Роль скептичної очевидності в першій і другій "Медитаціях" сумнів за Декартом і Секстом Емпіриком

23. Perler, D. (2004). Was There a Pyrrhonian Crisis in Early Modern Philosophy? A Critical Notice of Richard H. Popkin. Archiv fьr Geschichte der Philosophie, 86(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.2004.009

24. Popkin, R. (2003). The History of Scepticism: from Savonarola to Bayle.Oxford,& New York: Oxford UP.

25. Scribano, E. (2008).Guida alla lettura delle Meditazioni metafisiche di Descartes.Roma: Laterza.

26. Sextus Empiricus. (1569). Adversus Mathematicos. Pyrrhoniarum Hypotyposeon. (H. Stephanus, &G. Hervetus, Trans.). Parisiis : Apud Martinum Iuvenem.

27. Sextus Empiricus. (1621). Sextou Empeirikou ta sцzomena. = Sexti Empirici Opera quae extant. Geneuae: Sumptibus Petri & Jacobi Chouлt.

28. Sirven, J.-E. (1928). Les Annйes d'apprentissage de Descartes, 1596-1628. Albi: Imprimee Cooperative du Sud-Quest.]

29. Sosa,E. (1997). How to resolve the pyrrhonian problematic: A lesson from Descartes. Philosophical Studies, 85(2-3): 229-249.

30. Westphal, K. R. (1987). Sextus Empiricus Contra Renй Descartes. Philosophy Research Archives, 13, 91-128. https://doi.org/10.5840/pra1987/19881330

References

1. Brahami, F. (2006). Pourquoi Prenons-nous Titre D'кtre?: Pensйe de soi et pensйe de Dieu chez Montaigne et Descartes. Revue de Mйtaphysique et de Morale, 49(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.061.0021

2. Broughton, J. (2002). Descartes's Method of Doubt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.

3. Descartes, R. (1996). Њuvres complиtes in 11 vol.(СЕ Adam, & P. Tannery, Eds.). Paris: Vrin.

4. Descartes, R. (2014). Meditations on First Philosophy. Metaphysical meditations. [In Latin, French, & Ukrainian]. In O. Khoma (Ed.), Descartes ' "Meditations ” in the Mirror of Contemporary Interpretations. Kyiv: Duh i Litera.

5. Duncan, S. M. (2008). The proof of the external world: Cartesian theism and the possibility of knowledge. Cambridge, U.K.: James Clarke.

6. Eva, L. (2013). Montaigne et les Academica de Cicйron, Astйrion, 11. Retrieved from http://asterion.revues.org/2364

7. Giocanti, S. (2002). Descartes face au doute scandaleux des sceptiques. Dix-septiиme siиcle, 217(4), 663-673. https://doi.org/10.3917/dss.024.0663

8. Giocanti, S. (2006). Descartes s'est-il dйbarassй du scepticisme? Cahiers philosophiques, 106, 71-83.

9. Giocanti, S. (2011). Hйriter de Montaigne а l'вge classique: les exemples de Descartes, Pascal et La Mothe Le Vayer. Littйratures classiques, 75(2), 27-50.https://doi.org/10.3917/licla.075.0027

10. Giocanti, S. (2013). Comment traiter de ce qui n'est pas “entiиrement certain et indubitable”. Descartes hйritier des Acadйmiques de Cicйron. Astйrion, 11. Retrieved from http://asterion.revues.org/2371

11. Gouhier, H. (1999). La pensйe mйtaphysique de Descartes. Paris: Vrin.

12. Kambouchner, D. (2005). Les Mйditations mйtaphysiques"de Descartes. I. Introduction gйnйrale: Mйditation I. Paris: PUF.

13. Maia Neto, J. R. (1997). Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy. Journal of the History of Ideas, 58(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1353/ihi.1997.0018

14. Maia Neto, J. R. (2003). Charron's epoche and Descartes' cogito: the sceptical base of Descartes' refutation of skepticism. In G. Paganini (Ed.), The Return of Scepticism.From Hobbes and Descartes to Bayle.Dordrecht: Springer.

15. Maia Neto,J. R. (2014). Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy: The Charronian Legacy 1601-1662. Cham: Springer.

16. Maia Neto,J. R. (2014). Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy: The Charronian Legacy 1601-1662. Cham: Springer.

17. Navarro, J. (2010). Scepticism, Stoicism and Subjectivity: Reappraising Montaigne's Influence on Descartes. Contrastes: Revista Interdisciplinar de Filosofa, 15(1-2), 243-260.

18. Paganini, G. (2008). Skepsis: le dйbat des modernes sur le scepticisme: Montaigne, Le Vayer, Campanella, Hobbes, Descartes, Bayle. Paris: Vrin.

19. Paganini, G. (2009). Descartes and Renaissance skepticism: The Sanches case. In J. Maia Neto, G. Paganini, & J. Laursen (Eds.), Skepticism in the modern age.Building on the work of Richard Popkin, (pp. 249-268). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ei.9789004177840.i-39Q.57

20. Panych, O. A. (2007). Exploration on the history of skepticism in the British-American epistemology. Part 1: British modern philosophy (Hobbes, Locke, Barkley, Hume, Reid).[In Ukrainian]. Donetsk: DonNU.

21. Perler, D. (2004). Was There a Pyrrhonian Crisis in Early Modern Philosophy? A Critical Notice of Richard H. Popkin. Archiv fьr Geschichte der Philosophie, 86(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.2004.009

22. Popkin, R. (2003). The History of Scepticism: from Savonarola to Bayle.Oxford,& New York: Oxford UP.

23. Scribano, E. (2008).Guida alla lettura delle Meditazioni metafisiche di Descartes.Roma: Laterza.

24. Secundant, S. G. (2013). Leibniz' Epistemology in its normative and critical bases. [In Russian]. Odesa: Pechatnyi Dom.

25. Sextus Empiricus. (1569). Adversus Mathematicos. Pyrrhoniarum Hypotyposeon. (H. Stephanus, &G. Hervetus, Trans.). Parisiis : Apud Martinum Iuvenem.

26. Sextus Empiricus. (1621). Sextou Empeirikou ta sцzomena. = Sexti Empirici Opera quae extant. Geneuae: Sumptibus Petri & Jacobi Chouлt.

27. Sirven, J.-E. (1928). Les Annйes d'apprentissage de Descartes, 1596-1628. Albi: Imprimee Cooperative du Sud-Quest.]

28. Sosa,E. (1997). How to resolve the pyrrhonian problematic: A lesson from Descartes. Philosophical Studies, 85(2-3): 229-249.

29. Westphal,K. R. (1987). Sextus Empiricus Contra Renй Descartes. Philosophy Research Archives, 13, 91-128. https://doi.org/10.5840/pra1987/19881330

Размещено на Allbest.ru