Организационные потребности общества как исток морали в этике Бернарда Мандевиля

13. Dickey L.Pride, Hypocrisy and Civility in Mandeville's Social and Historical Theory // Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society. 1990. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 387-431.

14. Gaston S.The Impossibility of Sympathy // The Eighteenth Century. 2010. Vol. 51. No. 1-2. P. 129-152.

15. Gauthier D.P.Morals by Agreement. N.Y.: Oxford UP, 1986. 378 p.

16. GillM.B.The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 359 p.

17. GoldsmithM.Private Vices, Public Benefits: Bernard Mandeville's Social and Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985. 183 p.

18. Hayek FA.Dr. Bernard Mandeville // Hayek FA.New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. L., 1990. P. 249-266.

19. Heath E.Mandeville's Bewitching Engine of Praise // History of Philosophy Quarterly. 1998. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 205-226.

20. Hope S.The Circumstances of Justice // Hume Studies. 2010. Vol. 36. No. 2. P. 125-148.

21. Hubin D.C.The Scope of Justice // Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1979. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 3-24.

22. Hundert E.J.The Enlightenment's Fable: Bernard Mandeville and the Discovery of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994. 284 p.

23. Mandeville B.An Enquiry into the Origin of Honour, and the Usefulness of Christianity in War. L.: Printed for John Brotherton, at the Bible of Cornhill, 1732. 264 p.

24. Mandeville B.The Fable of the Bees: or, Private Vices, Public Benefits. Vol. 2. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1988. 481 p.

25. Norton D.F, Norton M.J.Editor's Annotations // Hume D.A Treatise of Human Nature. Vol. 2. Editorial Material / Ed. by D.F. Norton and M.J. Norton. Oxford, 2007. P. 85-978.

26. Primer I.Mandeville and Shaftesbury: Some Facts and Problems // Mandeville Studies: New Explorations in the Art and Thought of Dr. Bernard Mandeville (1670-1733) / Ed. by I. Primer. The Hague, 1975. P. 26-141.

27. Seigel J.Self-centeredness and Sociability: Mandeville and Hume // Sei- gel.The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2005. P. 111-139.

28. Tolonen M.Politeness, Paris and the Treatise // Hume Studies. 2008. Vol. 34. No. 1. P. 21-42.

29. Tolonen M. Self-Love and Self-Likingin the Political Philosophy of Bernard Mandeville and David Hume. University of Helsinki, Ph.D. thesis, 2009. 395 p.

30. Welchman J.Who Rebutted Bernard Mandeville? // History of Philosophy Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 57-74.

31. Wright J.PHume's `A Treatise of Human Nature'. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. 336 p.

32. Apressyan, R. “Ponyatie obshchestvennoi morali” [The Concept of Public Morality], Obshchestvennayamoral': filosofskie, normativno-eticheskie ipriklad- nye problemy [Public Morality: Philosophical, Normative-ethical and Applied Issues], ed. R.G. Apressyan. Moscow: Al'fa-M Publ., 2009, pp. 15-35. (In Russ.)

33. Bernard Mandeville's “A Modest Defence of Publick Stews”, Prostitution and Its Discontents in Early Georgian England, ed. I. Primer. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. 224 p.

34. Church, J. “Selfish and Moral Politics: David Hume on Stability and Cohesion in the Modern State”, The Journal of Politics, 2007, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 169-181.

35. Cohon, R. “Hume's Artificial and Natural Virtues”, Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise, ed. S. Traiger. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006, pp. 256-275.

36. Cook, H.J. “Bernard Mandeville and the Therapy of `The Clever Politician'”, Journal of the History of Ideas,1999, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 101-112.

37. Cook, R.I. “`The Great Leviathan of Lechery': Mandeville's Modest Defence of Public Stews (1724)”, Mandeville Studies: New Explorations in the Art and Thought of Dr. Bernard Mandeville (1670-1733), ed. I. Primer. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975. P. 22-33.

38. Dickey, L. “Pride, Hypocrisy and Civility in Mandeville's Social and Historical Theory”, Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 1990, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 387-431.

39. Dyurkgeim, E. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda. Metod sotsiologii[The Division of Labor in Society]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1991. 575 p. (In Russain)

40. Gaston, S. “The Impossibility of Sympathy”, The Eighteenth Century, 2010, vol. 51, no. 1-2, pp. 129-152.

41. Gauthier, D.P. Morals by Agreement. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1986. 378 p.

42. Gill, M.B. The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 359 p.

43. Goldsmith, M. Private Vices, Public Benefits: Bernard Mandeville's Social and Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. 183 p.

44. Guseinov, A. Velikie proroki i mysliteli. Nravstvennye ucheniya ot Moi- seya do nashikh dnei[The Great Prophets and Thinkers. Moral Teachings from Moses to the Present Day]. Moscow: Veche Publ., 2009. 496 p. (In Russ.)

45. Hayek, F.A. “Dr. Bernard Mandeville”, in: F.A. Hayek. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas.L.: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1990, pp. 249-266.

46. Heath, E. “Mandeville's Bewitching Engine of Praise”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 1998, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 205-226.

47. Hope, S. “The Circumstances of Justice”, Hume Studies, 2010, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 125-148.

48. Hubin, D.C. “The Scope of Justice”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1979, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3-24.

49. Hume, D. “Traktat o chelovecheskoi prirode” [A Treatise of Human Nature], in: D. Hume. Sobranie sochinenii, 2 t. [Collected Works, 2 vols.], vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1996, pp. 53-656. (In Russ.)

50. Hundert, E.J. The Enlightenment's Fable: Bernard Mandeville and the Discovery of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 284 p.

51. Kashnikov, B. Liberal'nye teorii spravedlivosti i politicheskaya praktika Rossii[Liberal Theory of Justice and the Russian Political Practice]. Novgorod: Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod St. Univ. Publ., 2004. 260 p. (In Russ.)

52. Mandeville, B. An Enquiry into the Origin of Honour, and the Usefulness of Christianity in War. L.: Printed for John Brotherton, at the Bible of Cornhill, 1732. 264 p.

53. Mandeville, B. Basnya o pchelakh[Fable of the Bees]. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1974. 376 p. (In Russ.)

54. Mandeville, B. The Fable of the Bees: or, Private Vices, Public Benefits,

55. vol. 2. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1988. 481 p.

56. Norton, D. F., Norton, M.J. “editor's annotations”, hume, d. A treatise of human nature,vol. 2. Editorial material, ed. byD. F. Norton and M.J. Norton. Oxford: oxford university press, 2007, pp. 685-978.

57. Parsons, T. O sotsial'nykh sistemakh[On the Social Systems]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2002. 832 p.

58. Primer, I. “Mandeville and Shaftesbury: Some Facts and Problems”, Mandeville Studies: New Explorations in the Art and Thought of Dr. Bernard Mandeville (1670-1733), ed. I. Primer. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975, pp. 126-141.

59. Prokof'ev, A. Vozdavat' kazhdomu dolzhnoe... Vvedenie v teoriyu spravedlivosti[Giving Everyone His Due... An Introduction to a Theory of Justice]. Moscow: Al'fa-M Publ., 2013. 512 p. (In Russ.)

60. Seigel, J. “Self-centeredness and Sociability: Mandeville and Hume”, The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 111-139.

61. Subbotin, A. Bernard Mandevil'[Bernard Mandeville]. Moscow: IFRAN Publ., 2013. 111 p. (In Russ.)

62. Tolonen, M. “Politeness, Paris and the Treatise”, Hume Studies, 2008, vol. 34, no 1, pp. 21-42.

63. Tolonen, M. Self-Love and Self-Liking in the Political Philosophy of Bernard Mandeville and David Hume. University of Helsinki, Ph.D. thesis, 2009, 395 p.

64. Welchman, J. “Who Rebutted Bernard Mandeville?”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 2007, vol. 24, no 1. pp. 57-74.

65. Wright, J.P. Hume 's `A Treatise of Human Nature'. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 336 p.

Organizational Needs of Society as an Origin of Morality in Bernard Mandeville's Ethics

Andrey Prokofiev, Doctor (Habilitation) in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow. Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow

The paper analyses ethical views of Bernard Mandeville as an example of such an explanation of morality that considers moral norms to be an element of the complex system enabled human societies to maintain their internal order and external competitive ability. In `An Enquiry into the Origin of Moral Virtue' (the part of the first volume of `The Fable of the Bees') Mandeville derives moral beliefs from the rhetoric of politicians and moralists exploiting natural pride and natural shame. Besides he indicates some origins of morality that pertain to the sphere of pragmatic communication and can not be reduced to the direct influence of politicians and moralists. But they come into operation only after the `savage man' has been broken and the `foundation of politics' has been laid. In late works of Mandeville this simplistic and vulnerable picture turns into a more sophisticated conception of slow evolving of moral norms and psychological mechanisms through many inventions of men involved in horizontal and vertical social communications. Politicians and moralists play a significant part in this process, but only at the last stage.

This enrichment makes irrelevant some criticisms leveled at Mandeville by David Hume. Hume maintains that Mandeville `represents all moral distinctions as the effect of artifice and education' but the Mandevillian account of the evolution of good manners, honour, and moral virtue from the second volume of `The Fable of the Bees' and `An Enquiry into the Origin of Honour, and the Usefulness of Christianity in War' shows that it is not the case.

Politicians and moralists just correct and reshape already existing patterns of behavior and contribute to the perpetuation of rules formed by pragmatic communicative strategies.

Keywords: ethics, morality, social order, human nature, social evolution, Bernard Mandeville, David Hume

Размещено на Allbest.ru