Виртуальная реальность как превращенная форма

Хоружий С.С. Род или недород. Заметки к онтологии виртуальности // Хоружий С.С. О старом и новом. СПб.: Алетейя, 2000. С. 311-352.

Хоружий С.С. Очерки синергийной антропологии. М.: Институт философии, теологии и истории св. Фомы, 2005. 408 с.

Chalmers D.J. The Virtual and the Reality // Disputatio. 2017. No. 9. P. 309-352.

Chalmers D.J. Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Co, 2022. 505 p.

Marx K., Engels F. Werke. Bd. 23: Das Kapital. Bd. I. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1968. 955 S.

Abstract

Virtual reality as a transformed form

Sergey A. Smirnov

The article provides an analysis of one problem related to the discussion of the ontological status of virtual reality. The author proposes to discuss the problem of the reality of virtual worlds in terms of transformed forms. In this regard, an analysis is given of how this concept was introduced by K. Marx and how it was discussed further in the scientific literature. It is proposed to perceive the transformed form not as a perverted or false reality, but as a separate form of life presented in its transformation.

An example is the metamorphosis of the cost of labor into the monetary form of a commodity, as was shown in Capital. On this example, a proposal is made, according to which virtual reality is the same transformed form of reality, and not an illusion of consciousness, and not an imaginary world. The qualities of the transformed form of reality are introduced: 1) a separate, but not independent form of life; 2) playing a role in the process of transformation as an indirect form; 3) representation in the form of a copy of the original; 4) sign-symbolic mode of existence; 5) dependence on the original, generic form of reality, not independence.

It is shown that virtual reality is, as it were, an unembodied form of reality, existence in its potency. Such a representation was presented in the history of philosophy in the form of the idea of potential being. But this idea did not subsequently become the basis for the development of an independent ontology of virtual reality.

A distinction is made between the concept of virtual reality as a reality, not an illusion (the reality of digital objects) in the concept of D. Chalmers, and reality in the form of its transformed form. It is shown that virtual reality is not reduced only to the reality of imaginary worlds, to the reality of consciousness, the reality of special psychological states.

The rationale is given that virtual reality is the continuation of a natural-artificial process of metamorphosis of human activity, only embodied in its transformed form. In this regard, the author proposes to interpret virtual reality as a form of life in its transformation and non-incarnation, which a person must use as a new resource for their development in order to overcome alienation from themselves.

Keywords: virtual reality, transformed form, life form, alienation, transformation, man, potential being

References

Batishchev, G.S. “Deyatel'nostnaya sushchnost' cheloveka kak filosofskij princip” [Activity Essence of Man as a Philosophical Principle], Problema cheloveka v sovremennoj filosofii [Man in the Modern Philosophy], ed. by I.F. Balakina et al. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1969, pp. 73-144. (In Russian)

Chalmers, D.J. “The Virtual and the Reality”, Disputatio, 2017, No. 9, pp. 309-352.

Chalmers, D.J. Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 2022. 505 pp.

Davydov, Yu.N. “Perspektiva marksistskoj kul'turologii (ot problematiki otchuzhdeniya k prob- leme kul'tury)” [The perspective of Marxist cultural studies (from the problem of alienation to the problem of culture], Neomarksizm i problemy sociologii kul'tury [Neo-Marxism and Problems of the Sociology of Culture], ed. by G.V. Osipov. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1980, pp. 263-350. (In Russian)

Horujy, S.S. “Rod ili nedorod. Zametki k ontologii virtual'nosti” [Born or unborn. Notes on the ontology of virtuality], in: S.S. Horujy, O starom i novom [The old and the new]. St. Petersburg: Aletejya Publ., 2000, pp. 311-352. (In Russian)

Horujy, S.S. Ocherki sinergijnoj antropologii [Essays on Synergistic Anthropology]. Moscow: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy Publ., 2005. 408 pp. (In Russian)

Il'enkov, E.V. Ideal'noe i real'nost'. 1960-1979 [Ideal and reality. 1960-1979]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ.; Reabilitaciya Publ., 2018. 528 pp. (In Russian)

Langshtejn, M.S. “Prevrashchennye formy v politicheskoj ekonomii: voprosy metodologii” [Transformed Forms in Political Economy: Questions of Methodology], Ekonomika Sovet- skoj Ukrainy, 1986, No. 10, pp. 39-46. (In Russian)

Mamardashvili, M.K. “Forma prevrashchennaya” [Transformed Form], Novaya filosofskaya en- ciklopediya [New encyclopedia of philosophy], Vol. 4, ed. by V.S. Stepin et al. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 2001, pp. 264-266. (In Russian)

Mamardashvili, M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu [As I understand philosophy], 2^nd ed. Moscow: Progress Publ.; Kul'tura Publ., 1992. 416 pp. (In Russian)

Marks, K. & Engels, F. Sochineniya [Works], 50 Vols., 2^nd ed. Moscow: Izd-vo politicheskoj li- teratury Publ., 1955-1981. (In Russian)

Marx, K. & Engels, F. Werke, Bd. 23: Das Kapital, Bd. I. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1968. 955 S.

Nemykina, O.I. “Ponyatie virtual'nosti v filosofskom kontekste” [The concept of virtuality in a philosophical context], Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Gu- manitarnye nauki, 2011, No. 1 (17), pp. 53-62. (In Russian)

Nicholas of Cusa. Sochineniya [Works], Vol. 2, trans. by A.F. Losev, V.V. Bibikhin and Yu.A. Shichalin. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1979. 471 pp. (In Russian)

Nosov, N.A. “Virtual'naya real'nost'” [Virtual Reality], Voprosy filosofii, 1999, No. 10, pp. 152-- 164. (In Russian)

Ragozina, T.E. “Forma prevrashchennaya kak universal'naya kategoriya dialektiki” [Form transformed as a universal category of dialectics], Kultura i civilizaciya, 2017, No. 2 (6), pp. 60-69. (In Russian)

Rimskij, V.P. & Kalinina, G.I. “Samopolaganie nauki i prevrashchennye formy znaniya” [Self- positing of science and transformed forms of knowledge], Nauchnye vedomosti, Seriya Filosofiya, Sociologiya, Pravo, 2012, No. 20 (139), Iss. 22, pp. 28-39. (In Russian)

Rozin, V.M. “Oblasti upotrebleniya i priroda virtual'nykh real'nostei” [Areas of use and nature of virtual realities], Tekhnologii virtual'noi real'nosti. Sostoyanie i tendentsii razvitiya [Virtual reality technologies. Status and development trends], ed. by N.A. Nosov. Moscow: ITAR-TASS Publ., 1996, pp. 57-68. (In Russian)

Rushanik, B.A. “Cherez prevrashchennye formy - k politicheskoj ekonomii socializma” [Through transformed forms to the political economy of socialism], Ekonomicheskie nauki, 2012, No. 2 (87), pp. 46-50. (In Russian)

Ruzavin, G.I. “Virtual'nost'” [Virtual], Novaya filosofskaya enciklopediya [New encyclopedia of philosophy], Vol. 1, ed. by V.S. Stepin et al. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 2000, pp. 404. (In Russian)

Tanyushina, A.A. “Virtual'nyj realizm, informacionnaya ontologiya soznaniya i strukturnyj re- alizm v filosofii Devida Chalmersa” [Virtual Realism, Information Ontology of Consciousness and Structural Realism in the Philosophy of David Chalmers], Filosofskij zhur- nal / Philosophy Journal, 2021, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 53-64. (In Russian)

Размещено на Allbest.ru