The Impact of European Languages in Former Colonial territories

A case study of the impact of a European language (English) in a former colonial territory (Pakistan). As Pakistan is a frontline state helping the United States to fight terrorism while, and having an educational system too, which can create terrorists.

Рубрика Иностранные языки и языкознание
Вид магистерская работа
Язык английский
Дата добавления 25.06.2010
Размер файла 114,2 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

Annexure-1

Literacy in English

1951 Numbers

Percentage

1961 Numbers

Percentage

Mother Tongue Speakers

12,359

0.016

20,343

0.02

Number able to read and write

1,953,221

2.58

2,403,099

2.67

Number able to read

452,249

0.60

49,198

0.05

Number who commonly speak either as mother tongue or additional language

1,377,567

1.82

1,262,140

1.40

Source:1951: Table 8.A (Language of literacy); Table 7 (Mother Tongue) population 75,635,496.

Census 1961:Statement 5.1 (Mother Tongue); 5.5 (Literacy in Main languages). Population: 90,282,674.

NB:The above information was not provided in any of the subsequent Censuses (1972, 1981 and 1998).

Annexure-2

Number of Students who appear in Pakistani Examinations Versus those who appear in British Examinations

Total SSC (Pakistani Matriculation)

1,026,805 (2002 Annual)

Total HSSC (Pakistani F.A/F.Sc)

5,02,209 (2002 Annual)

Total O' Level (British Ordinary School Leaving Certificate)

10,546 (2002 Annual)

Total A' Level (British Advanced School Leaving Certificate)

5,680 (2002 Annual)

Ratio of Pakistani School Examinees to British Ones

Pakistani Matriculation (SSC)

1,026,805

98.95%

British GCE O' Level

10,546

1.05%

Pakistani Intermediate (HSSC)

5,02,209

98.88%

British GCE `A' Level

5,680

1.12%

Sources:For SSC/HSSC 24 BISE's of Pakistan. Data Base of Inter-Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Islamabad.

For O' and A' Level, British Council, Examination Section, Islamabad, May 2004.

Annexure-3

Monthly Income and Social Mobility of Students and Faculty in Different Educational Institutions in Pakistan

The government of Pakistan gives income in quintiles. These are calculated in Appendix-C of PIHS (2002). The income is in Pakistani rupees per month per capita is as follows:

1st QRs. 620.45 and below

2nd QRs. 620.46 - 769.9

3rd QRs. 769.1-947.53

4th QRs. 947.54-1254.53

5th QRs. 1254.54 and above.

For this survey, the present author has calculated income in rupees per month and divided it according to socio-economic class. This information has been collected in response to section 1 of the questionnaire which is given in Annexure-2.

Section-1: Monthly Income

The figures below give the monthly income of the families of students and faculty as reported by them in our sample. Those who have not written the income, as well as those those who have, have been tabulated separately. The correspondence with socio-economic class, however rough, is as follows:

Working (lower) class=Upto Rs 5000 per month.

Lower middle class=5001 - 10,000

Middle class=10,001-20,000

Upper middle class=20,001 - 50,000

Lower upper class=50,001 - 100,000

Middle upper class=Above 100,000

The income is for the whole family and not of the individuals earning it. In most cases income of female has not been written presumably because they are housewives and do not get paid. In case their income is written, the family income is calculated by adding their income to the income of the male earning member's income.

Income of the Families of Madrassa Students N = 142

Not written

Upto 5,000

5,001-10,000

10,001- 20,000

20,001- 50,000

50,000- 100,000

Pay father

65 of 142 (47.77%)

59 of 77 (76.62%)

10 of 77 (14.86%)

04 of 77 (5.19%)

04 of 77 (5.19%)

Nil

Pay mother

139 of 142 (97.89%)

02 of 3 (66.66%)

1 of 3 (33.33%)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Father and Mother

N.A

1 of 3 (33.33%)

01 of 3 (33.33%)

1 of 3 (33.33%)

Analysis: Most madrassa students belong to the working classes.

Income of the Families of Madrassa Teachers N = 27

Not written

Upto 5,000

5,001-10,000

10,001- 20,000

20,001- 50,000

50,000- 100,000

Pay self

09 of 27 (33.33%)

13 of 18 (72.22%)

03 of 18 (16.66%)

02 of 18 (11.11%)

Nil

Nil

Pay spouse

26 of 27 (96.30%)

01 of 1 (100%)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Husband and wife

N.A

Nil

01 of 1 (100%)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Analysis: Most madrassa teachers belong to the working classes.

Income of the Families of Elitist English School Faculty N = 65

Not written

Upto 5,000

5,001-10,000

10,001- 20,000

20,001- 50,000

50,000- 100,000

Above 100,000

Pay self

11 of 65 (16.92%)

03 of 54 (5.55%)

22 of 54 (40.74%)

18 of 54 (33.33%)

10 of 54 (15.38%)

01 of 54 (1.85%)

Nil

Pay spouse

55 of 65 (84.62%)

Nil

1 of 10 (10%)

6 of 10 (60%)

02 of 10 (20%)

01 of 10 (10%)

Nil

Husband and wife

N.A

Nil

Nil

3 of 10 (30%)

04 of 10 (40%)

02 of 10 (20%)

01 of 10 (10%)

Analysis: Most teachers have written their own income but not of their spouses. They fall between middle and upper middle class brackets. When husband and wife both earn, the family goes up in income even going into the lower upper class.

Income of the Families of Elitist English School Students N = 116

Not written

Upto 5,000

5,001-10,000

10,001- 20,000

20,001- 50,000

50,000- 100,000

Above 100,000

Pay father

81 of 116 (69.83%)

Nil

01 of 35 (2.86%)

03 of 35 (8.57%)

18 of 35 (51.43%)

08 of 35 (22.86%)

05 of 35 (14.29%)

Pay mother

101 of 116 (87.07%)

1 of 15 (6.66%)

03 of 15 (20%)

02 of 15 (13.33%)

08 of 15 (53.33%)

1 of 15 (6.66%)

Nil

Father and mother

N.A

1 of 15 (6.66%)

02 of 15 (13.33%)

Nil

04 of 15 (26.66%)

05 of 15 (33.33%)

03 of 15 (20%)

Analysis:

Most of them have not written their parents' income. Out of those who have most belong to the upper middle class. More than one third belong to the upper classes

Income of Families of Urdu-medium School Students N = 230

Not written

Upto 5,000

5,001-10,000

10,001- 20,000

20,001- 50,000

50,000- 100,000

Above 100,000

Pay father

95 of 230 (41.31%)

83 of 135 (61.48%)

36 of 135 (26.66%)

13 of 135 (9.63%)

03 of 135 (2.22%)

Nil

Nil

Pay mother

220 of 230 (95.65%)

8 of 10 (80%)

2 of 10 (20%)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Father and mother

N.A

2 of 10 (20%)

4 of 10 (40%)

4 of 10 (40%)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Analysis:

Most have written their fathers' income but not their mothers' who are probably housewives. Out of those of who have written, most belong to working class families. About a quarter, however, also belong to the lower middle classes. Very few are above that in income.

Income of the Families of the Faculty of Urdu-medium Schools N = 100

Not written

Upto 5,000

5,001-10,000

10,001- 20,000

20,001- 50,000

50,000- 100,000

Above 100,000

Pay self

6 of 100 (6%)

17 of 94 (18.09%)

62 of 94 (65.96%)

15 of 94 (15.96%)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Pay spouse

82 of 100 (82%)

3 of 18 (16.66%)

06 of 18 (33.33%)

07 of 18 (38.89%)

02 of 18 (11.11%)

Nil

Nil

Husband and wife

N.A

Nil

Nil

09 of 18 (50%)

09 of 18 (50%)

Nil

Nil

Analysis:

Most earners have written their income but not that of their spouse. Most belong to the lower middle class. Out of the few spouses whose income is reported, a fairly large proportion tend to have middle class incomes and a very small minority even higher than that.

Income of the families of Public School and Cadet College Students N = 130

Not written

Upto 5,000

5,001-10,000

10,001- 20,000

20,001- 50,000

50,000- 100,000

Above 100,000

Pay father

72 of 130 (55.38%)

Nil

5 of 58 (8.62%)

17 of 58 (29.31%)

33 of 58 (56.90%)

3 of 58 (5.17%)

Nil

Pay mother

111 of 130 (85.39%)

2 of 19 (10.53%)

8 of 19 (42.11%)

4 of 19 (21.05%)

5 of 19 (26.32%)

Nil

Nil

Father and mother

N.A

Nil

Nil

2 of 19 (10.53%)

11 of 19 (57.89%)

4 of 19 (21.05%)

Nil

Analysis:

Most have written their father's income but not that of their mother. They mostly fall in the upper middle class. Very few of them, however, also fall in the lower upper classes.

Income of the Faculty of Cadet Colleges/Public Schools N= 51

Not written

Upto 5,000

5,001-10,000

10,001- 20,000

20,001- 50,000

50,000- 100,000

Above 100,000

Pay self

1 of 51 (1.96%)

1 of 50 (2%)

17 of 50 (34%)

28 of 50 (56%)

4 of 50 (8%)

Nil

Nil

Pay spouse

45 of 51 (88.24%)

Nil

1 of 6 (16.66%)

5 of 6 (83.33%)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Husband and wife

N.A

Nil

Nil

1 of 6 (16.66%)

5 of 6 (83.33%)

Nil

Nil

Analysis:

Most have written their own income but not their wife's. They fall mostly in the middle class with families, where husband and wife both earn, falling mostly in the upper middle class.

Annexure-4

Survey 2003

Survey of Schools and Madrassas,

This survey was conducted between December 2002 and April 2003 with the help of two research assistants Imran Farid and Shahid Gondal whom I take this opportunity to thank. The survey was conducted in Islamabad (myself), Rawalpindi (myself), Peshawar (myself), Karachi (myself), Mandi Bahauddin (Shahid Gondal), Lahore, Faisalabad and Multan (Imran Farid). It was a stratified, non-random survey because a complete list of all target institutions was not available. Moreover, we had to restrict ourselves to urban areas because we neither had the time nor the resources to venture into rural ones.

The major stratas are (1) Urdu-medium school, (2) elitist English-medium schools (3) Cadet Colleges/Public Schools and (4) madrassas. Gender-wise breakdown is available but is not given here for the sake of brevity. The following chart helps explain these strata:

STUDENTS

M (ale)

F (emale)

Total

English-medium

62

52

116

Cadet college/public schools

130

Nil

130

Urdu-medium

123

107

230

Madrassas

142

Nil

142

Grand Total

618

As the views of each strata are taken separately, they do not represent their proportional share in the student population of Pakistan.

The ages of the students are as follows

Institutions

Mean

Mode

Range

Cadet colleges

15.5

15

12-19

Madrassas

19

20

14-27

English-medium schools

14.1

15

13-18

In the case of the madrassas the range is higher because some of the sanvia class groups had older boys who had joined the seminary late. In the O'level groups both 10th and 11th were represented. Urdu-medium schools had only class-10 clusters.

The questionnaire for students is reproduced here.

QUESTIONNAIRE (STUDENTS)

DO NOT WRITE YOUR NAME TO ENSURE SECRECY. WRITE THE NAME of your SCHOOL with medium of Instruction.

age.

Class

Sex(1)Male(2)Female

What is the occupation of your father? Give his rank, title, occupational status; salary; grade; income from all sources etc?

What is the occupation of your mother? Give her rank, title, occupational status, salary, grade, income from all sources etc?

PART-II

What should be Pakistan's priorities?

1.Take Kashmir away from India by an open war?

(1)Yes(2)No(3)Don't Know

2.Take Kashmir away from India by supporting Jihadi groups to fight with the Indian army?

(1)Yes(2)No(3)Don't Know

3.Support Kashmir cause through peaceful means only (i.e. no open war or sending Jihadi groups across the line of control?).

(1)Yes(2)No(3)Don't Know

4.Give equal rights to Ahmedis in all jobs etc?

(1)Yes(2)No(3)Don't Know

5.Give equal rights to Pakistani Hindus in all jobs etc?

(1)Yes(2)No(3)Don't Know

6.Give equal rights to Pakistani Christians in all jobs etc?

(1)Yes(2)No(3)Don't Know

7.Give equal rights to men and women as in Western countries?

(1)Yes(2)No(3)Don't Know

Consolidated Data of Opinions Indicating Militancy and Tolerance Among three Types of Schools Students in Pakistan in Survey 2003 (in percentages)

Abbreviated Questions

Madrassas

Urdu-medium

English-medium

Cadet Colleges/ Public Schools

1.

Open War

Yes

59.86

39.56

25.86

36.92

No

31.69

53.04

64.66

60.00

Don't Know

8.45

7.39

9.48

3.08

2.

Jihadi groups

Yes

52.82

33.04

22.41

53.08

No

32.39

45.22

60.34

40.00

Don't Know

14.79

21.74

17.24

6.92

3.

Peaceful means

Yes

33.80

75.65

72.41

56.15

No

54.93

18.26

18.97

36.92

Don't Know

11.27

6.09

8.62

6.92

4.

Ahmedis

Yes

12.68

46.95

65.52

41.54

No

82.39

36.95

9.48

36.92

Don't Know

4.93

16.09

25.00

21.54

5.

Hindus

Yes

16.90

47.39

78.45

64.62

No

76.06

42.61

13.79

31.54

Don't Know

7.04

10.00

7.76

3.85

6.

Christians

Yes

18.31

65.65

83.62

76.92

No

73.24

26.52

8.62

18.46

Don't Know

8.45

7.83

7.76

4.62

7.

Women

Yes

16.90

75.22

90.52

67.69

No

77.46

17.39

6.03

25.38

Don't Know

5.63

7.39

3.45

6.92

NB:Figures for (3) are uninterpretable because some respondents ticked opinion (1) and/or (2) while also ticking (3).

Annexure-5

Circulation of English Periodicals

Year

Circulation of English Periodicals

Circulation of Periodicals in other languages

Total circulation

Circulation of English periodicals to total circulation in percentages

1994

727,772

4,424,956

5,152,728

14.12

1995

712,698

5,046,292

5,758,990

12.38

1996

636,440

4,696,862

5,333,302

11.93

1997

675,185

5,063,582

5,738,767

11.77

1998

637,140

5,889,499

6,526,639

9.76

1999

701,018

6,609,968

7,310,986

10.61

2000

722,443

6,736,219

7,458,662

9.69

2001

747,165

6,841,971

7,589,136

9.85

2002

835,435

7,140,742

7,976,177

10.47

2003

866,825

7,383,810

8,250,635

10.51

Source:Audit Bureau of Circulation, Ministry of Information are Broadcasting, Govt. of Pakistan, May 2004.

Annexure-6

Number of English Periodicals

Year

Number of English Periodicals

Total Number of Periodicals

Percentage of English periodicals out of the total number of periodicals

1994

152

3242

4.69

1995

180

3429

5.25

1996

162

3444

4.70

1997

368

4455

8.26

1998

215

1344

16.00

1999

215

1571

13.69

2000

150

815

18.40

2001

153

763

20.05

2002

163

720

22.64

2003

204

945

21.59

Source:Provincial Public Relations Department, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of Pakistan, may 2004.

Annexure-7

Films Examined by the Central Board of Film Censors (2003)

Language of the Film

Number

Percentage out of the total

*English

34

40.96

Urdu

18

21.69

Punjabi

15

18.07

Pashto

15

18.07

Other

01

1.20

Total

83

100

Source:Central Board of Film Censors, Govt. of Pakistan.

*Out of these 11 (13.25 per cent) were dubbed into Urdu. Others were to be shown in English without being dubbed.

Annexure-8

Increase in O' and A' Level Candidates in 2001-2003 of the Cambridge Board of Examinations

Year

Number of O' Level Candidates

Number of A' Level Candidates

2002 (June)

10,139

5,459

2003 (June)

12,669

6,984

Source:British Council, Islamabad, Pakistan, June 2004.

NB:Examinations are held in November and June. Besides the Cambridge Board, the London Board also conducts these examinations.

Annexure-9

DIFFERENCES IN COSTS IN MAJOR TYPES OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (in Pakistani rupees)

Institution

Average cost per student per year

Payer (s)

Cost to the state

Madrassas

5,714 (includes board and lodging)

Philanthropists + religious organizations

*Rs. 1.55 in 2001-02 an additional sum of Rs. 28.60 for subsidies on computers, books etc in some madrassas in 2003-04.

Urdu-medium Schools

2264.5 (only tuition)

State

2264.5

Elitist English medium schools

96,000---for `A' level & 36,000 for other levels (only tuition)

Parents

None reported except subsidized land in some cantonments.

Cadet colleges/public schools

90,061 (tuition and all facilities).

Parents + state (average of 6 cadet colleges + 1 public school

14,171 (average of 5 cadet colleges only)

*The cost per student per year in the madrassas is calculated for all 1,065,277 students reported in 2000. In 2001-02 a sum of Rs. 1,654,000 was given by the government to those madrassas which accepted financial help. In 2003-04 Rs. 30.45 million will be given in addition for computerization and modernization of textbooks. However, not all students receive this subsidy as their madrassas refuse government help (these figures are from IPS 2002: tables 1.17 and 1.19).

Source:Data obtained from several institutions.

References

1. Abbas, Shemeem.1993. The Power of English in Pakistan. World Englishes 12; 2: 147-56.

2. Ahmar, Mahboob.2003. The Future of English in Pakistan Islamabad: Strengthening Participatory Organizations Discussion Paper

3. Ahmed, Shakeel. 1989. Sir Sahibzada Abdul Qayum: Life and Work. Peshawar: Islamabad College, University of Peshawar.

4. Aziz, Shah Abdul. n. d. Fatawa-e-Azizi. Repr. Karachi: Saud Company.

5. Baumgardner, Robert J. 1993. The English Language in Pakistan. Karachi, Karachi Oxford University Press.

6. Census. 1998. Census Report of Pakistan Islamabad: Population Census Organization Statistics Division. Govt. of Pakistan 2001.

7. Census. 1984. Census Report of Pakistan-1981. Islamabad: Population Census Organization, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan.

8. CII. 1983. Islamization of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898: 9th Report of the Council of Islamic Ideology Islamabad: Council of Islamic Ideology Government of Pakistan.

9. Crystal, David. 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10. Darlymple, William .2002. The White Mughals London: Harper-Collins.

11. Fisher, Michael H. 1996. The First Indian Author in English: Dean Mahomet (1759-1851) in India, Ireland, and England. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

12. Fisher. 1826. `Memoir compiled from the records of the India Government at the East India House, in pursuance of a Minute of the Committee of Correspondence of the 7th February 1826, “showing the extent to which aid has been afforded by the local Government in India, towards the establishment of Native schools in that country”. In Basu, A. N (ed). 1952. India Education in Parliamentary Papers: Part-I (1832). Bombay: Asia Publishing House: 1-143.

13. GOP. 1966. Report of the Commission on Student's Problems and Welfare and Problems Islamabad : Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan

14. Grimes, Barbara F (ed). 2000. `Pakistan'. In Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 14th Edition Dallas, Texas; Summer Institute of Linguistics. pp, 588-598.

15. Hampton, H. V. 1947. Biographical Studies in Modern Indian Education. Madras: Oxford University Press.

16. Haque, A. R. 1983. `The Position and Status of English', in Pakistan, in World Language English, Vol. 2, No. 1 Great Britain: Pergamon Press.

17. Jabbar, Javed. 2004. `Interview of Senator Javaed Jabbar', Islamabad, 07 June.

18. Khan, Seid Ghulam Hossein. 1789. The Seir Mutaqherin: or Review of Modern Times: Being an History of India as far down as the year 1783 the whole written in Persian. Trans into English, by tota Manus. 4 vols. Reprinted. Lahore: Sheikh Mubarak Ali, Oriental Publishers and Booksellers, 1975.

19. Khan, Asif. 1998. `Varlian Mooan Jamdian Nams Jenam De Nan'. Interview of Asif Khan by the panel of Chetar. In Chetar [Punjabi: Department of Punjabi, Oriental College, Lahore]: 48-70.

20. Khan, Ayub. 1967. Friends Not Masters: A Political Autobiography. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

21. Mansoor, Sabiha. 1993. Punjabi, Urdu English in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic Study. Lahore: Vanguard.

22. Mansoor, Sabiha. 2002. `The Role of English in Higher Education in Pakistan', Unpublished Ph. D Thesis, University of Reading.

23. Muhammad, Rahma. 2003. `Welcome to Bloggistan U.S. [Magazine of The News] 07 November 2003 see www.pakibloggers.blogspot.com

24. Mahbub, Ahmar. 2003. The Future of English in Pakistan, Strengthening Participatory Organization Discussion Paper Series.

25. Menzes. 2004. `Drama of the Devilish Diplomat', The Friday Times [Lahore] 21-27 May.

26. Rahman, Tariq 1991. A History of Pakistani Literature in English Lahore: Vanguard.

27. Rahman, Tariq. 1996. Language and Polities in Pakistan Karachi, Oxford University Press.

28. Rahman, Tariq. 1990. Pakistani English: The Linguistic Description of a Non-Native Variety of English, Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad.

29. Rahman, Tariq. 2002. Language, Ideology and Power, Language Learning Among the Muslims of Pakistan and North India Karachi: Oxford University Press.

30. Rizvi. Abbas. 1982, Shah Abd al-Aziz: Puritanism, Sectarian Polemics and Jihad. Australia: Ma'rifat Publishing House.

31. Shamsie, Kamila .2004. `In Their Own Write', Newsline [Karachi] (June), 108-09.


Подобные документы

  • Language is the most important aspect in the life of all beings. General information about Proto-Indo-European language. Proto-Indo-European phonology. Comparison of modern languages of origin. All words about family, particularly family members.

    курсовая работа [30,2 K], добавлен 12.12.2013

  • Strengthening of international fight against terrorism. Terrorism in Spain, in Northern Ireland, in Greece. The number of European deaths from terror. The phenomenon of terrorism exits everywhere, in spite of the geographical location, level of democracy.

    курсовая работа [44,1 K], добавлен 30.03.2011

  • France is a member state of the European Union, the largest one by area. It is also the third largest in Europe behind Russia and Ukraine. It would be second if its extra-European territories like French Guiana. It is a unitary semi-presidential republic.

    презентация [8,2 M], добавлен 02.05.2010

  • The history of the English language. Three main types of difference in any language: geographical, social and temporal. Comprehensive analysis of the current state of the lexical system. Etymological layers of English: Latin, Scandinavian and French.

    реферат [18,7 K], добавлен 09.02.2014

  • The case of the combination of a preposition with a noun in the initial form and description of cases in the English language: nominative, genitive, dative and accusative. Morphological and semantic features of nouns in English and Russian languages.

    курсовая работа [80,1 K], добавлен 05.05.2011

  • Washington is the northwestern-most state of the contiguous United States. Geographical position, climatе, demographics of the state. Rain shadov effects. History of settling of coast. Washington has the least progressive tax structure in the U.S.

    презентация [5,5 M], добавлен 13.06.2010

  • The oldest words borrowed from French. Unique domination of widespread languages in a certain epoch. French-English bilinguism. English is now the most widespread of the word's languages. The French Language in England. Influence on English phrasing.

    курсовая работа [119,6 K], добавлен 05.09.2009

  • Comparative analysis and classification of English and Turkish consonant system. Peculiarities of consonant systems and their equivalents and opposites in the modern Turkish language. Similarities and differences between the consonants of these languages.

    дипломная работа [176,2 K], добавлен 28.01.2014

  • In the world there are thousands of different languages. How indeed modern English is optimum mean for intercourse of people of different nationalities. Knowledge of English is needed for the effective teaching subsequent work and improvement of our life.

    сочинение [13,7 K], добавлен 11.02.2009

  • The old Germanic languages, their classification and principal features. The chronological division of the History of English. The role of the Wessex dialect. The Norman Conquest and its effect on English. The Germanic languages in the modern world.

    контрольная работа [34,7 K], добавлен 17.01.2010

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.