Метакогнитивный мониторинг и контроль в ситуации распределенного познания

Анализ специфики метакогнитивного мониторинга и контроля. Исследование способов формирования метакогнитивных оценок. Роль метакогнитивных переживаний в профилактике и коррекции когнитивных ошибок в контексте совместного и распределенного познания.

Рубрика Философия
Вид статья
Язык русский
Дата добавления 27.02.2024
Размер файла 43,2 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

Boldt A., Blundell C., De Martino B. Confidence modulates exploration and exploitation in value-based learning // Neuroscience of consciousness. 2019. Vol. 2019 (1). https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niz004

Broder A., Newell B.R. Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor // Judgment and Decision Making. 2008. Vol. 3 (3). P. 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1930297500002412

Carlebach N., Yeung N. Flexible use of confidence to guide advice requests // Cognition. 2023. Vol. 230. P 105264.

Carruthers P. Mindreading underlies metacognition // Behavioral and brain sciences. 2009. Vol. 32 (2). P 164-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000831

Carruthers P., Williams D. M. Model-free metacognition // Cognition. 2022. Vol. 225. P. 105117.

Cleeremans A. Connecting conscious and unconscious processing // Cognitive science. 2014. Vol.38 (6).

P. 1286-1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12149

Cohen J. D, McClure S. M., Yu A. J. Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2007. Vol. 362 (1481). P. 933-942. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2098

Desender K., Boldt A., Yeung N. Subjective confidence predicts information seeking in decision making // Psychological science. 2018. Vol. 29 (5). P. 761-778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617744771

Echterhoff G., Higgins E. T., Kopietz R., Groll S. How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2008. Vol. 137 (1). P. 3-21. https://doi. org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.3

Echterhoff G., Higgins E. T., Levine J. M. Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others' inner states about the world // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2009. Vol. 4. (5). P. 496-521. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x

Efklides A. Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process?

// Educational Research Review. 2006. Vol. 1 (1). P. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001

Efklides A. Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation // Trends and prospects in motivation research / A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, R. M. Sorrentino, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. P. 297-323.

Ferguson A. M., McLean D., Risko E. F. Answers at your fingertips: Access to the Internet influences willingness to answer questions // Consciousness and Cognition. 2015. Vol. 37. P. 91-102. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.08.008

FestingerL. A theory of social comparison processes // Human Relations. 1954. Vol. 7 (2). P. 117-140. https:// doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

Fisher M., Goddu M. K., Keil F C. Searching for explanations: How the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2015. Vol. 144 (3). P. 674-687. https://doi. org/10.1037/xge0000070

Flavell J. Development of children's knowledge about the mental world // International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2000. Vol. 24 (1). P. 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500383421

Flavell J. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry // American Psychologist. 1979. Vol. 34 (10) P. 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Flavell J. H. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving // The nature of intelligence / L.B. Resnick, ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976. P. 231-235.

Fleming S., Daw N. Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation // Psychological review. 2017. Vol. 124 (1). P. 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000045

Fleming S., Lau H. How to measure metacognition // Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2014. Vol. 8. P. 443.

Fourneret P, Jeannerod M. Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects // Neuropsychologia. 1998. Vol. 36 (11). P. 1133-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00006-2

Frith C. The role of metacognition in human social interactions // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012. Vol. 367 (1599). P. 2213-2223. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rstb.2012.0123

Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U., KleinboltingH. Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence // Psychological Review. 1991. Vol. 98 (4). P. 506-528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.4506

Goldsmith M. Metacognitive quality-control processes in memory retrieval and reporting // The Oxford Handbook of Metamemory / J. Dunlosky, S. K. Tauber, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. P. 357-385. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.28

Grinschgl S., Papenmeier F., Meyerhoff H. Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory // Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2021. Vol. 74 (9). P. 1477-1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211008060

Hart J. Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience // Journal of Educational Psychology. 1965. Vol. 56 (4). P. 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022263

Hanks T., Mazurek M., Kiani R., Hopp E., Shadlen M. Elapsed decision time affects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task // Journal of Neuroscience. 2011. Vol. 31 (17). P. 6339-6352. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 5613-10.2011

Heyes C. Cognitive Gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018. Heyes C., Bang D., Shea N., Frith C. D., Fleming S. M. Knowing ourselves together: The cultural origins of metacognition // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2020. Vol. 24 (5). P. 349-362. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj. tics.2020.02.007

Hu X., Luo L., Fleming S. M. A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading // Cognition. 2019. Vol. 193.

P. 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104012

Hutchins E. The social organization of distributed cognition // Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition / L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, S. D. Teasley, eds. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1991. P. 283-307. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-012

Jost J., Kruglanski A., Nelson T Social metacognition: An expansionist review // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1998. Vol. 2 (2). P. 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_6

Kinder A., Shanks D. R., Cock J., Tunney R. J. Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2003. Vol. 132 (4). P. 551565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.551

Koriat A. Metacognition and consciousness // The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness / P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, E. Thompson, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 289-325. https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816789.012

Koriat A. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning // Journal of experimental psychology: General. 1997. Vol. 126 (4). P. 349-370. https://doi. org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349

Koriat A. Metamemory: The feeling of knowing and its vagaries // Advances in psychological science. Vol. 2. Biological and cognitive aspects / M. Sabourin, F. Craik, M. Robert, eds. Erlbaum: Taylor & Francis, 1998. P. 461-479.

Koriat A. The self-consistency model of subjective confidence // Psychological Review. 2012a. Vol. 119 (1).

P. 80-113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025648

Koriat A. When are two heads better than one and why? // Science. 2012b. Vol. 336 (6079). P. 360-362. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216549

Koriat A., Maayan H., Nussinson R. The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2006. Vol. 135 (1). P. 36-69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096- 3445.135.1.36

Krueger K. The impact of another person's responses to opinion communication: shared reality, epistemic trust, and belief certainty: Master's thesis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 2017.

Kruger J., Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999. Vol. 77 (6). P. 1121-1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77A1121

Lebuda I., Benedek M. A systematic framework of creative metacognition: preprint // PsyArxiv. 2023. https:// psyarxiv.com/s793q (дата обращения: 16.04.2023).

Moran R., Teodorescu A. R., Usher M. Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account // Cognitive psychology. 2015. Vol. 78. P. 99-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.01.002

Nelson T., Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings // The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 1990. Vol. 26. P. 125-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5

Newell B. R., Shanks D. R. Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing “one-reason” decision making // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2003. Vol. 29 (1). P. 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.53

Pescetelli N., Hauperich A. K., Yeung N. Confidence, advice seeking and changes of mind in decision making // Cognition. 2021. Vol. 215. P. 104810.

Pescetelli N., Yeung N. The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2021. Vol. 150 (3). P. 507-526. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000960

Pulford B. D., Colman A. M., Buabang E. K., Krockow E. M. The persuasive power of knowledge: Testing the confidence heuristic // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2018. Vol. 147 (10). P. 14311444. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000471

Rahnev D., Koizumi A., McCurdy L., D'Esposito M., Lau H. Confidence leak in perceptual decision making // Psychological science. 2015. Vol. 26 (11). P. 1664-1680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615595037

Reber R., Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth // Consciousness and Cognition. 1999. Vol. 8 (3). P. 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1999.0386

Reber R., Schwarz N., Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? // Personality and social psychology review. 2004. Vol. 8 (4). P. 364-382. https:// doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3

Risko E. F., Gilbert S. J. Cognitive offloading // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2016. Vol. 20 (9). P. 676-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002

Schulz L., Fleming S. M., Dayan P Metacognitive computations for information search: Confidence in control // Psychological Review. 2023. Vol. 130 (3). P. 604-639.

Schwartz B. Sparkling at the end of the tongue: The etiology of tip-of-the-tongue phenomenology // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1999. Vol. 6. P. 379-393. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210827

Schwarz N., Clore G.L. Feelings and phenomenal experiences // Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles / A. W Kruglanski, E. T Higgins, eds. New York: The Guilford Press, 2007. P. 385-407.

Shea N., Boldt A., Bang D., Yeung N., Heyes C., Frith C. Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2014. Vol. 18 (4). P. 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006

Shekhar M., Rahnev D. Sources of metacognitive inefficiency // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2021. Vol. 25 (1). P. 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.007

Sloman S. A., Rabb N. Your understanding is my understanding: Evidence for a community of knowledge // Psychological science. 2016. Vol. 27 (11). P. 1451-1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616662271

Sparrow B., Liu J., Wegner D. Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips // Science. 2011. Vol. 333 (6043). P. 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745

Storm B. C., Soares J. S. Memory in the digital age: preprint. 2022. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h8q6e

Tikhonov R., Moroshkina N. The social verification of implicit knowledge in dyads: The mediating role of confidence // Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2023. No. 35 (5). P. 578-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/2 0445911.2023.2220924

Undorf M., Livneh I., Ackerman R. Metacognitive control processes in question answering: help seeking and withholding answers // Metacognition and Learning. 2021. Vol. 16 (2). P. 431-458. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11409-021-09259-7

Whittlesea B. W A., Jacoby L., Girard K. Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality // Journal of Memory and Language. 1990. Vol. 29 (6). P. 716-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90045-2

Whittlesea B. W. A., Price J. R. Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect // Memory & Cognition. 2001. Vol. 29 (2). P. 234-246. https://doi.org/10.3758/ BF03194917

Zhang J., Patel V. L. Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance // Pragmatics & Cognition. 2006. Vol. 14 (2) P. 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.142.12zha

Zylberberg A., Barttfeld P, Sigman M. The construction of confidence in a perceptual decision // Frontiers in integrative neuroscience. 2012. Vol. 6. P. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00079

Reference

Ackerman, R. (2014). The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 143 (3), 1349-1368. https://doi.org/10.1037/aO035098

Ackerman, R. (2019). Heuristic cues for meta-reasoning judgments: Review and methodology. Psychological Topics, 28 (1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.28.1.1

Ackerman, R., Thompson, V A. (2017). Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 21 (8), 607-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.004

Allakhverdov, VM. (1993). The experience of theoretical psychology (in the genre of scientific revolution). St. Petersburg, Pechatnyi dvor Publ. (In Russian)

Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and social psychology review, 13 (3), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564

Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Latham, P. E., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C. D. (2010). Optimally interacting minds. Science, 329 (5995), 1081-1085. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185718

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84 (2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X. 84.2.191

Bandura, A. (2000). Social Learning 'Theory. St. Petersburg, Evraziia Publ. (In Russian).

Bang, D., Fusaroli, R., Tylen, K., Olsen, K., Latham, P. E., Lau, J.Y. F., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C.D., Bahrami, B. (2014). Does interaction matter? Testing whether a confidence heuristic can replace interaction in collective decision-making. Consciousness and cognition, 26, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. concog.2014.02.002

Boldt, A., Blundell, C., De Martino, B. (2019). Confidence modulates exploration and exploitation in valuebased learning. Neuroscience of consciousness, 2019 (1), 004. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niz004

Broder, A., Newell, B. R. (2008). Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor. Judgment and Decision Making, 3 (3), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1930297500002412

Carlebach, N., Yeung, N. (2023). Flexible use of confidence to guide advice requests. Cognition, 230, 105264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105264

Carruthers, P. (2009). Mindreading underlies metacognition. Behavioral and brain sciences, 32 (2), 164-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000831

Carruthers, P., Williams, D.M. (2022). Model-free metacognition. Cognition, 225, 105117. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105117

Chetverikov, A. A., Odainik, A. S. (2013). Models of subjective evaluation of performance in cognitive tasks. Part 1. Theories of additional evaluation and partial access theories. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 3, 55-61. (In Russian)

Chetverikov, A. A., Odainik, A. S. (2014). Models of subjective evaluation of performance in cognitive tasks.

Part 2. Inferential theories. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 1, 117-125. (In Russian) Cleeremans, A. (2014). Connecting conscious and unconscious processing. Cognitive science, 38 (6), 1286

1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12149

Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., Yu, A. J. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362 (1481), 933-942. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2098

Desender, K., Boldt, A., Yeung, N. (2018). Subjective confidence predicts information seeking in decision making. Psychological science, 29 (5), 761-778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617744771

Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., Kopietz, R., Groll, S. (2008). How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137 (1), 3. https://doi. org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.3

Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others' inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4 (5), 496-521. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x

Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving. In: A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, R. M. Sorrentino (eds.). Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297-323). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publ.

Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational research review, 1 (1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001

Ferguson, A. M., McLean, D., Risko, E. F. (2015). Answers at your fingertips: Access to the Internet influences willingness to answer questions. Consciousness and cognition, 37, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.10167j. concog.2015.08.008

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7 (2), 117-140. https://doi. org/10.1177/001872675400700202

Fisher, M., Goddu, M. K., Keil, F. C. (2015). Searching for explanations: How the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 144 (3), 674-687. https://doi. org/10.1037/xge0000070

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects ofproblem solving. In: L. B. Resnick (ed.). The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34 (10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X. 34.10.906

Flavell, J. H. (2000). Development of children's knowledge about the mental world. International journal of behavioral development, 24 (1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500383421

Fleming, S.M., Daw, N. D. (2017). Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation. Psychological review, 124 (1), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000045

Fleming, S. M., Lau, H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443

Fomin, A. E. (2015) Metacognitive Monitoring of Learning Problem Solving: Mechanisms and Biases. Kaluga: KGU im. K. E. Tsiolkovskogo Press. (In Russian)

Fourneret, P., Jeannerod, M. (1998). Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36 (11), 1133-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00006-2

Frith, C.D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367 (1599), 2213-2223. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0123

Gershkovich, V. A., Moroshkina, N.V, Naumenko, O. V, Allakhverdov, V. M. (2010). Social verification of hypotheses in solving problems with a high degree of uncertainty. Eksperimental'naia psikhologiia v Rossii: traditsii iperspektivy (pp. 372-376). Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russian)

Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., Kleinbolting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological review, 98 (4), 506-528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98Th506

Goldsmith, M. (2016). Metacognitive quality-control processes in memory retrieval and reporting. In: J. Dunlosky, S. K. Tauber (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Metamemory (pp. 357-385). Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.28

Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S. (2021). Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74 (9), 1477-1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211008060

Hart, J. T (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56 (4), 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022263

Hanks, T D., Mazurek, M. E., Kiani, R., Hopp, E., Shadlen, M. N. (2011). Elapsed decision time affects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task. Journal of Neuroscience, 31 (17), 63396352. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5613-10.2011

Heyes, C. (2018). Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674985155

Heyes, C., Bang, D., Shea, N., Frith, C. D., Fleming, S.M. (2020). Knowing ourselves together: The cultural origins of metacognition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 24 (5), 349-362. https://doi.org/10.1016fj. tics.2020.02.007

Hu, X., Luo, L., Fleming, S.M. (2019). A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading. Cognition, 193, 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104012

Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In: L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, S. D. Teasley (eds). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 283-307). Washington, American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-012

Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W, Nelson, T O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2 (2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_6

Kinder, A., Shanks, D. R., Cock, J., Tunney, R. J. (2003). Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132 (4), 551-565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.551

Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 126 (4), 349-370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096- 3445.126.4.349

Koriat, A. (1998). Metamemory: The feeling of knowing and its vagaries. In: M. Sabourin, F. Craik, M. Robert (eds.). Advances in Psychological Science. Vol. 2. Biological and cognitive aspects (pp. 461-479). Erl- baum, Taylor & Francis.

Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In: P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, E. Thompson (eds). The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289-325). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816789.012

Koriat, A. (2012a). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119 (1), 80113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025648

Koriat, A. (2012b). When are two heads better than one and why? Science, 336 (6079), 360-362. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.1216549

Koriat, A., Ma'ayan, H., Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 135 (1), 36-69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135Th36 Krueger, K. (2017). The impact of another persons responses to opinion communication: shared reality, epis- temic trust, and belief certainty. Master's thesis. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh.

Kruger, J., Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77 (6), 11211134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022Th514.77A1121

Lebuda, I., Benedek, M. (2023). A systematic framework of creative metacognition. PsyArXiv. Available at: https://psyarxiv.com/s793q (accessed: 16.04.2023).

Moran, R., Teodorescu, A. R., Usher, M. (2015). Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account. Cognitive psychology, 78, 99-147. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.01.002

Moroshkina, N. V., Ivanchei, I. I., Karpov, A. D. (2017). Implicit Learning. In: V. F. Spiridonov (ed.). Izbran- nye razdely psikhologii naucheniia (pp. 223-275). Moscow, Delo Publ. of RANEPA. (In Russian)

Nelson, T. O., Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of learning and motivation, 26, 125-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5

Newell, B. R., Shanks, D. R. (2003). Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing “one-reason” decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29 (1), 53. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.53

Nezdoimyshapko, L. A., Tikhonov, R. V (2023). The role of response consonance in trust building in advice from humans and artificial intelligence [Paper presentation]. In: I. Yu. Vladimirov, S.Yu. Korovkin (eds). Psikhologiia poznaniia: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii YarGU (16-17 December 2022) (pp. 230-234). Yaroslavl': Filigran' Publ. (In Russian)

Pescetelli, N., Hauperich, A. K., Yeung, N. (2021). Confidence, advice seeking and changes of mind in decision making. Cognition, 215, 104810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104810

Pescetelli, N., Yeung, N. (2021). The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150 (3), 507-526. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000960

Pulford, B. D., Colman, A. M., Buabang, E. K., Krockow, E. M. (2018). The persuasive power of knowledge: Testing the confidence heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147 (10), 1431-1444. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000471

Rahnev, D., Koizumi, A., McCurdy, L. Y., D'Esposito, M., Lau, H. (2015). Confidence leak in perceptual decision making. Psychological Science, 26 (11), 1664-1680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615595037

Reber, R., Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8 (3), 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1999.0386

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 (4), 364-382. https:// doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3

Risko, E. F., Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20 (9), 676-688. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002

Schulz, L., Fleming, S. M., Dayan, P. (2023). Metacognitive computations for information search: Confidence in control. Psychological Review, 130 (3), 604-639. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000401

Schwartz, B. L. (1999). Sparkling at the end of the tongue: The etiology of tip-of-the-tongue phenomenology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 379-393. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210827

Schwarz, N., Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In: A. W. Kruglanski, E. T. Higgins (eds). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 385-407). New York, The Guilford Press.

Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., Frith, C. D. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18 (4), 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006 Shekhar, M., Rahnev, D. (2021). Sources of metacognitive inefficiency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25 (1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.007

Shendyapin, V M., Barabanschikov, V A., Skotnikova, I.G. (2010). Confidence in decision: modeling and experimental verification. Experimental Psychology, 3 (1), 30-57. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/ journals/exppsy/archive/2010_n1/28611 (accessed: 16.04.2023). (In Russian)

Sloman, S. A., Rabb, N. (2016). Your understanding is my understanding: Evidence for a community of knowledge. Psychological science, 27 (11), 1451-1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616662271

Sparrow, B., Liu, J., Wegner, D.M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333 (6043), 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745

Storm, B. C., Soares, J. S. (2022). Memory in the digital age: preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h8q6e

Tikhonov, R.V (2020). Social verification of implicit knowledge. PhD dissertation (Psychology). St. Petersburg. (In Russian)

Tikhonov, R. V, Ammalainen, A. V, Moroshkina N. V. (2018). The variety of metacognitive feelings: Different phenomena or different terms? Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 8 (3), 214-242. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.302 (In Russian)

Tikhonov, R.V, Ovchinnikova, I. V. (2016). Role of social interaction in learning processes. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 17, 172-186. Available at: https://ppj.spbpo.ru/psy/article/view/138 (accessed: 16.04.2023). (In Russian)

Tikhonov, R., Moroshkina, N. (2023) The social verification of implicit knowledge in dyads: The mediating role of confidence. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 35 (5), 578-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/2044591 1.2023.2220924

Undorf, M., Livneh, I., Ackerman, R. (2021). Metacognitive control processes in question answering: help seeking and withholding answers. Metacognition and Learning, 16 (2), 431-458. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11409-021-09259-7

Vygotskii, L.S. (1984). Collected opuses: in 6 vols. Vol. 6. Scientific heritage. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ. (In Russian)

Whittlesea, B.W, Jacoby, L. L., Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attribu- tional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29 (6), 716-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90045-2

Whittlesea, B.W, Price, J. R. (2001). Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition, 29 (2), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.3758/ BF03194917

Zhang, J., Patel, V L. (2006). Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14 (2), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.142.12zha

Zylberberg, A., Barttfeld, P., Sigman, M. (2012). The construction of confidence in a perceptual decision. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 6, 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00079

Размещено на Allbest.ru


Подобные документы

  • Методы познания как сложная система, их классификация. Роль диалектического метода познания для современной науки. Реализация и применение принципов диалектики. Общенаучные методы эмпирического познания. Потребность в единой системе единиц измерения.

    реферат [54,8 K], добавлен 12.12.2016

  • Стороны реально существующего познания. Проблемы природы и возможностей познания, отношение знания к реальности. Философские позиции по проблеме познания. Принципы скептицизма и агностицизма. Основные формы познания. Природа познавательного отношения.

    презентация [191,7 K], добавлен 26.09.2013

  • Теория познания (гносеология) - это раздел философии, в котором изучаются такие проблемы как природа познания, его возможности и границы, отношение к реальности, субъекта и объекта познания. Характеристика рефлексивных и нерефлексивных форм познания.

    реферат [11,3 K], добавлен 23.12.2003

  • Теория познания: исследование различных форм, закономерностей и принципов познавательной деятельности людей. Познавательный тип отношений между субъектом и объектом. Основные принципы теории познания. Особенности научного познания, понятие парадигмы.

    реферат [35,3 K], добавлен 15.03.2010

  • Объективность социально-гуманитарного познания. Адекватное определение "социальной перспективы". Аксиологическое измерение познания. "Горизонтность" и "перспективизм" как характеристики познания. Сходство естественнонаучного и социогуманитарного познания.

    реферат [22,2 K], добавлен 03.08.2013

  • Общая характеристика теории познания. Виды, субъекты, объекты и уровни познания. Сравнительный анализ чувственного, эмпирического и теоретического познания. Понятие, сущность и формы мышления. Описание основных философских методов и приемов исследования.

    контрольная работа [34,3 K], добавлен 12.11.2010

  • Проблема познания в философии. Понятие и сущность обыденного познания. Рациональность обыденного познания: здравый смысл и рассудок. Научное познание его структура и особенности. Методы и формы научного познания. Основные критерии научного познания.

    реферат [26,3 K], добавлен 15.06.2017

  • Понятие научного метода познания мира. История формирования научного метода познания. Роль гипотезы в естествознании. Сбор и накопление эмпирических данных, осуществляемых путём наблюдения и эксперимента.

    реферат [18,7 K], добавлен 17.10.2005

  • Анализ сущности и видов познания - процесса получения человеком нового знания, открытия неизвестного ранее. Отличительные черты чувственной (восприятие, представление, воображение) и рациональной форм познания. Проблема границ субъекта и объекта познания.

    контрольная работа [31,0 K], добавлен 23.12.2010

  • Философское обоснование проблем диагностики и врачевания; использование законов диалектики и логики. Специфика процесса диагностики как метода познания, роль практики; логическая структура заключения врача. Гносеологические причины диагностических ошибок.

    презентация [596,9 K], добавлен 18.05.2015

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.