Андромоноэция у Aegopodiumpodagraria L. (Apiaceae) в Московской области

Литература

1. Yampolsky C., Yampolsky H. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora // Bibliotheca Genetica. 1922. Vol. 3. PP. 1-62.

2. Schlessmann M.A. Major events in the evolution of sexual systems in Apiales: ancestral andromonoecy abandoned // Plant Diversity and Evolution. 2010. Vol. 128, № 1-2. PP. 233-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0011

3. Годин В.Н. Анализ полового полиморфизма растений подкласса Rosidae в Сибири // Сибирский экологический журнал. 2012. Т. 19, № 3. С. 453-460.

4. Годин В.Н. Половые формы и их экологические корреляции у цветковых растений Сибири // Экология. 2017. № 5. С. 357-364. doi: https://doi.org/10.7868/ S0367059717050055

5. Torices R., Mendez M., Gomez J.M. Where do monomorphic sexual systems fit in the evolution of dioecy? Insights from the largest family of angiosperms // New Phytologist. 2011. Vol. 190, № 1. PP. 234-248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03609.x

6. Casimiro-Soriguer R., Herrera J., Talave S. Andromonoecy in an Old World Papilionoid legume, Erophaca baetica // Plant Biology. 2013. Vol. 15, № 2. PP. 353-359. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00648.x

7. Diggle P.K., Miller J.S. Developmental plasticity, genetic assimilation, and the evolutionary diversification of sexual expression in Solanum // American Journal of Botany. 2013. Vol. 100, № 6. PP. 1050-1060. doi: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200647

8. Knuth P. Handbuch der Blutenbiologie. Leipzig : Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann. 1898. Bd. II, T. I. 696 s.

9. Bell C.R. Breeding systems and floral biology of the Umbelliferae, or evidence for specialization in unspecialized flowers // The biology and chemistry of the Umbelliferae / ed. by VH. Heywood. London : Academic Press, 1971. PP. 93-108.

10. Reuther K., ClaЯen-Bockhoff R. Diversity behind uniformity - inflorescence architecture and flowering sequence in Apiaceae-Apioideae // Plant Diversity and Evolution. 2010. Vol. 128, № 1-2. PP. 181-220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0009

11. Годин В.Н., Перкова Т.В. Биология цветения и половой полиморфизм у видов семейства Apiaceae (Московская область) // Ботанический журнал. 2017. Т. 102, № 1. С. 35-47.

12. Смирнова О.В. Aegopodium podagraria L. // Биологическая флора Московской области / отв. ред. Т.А. Работнов. М. : МГУ, 1974. Вып. 1. С. 131-141.

13. Кузнецова Т.В., Тимонин А.К. Соцветие: морфология, эволюция, таксономическое значение (применение комплементарных подходов). М. : Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2017. 183 с.

14. Шишкин Б.К. Род 1018. Сныть - Aegopodium L. // Флора СССР / отв. ред. В.Л. Комаров. Т 16 / ред. Б.К. Шишкин. М.; Л. : АН СССР, 1950. С. 451-458.

15. Korta J. Aegopodium podagraria L. Podagrycznik pospolity. L'Egopode podagraire. I. Analyse anatomique // Acta biologica Cracoviensia. Series botanica. 1962. Vol. 5, № 1. PP. 63-76.

16. Wrфblewska A. Kwitnienie i pozytek pylkowy wybranych gatunkфw z rodziny baldaszkowatych - Umbelliferae Juss. (Apiaceae Lindl.) w okolicach Lublina. Czзsc I. Biologia i obfitosc kwitnienia // Acta agrobotanica. 1992. Vol. 45, № 1-2. PP. 5-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1992.001

17. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 4th edition. N. Y : W.H. Freeman and Co, 2012. 937 p.

18. Федоров Ал.А., Артюшенко З.Т. Атлас по описательной морфологии высших растений. Цветок. Л. : Наука, 1975. 351 с.

19. Eckhart VM. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences // Geber M.A., Dawson T.E., Delph L.F. (eds.) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Berlin : Springer, 1999. PP. 123-148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3_5

20. Годин В.Н., Демьянова Е.И. О распространении гинодиэции у цветковых растений // Ботанический журнал. 2013. Т. 98, № 12. С. 1465-1487.

21. Ajani Y, Bull-Herenu K., ClaЯen-Bockhoff R. Patterns of flower development in Apiaceae-Apioideae // Flora. 2016. Vol. 221. PP. 38-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/). flora.2016.02.004

22. Kirchoff B.K., ClaЯen-Bockhoff R. Inflorescences: concepts, function, development and evolution // Annals of Botany. 2013. Vol. 112, № 8. PP. 1471-1476. doi: http://doi. org/10.1093/aob/mct267

23. Pedersoli G.D., Teixeira S.P. Floral development ofParkia multijuga and Stryphnodendron adstringens, two andromonoecious mimosoid trees (Leguminosae) // International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2016. Vol. 177, № 1. PP. 60-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/683845

24. Krosnick S.E., Perkin J.S., Schroeder T.S., Campbell L.G., Jackson E.B., Maynord S.C., Waters C.G., Mitchell J.S. New insights into floral morph variation in Passiflora incarnata L. (Passifloraceae) in Tennessee, U.S.A. // Flora. 2017. Vol. 236-237. PP. 115125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2017.10.005

25. McKone M.J., Webb C.J. A difference in pollen size between the male and hermaphrodite flowers of two species of Apiaceae // Australian Journal of Botany. 1988. Vol. 36, № 3. PP. 331-337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9880331

References

1.Yampolsky C, Yampolsky H. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibliotheca Genetica. 1922;3:1-62.

2. Schlessmann MA. Major events in the evolution of sexual systems in Apiales: ancestral

andromonoecy abandoned. Plant Diversity and Evolution. 2010;128(1-2):233-245. doi: 10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0011

3. Godin VN. Analysis of sexual polymorphism of the plant from subclass Rosidae in Siberia. Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2012;5(3):337-342. doi: 10.1134/S1995425512030067

Godin VN. Sexual forms and their ecological correlates of flowering plants in Siberia. Russian Journal of Ecology. 2017;48(5):433-439. doi: 10.1134/S1067413617050058

5. Torices R, Mendez M, Gomez JM. Where do monomorphic sexual systems fit in the

evolution of dioecy? Insights from the largest family of angiosperms. New Phytologist. 2011;190(1):234-248. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03609.x

6. Casimiro-Soriguer R, Herrera J, Talave S. Andromonoecy in an Old World Papilionoid

legume, Erophaca baetica. Plant Biology. 2013;15(2):353-359. doi: 10.1111/j.1438- 8677.2012.00648.x

7. Diggle PK, Miller JS. Developmental plasticity, genetic assimilation, and the evolutionary

diversification of sexual expression in Solanum. American Journal of Botany. 2013;100(6):1050-1060. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200647

8. Knuth P. Handbuch der Blutenbiologie. Bd II, T. I. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann;

1898. 696 S. In German

9. Bell CR. Breeding systems and floral biology of the Umbelliferae, or evidence for specialization in unspecialized flowers. In: The biology and chemistry of the Umbelliferae. Heywood VH, editor. London: Academic Press; 1971. pp. 93-108.

10. Reuther K, ClaЯen-Bockhoff R. Diversity behind uniformity - inflorescence architecture and flowering sequence in Apiaceae-Apioideae. Plant Diversity and Evolution. 2010;128(1- 2):181-220. doi: 10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0009

11. Godin VN, Perkova TV. Flowering biology and sexual polymorphism in the Apiaceae species (Moscow region). Botanicheskiy Zhurnal = Botanical Journal. 2017;102(1):35-47. In Russian, English Summary

12. Smirnova OV Aegopodium podagraria L. In: Biological flora of Moscow region. Rabotnov TA, editor. Pt. 1. Moscow: MSU Press; 1974. pp. 131-141. In Russian

13. Kuznetzova TV, Timonin AC. Inflorescence: morphology, evolution, and taxonomic importance (considered in the light of Bohr's principle of complementarity). Moscow: KMK Scientific Press; 2017. 183 p. In Russian

14. Shishkin BK. Gen. 1018. Aegopodium L. In: Flora of the USSR. Komarov VL, editor-inchief. Vol. 16. Shishkin BK, editor. Moscow, Leningrad; 1950. pp. 451-458. In Russian

15. Korta J. Aegopodium podagraria L. Podagrycznik pospolity. L'Egopode podagraire. I. Analyse anatomique. Acta biologica Cracoviensia. Series botanica. 1962;5(1):63-76. In French

16. Wrфblewska A. Kwitnienie i pozytek pyпkowy wybranych gatunkфw z rodziny baldaszkowatych - Umbelliferae Juss. (Apiaceae Lindl.) w okolicach Lublina. Czзsc I. Biologia i obfitosc kwitnienia. Acta agrobotanica. 1992;45(1-2):5-24. doi: 10.5586/ aa.1992.001 In Polish

17. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 4th ed. New York: WH Freeman and Co; 2012. 937 p.

18. Fedorov AlA, Artyushenko ZT. Atlas po opisatelnoy morfologii vysshih rasteniy. Cvetok [Atlas of the descriptive morphology of higher plants. Flower]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ.; 1975. 351 p. In Russian

19. Eckhart VM. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. In: Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Geber MA, Dawson TE and Delph LF, editors. Berlin: Springer Publ.; 1999. pp. 123-148. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3_5

20. Godin VN, Demyanova EI. On the distribution of gynodioecy in flowering plants. Botanicheskiy Zhurnal = Botanical Journal. 2013;98(12):1465-1487. In Russian

21. Ajani Y, Bull-Herenu K, ClaЯen-Bockhoff R. Patterns of flower development in Apiaceae- Apioideae. Flora. 2016;221:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2016.02.004

22. Kirchoff BK, ClaЯen-Bockhoff R. Inflorescences: concepts, function, development and evolution. Annals of Botany. 2013;112(8):1471-1476. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct267

23. Pedersoli GD, Teixeira SP. Floral development of Parkia multijuga and Stryphnodendron adstringens, two andromonoecious mimosoid trees (Leguminosae). International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2016;177(1):60-75. doi: 10.1086/683845

24. Krosnick SE, Perkin JS, Schroeder TS, Campbell LG, Jackson EB, Maynord SC, Waters CG, Mitchell JS. New insights into floral morph variation in Passiflora incarnata L. (Passifloraceae) in Tennessee, U.S.A. Flora. 2017;236-237:115-125. doi: 10.1016/j. flora.2017.10.005

25. McKone MJ, Webb CJ. A difference in pollen size between the male and hermaphrodite flowers of two species of Apiaceae. Australian Journal of Botany. 1988;36(3):331-337. doi: 10.1071/BT9880331

Размещено на Allbest.ru