The relationship between economic globalization and ecological footprint: empirical evidence for developed and developing countries
Examining the relationship between economic globalization and the Ecological Footprint in countries with different levels of development using possible generalized least squares (FGLS) analysis. Development of communication technologies and trade.
| Рубрика | Международные отношения и мировая экономика |
| Вид | статья |
| Язык | английский |
| Дата добавления | 06.06.2023 |
| Размер файла | 907,7 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060.
5. Ahmed, Z., Cary, M., & Le, H. P. (2021b). Accounting asymmetries in the long-run nexus between globalization and environmental sustainability in the United States: an aggregated and disaggregated investigation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106511.
6. Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., Mahmood, F., Hafeez, M., & Ali, N. (2019). Does
globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(18), 18565-18582.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9.
7. Aluko, O. A., Opoku, E. E. O., & Ibrahim, M. (2021). Investigating the
environmental effects of globalization: insights from selected industrialized countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 281, 111892.
https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvman.2020.111892.
8. Apaydin, §. (2020). Effects of globalization on ecological footprint: the case of Turkey. Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, 5(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.695836.
9. Apaydin, §., Ursava§, U., & Ko?, U. (2021). The impact of globalization on the ecological footprint: do convergence clubs matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 53379-53393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021- 14300-y.
10. Bai, J., Choi, S. H., & Liao, Y. (2021). Feasible generalized least squares for panel data with cross-sectional and serial correlations. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01977-2.
11. Bataka, H. (2021). Globalization and environmental pollution in Sub- Saharan Africa. African Journal of Economic Review, IX(I), 191-213. Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajer/article/view/201943.
12. Bilgili, F. Ulucak, R., Ko?ak, E., & ilkay, S. Q. (2020). Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 1087-1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06996-w.
13. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Application to Model Specifications in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111.
14. Can, M., Dogan, B., & Saboori, B. (2020). Does trade matter for environmental degradation in developing countries? New evidence in the context of export product diversification. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 14702-14710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08000-2.
15. Chang, C-P., & Lee, C-C. (2010). Globalization and economic growth: a political economy analysis for OECD Countries. Global Economic Review, 39(2), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2010.483835.
16. Charfeddine, L. (2017). The impact of energy consumption and economic development on ecological footprint and CO2 emissions: evidence from a Markov Switching Equilibrium Correction Model. Energy Economics, 65, 355-374. https://doi.org/10.1016yj.eneco.2017.05.009.
17. Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.09.007.
18. Copeland, B. R. (2005). Policy endogeneity and the effects of trade on the
environment. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 34(1), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500001532.
19. Copeland, B. R. (2009). Globalization and the environment In K. Anderson (Ed.), Australia's economy in its international context: The Joseph Fisher Lectures, vol. 2: 1956-2012 (pp. 575-598). University of Adelaide Press. Available at: http://wwwjstor.org/stable/10.20851/j.ctt1t304mv.35.
20. Copeland, B. R., Shapiro, J. S., & Taylor, M. S. (2021). Globalization and the environment (Working Paper No. 28797). Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w28797.
21. Qetin, M., & Saygin, S. (2019). Empirical analysis of environmental
Kuznets Curve hypothesis: the example of Turkish Economy. Journal of Management and Economics, 26(2), 529-546.
https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.491110.
22. Destek, M. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Investigation of Environmental
Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Science of Total Environment, 650, 2, 2483-2489.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017.
23. Destek, M. A. (2020). Investigation on the role of economic, social and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 33601-33614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 019-04698-x.
24. Dinda, S. (2006). Globalization and environment: can pollution haven hypothesis alone explain the impact of globalization on environment? (MPRA Paper No. 50590). Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59111.
25. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new
Index of Globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091-1110.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078.
26. El Alaoui, A. (2017). What is the relationship between environmental quality, economic growth and free trade? International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(1), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.283594.
27. Farhani, S., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(20), 15663-15676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4767-1.
28. Figge, L., Oebels, K., & Offermans, A. (2017). The effects of globalization on ecological footprints: an empirical analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(3), 863-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8.
29. Gallagher, K. P. (2009). Economic globalization and the environment.
Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 279-304.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.021407.092325.
30. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (NBER Working Paper No. w3914). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=232073.
31. Gurgul, H., & Lach, L. (2014). Globalization and economic growth: evidence from two decades of transition in CEE (MPRA Paper No. 52231). Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/52231.
32. Hansen, C. B. (2007). Generalized least squares inference in panel and multilevel models with serial correlation and fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 140(2), 670-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeconom.2006.07.011.
33. Hassan, S. T., Batool, B., Sadiq, M., & Zhu, B. (2022). How do green energy investment, economic policy uncertainty, and natural resources affect
greenhouse gas emissions? A Markov-switching equilibrium approach. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 97, 106887.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106887.
34. Herrmann, I. T., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2009). Effects of globalisation on
carbon footprints of products. CIRP Annals, 58(1), 13-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016yj.cirp.2009.03.078.
35. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2008). Globalization: a brief overview. Available at: https://www.imf.org /external/np/exr/ib/2008/053008.htm.
36. Kalayci, C., & Hayaloglu, P. (2019). The impact of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: the case of NAFTA countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(1), 356-360. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7233.
37. Karasoy, A. (2021). Examining the impacts of globalization, industrialization, and urbanization on Turkey's ecological footprint via the augmented ARDL approach. Hitit Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 208-231. http://doi. org/10.17218/hititsbd.929092.
38. Karata§, A. (2016). Environmental impacts of globalization and a solution proposal. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 6(2), 64-70. Available at: https://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_2_April_2016/8.pdf.
39. Kassouri, Y., & Altmta§, H. (2020). Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: a trade-off? Journal of environmental management, 263, 110405. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvman.2020.110405.
40. Kirikkaleli, D., Adebayo, T. S., Khan, Z., & Ali, S. (2020). Does
globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 1400914017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7.
41. Ko?ak, E. (2014). The validity of the environmental Kuznets Curve
hypothesis in Turkey: ARDL bounds test approach. Isletme ve Iktisat Calismalari Dergisi, 2(3), 62-73. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320701087.
42. Kucher, A., Heldak, M., Kucher, L., Fedorchenko, O., & Yurchenko, Yu. (2019). Consumer willingness to pay a price premium for ecological goods: case study from Ukraine. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 7(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2019-0004.
43. Kylycarslan, Z., & Dumrul, Y. (2018). The impact of globalization on
economic growth: empirical evidence from the Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(5), 115-123. Available at:
https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/6593/pdf.
44. Langnel, Z., & Amegavi, G. B. (2020). Globalization, electricity
consumption and ecological footprint: an autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, 102482.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102482.
45. Majeed, M. T., & Mazhar, M. (2020). Reexamination of environmental Kuznets Curve for ecological footprint: the role of biocapacity, human capital, and trade. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 14(1), 202-254. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/216870.
46. Mahmood, N., Wang, Z., & Hassan, S. T. (2019). Renewable energy,
economic growth, human capital, and CO2 emission: an empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 20619-20630,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05387-5.
47. McAusland, C. (2008). Globalisation's direct and indirect effects on the
environment. Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World (Guadalajara, 10-12 November 2008). Available at:
https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/greening-transport/41380703.pdf.
48. Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Economic complexity versus ecological footprint in the era of globalization: evidence from ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 64871-64881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021- 15360-w.
49. Omoke, P. C., Nwani, C., Effiong, E. L., Evbuomwan, O. O., &
Emenekwe, C. C. (2020). The impact of financial development on carbon, noncarbon, and total ecological footprint in Nigeria: new evidence from asymmetric dynamic analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(17), 2162821646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08382-3.
50. Ozbek, S., & Ogul, B. (2022). The validity of environmental Kuznets Curve
hypothesis: an empirical study on Turkey. Journal of academic Researches and Studies, 14(26), 35-46. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1041209.
51. Panayotou, T. (2000). Globalization and Environment (CID Working Paper Series 2000.53). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Available at: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1Z39569837.
52. Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental
degradation at different stages of economic development (Working Paper 238). International Labour Office (ILO). Available at:
http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1993/93B09_31_engl.pdf.
53. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of crosssection dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951.
54. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diognastic tests for cross section dependence in panels. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504.
55. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x.
56. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large
panels. Journal of Econometric, 142(1), 50-93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeconom.2007.05.010.
57. Potrafke, N. (2015). The evidence on globalisation. The World Economy, 38(3), 509-552. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12174.
58. Rao, B. B., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2011). Globalization and growth in the low income African countries with the extreme bounds analysis. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 795-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.009.
59. Rudolf, A., & Figge, L. (2017). Determinants of ecological footprints: What
is the role of globalization? Ecological Indicators, 81, 348-361.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.060.
60. Sabir, S., & Gorus, M. S. (2019). The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 33387-33398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019- 06458-3.
61. Saleem, N., Rahman, U. S. & Jun, Z. (2019). The impact of human capital and biocapacity on environment, environmental quality measure through ecological footprint and greenhouse gases. Journal of Pollution Effects & Control, 7(2(237)), https://doi.org/10.35248/2375-4397.19.7.237.
62. Samimi, P., & Jenatabadi, H. S. (2014). Globalization and economic growth: empirical evidence on the role of complementarities. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e87824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087824.
63. Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M. K., & Loganathan, N. (2015). Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecological Indicators, 52, 379393. https://doi.org/10.1016yj.ecolind.2014.12.025.
64. Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., Ali, A., & Bhattacharya, M. (2017). The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(4), 929-957. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590817400331.
65. Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Mahalik, M. K. (2018a). Is globalization detrimental to CO2 emissions in Japan? New Threshold Analysis. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 23, 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9584-0.
66. Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., Mahalik, M. K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2018b).
Does globalisation worsen environmental quality in developed economies? Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 23, 141-156.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9574-2.
67. Shahbaz, M. Lahiani, A., Abosedra, S., & Hammoudeh, S. (2018c). The role of globalization in energy consumption: a quantile cointegrating regression approach. Energy Economics, 71, 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.009.
68. Shahzadi, A., Yaseen, M. R., & Anwar, S. (2019). Relationship between globalization and environmental degradation in low income countries: an application of Kuznet Curve. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12(19), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i19/143994.
69. Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Qureshi, M. A. (2019). Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 11191-11211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04351-7.
70. Suki, N. M., Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Suki, N. M. (2020). Revisiting the environmental Kuznet Curve in Malaysia: the role of globalization in sustainable
environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121669.
https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121669.
71. Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1970). Efficient Inference in A Random Coefficient Regression Model. Econometrica, 38(2), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913012.
72. Tekba§, M. (2021). The impact of economic, social and political
globalization on economic growth: evidence from BRICS-T Countries. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(1), 57-71.
https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.796472.
73. Tetteh, B., & Baidoo, S. T. (2022). Environmental degradation, energy use, and globalization in Ghana: new empirical evidence from regime switching and neural network autoregression models. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18(1), 679-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2110680.
74. Tun5bilek, N., & Ulucak, R. (2021). The effect of globalisation on the environment in developing countries. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 452-465. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.790690.
75. Usman, O., Akadiri, S. S., & Adeshola, I. (2020). Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 30681-30693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09170-9.
76. Yang, X., Li, N., Mu, H., Zhang, M., Pang, J., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Study on the long-term and short-term effects of globalization and population aging on ecological footprint in OECD countries. Ecological Complexity, 47, 100946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2021.100946.
77. Yilanci, V., & Gorus, M. S. (2020). Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA countries? A panel causality test with a Fourier function. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 40552-40562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10092-9.
78. Ying, Y. H., Chang, K., & Lee, C. H. (2014). The impact of globalization on economic growth. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, XVII(2), 25-34. Available at: https://ipe.ro/rjef/rjef2_14/rjef2_2014p25-34.pdf.
79. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. Philadelphia, PA, New Society Publishers.
80. Wang, Q. J., Geng, Y., & Xia, X. Q. (2021). Article revisited globalization's impact on total environment: evidence based on overall environmental performance index. International of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111419.
81. Wiseley, R. A. (2020). Potentially terminal conditions: economic
globalization and ecological footprint. Available at:
https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ student_scholarship/944.
82. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 0084.2007.00477.x.
83. Xu, B., Li, S., Afzal, A., Mirza, N., & Zhang, M. (2022).
Размещено на Allbest.ru
Подобные документы
Characteristic of growth and development of Brazil and Russian Federation. Dynamics of growth and development. Gross value added by economic activity. Brazilian export of primary and manufactured goods. Export structure. Consumption side of GDP structure.
реферат [778,3 K], добавлен 20.09.2012Forum for 21 Pacific Rim countries that seeks to promote free trade and economic cooperation throughout the Asia-Pacific region. History of establishment Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), speciality of membership, scope of work and structure.
реферат [366,7 K], добавлен 16.01.2012Influence of globalization on Hospitality Industry. Basic Characteristics of Globalization in Tourism. Challenges brought by Globalization. Global promotion, advertising, e-marketing, pricing and ethics. Strategies and tends toward Globalization.
реферат [50,1 K], добавлен 30.11.2010Integration, globalization and economic openness - basical principles in attraction of capital inflows. Macroeconomic considerations. Private investment. Problems of official investment and managing foreign assets liabilities. Positive benefits from capit
курсовая работа [52,4 K], добавлен 25.02.2002Russian Federation Political and Economic relations. Justice and home affairs. German-Russian strategic partnership. The role of economy in bilateral relations. Regular meetings make for progress in cooperation: Visa facilitations, Trade relations.
реферат [26,3 K], добавлен 24.01.2013Presence of nominal rigidity as an important part of macroeconomic theory since. Definition of debt rigidity; its impact on crediting. The causes of the Japanese economic crisis; way out of it. Banking problems in United States and euro area countries.
статья [87,9 K], добавлен 02.09.2014A monetary union is a situation where сountries have agreed to share a single currency amongst themselves. First ideas of an economic and monetary union in Europe. Value, history and stages of economic and money union of Europe. Criticisms of the EMU.
реферат [20,8 K], добавлен 06.03.2010The Soviet-Indian relationship from the Khrushchev period to 1991 was. The visit by Indian prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru to the Soviet Union in June 1955 and Khrushchev's return trip to India in the fall of 1955. Economic and military assistance.
аттестационная работа [23,4 K], добавлен 22.01.2014A peaceful Europe (1945-1959): The R. Schuman declaration, attempts of Britain, government of M. Thatcher and T. Blair, the Treaty of Maastricht, social chapter, the treaty of Nice and Accession. European economic integration. Common agricultural policy.
курсовая работа [47,4 K], добавлен 09.04.2011Natural gas is one of the most important energy resources. His role in an international trade sector. The main obstacle for extending the global gas trading. The primary factors for its developing. The problem of "The curse of natural resources".
эссе [11,4 K], добавлен 12.06.2012
