973). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. (in English)

Baehr, Р. (2010). Hannah Arendt, Totalitarianism, and the Social Sciences. Stanford University Press. (in English)

Beskova, T. V. (2012). Metodika issledovaniya zavistlivosti lichnosti [Methodology for the study of personality envy]. Voprosypsikhologii, 2, 127-141. (in Russian)

Beskova, T. V. (2013). Sotsialno-psikhologicheskaya struktura i determinanty zavisti [Socio-psychological structure and determinants of envy]. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. Un-ta. (in Russian)

Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4.

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225 (in English)

Bruno Castanho Silva, loannis Andreadis, Eva Anduiza, Nebojaa Blanuaa, Yazmin Morlet Corti, Gisela Delfino, Guillem Rico, et al. (2018). Public Opinion Surveys: A New Scale. In Kirk Hawkins, Ryan Carlin, Levente Littvay, and Cristуbal Rovira Kaltwasser (edited by), The Ideational Approach to Populism: Theory, Method & Analysis, рр. 150-178. London: Routledge. (Executive Memo on a new Populist Attitudes Scale) (in English)

Bruno Castanho Silva, Sebastian Jungkunz, Marc Helbling, and Levente Littvay. (2019). An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales. Political Research Quarterly, 1-16. Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions doi: 10.1177/1065912919833176 journals.sagepub.com/home/prq (in English)

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131 doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116

(in English)

Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., Esses, V. M. (2010). The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. SAGE Publications Ltd. (in English)

Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065- 2601(01)800046 (in English)

Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861-1894. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x (in English)

Eatwell, R., Goodwin, M. (2018). National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. Pelican Books. (in English)

Filimowicz, M. (2022). Digital Totalitarianism: Algorithms and Society. Routledge. (in English)

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42. doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 (in English)

Klicperova-Baker, M., Kostal, J. (2017). Post-communist democracy vs. totalitarianism: Contrasting patterns of need satisfaction and societal frustration. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 50, № 2, pp. 99-111. (in English)

Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2014). Dispositional Envy Revisited: Unraveling the Motivational Dynamics of Benign and Malicious Envy. Personality and Social Psychology. Bulletin, 41(2), 284-294. doi:10.1177/0146167214564959 (BeMas) (in English)

Leach, C. W., Zomeren, M. van, Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., ... Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144-165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144 (in English)

Magalhres, P. C. (2013). Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 77-97. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12024 (in English)

Magalhres, P. C. (2014). Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475- 6765.12024 (in English)

Marchlewska, M., Castellanos, K. A., Lewczuk, K., Kofta, M., & Cichocka, A. (2018). My way or the highway: High narcissism and low self-esteem predict decreased support for democracy. British Journal of Social Psychology. doi:10.1111/bjso.12290 (in English)

Mehrabian, A. (1996). Relations Among Political Attitudes, Personality, and Psychopathology Assessed With New Measures of Libertarianism and Conservatism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(4), 469491. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1804_7. To link to this article:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1804 7 (in English)

Moore, B. Jr. (1973). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Penguin Books (in English)

Naydonov, M. I. (2011). Filtry hrupovoi refleksii v sotsialnii sytuatsii osobystisnoho ta suspilnoho rozvytku [Filters of group reflection in social situations of personal and social development]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii. Vol. XII. Psykholohiia tvorchosti, 13, 306-310. (in Ukrainian)

Naydonov, M. I. (2010). Potentsial ta aktualizatsiia subiektnosti z pozytsii pereosmyslennia yii yak resursu [The potential and actualization of subjectivity from the point of view of reinterpretation of as a resource]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. (Seriia «Psykholohiia»). Vol. 15. Is. 11. Part 2, pp. 84-93. (in Ukrainian)

Naydonov, M. I. (2009). Refleksyvnyi intentsional dyskursu: do liderskoi pozytsii psykholohii v mizhhaluzevomu znanni [Reflexive intentionality of discourse: towards the leadership position of psychology in interdisciplinary knowledge]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii, 23 (26), 46-66. (in Ukrainian)

Naydonov, M. I. (2012). Zbahachenist vzaiemodii suspilstva ta osvity: hrup- refleksyvnyi pidkhid [Enrichment of the interaction of society and education: groupreflexive approach]. Psykholohichni perspektyvy. Is. «Aktualni problemy psykholohii malykh, serednikh ta velykykh hrup». Vol. 2. Problema tsilisnosti suspilstva, hrupy ta osobystosti, pp. 186-204. (in Ukrainian)

Passmore, K. (2002). Fascism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. (in English)

Paxton, R.O. (2004). The Anatomy of Fascism. Knopf. (in English)

PetroviK. M. B., & Kehelj, I. (2021). Thinking Inconsistently: Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Proneness to Doublethink. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication.

https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000645 (in English)

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. (in English)

Roberts, C. P., Uden, D. R., Allen, C. R., & Twidwell, D. (2018). Doublethink and scale mismatch polarize policies for an invasive tree. PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0189733. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189733 (in English)

Sannikova, O. P., & Lisovenko, A. F. (2015). Uiavlennia studentiv pro fenomen «zazdrist» [Students' ideas about the phenomenon of «envy»]. Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology, III(29), 57, 72-75. (in English)

Slyusarevskyy, M. (Ed.) (2022). Terminolohichnyi slovnyk rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny [Terminological dictionary of the Russian-Ukrainian war]. Kyiv: In-t sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii NAPN Ukrainy. (in Ukrainian)

Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335-340. (in English)

Tang, W. (2016). Populist authoritarianism: Chinese political culture and regime sustainability. Oxford University Press. (in English)

Traverso, E. (2019). The New Faces of Fascism: Populism and the Far Right. Verso. (in English)

Zavala, A. G. de, Cichocka, A., & Bilewicz, M. (2013). The Paradox of InGroup Love: Differentiating Collective Narcissism Advances Understanding of the Relationship Between In-Group and Out-Group Attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 16-28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x (in English)

Zavala, A. G. de, Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074-1096. doi:10.1037/a0016904 (in English)

Zavala, A. G. de, Cichocka, A., & Iskra-Golec, I. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1019-1039. doi:10.1037/a0032215 (in

English)

lemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowski, J., Sedikides, C., Sawicki, A., Czarna, A. Z., Fatfouta, R., & Baran, T. (2021). Communal collective narcissism. Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/jopy.12636 (in English)

Размещено на Allbest.ru