Теоретичні засади фінансово-економічного стимулювання розвитку смарт-промисловості

54. Stiglitz J.E., Yifu J., Monga C. (2013). The rejuvenation of industrial policy. Policy Research Working Paper. Series 6628. The World Bank.

55. Tan R. (1995). Establishing technology transfer infrastructure as a strategy for promoting manufacturing automation in Taiwan. Technovation. Vol. 15. Iss. 7. Р. 407-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95) 96591-g

56. Tresch R. (2015). First-Best and Second-Best Analyses and the Political Economy of Public Sector Economics. Public Finance. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-41 5834-4.00003-0

57. United Kingdom public sector information website (2023). Chancellor sets out longterm vision to grow the economy. URL: https: // www.gov.uk/government/news/cha ncellor-sets-out-long-term-vision-to-growthe-economy#:~:text=Chancellor%20Jere my%20Hunt%20today%20set,site%20for %20innovators%20and%20entrepreneurs (дата звернення: 26.06.2023).

58. Wangsa I., Vanany I., Siswanto N. (2023). The optimal tax incentive and subsidy to promote electric trucks in Indonesia: Insight for government and industry. Case Studies on Transport Policy. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cstp.2023.100966

59. Zhang J., Guan J. (2018). The time-varying impacts of government incentives on innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. No. 135. Р. 132-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016zj.techfore.2018.04. 012

60. References

61. Kalat, Y. Ya. (2020). Incentives for the development of industrial parks (on the example of the border regions of Poland). Sotsialnoekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny: collection of scientific papers, 2 (142), pp. 78-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 36818/2071-4653-2020-2-11

62. Mazur, Yu.O. (2020). Analysis of state instruments for stimulating innovative technologies in the conditions of global digitalization. Econ. promysl., 4 (92), pp. 91-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry 2020. 04.091

63. Storonyanska, I.Z., & Patytska, H.O. (2022). Special economic zones as a tool for stimulating local economic development. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny: collection of scientific papers, 3 (155), pp. 3-9. DOI:

64. https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-20223-1

65. Alkhazaleh, R., Mykoniatis, K., & Alahmer, A. (2022). The Success of Technology Transfer in the Industry 4.0 Era: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of open innovation: technology, market and complexity, 8 (4), Art. 202. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/joitmc8040202

66. Allan, B., & Eaton, D. (2023). Kickstarting Canada's net-zero industrial policy. Retrieved from https://www.corporateknights. com/category-climate/kickstarting-canadanet-zero-industrial-policy/

67. Alstadsster, A., Barrios, S., Nicodeme G., Skonieczna, A.M., & Vezzani, A. (2018). Patent boxes design, patents location, and local R&D. Economic Policy, 33 (93),

68. pp. 131-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ epolic/eix021

69. Bernanke, B.S. (2011). Promoting Research and Development: The Government's Role. Retrieved from https://issues.org/bernankeresearch-development-government/

70. Bloomberg (2023а). How US Industrial Policy Is Changing the World Economy. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/ newsletters/2023 -03-30/biden-s-industrialpolicy-is-changing-the-world-economy

71. Bloomberg (2023b). Biden's Industrial Policy Gets It Right, almost. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ articles/2023-06-11/biden-s-industrialpolicy-is-working-but-could-be-better

72. Bodas Freitas, I., Castellacci, F., Fontana, R., Malerba, F., & Vezzulli, A. (2017). Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: A cross-country microeconometric analysis. Research Policy, 46(1), pp. 57-72.

73. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.respol.2016. 10.002

74. Borras, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The Choice of Innovation Policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80 (8), pp. 15131522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfo re.2013.03.002

75. Bravo-Biosca, A. (2013). Access to finance for innovation: Rationales and risks of public intervention. Policy Brief, The Innovation Policy Platform. Retrieved from https: // demo -ipp.nuvole.org/sites/default/fi les/rdf_imported_documents/Financing% 20innovation%20-%20Market%20and%20 Govnerment%20Failures%20Policy%20 Brief.pdf

76. Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45 (2), pp. 442-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008

77. Bunn, D. (2021). Tax Subsidies for R&D Spending and Patent Boxes in OECD Countries. Retrieved from https://taxfoundation.org/ rd-tax-credit-rd-tax-subsidies-oecd/

78. Cappelen, A., Raknerud, A., & Rybalka, M. (2012). The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Research Policy, 41 (2), pp. 334-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.respol.2011.10.001

79. Carboni, O. (2017). The effect of public support on investment and R&D: An empirical evaluation on European manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, pp. 282-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/jztechfore.2016.11. 017

80. China's Industrial Policy. (2023). Retrieved from https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/ chinas-industrial-policy

81. Coriat, B. (2000). Entre politique de la concurrence et politique commerciale, quelle politique industrielle pour l'Union europeenne? Supplement G in La Documentation Fran$aise (ed.), CAE Report No. 26. Politique industrielle, Paris, France.

82. Dechezlepretre, A., Einio, E., Martin, R., Nguyen, K.T., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (No. w22405). National Bureau of Economic Research.

83. Efficacite et Transparence des Acteurs Europeens (2022). Berlin proclaims (European) `year of industrial policy'. Retrieved from https: //www. euractiv. com/ section/economyjobs/news/berlin-proclaims-european-yearof-industrial-policy/

84. European Parliament (2023). Innovation policy. Fact Sheets on the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa. eu/factsheets/en/sheet/67/innovation-policy

85. Ferrario, A. (2023). Design, Development and Applications of a Learning Factory at The University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.repository.unipr.it/bitstream/1 889/4096/1/Tesi_AndreaFerrario.pdf

86. Giansoldati, M., Monte, A., & Scorrano, M. (2020). Barriers to the adoption of electric cars: Evidence from an Italian survey. Energy Policy, 146, 111812. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111812

87. Guadagno, F., & Fortunato, P. (2016). Virtual Institute Teaching Material on Structural Transformation and Industrial Policy. UNCTAD: United Nations, Geneva,143 p.

88. Hardman, S., Chandan, A., Tal, G., & Turrentine, T. (2017). The effectiveness of financial purchase incentives for battery electric vehicles - A review of the evidence. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, pp. 1100-1111. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.rser.2017.05.255

89. Hirte, G., & Tscharaktschiew, S. (2013). The optimal subsidy on electric vehicles in German metropolitan areas: A spatial general equilibrium analysis. Energy Economics, 40, pp. 515-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.10 16/j.eneco.2013.08.001

90. Hottenrott, H., & Richstein, R. (2020). Start-up subsidies: Does the policy instrument

91. matter? Research Policy, 49 (1),

92. Art. 103888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.respol.2019.103888

93. Huang, Y., Porter, A.L., Cunningham, S.W., Robinson, D., Liu, J., & Zhu, D. (2018). A technology delivery system for characterizing the supply side of technology emer-gence: Illustrated for Big Data & Analytics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 130, pp. 165-176. DOI:

94. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j .techfore.2017.09. 012

95. Industrie online (2022). Macron II: what industrial policy for the next five years? Retrieved from https://www.industrieonline.com/en/actualite/macron-ii-quelle-po litique-industrielle-pour-les-5-prochainesannees Jenn, A., Azevedo, I., & Ferreira, P. (2013). The impact of federal incentives on the adoption of hybrid electric vehicles in the United States. Energy Economics, 40,

96. pp. 936-942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/_j. eneco.2013.07.025

97. Kumar, N. (2023). New industrial policy for New India. Retrieved from https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/new-industri al-policy-for-new-india/article66433347.ece

98. Kumar, R.R., & Alok, K. (2020). Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustain-ability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253. Art. 119911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019. 1199 11

99. Lee, E.Y., & Cin, B.C. (2010). The effect of risk-sharing government subsidy on corporate R&D investment: Empirical evidence from Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77 (6), pp. 881-890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010. 01.012

100. Lee, K. (2023). Will the new industrial policy work? Bangkok Post. Retrieved from

101. https: // www.bangkokpost.com/ opinion/opi nion/2515674/will-the-new-industrial-poli cy-work

102. Manufacturing Government Initiatives (2023). Government-led promotion of fundamental reform of the manufacturing industry and strengthening of international competitiveness. Manufacturing Government Initiatives. Retrieved from https://www.jetro.go. jp/en/invest/attractive_sectors/manufacturi ng/government_initiatives.html

103. Mpoi, G., Milioti, C., & Mitropoulos, L.

104. (2023). Factors and incentives that affect electric vehicle adoption in Greece. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijtst.2023.01.002

105. Nester, W. (1997). American industrial policy: Free or managed markets? Macmillan Press Ltd, London, UK.

106. Nilsen, 0., Raknerud, A., & lancu, D. (2020). Public R&D support and firm performance: A multivariate dose-response analysis. Research Policy, 49(7), 104067. DOI:

107. https:// doi. org/ 10.1016/j. respol .2020.104067

108. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2013). European Patent Box Regimes, Japan External Trade Organisation. Retrieved from https://www.jetro.go.jp/world/europe/ip/pdf/ european_patent_box_regimes_en.pdf

109. Rietmann, N., & Lieven, T. (2019). How policy measures succeeded to promote electric mobility. World-wide review and outlook. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 206,

110. pp. 66-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016Zj. jclepro.2018.09.121

111. Rodrigues, T., Filho, V.H. Pontes, J., Resende, L., & Yoshino, R. (2021). Government Initiatives 4.0: A Comparison Between Industrial Innovation Policies for Industry 4.0. Revista Gestao e Desenvolvimento, 18 (1), pp. 119-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 25112/rgd.v18i1.2411

112. Rowe-Brown, M., & Huw, J. (2020). Evaluation of the Patent Box. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio ns/evaluation-of-the-patent-box

113. Sakar, A. (2015). Innovation for a New Tax Incentive: Patent Box Regime Turkey and the EU Application. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, pp. 544-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015. 06.269

114. Salazar, X., Nubler, I., & Kozul-Wright, R. (2014). Industrial Policy, Productive Transformation and Jobs: Theory, History and Practice. Geneva: ILO, 38 p.

115. Santos G., & Davies, H. (2020). Incentives for quick penetration of electric vehicles in five European countries: Perceptions from experts and stakeholders. Transportation Research. Part A (137), pp. 326-342. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.034

116. Silva-Gamez, A.I., Mendez-Prado, S.M., & Arauz, A. (2022). What's Happening with the Patent Box Regimes? A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14 (18), pp. 11423. DOI: https://doi .org/10.3390/su141811423

117. Stiglitz, J.E., Yifu, J., & Monga, C. (2013). The rejuvenation of industrial policy. Policy Research Working Paper Series 6628. The World Bank.

118. Tan, R. (1995). Establishing technology transfer infrastructure as a strategy for promoting manufacturing automation in Taiwan. Technovation, 15 (7), pp. 407-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95)965 91-g

119. Tresch, R. (2015). First-Best and Second-Best Analyses and the Political Economy of Public Sector Economics. Public Finance, pp. 65-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b9 78-0-12-415834-4.00003-0

120. United Kingdom public sector information website (2023). Chancellor sets out longterm vision to grow the economy. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/ news/chancellor-sets-out-long-term-visionto-grow-the-economy#:~:text=Chancellor %20Jeremy%20Hunt%20today%20set,site %20for%20innovators%20and%20entrepre neurs

121. Wangsa, I., Vanany, I., & Siswanto, N. (2023). The optimal tax incentive and subsidy to promote electric trucks in Indonesia: Insight for government and industry. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 11, 100966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cstp.2023.100966

122. Zhang, J., & Guan, J. (2018). The time-varying impacts of government incentives on innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, pp. 132-144. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2018.04. 012

Размещено на Allbest.ru